Transparent heart icon with white outline and + sign.

Life's busy, read it when you're ready!

Create a free account to save articles for later, keep track of past articles you’ve read, and receive exclusive access to all RP resources.

White magnifying glass.

Search thousands of RP articles

Helping you think, speak, and act in Christ.

Open envelope icon with @ symbol

Get Articles Delivered!

Helping you think, speak, and act in Christ. delivered direct to your Inbox!

Parenting

Matrescence: the process of becoming a mother

I was deeply ashamed. "I just want to go back to before," I said to my husband, burying my face in his shoulder. I'd been so excited for this baby and now that she was here, I'd never felt so lost, so disconnected from who I was, so anxious and miserable. I lay awake at night for hours with my heart pounding, unable to sleep in case my baby needed me. And at the same time, I couldn't adjust to being needed so deeply and constantly.

"You don't want to go back," my husband told me. "I know you don't. Because I can tell, you're happy."

I pulled back and stared at him. "I'm happy?" I was crying all the time, desperate for some stability in the current chaos that was our life.

"Yes," he said, and the strange thing was, he was right.

Because now, when I go back and look at pictures of that time, of the crazy first few months with a newborn daughter, I see my calm, serene face gazing down at my baby, or smiling into the camera. I was happy to be a mother, and I was also so disconnected from myself that I couldn't feel that happiness. I didn't think I felt happy at all.

It might seem a bit cliché to write about motherhood, or maybe a bit presumptuous, so soon after having my first baby. But after having gone through it I found we don't talk about it enough.

It makes sense in a way, since it's impossible to put into words before you go through it. And there is an element of not wanting to scare other women. But most of what is written is about the objective, factual motions of having a baby – the sleepless nights, the changes in your body, the lists of supplies the baby will need. There is less written about the experience of having your identity overturned and changed into something else, into something we assume should come naturally but instead often develops in us with time and experience. That big word – motherhood.

How do you go through something hard that's simultaneously such a blessing? What is it like to go through an experience that strips everything out of you and takes you apart, only to put you back together in a way that feels like you're more fully yourself?

There's a word I never heard until recently, a word, matrescence, that means the process of becoming a mother. It's similar to the word adolescence, which is the process of forming your adult identity, or in other words, an in-between stage between childhood and being a grown-up. When I heard "matrescence," I loved that there was a word for it, a word that is less a black-and-white before-and-after (once you have a baby you're suddenly a mother), but rather a word that demonstrates it's a process and a journey, and you might not be "there" right away. At the same time, it's about becoming yourself in a new way, not becoming somebody totally different and alien to yourself. I was afraid I had lost touch with who I was but that wasn't true – I was still myself, but myself in a different way.

I have to note that this piece of writing is one hundred percent my experience. The experience of "becoming" is different for every woman (and I'd imagine fathers would have their own too). I don't want to say this is what anyone should experience, but I want to share my journey for those who may experience similar things, to know there are others out there that feel like they do. And to share some insight for others who aren't mothers, into what at least one experience was like. In a culture where motherhood is becoming less and less common, talking about it matters more. Because the mundane realities of sleepless nights don't express the wonder of the experience, and yet that is what is primarily noticeable from the outside.

So with that said, here are a few aspects of my experience.

"It takes a village"

I felt like an awful mother those first weeks. I felt like this baby who cried constantly could not love me. I felt like my daughter was a stranger I'd expected to know and understand and yet I somehow didn't. Like I'd never received the mother instinct I was supposed to be born with.

My husband gently contradicted me, batting away each negative thought as they rose up in me. But more than that, he insisted I talk to other mothers. I was sure I was the only woman in the world who felt this way. But he was sure I wasn't.

I wanted to retreat into the internet, to anonymously compare my feelings to women who posted online, to predict my experience from the challenges they asked questions about. I've always been hesitant to be vulnerable. I feel sure that my shortcomings will lead others to judge me, and when it came to motherhood, I was terrified that mothers who seemed to have it all under control would know how I was failing. It felt safer to anonymously browse the internet. But my husband insisted the internet was not reality.

He was sure that other women felt like they were floundering too even if I thought they had it all together. So I spoke the words, face-to-face, to other women that I was having a hard time.

"Thank you for your questions," one friend told me after I'd bombarded her with queries about her experience in her first weeks after giving birth. "I'd almost forgotten about what that time was like. It's good to remember how it felt."

