Transparent heart icon with white outline and + sign.

Life's busy, read it when you're ready!

Create a free account to save articles for later, keep track of past articles you’ve read, and receive exclusive access to all RP resources.

White magnifying glass.

Search thousands of RP articles

Helping you think, speak, and act in Christ.

Open envelope icon with @ symbol

Get Articles Delivered!

Helping you think, speak, and act in Christ. delivered direct to your Inbox!





Red heart icon with + sign.
Family, Movie Reviews

The InBESTigators

Children's show / TV 2019-2020 / 15 minutes x 40 episodes RATING: 9/10 Ava, Maudie, Ezra, and Kyle are four fifth graders with a knack for solving crimes. Or, rather, the brilliant and hyper-observant Maudie, has a real knack for solving crimes... and she couldn't do it without help. Maudie is smart, but her weakness is social awareness – she'll sometimes blurt out something that is certainly true, but might not be appropriate or polite. The other girl on the team, Ava, is the more emotionally-aware one, and the most compassionate and bubbly, always raising money for this charitable project or that. The two boys could be summed up as geek and dumb jock, and while that's a bit simplistic, it isn't far off. Ezra is very smart, particularly with computers, but smart like you or me can be – he's still not the Sherlock Holmes-kind of smart that Maudie is. His best friend is the energetic, athletic, and easily distracted Kyle. who likes every sport and is the best at all of them. He's the biggest comedic factor, but he's not really dumb. He's probably the most age-accurate of the bunch – he doesn't get things that the watching kids wouldn't get either, so when he asks questions to clear away his confusion, that helps the elementary-aged viewers too. After coming together to solve a mystery in the first episode, the four friends decide to start a detective agency to help solve cases around their school and neighborhood. They call themselves The InBESTigators, and after each crime is solved they record their thoughts on a vlog which turns into the episode we watch. It's a little bit like a faux reality-show, though we get to see much more than what their video camera records. There's loads of humor here, and all of it the good clean goofy sort. Cautions Language concerns in  the six episodes I watched were limited to one instance of "oh my goodness." To clarify, I didn't watch the whole series. I just sat down to watch the first half dozen, five of which were easy to recommend without reservation. While they are tackling  "crimes" they are of a pretty kid-appropriate sort – someone claims someone else's homework as their own, for example. The one episode I had issue with was the fifth, called "The Case of the Sleepover Secret," which had a classmate's parental divorce as a subtext. Divorce is common, so I understand why the writers might have thought it no big deal to have as an element in the story. But as divorce is also one of the most worrisome things that could happen to a child, it's not something I want to introduce as concern for my own kids. But, quizzing my family on the other 34 episodes, they can't recall any other material that, like this, is too heavy for this otherwise lightweight carefree show. I'll also take issue with how some of the "criminals" do their wrong-doing for reasons that are made a bit too understandable. The InBESTigators don't quite go as far as excusing the crime, but they can veer in that direction, so parents may need to emphasize that wrong is still wrong, even when someone else has been mean first. Conclusion The InBESTigators is the kind of show that could get big laughs from kids 8 to 12, and smiles from everyone else – mom and dad really won't mind checking out an episode or three. My kids have watched them on repeat, seeing each episode probably three or four times. Part of the appeal for me is that each episode is just 15 minutes long, which makes this easy to watch for just a short time – you don't have to commit to the 90 minutes a movie would take. It seems to move around on the various streaming services, but as of writing is available on Netflix and BYUtv.org. Check out the trailer below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Articles, Book Reviews