Other women admitted in hushed tones that they had also been anxious, that they also hadn't known how to cope. For some, our conversation was a space to speak what they'd experienced out loud, to admit to someone else that they hadn't had it all together way back when. And I could hear that no one had done everything "perfectly," the way my ideals insisted, shaped by what doctors had told me and what I thought other mothers had done before me.

I had been ashamed to accept help because I thought I was falling short if I couldn't do it on my own, but to find out others hadn't done it all by themselves either freed me. I asked for help, and got it.

And when I asked for help, I finally had the time to see my daughter – to really sit and watch her, lying on her blanket in the sun with her legs kicking in the air and her little hands just starting to reach out to what was in front of her. She had felt a bit like a stranger when I’d first met her, though I’d carried her inside me for nine months, a stranger I was oddly and fiercely protective of for some reason. It was strange to be so protective of someone I was still getting to know, to feel so rightly needed by a little being whom I’d barely met. But as I found the time to watch her, I found out who she was. Her personality pushed up through her newborn surface, emerging and proving she was her own person though she seemed so dependent on me. Her eyes widened at the world around her and I began to see how new it must all be to her. I didn’t have to push myself to take her hand and show her everything. I wanted to show the world to my daughter.

As I got to know her, I began to know myself again as well, that I was still myself, yet transformed into the person who was her mother. I saw the world with new eyes. I hadn't been sure I could be happy as a mother, but little by little I could feel that I was happy.

"It takes a village," is the cliché about raising children, and so many nowadays are raising children without a village. But in the Church, we have more than a village, we have a body.

"For the body does not consist of one member but of many…. If one member suffers, all suffer together; if one member is honored, all rejoice together." (1 Cor. 12:14,26).

And yet we so often cannot speak to each other about what we are feeling. We are afraid to let others see under our polished surfaces. And yes, not everyone will respond well when we share. But I will never forget the ladies who came around me from within the Church and reassured me that they had experienced similar feelings. If we never try to share, we will never find those who do.

It's utterly terrifying to be vulnerable. But my baby, so utterly vulnerable herself, needed me and more than just me. In my own strength I was not enough. I needed others, I needed God, and I needed help to see how to lean on God's strength. The body of Christ came around me and reassured me that I was not alone. And then I could reach out and help my baby, and through my baby, help others.

Motherhood as a service

When I was pregnant, strangers started talking to me. "Congratulations! How many months?" they said, or, "When are you due?" I'm used to feeling somewhat invisible as I move through the world, but as my belly grew, I no longer faded into the crowd. And since I was excited, I enjoyed the excitement of people around me, even as I marveled that the thought of a birth could make so many people smile like that.

And now that my daughter is here, I am still visible, dragging our stroller and diaper bag and car seat wherever we go. And if I manage to enter a room quietly, my daughter announces herself – I'm here too, look at me! And then a wonderful thing happens – wonderful to me, at least, as a person who was always afraid others were annoyed when she took up too much space or spoke too loudly. People's faces soften at the sight of a baby, they pause and smile, and somehow their cares are lifted for a moment as her tiny hands reach out to them.

If I'd known before how simple it was to make people happy when you have a baby, that I could just show up with my daughter and make them smile, I would've been surprised. Maybe it's the culture around us that complains about babies crying on airplanes and in restaurants that trained me to expect others to be annoyed with my baby. But almost always, she brings joy just by existing near them. And I wonder, what other small ways of bringing joy to others have I overlooked?

"I really needed this," more than one person told me, as my daughter snuggled her face into their chest, or held their finger in her hand. Seniors' eyes tear up with the memory of their own children, once so young. People who had a tough day find a moment of peace, a moment to let out their breath while holding her. Because a baby means hope.

It's not always easy to get out of the house. There's a lot more to take. There's a lot more germs to face. I don't know how my daughter will react. But so often when I go out, it feels worth it.
I never thought becoming a mother could be a way to serve people I barely knew.

Radical shift

The happiness motherhood brings is impossible to put into words. It's easier to talk about the complexities of breastfeeding, the difficulties of getting your child to sleep, or how long a single day can feel with a newborn who needs you every moment. No wonder most of our cultural conversation about motherhood revolves around objective realities like this. It's easier to give advice about what car seat to buy than to explain how full your heart feels even while your eyes are scratchy with tiredness. It's not something I experienced before I became a mother.

And yet I know I would've bristled a bit if a mother had told me I could never understand her love before I'd given birth, as if she were suggesting I was not a fully realized person because I wasn't a mother. No, it's not a necessary experience in life. And yet I have to admit, to my single self's chagrin, that I had no idea. And I have to admit now that I would never have been able to explain my joy to my former self anyway.