Good, Great, & Gift: RP's 3 levels of best books

Learning to read well is more like cooking a steak than you might imagine. A great chef can have the best set of knives and the most expensive pots and pans, but even if he pulls off the perfect medium-rare it isn't going to matter if you started him off with a dollar-store patty. And even if a kid knows his ABCs, and has worked hard on being able to sound out the toughest words, if all he has around him are the same 10 Captain Underpants comics he rips through each night, he isn't going to turn into a good reader. So whether you're cooking or booking, it needs to start with good ingredients. There are more than a million books published in English each year, and it's a task to hunt down the very few good ones. Secular libraries and bookstores won't help – they're the ones pushing trash on our kids. There are a lot of conservative and Christian review sites, but too often they're reviewing what's new or what's popular, whether it's good or not. RP's Recommended Reads is focused only on what's awesome. We've got hundreds of suggestions, covering all ages and interests. Some are important and even life-changing, while others are simply light-hearted entertainment. Both sorts are good, it's just the former is like meat – we need it in our diet – while the second is akin to candy, which can be a delight and a joy, but we'll get unhealthy fast if we turn it into our major food group. When we do pass along a chocolate-brownie-with-a-dollop-of-moosetracks-ice-cream-on-top suggestion, you can be sure it's going to be amazing, and you shouldn't be surprised if it also happens to have some vitamins packed in there somewhere too. Even among the best books, some are still going to be better than others. That's why, moving forward, we're going to give a rating for most of the books we review, and it isn't going to be a star system, or a one thumb vs. two thumbs up kind of thing. I’ve settled on three categories, and there’s a sense in which these could be divided into could, should, and must reads. Or the three categories could be understood as books worth borrowing, buying, or giving. The point is, these are all good books, so that’s where the scale starts, going up from there, from good to great and finally to gift. These ratings will be applied to all children and teen books, and adult biographies and fiction too, but not adult non-fiction. There a book's value is often tied to its utility or usefulness for a specific audience so a generalized rating doesn't work well. Good Some books are entertaining, but maybe not important. These could be kids’ picture books that they’ll enjoy for a time, or maybe a geo-political thriller that dad will find just perfect for the beach. But they aren’t the sort of books you want to get stuck in, rereading again and again, because they just aren’t worth that sort of investment. It’s the sort you might borrow from the library rather than buy: plenty of adventure, bright, hilarious, and safe – none of that modern-day weird stuff – but not the sort that needs to be passed through the generations. These could still make for fantastic purchases for a Christian school library, for all the kids who just rip through one book after another and the librarians just can't keep ahead of 'em. But there's plenty of even better books you’d get first for your home library, which is going to be more selective, stocked with the books you want them paging through repeatedly. Great Here we're getting into books that are going to be read by multiple members of your family, and it just makes sense to have your own copy then. Or we're talking about books that really should be read, for whatever reason – maybe to refine the palette, teach what the world's really like, or just generally make one literate. They are worth buying to always have on hand. Gift Finally, we've got books that really must be read. We're talking the kind of novel your spouse doesn't need to read because you just had to share this great bit and that, until finally by book's end you've read the whole thing to her. It's the book you want everyone in your company to read so you bought it by the pallet. It's one your kids aren't allowed to move out of the house until they've read it. And even if your grandkids are far on the horizon yet, you already know what they'll be getting from you for at least one of their birthdays. It's the book you always have a spare copy on hand, in your car glove compartment, just in case you meet someone who hasn't read it yet. It's that book. There aren't a lot of this sort, but these rare gems will make for the perfect gift, whether for birthdays, or just because....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Adult non-fiction, Book Reviews