I bring this up because the natural disconnect between those who aren't mothers and aren't sure what the fuss is all about, and the mothers who insist they love every minute even though they look like they don't, has been increased in our culture. Young people don't know why they should have children, and I don't know how to tell them that it's a life-changing experience that's worth it.

It's worth it. If you're not sure, I can't tell you what it's like or why, despite feeling stretched in ways you've never felt before, you will be glad you did it, but I'm trying as best I can to contradict the narrative that life with children is a misery.

God “fills your cup”

There’s a lot of advice out there about filling your cup, or in other words, about taking care of yourself so you can take care of others. And it’s true that some advice to new mothers is so self-sacrificial that it’s unhealthy and unsustainable. It is good as a new mother to do things that bring you joy and comfort – spending time with your husband without the baby, or getting out for a bit with good friends, or just taking an unhurried bubble bath. But you can do these things for yourself and still feel stretched out.

In the beginning, I did take time for myself here and there. But I always knew I had to go back, and I still felt like what I had to do was beyond me. I was terrified at how I wanted these breaks to last forever, and I felt like that must make me a bad mother.

It turns out that filling your own cup can't help you wrap your mind around who you're becoming, though it does help you connect to who you are in the moment. To become comfortable with the person you're becoming, the person you don't quite know yet, you need to lean on someone who already knows what you can be. You need to lean on God.

I’ve always struggled to fully trust in my relationship with God. I tend to think God gives me hard things that I don’t like to make me grow, and that I need to just endure them. But I forget I can trust He will bring me good, and often this good can even feel good. He is not out to make me miserable, as I tend to mistrustfully be afraid He is.

So it was hard for me to turn to God in my matrescence. He’d blessed me with a daughter and I felt like He’d be angry that I thought it was hard. I felt guilty that I had thoughts that I wanted to go back to before. And the guilt stopped me from bringing all my struggles to God. My mistrust led me to think He wouldn’t help me with them, that I should be doing better and be happier all on my own.

But I did have to rely on God. I’m still learning when it comes to this. But I can pray in the middle of the night for strength to take care of my baby. I can even pray things get easier with her – and things did eventually get easier. I’m not a better Christian, or a better mother, if I suffer more. I can be happy. I can believe God wants me to be happy in the blessings He gives me.

"You anoint my head with oil; my cup overflows. Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life." (Ps. 23: 5-6)

Trust the process

Motherhood keeps changing. One moment I'm dealing with cluster feeding, the next moment I'm figuring out how to feed solids. And I know my daughter will continue to grow and face new challenges and I'll have to navigate that. By accepting that I'm in the middle of becoming, rather than having attained a goal, I find I adapt to the shifting waves of change better. I don't know it all. I'm learning, just like my baby is.

After all, my identity is not in being a mother, and it certainly is not in all the things that felt like my identity before I became a mother (whether jobs, interests, abilities, connections or possessions). My identity is in Christ.

"For in the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily, and you have been filled in him," or as the NIV says, "brought to fullness." It is through Christ that we find ourselves and the full potential of who He truly created us to be. It is through Him that we can even go beyond ourselves and our frail human abilities.

It's scary to let go of who you thought you were. It's terrifying to do hard things and feel like you're bad at them, or failing at them, or that you just don't have it in you to do them. It's even worse to do this without relying on the God who knows you, who can tell you that you are not losing yourself because you are centered in Him.

Instead of clinging to what I knew before, I learned to let go and go through the process, to trust God and discover that I was still myself even though I had grown into something I never could have imagined for myself. It was not the stereotype of "good mother" that I'd had before I became one. It was not what the world told me a good mother looks like, or the ideal in my head of what I should be like. Instead, it looks like a vulnerable woman who needs lots of help from her family in Christ and from God, and at the same time, one who connected with the joy she truly had within herself all along. It's wonderful to become a mother.

Red heart icon with + sign.
Technology

Screen-fast 2026: How’d we all do?

Last year’s screen-fast set the bar pretty high with over 900 people signing up to participate. This year, nearly 800 of you decided to once again sign on and limit your screen time for 10 straight days. It was encouraging for everyone involved to have so many others participating and promoting this challenge. We heard back from 130 screen-fasters and found out that over 70% completed 8 or more days. Many of you also shared what you learned, how your kids got involved, tips for making the best use of your time, and the things you struggled with. Doing this together “Every day I made a recording of what my day was like and sent it to all my children. The support from them was great. The reporting got me through the hard day's because not only would I fail myself, but I would fail my children.” “I found that when my family did it alongside me, (unlike last year) it was much easier to stay off of my devices.” I spent time with… “My nephew came over when there was 3 days left... I spent a lot of time with him and it was soo fun too!” “It was a hot week and I spent time with my kids and grandkids in the pool and just left my phone in the house the whole time. We also had campfires most evenings and chatted around the fire without the distraction of a screen.” “We ate a lot of meals outside, played games, took walks, worked outside together, and did a lot of reading.” “Because I didn't always have video games to fall back onto, I wanted to spend more time outside or with my siblings.” “We observed our teen and ten-year-old son lounging on the youngest's bunkbed having a conversation, something that would have never happened outside of our screen fast. They sought each other out, I think, because they were 'bored.' We also had an hour and a half conversation at one point with our teen about infant and adult baptism, morphing into other subjects...a conversation we felt he would not have initiated if he had not been 'forced' off his phone.” “My kids were surprised I had time to play with them that was a big hit to my heart.” It was more peaceful “…we found everyone's mood improved dramatically with no/less screens. The younger ones played much more pleasantly and creatively. We had better family conversations. It felt more peaceful in our home.” “As a mom I definitely appreciated not being asked every hour if they could go on either the Nintendo or tv! They all enjoyed a lot more time outside and we actually had later nights spent together because we were just enjoying our time outside and losing track of time.” “The kids took time to tinker, play and just be kids. There was no battle to shut the tv off.” Just me and my brain “This fast helped me realize how much I habitually use my phone to entertain my brain in moments through the day. I was much less distracted without that constant pull.” “I’m nursing a baby right now and it’s “nice” to scroll through the boredom. But I sat in silence and let my brain rest instead of consuming content - which I think was good for my tired mind.” “I found myself more mentally available, having less things on my mind that I've read or watched on a short reel or a headline.” “The background “noise” of social media quieted and it was a noticeable relief for me. I thought I would miss the content but I don’t miss it.” I had time to… “I finished and/or worked on a few projects that I have been working on that I probably wouldn't have touched this summer, so that was good.” “I managed to get trousers mended, pillow cases resewn, garden seriously weeded, read several chapters in a couple of books I've been 'meaning to' read, cleaned out a room or two and did a 1000-piece puzzle…” The blessing of sleep “….going 10 days without and seeing the benefit in my own productivity, presence, and even sleep, has me realizing what a blessing it would be if our schools also stepped away from screens.” “I noticed that my siblings slept in later because they didn’t have to rush to be the first one to get a screen.” I didn’t know I could… “Well, as a soon-to-be senior at 63 years old, I hesitantly joined as I love movies and the long and short of it was that I thanked the Spirit for nudging (okay, pushing) me to participate in this challenge. Two key takeaways: 1) My body can move more than I thought it could! When you're sedentary, you're well... not moving. I was so bored during this screenfast that I actually tackled some hard, physical labour outside, with wonderful results for my efforts! 2) Sleep. Who knew that a screenfast would leave me bushed at the end of the day?! (see point one) Hello to voluntarily going to bed ON TIME instead of scrolling ad infintum till the wee hours. Rules are here to help “In hindsight, I think I should have made the rules for myself a bit harder. It was good for me to beoff social media, but I found myself surprised at how many times I was still googling this or that and spending time on my phone ... because I hadn't made no googling part of my ‘fast.’” “I found the information provided this year allowed participants to build the screen fast in a way that made sense to them. It'snot about the rules; it's about the bigger picture.” Time with the Lord… “I meditated in God's Word, relying on the Holy Spirit to fill my summer days with good and enjoyable things. A certain verse in the New Testament stood out to me: ‘But you, when you fast, anoint your head and wash your face, so that you do not appear to men to be fasting, but to your Father who is in the secret place; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you openly’ (Matt. 6:17-18, NKJV). Jesus said that if we fast faithfully we will be rewarded by our Father. What better way to be rewarded than to dwell in the words and presence of our Heavenly Father without screens or technology to distract us?” “I also found it easier to talk to God in prayer, and do my devotions because I could pay more attention.” “It was also amazing to discover God's Word together as a family.” “It was very helpful to remind me not to grab for my phone first thing in the morning and to spend that time talking to God and doing my devotionals instead.” What’s next? “I am going to keep social media off my phone the remainder of the Summer to continue good habits!” “Some aspects of the fast will continue beyond the fast and I pray that the Lord will give me the discernment and discipline to continue making wiser choices with the time He has given me day to day.” “We are happy to have participated in the screen fast and are praying that we will maintain our motivation to implement more conscious screen restrictions so that our family will continue to reap the benefits we experienced.” “Going forward I think we will set clear times when screens may or may not be allowed to stop the constant asking. I also had deleted social media apps from my phone for the fast and do not intend to redownload them...” Some tips “…as long you put your phone physically away in the evening it made it much easier to screenfast!” “Another thing my wife and I did shortly before the fast began was installing a phone holder for our devices above the kitchen counter where, as a general practice, our phones stay while we are at home and also overnight. Not feeling every buzz in your pocket has allowed us to be more present with each other and our kids and also forces us to go out of our way to use our phones should the need arise.” ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Parenting