How an Economy Grows and Why It Crashes

by Peter Schiff and Andrew Schiff 2014 / 304 pages Economics affects everyone but few people care to learn much about it. All the numbers and graphs make it seem complex and quite boring. Of course some subjects are so important that even if they were boring we’d just have to soldier on and learn them anyway. And you could certainly make that case for economics – every citizen has to get a handle on the basics of economics so we can properly evaluate government policies and get a handle on where the economy may be heading. However, Peter Schiff and Andrew Schiff have done us a service by making it possible to learn economics without being bored to sleep. Peter Schiff is an investment manager who was also an economic adviser to Congressman Ron Paul's 2008 presidential campaign. Andrew, Peter’s brother, is the communications director for Peter’s investment firm. In 2014 they released a Collector's Edition of their book How an Economy Grows and Why It Crashes that is part fiction, part comic book, and educationally entertaining throughout. . A fish story Their book is written in the form of a story, with some cartoon illustrations thrown in, which makes this a lot easier to digest and follow than, say, a university economics textbook. The story begins as follows: Three men, Able, Baker, and Charlie, live on an island and survive by catching fish with their bare hands. They just barely subsist from day to day, catching only enough for their next meal. Then Able gets the idea of making a simple net to catch fish, but to make it, he has to invest a day’s worth of time. Instead of going fishing, he spends the day crafting the net. This investment is not only costly – he has to go a day without food – it is also risky: he doesn’t know if his net will work. But Able is an entrepreneur, so he takes the risk, and makes the investment. And work it does. The net enables him to dramatically increase the amount of fish he catches, and therefore improves his lifestyle. The net is “capital” he created that increased his productivity. He subsequently catches more fish than he can consume, and this situation initiates improvements on the island. The lesson, as the Schiffs write, is that “spare production is the lifeblood of a healthy economy.” Because he has surplus fish, Able lends them to Baker and Charlie. Those two fellows can then take time off from catching fish with their hands to make nets for themselves. That is, they too create capital to improve production. With the extra fish they can now catch, they pay Able back with interest, and all three of the men are better off than before. Even though they had to pay interest, Baker and Charlie increased their own standard of living. Able’s motivation in loaning the fish was to earn a profit. But the loan he provided benefited the other two men as well as himself. As the Schiffs explain, The pursuit of profit drives innovation, business formation, and economic growth. It’s the force that raises everyone’s living standard. A big profit just means that a business is good at satisfying customers. Those who earn it should be celebrated not vilified. Increasing productivity The story continues from this point with the three men able to spend less time fishing, and more time developing other tools and implements (capital) for improving their lives. For example, they make more nets to build larger fish-catching devices. The new capital they create increases productivity even further. The Schiffs strongly emphasize the importance of increasing productivity as the key to a successful economy. It benefits everyone. Besides using their story to show how, they also add a real-life example: the industrial revolution of the nineteenth century. They write that the …vastly increased productivity of the industrial revolution made it possible for working-class people to afford all kinds of goods, like upholstered furniture, tailored clothing, plumbing, and wheeled transportation, that were previously available only to the rich. Eventually Able, Baker and Charlie begin trading with people on other islands. Immigrants come to their island, a government is formed, and the economy becomes more complex. Their island society becomes known as Usonia. It’s an easy story to follow with lessons on basic economics interwoven with the story’s events. Paper currency Fish function in this story not only as food but also as currency. Everyone eats fish and they are easy to exchange for other items. Once a government is created for Usonia, it issues paper currency backed by fish. Each “Fish Reserve Note” could be redeemed for actual fish at a central bank. Using paper money was much easier than carrying actual fish, so it became the common currency. Over time, though, the government produces larger and larger amounts of paper currency without maintaining enough fish to redeem the notes. Eventually the government declares that the Fish Reserve Notes could not be redeemed for actual fish after all. The value of the currency then becomes based on the citizens’ confidence in the government. This is much like the situation with money in the world today. The currencies of modern nations are no longer based on particular sources of value (like gold) but on confidence in the nations’ governments. The Canadian and US dollars were at one time backed by gold (that is, a dollar represented a specific amount of gold), but that is no longer the case. Now they are just paper. The Schiffs point out that this kind of paper money is commonly called “fiat” money. The word “fiat” comes from Latin and literally means “let it be done.” The word applies because paper money does not have any intrinsic worth, but rather derives its value from government decree. Right now the worldwide economy based on fiat money seems to be working. But the Schiffs do not think it will last. They do not consider fiat money to be real money because it has no inherent value, the way gold and other precious metals do. In their view, we are in a “through the looking glass” world where, for the past 40 years, no country issues real money. This is the biggest monetary experiment ever conducted. No one knows how or when it will end. But rest assured, it will. Government debt The government of Usonia, like actual governments today, increases spending beyond its means and finances its operations through increased taxes, borrowing money, and also printing more paper money. These activities are harmful to the economy in the long run. The Schiffs state that Taxes and borrowing merely divert private-sector spending or investment to government. Printed money has the same effect. Newly created money spent into circulation by the government depresses the purchasing power of money held by the public. In the United States, President Barack Obama has pursued a policy of high government expenditures financed by borrowing and printing money. The US government debt is so large, in fact, that the Schiffs do not believe it can ever be paid. They paint a rather unnerving picture: Ultimately the U.S. government will have only two options: default (tell our creditors that we can’t pay, and negotiate a settlement) or inflate (print money to pay off maturing debt). Either option will lead to painful consequences. They believe that the value of the US dollar will drop steeply because so much is currently being printed. However, its status as the official “reserve currency” of the world keeps its value artificially propped up. Being the international reserve currency means that the dollar is accepted as the exchange currency for any international transaction. This means that everyone, not just the United States and its trading partners, needs dollars to conduct trade. So even if no one actually buys things that are made in this country, dollars are always in demand. No other country has this monetary good fortune. In their view, if the US dollar was to lose reserve status, its value would drop severely, wiping out much of the wealth Americans currently possess. Its present value only remains high because of its wide acceptance around the world. Conclusion Economics may not be inherently exciting to many people but it affects everyone. The basics are understandable if they are presented properly, and the Schiff brothers do a great job in their book. They provide a simple basis for understanding the kinds of measures that help an economy grow as well as those that stifle growth. Some policies (such as printing more money) provide a temporary illusion of prosperity followed by a financial downturn. Politicians campaigning for re-election love policies that provide an illusion of prosperity. They often make decisions that will benefit themselves in the short run but actually harm the economy in the long run. The Schiffs emphasize work, saving, thrift, and innovation as keys to economic success. To a large degree the virtues that lead to prosperity are also Biblical virtues. Therefore, even though the book is not specifically Christian, it reflects much that is compatible with Biblical Christianity. This was originally published in the May 2015 issue under the title “Economics for Everyone.”...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews

Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget

Animated 2023 / 101 minutes RATING: 8/10 Twenty-three years ago, Rocky and Ginger were trying to break out – they had to get off their farm to escape being made into chicken pot pies. This time, they have to break in to save their beloved little girl, Molly, from being turned into a bucket of nuggets. Dawn of the Nugget is that rare sequel that lives up to the original... and maybe even surpasses it. Rocky, Ginger, and their fellow chicken friend escapees have made a new and very safe life on an isolated island in the middle of a large lake and things couldn't be more idyllic. The only discontented citizen? Rocky and Ginger's young daughter, Molly, was born on the island and has never known anything else. Molly wants to see what's out there, across the water, and her mom's evasive answer – "there's nothing over there for us" – isn't doing anything to calm her daughter's wanderlust. And then the humans come a-knockin'. Across the water, the chickens see a new factory is being built, and not just any sort of factory – this "Funland Farms" facility is a chicken processing plant! Rocky and Ginger don't share this news with Molly because they think it'd be too scary for her, but in trying to protect Molly, they leave her completely in the dark about life outside of their island. That quickly becomes a problem when Molly sets off on her own, crosses over water, and ends up walking right up to a Funland Farms truck. She doesn't understand the danger, and quickly gets caught and tossed in with all the other captive chickens. Now, mom and dad have to organize a rescue mission, and here's where it gets super fun for parental viewers. There are all sorts of Mission Impossible and James Bond kinds of escapades, with laser-guided exploding robot ducks, brainwashed chicken minions, and an evil computer genius running the show. Cautions The main caution would be age-appropriateness. There are loads of cute animated characters here, which might have parents thinking this should be fine for their littles. But this is a rescue mission where the stakes are such that if they don't succeed, Molly and friends are going to be turned into bite-sized nuggets. That's definitely more peril than a normal kid flick. I think this is best for 10 and up, and I'll make my case by highlighting two scenes that happen pretty close to each other. Mrs. Tweedle is back – somehow the villain from Film #1 survived, and in this one she has another enormous fall. She lands in the giant metal funnel that sends chickens into the nuggetifier. As the machine starts gurgling, with this oversized human load, kids are going to wonder if we just saw Mrs. Tweedle get killed! And it takes a minute or two to learn that no, it isn't so – phew! She does emerge out the other end, breaded, but still entirely intact. Next, the now enraged woman goes all Jack Nicholson from The Shining as she uses her axe to peel back the roof of the chickens' getaway truck. It is only a moment, which minimizes the terror – I don't think any kids over 12 will be super scared, but all bets are off for the under 10s. Language concerns include a mention of "ye gods" and one instance each of "hell" and "blooming heck." I don't think this is trying to put us off of eating chicken, but when chickens are the good guys, and chicken nuggets are the worst thing imaginable, I can imagine that inadvertent vegan indoctrination is a possibility. Conclusion We all want to protect our own little chicks, but eventually they have to leave the nest, and we do need to get them ready! Like the original Chicken Run, this is a movie aimed squarely at parents, and what makes it special is that the moral to this story – don't helicopter-parent your kids – is one we can actually appreciate and learn from. How many Hollywood flicks can you say that about? Check out the trailer below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Children’s picture books

Bruno the Bear

by W.G. Van de Hulst 47 pages / 1978 & 2014 Rating: Good/GREAT/Give Little Rosie is sick so Mother takes her off to bed. But wait, what about her teddy bear Bruno? The little goof has slipped right out of her tired little hand onto the floor. There he lies, sitting up against the doorpost with his glass eye twinkling, almost winking, as if he had a secret joke. It’s no joke though, when Jimmy and Joe come home from school, and turn their sister’s favorite toy into a puppet on a string. They make Bruno dance and fly, and then - oh no! – they swing him about over the canal outside their window. When Bruno gets hooked on a pole sticking out of the water the string breaks, and then the two naughty boys don’t know what to do. Their sister is crying – she’s sick and wants her teddy. But they don’t dare tell Mother what they did! Bruno the Bear was originally published in Dutch, and the translators have done a wonderful job – it is a fun book to read out loud. It is also a beautiful book, with more than 25 pictures that are quite helpful in setting the scene. My three-year-old and five-year-old were both able to follow all the way through this pretty long story – I think it might have taken a half hour to finish. One thing I particularly appreciated was the author’s Christian take on the boys naughtiness. The two boys don’t want to tell Mother or Father, and they don’t. But that night, as they go to bed, we learn that Joe tried to pray, but didn’t dare. And Jimmy “had said it as fast as he could. And that was not really praying. No, Jimmy did not really dare to pray either.” When I asked my girls why the two boys didn’t dare pray, they understood exactly why, and we had a good conversation about what the boys needed to do – fess up! (Which they do indeed do a few pages later.) Bruno is one of 21 Van de Hulst children’s books the publisher sent me, and so far this is our favorite. In some of the other books I’ve had to “mute” some of the action – for example, in The Rockity Rowboat I skipped over a description of just how fierce a big black dog looked – but what might be need a bit of abridgment for a three year old will be great reading for a child in Grade 1 and 2. So, to sum up, Bruno is well translated, beautifully illustrated, thoroughly Christian, and engaging enough to keep a three-year-old’s attention for half an hour. You can order it, and the other Van de Hulst books, at Inheritance Publications....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

Adam’s Rib

Courtroom Drama 1949 / 101 minutes RATING: 8/10 There are two types of feminism: one demands equal respect for women the other demands identical outcomes for women – whatever men do, women must do to It's the flaws in this latter form of feminism that are the focus of this silver screen battle of the sexes. When Doris Attinger finds her husband with another woman, she takes a shot at him and is charged with attempted murder. Adam Bonner is assigned to prosecute the case, and to his surprise his wife Amanda Bonner takes on the defense. The thing is, Amanda doesn’t care if her client is innocent or guilty – she instead argues that her client should be set free because that’s what a jury would do if they were dealing with a man caught in similar circumstances. If a man had caught another man with his wife and taken a shot at him, she is sure this attempted homicide would have been deemed perfectly excusable. So, Amanda doesn’t want justice; she wants equal injustice for all. It’s up to Adam to convince the jury – and his wife – that equal injustice just isn’t just. This is a witty, dialogue driven movie that you have to watch right to the end for a satisfying but surprising conclusion. Cautions Topic matter, including both an affair and an attempted murder, means this isn't a film for the kids. The other caution would be that, no matter the biblical reference in the film's title, this doesn't have a Christian worldview undergirding its take on gender. It is, instead, a 1950s understanding of what makes men and women different. There is one big commonality though – Adam Bonner knows there are two sexes! That's quite the stand, both then, and especially now. But that doesn't mean he has much else right. Conclusion This is from another time, and fascinating as a reflection of that time. C.S. Lewis suggested that for every new book we read, we should read one old one because different eras have their own unique blindspots, and by sampling from times gone by, it may help us see past our own. I think that recommendation could hold for films too. The battle of the sexes has never gone away, but this is certainly a different take on it. So, watch this one old film with some friends, and get ready for a good discussion afterwards! ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Graphic novels

Eric's Greatest Race

The Inspiring True Story of Eric Liddell by Tim Challies 2025 / 128 pages Rating: GOOD/Great/Give Eric Liddell is probably best known as the man who refused to run the 100 meters at the 1924 Olympics because the finals were going to take place on a Sunday. He wanted to obey his LORD, and God's 4th Commandment: "Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your male or female servant, nor your animals, nor any foreigner residing in your towns...." (Ex. 20:8-11). Instead of the 100, Eric competed in two other events that weren't his specialty, the 200 and 400-meter races. While Hollywood played a little loose with the facts in their 1981 biopic Chariots of Fire, they got the gist right – Liddell went on to win a gold in the 400. Tim Challies' comic book biography does better than the film in keeping strictly to the facts. It also includes more of Liddell's life. He and his brother were often separated from their missionary parents, but they both enjoyed their schooling and many athletic ventures. After his Olympic win, Liddell went on to become a missionary himself in China. When the Japanese invaded China during World War II, Liddell spent his final years as a prisoner in a Japanese internment camp where he encouraged other prisoners by pointing them to the God who was still in control, even in these circumstances. Liddell died in that camp right as the war was nearing an end in 1945. Cautions None. Conclusion I liked, but didn't love Eric's Greatest Race. What I liked was the opportunity to learn a little bit more about the man I'd first encountered in Chariots of Fire. But with only about 30 words a page, this was still quite a brief overview of his life. The black and white artwork is solid, but it isn't vivid enough to grab a young reader's attention. I pitched this to my teen daughter, and she echoed my own take: this is a solid base hit, but no home run. That said, the comic format makes this more accessible to any interested audience than a book-length treatment could ever be. And those 30 words per page mean it is also a quick, easy read. I think Eric's Greatest Race would make a great addition to any Christian school library; however, there are more exciting options to consider as a gift for your kids or grandkids....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Family, Movie Reviews

The Court Jester

Musical comedy/Spoof 1956 / 101 min Rating: 8/10 In medieval England, the crown has been usurped, and the only surviving heir to the throne is a mere baby. So, who is left to stop the villainous new ruler, King Roderick the Tyrant? Some might think it'd be the brave Black Fox, a Robin Hood-like outlaw, who has his own band of merry rebels hiding out with him in the forest. But the hero of this story is an unlikely sort – Hubert Hawkins (Danny Kaye) is the Black Fox's minstrel, or, to say it another way, he's the outlaw band's entertainment director. This is a movie you might want to watch twice just to keep track of the convoluted plot. Hawkins ends up sneaking into the castle by taking the place of an internationally famous jester who was coming at the king's request. But little does Hawkins know, "Giacomo: the king of jesters, and jester to kings" is also secretly a highly sought-after assassin, and the king has summoned him to knock off the his remaining rivals. If you're still with me, that means the king thinks mild-mannered Hawkins is actually his paid killer. To add to the mayhem, Hawkins ends up getting accidentally hypnotized such that, at one snap of the fingers he thinks himself the greatest of all swordsmen, and at a second snap, he's back to his own defenceless self. Imagine the sword-fighting hijinks that ensue! Cautions The buffoon King Roderick does some leering early on, particularly in the direction of the heroine, Maid Jean. Thankfully, she escapes his attentions by claiming her father, his brothers, cousins, uncles, and aunts had all succumbed to "Brekenridge's scourge," but that "just because it runs in the family doesn't mean that everyone has it." Still, that bit of information cools his jets, and for the rest of the film, the king is afraid to even touch Maid Jean. Note also that a witch makes an appearance, but while she manages some hypnosis and attempts a poisoning, this doesn't get into any dark magics. Conclusion The Court Jester is a silly “Robin Hood” spoof of a story with Danny Kaye playing the bumbling jester/spy brilliantly. Check out the clip below for a sampling of Danny Kaye's mumbling, stumbling best. &...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Children’s fiction

Akimbo and the Lions

by Alexander McCall Smith 1992 / 66 pages Rating: Good/GREAT/Give Alexander McCall Smith is best known as the author of the The No. 1 Ladies' Detective Agency but it turns out he's written a number of children's books as well. And they are good. Really good! Akimbo is a boy who has access to all the coolest animals in Africa – his dad is chief ranger in charge of a wild game reserve, which means that from one book to the next Akimbo is having adventures with snakes and baboons and elephants and crocodiles, oh my! In Akimbo and the Lions he accompanies his father to trap a lion harassing a small village. But things don't go as planned – instead they trap a cub and scare the momma away. That means someone needs to take care of this wee little lion, and Akimbo convinces his dad that he is just the boy for the job! McCall does a wonderful job of balancing the tension in the book. There were moments where my 5 and 7-year-old were covering their mouths (and sometimes their eyes) but these moments didn't last too long. This is just a good old fashioned adventure, perfect for their age group. It is short – a book that can be read in an hour – exciting, sometimes sweet, with gentle humor along the way too. And in this first story, there is absolutely nothing to object to – Akimbo doesn't talk back to his parents, or teacher. No sex, no language, no weird philosophies. The only downside would be God's absence. In an adventure where God's creation has such a big role, it would be only natural to give God his credit for these wonderful creatures. But it seems that Akimbo and his parents are not Christians. And if I was going to add one other nitpick I'll also say this is not the sort of children's book that works equally well as an adult book (this is no Narnia, for example). The story is too simple and predictable for older folk. I only mention that because, since this is by a well known, and well-loved adult-fiction author, that might raise some expectations. But while these are very good kid's books, they are kid's books. There are five in all, in this order: Akimbo and the Lions Akimbo and the Crocodile Man Akimbo and the Elephants Akimbo and the Snakes Akimbo and the Baboons The others In addition to Akimbo and the Lions we've now read the other four in the series. Akimbo and the Crocodile Man was a bit scarier as there is an actual crocodile attack. It all turns out fine in the end, but that extra bit of tension means I was glad we did read things in order, starting with Lions before Crocodile Man – that order meant even in Crocodile Man's scariest bit, my girls understood that this sort of book was going to have a happy ending. Akimbo and the Elephants had Akimbo going behind his dad's back to stop ivory (which comes from elephant tusks) poachers. He has good intentions, but lies a number of times, and even steals some ivory to serve as bait for the poachers. We had to explain to the girls that Akimbo was doing something downright dumb here - that he should be talking his plan over with his dad. So while we enjoyed reading it together, I would have some reservations about my children reading this by themselves. In Akimbo and the Snakes we come along as Akimbo visits his Uncle Pete's snake farm for a month and learns what it means to "milk" snakes. My nine-year-old enjoyed learning more about snakes but said this was definitely a day time and not bedtime book. The only objectionable bit would be in the notes after the story where it briefly mentions that snakes are thought to have evolved from lizards. In Akimbo and the Baboons a "baboon lady" comes for a visit. This is a visiting scientist who has come to study that baboons, and Akimbo and his cousin Kosi get jobs as her assistants. The author believes in evolution, and while that only comes out clearly in a section in the back – "Brilliant baboon facts" where McCall notes baboons are not in the same genetic family as human beings – the scientist, Jen, notes a few times in the story, how the baboons are "a lot like us" or "just like us." True, in some ways, but when we read between the lines here, we can see this is about being similar in an evolutionary sense. I'm making much of this and will note my nine and under kids didn't even notice the evolutinoary angle. So if I was getting these for a school library, I would get the first two – two very enthusiastic thumbs up! – but maybe give the third a miss, and the fourth and fifth with a note about evolution in the front. What's the ideal age range? I'd think kids in Grades One to Three are sure to enjoy them. Akimbo and the Lions is available at Amazon.com and Amazon.ca....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Children’s fiction

Bad Badger

by Maryrose Wood 2024 / 184 pages Rating: GOOD/Great/Give This was a wonderfully strange book that left me wondering where it was going to go next. It is about a badger that isn't bad at all, though Septimus – that's his name – thinks he might be bad at being a badger. After all, he doesn't act like all the other badgers do. For one, he lives in a cottage, near the ocean, not a den deep in the forest. And he quite likes opera, which other badgers are quite indifferent to. So we have this one lonely badger who wears clothes and shops in town amongst the humans and it is never explained why no one else thinks this the least bit odd. He would like to have a friend, so when a seagull drops by, he invites the bird for tea. But, seagulls aren't great conversationalists – all Gully (the name he gave her) ever says is "Caw!" But Septimus seems very good at deciphering just what Gully means with each particular caw. In another quirky twist, Septimus eventually meets other seagulls, and that lot does speak in sentences. It's such a fun silly journey, with the rules turned all upside down and sideways. Are these animals "people"? Septimus certainly is. But Gully didn't start off seeming so – it looked like he might just be a regular bird. But then we discover his seagull relatives are "people." This is fun, but what makes it a particularly good read, in our present cultural climate, is the lesson Septimus learns about who he is. He is worried he isn't a badger because he does so many non-badger like things. I was wondering if this book was going to turn into some woke work, with Septimus deciding that he was actually a gull instead. But no, he eventually learns he might be quite the atypical badger, but a badger he remains. And isn't that good to know? Bad Badger is, then, a kind, gentle, and counter-cultural little animal tale....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews

The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe (1979)

Animated / Children 1979 / 95 minutes RATING: 7/10 This is the oldest surviving film version of C.S. Lewis's famous classic. It is absolutely fascinating as a curiosity, and I had some fun comparing the animated version to the 2005 live-action one. This starts off a little different – we see Lucy bursting out of the wardrobe shouting, "I'm back, I'm here." While both films are loyal to the book, small difference pop up throughout, the most notable being how the "Deeper Magic" is treated here. I suspect these scriptwriters might have been Christian and thus better understood the connection Lewis was making, while the Disney script was likely not by Christians. Cautions The cautions for this film would amount to the same warnings the book would get. As I share in my live-action review, the Bible speaks of God as being like a lion (Hosea 5:14, Is. 31:4, Rev. 5:5, etc.) and makes other analogous comparisons between God and animals such as a mother hen, eagle, and bear (Matt. 23:37, Ex. 19:4, and Hosea 13:8). But what should we think of depicting God as a lion? On the one hand, Lewis isn’t trying to say that Jesus is actually a lion – Narnia is supposed to be fantasy, not fact. But on the other hand, Lewis does make a close Aslan to Jesus connection in Aslan’s sacrifice to save Edmund in The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, and Lewis is just a hair’s breadth from stating the connection explicitly in The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (Book 5 in The Chronicles of Narnia), where Aslan tells Edmund and Lucy that in their world, “I have another name.” Conclusion If they'd never remade Wardrobe as a live action film, then this might have become a family favorite for many. It really isn't bad – it even won an Emmy back in 1979. I was initially going to give this a 6, but it keeps getting better and better as the story goes. There is a lot to like here! Visually, it isn't nearly as good as the 2005 update. You can get a feel for that difference watching the brief feature on it below. But for the passionate Narnia fan, it will be very fun to see another version of a favorite story. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Family, Movie Reviews

The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe

Family / Drama 2005 / 125 minutes Rating: 8/10 For those who have not read the C.S. Lewis book of the same name, this takes place during World War II. Four Pevensie children, Peter, Edmund, Susan, and Lucy, are among the thousands of children sent away from London to escape the dangers of ongoing German bombardments. They end up at the enormous house of a reclusive professor, and in exploring the house, the youngest of the children discovers a gateway into another world. No one believes little Lucy, though. They think she is just letting her imagination run away with her. But another world it is, populated by fauns, and talking beavers, and ruled over by a wicked White Witch who has kept this land of Narnia entombed in winter's embrace for more than one hundred years. There is also hope. A prophecy speaks of two sons of Adam and two daughters of Eve coming to help. So when Lucy finally manages to get her sister and brothers to come to Narnia with her, the prophecy seems ready to be fulfilled. But then Edmund disappears. And the White Witch gathers her army. And the newly arrived leader of the free animals of Narnia – a lion by the name of Aslan – doesn't seem able to stop her. Cautions While this won't be scary for kids over ten, the White Witch, her wolf minions, the battle scenes, and Aslan being killed in front of the White Witch's horde, could well be too much for younger viewers. Other cautions are of a more theological nature. The Bible speaks of God as like a lion (Hosea 5:14, Is. 31:4, Rev. 5:5, etc.) and makes other analogous comparisons between God and animals such as a mother hen, eagle, and bear (Matt. 23:37, Ex. 19:4, and Hosea 13:8). But what should we think of depicting God as a lion? On the one hand, Lewis isn't trying to say that Jesus is actually a lion – Narnia is supposed to be fantasy, not fact. But on the other hand, Lewis does make a close Aslan to Jesus connection in Aslan's sacrifice to save Edmund in The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, and Lewis is just a hair's breadth from stating the connection explicitly in The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (Book 5 in The Chronicles of Narnia), where Aslan tells Edmund and Lucy that in their world, "I have another name." Another objection is simply what Aslan gets wrong about forgiveness here. When Edmund returns to his siblings, Aslan says, "What's done is done. There is no need to speak to Edmund about what is past." But, of course, there is. Edmund didn't commit some mistake or oopsy – he betrayed everyone. It's a movie, sure, so there's only so much time, but to let Edmund reconcile without any sort of request for forgiveness or acknowledgment of the enormity of what he had done is to model the "C'mon, what's the big deal?" sort of repentance the world has on offer, which is exactly the sort that gets in the way of both true repentance and true forgiveness. Finally, in conversing with Peter, Aslan says that "there is a Deep Magic, more powerful than any of us, that rules over all of Narnia. It defines right from wrong, and governs all our destinies. Yours and mine." Insofar as Aslan represents Jesus here, Aslan is saying that there is a right and wrong apart from and above God Himself. Really? No. Good and bad aren't above Him, but their definitions spring out of the very character of God – Who He is defines what right and wrong are (see 2 Tim. 2:13, Matt. 5:48, Rom. 3:3-4, etc.). Conclusion There are three different adaptations of The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe to choose from, and this is the very best. While Netflix has plans for a fourth, it's hard to imagine how it could be better, and it is easy to anticipate – given some of the revisionist nonsense already leaking out (Aslan is to be voiced by a woman) – that it will be a great deal worse. But if you want a more gentle, calmer version, be sure to check out either the 1988 BBC TV series (a solid 6/10, with the talking animals portrayed via life-size puppets) or the quite good 1979 animated version, which rates a 7. Be sure to check out the trailer below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews

Horton Hears a Who! (1970)

Animated / Family 1970 / 30 minutes Rating: 7/10 Based on the Dr. Seuss classic picture book of the same name, this is the story of what a caring elephant heard, and what he did. With ears as big as his heart, Horton the elephant heard what no one else could – he heard the cry of some microscopically tiny people crying out for help. It seems there was an entire town of tiny persons – Whos is their name – living on a small speck of dust.  And with the wind blowing their speck about, a cry went out for assistance... and Horton came to their rescue. Why? Well, because, as Horton notes, "a person's a person, no matter how small!" He cushioned their fall, putting their speck on a clover fluff. While Dr. Seuss was not pro-life – at least according to his second wife – his story most decidedly is. Horton knows what others in the jungle do not: that size doesn't make the person. No one else believes that anything that tiny could have life on it, so they try to lock up Horton, and, in a vindictive twist, they try to boil the clover! But it doesn't matter what they all believe – it only matters what's so, and so, Horton fights on, while begging the tiny Whos to make themselves heard. Will their personhood be recognized? Will the murderous mob be turned? We can only hope so, because, as is true of the unborn, and Whovians alike, "a person is a person no matter how small." There is a 2008, full-length feature film version that might also be worth checking out, but I have yet to see it. You can watch the trailer for this half-hour version below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

Lord Jeff

Drama / Black & White / Family 1938 / 85 minutes RATING: 8/10 This is a fantastic film... and a hard sell for any modern audience. My 11-year-old gave it an 8.5 at the end, but she would never have picked it – that it's black and white would have put her off. She only watched it because she was sick, bundled up on the couch, and had gotten bored enough with her book to check out what her dad was watching. And then it won her over. The opening scene introduces us to the young and very spoiled Lord Geoffrey Braemer. His imperious ways don't endear him to the hotel staff where he's staying, but those same haughty manners put everyone off from questioning his lordship's lordship. For Geoffrey is no aristocrat at all. He's an orphan who has been taken in by two thieves, and when they visit a jewelry shop, the young "lord" fakes a faint, distracting everyone just long enough for one of his partners in crime to make off with a diamond necklace. But when their cover is blown, only Geoffrey is caught. He's sent to naval accademy for boys and told that if he doesn't smarten up his next stop will be prison. That's all just the first 10 minutes. What comes next is a hard boy gradually being soften. It's one of the most believable of cinematic turarounds – he keeps getting in trouble, makes a mess of any potential friendships, but slowly starts recognizing the opportunity he has here. Mickey Rooney plays Terry, a leading student willing to take Geoff under his wing. And when Geoff want have it, Terry helps him anyways. The reason this really is a must-watch comes near the end of story when Geoff hears from his two accomplices, who are looking for his help again. They did take him in when he had no one else, so he feels a fierce loyalty for him. But, as the Admiral spells it out for him, loyalty can be an admirable quality, but Geoff has two loyalties here, and he can only choose one: his former friends, or his new ones. So, which will it be? While no trailer seems available online, you can find some video clips here....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Graphic novels

Sleuth Family Robinson: fighting evil around the world

by Christopher P.N. Maselli 2025 / 160 pages Rating: GOOD/Great/Gift The Robinsons are an undercover spy family working for the UK. When someone hacks the British spy database, the Robinsons are the only spies whose cover wasn't blown, so they are called up to see if they can track down the hacker. Mom and dad are up for it, and brother and sister Edgar and Christie are ready too. In a nod to James Bond, they have their own super secret spy gadget supplier, a genius named W. The four of them end up traveling around the world, fighting an evil AI set on ruling the world. This is an explicitly Christian comic from Focus on the Family, an organization dedicated to building up the family. They've had a decades-long-running audio drama called Adventures in Odyssey, and the "author" of this comic, Wooten,  is one of the fictional characters from that drama. The comic itself was first serialized in Focus's Clubhouse magazine for kids, with two-page spreads each issue. My daughters read a few of these chapters so they were very excited to get their hands on this complete collection of the whole 44-chapter Sleuth Family Robinson adventure. That amounts to 88 pages, so what's in the rest of this 160 page book? There's some Sleuth Family Robinson trivia, and some background bios for the characters, but the bulk of the rest of the book is two page almost-devotional type reflections on the adventure. They explore questions like: What is a family?, Is it okay to fight? and The deal-o on adoption. I don't know if kids will spend much time in this second half, but if they do, it offers a solid conservative Christian perspective Cautions The only caution I'd offer is for this second half, and only because the "author" Wooten will sometimes ask questions that would be better addressed together with parents, and not by a kid reading alone. For example, on page 142 Wooten asks, "Do you believe God answers prayers? Why or why not?" I like the question, but I would like to help my kids answer it. But, again, I don't know how much time kids will even spend in this second half, unless a parent is reading it with them. Conclusion Christian comics are noted for their lack of nuance – the bad guys will change from story to story, but subtlety is always the enemy, and right and wrong will always be belabored. There's some of that here too, but the art is fantastic, the story fast-paced, and the target audience young enough that being a bit obvious isn't so bad. I'd pitch this to 10 and up, maybe all the way up to 16 if your family ever got Clubhouse magazine. I think even older teens will enjoy it then for the nostalgia....

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8