Teaching small fries to take notes, sing psalms, and speak to God

When your child is old enough to write... When your child learns to write he is ready to begin taking sermon notes. Say, what? Let's say that little George is 4 or 5 or 6 years old and he knows how to write his name and how to write all of his letters. Now he can get started! All you need is a regular notebook (or half size) and a pen or pencil. Before you go to church you should talk with him about the worship service, and how important it is to be quiet and still and to listen to God's Word being preached. Hopefully he has already been sitting in church for awhile and has become accustomed to obeying in this manner. Explain to him that he is old enough now to begin taking sermon notes! As you listen to the sermon, write in the notebook a simple sentence that you have just heard the minister say. Remember to write it in the type of lettering that little George will be able to read, in the size that he is used to. Then hand it to George and tell him to copy it. If he is a beginner, he will take awhile to do so. When he hands it back to you, smile, and listen to the sermon for a moment, and write another sentence. He needs to remember not to have a conversation about it. Let George complete this second one as well. Depending on the age and patience of your child, you can decide whether to have him write 5 sentences, or 10, or more. As he improves, he will be quicker and will accomplish more. He may keep it up throughout, or he may tire. I usually found it beneficial to "push" my child to do just one more after he said he was getting tired of it. This helped him to develop endurance. After the service, take the notebook home. If you will take a few moments to read it over when he is present, and to show it to your spouse, he will see that this is important to you and it will help him to strive to do it well. If he is able, you might even have him read it as a part of your family Bible reading time. This activity teaches him to take notes, because as he gets older you will ask him to listen and write down parts of sentences that he hears. It doesn't matter if he gets all of the words - just that he is listening and getting some of them. Eventually he will progress to where he can find the main points and summarize them, but that's a long way off. This activity also gives him something very worthwhile to do during worship. It is directly involved with the worship, as opposed to just being a toy, a page to color, or a series of "o's" to fill in, in his bulletin. It says to him that he is worshipping too, not just being forced to sit quietly for his parents' sake. It says to him that he is capable of taking sermon notes, just like the "big people" do. It also helps if he sees those older than him participating in this way. As his notebook progresses you could use it during the week to help him remember what he learned on Sunday. If you are enthusiastic, he will be also. When your child is old enough to sing... When your child is old enough to sing a song he is old enough to learn psalms and hymns. Little George is capable of picking up any song that he hears. So if you regularly sing words of praise to the Lord in your home and in your car, he will soon know all of the words as well. Good quality music that truly honors the Lord is just as fitting for children as it is for adults. They do not need off-key vegetables to get their attention. You might teach your children the psalms and hymns by methodically going through your church songbook and learning to sing all of the first stanzas. What a wonderful preparation to be ready for whichever ones the minister thinks fit best with his sermons for that day! Another way that you can assist your child in worship is by finding out ahead of time, if possible, which hymns or psalms will be sung next Sunday. Then you can sing that one at home a few times so that it becomes familiar to him. If it's one that was unfamiliar to you this could benefit everyone and improve the musical part of the worship of our Lord. If enough people are interested in knowing ahead of time perhaps you could ask the minister if he could email the titles or page numbers to the congregation by Thursday or Friday of each week. All of this serves to teach our children that what happens on Sunday is important and that it is not a Sunday-only activity. Preparing for worship and reflecting on it afterwards bring it to the forefront and promote our spiritual growth. Again, a little enthusiasm goes a long way. When your child is old enough to read... When your child is old enough to read he can begin reading the Bible. What an excitement it is for little George to help read one of the Bible verses at a family Bible reading time. Maybe he can only identify half or two-thirds of the words, but he is sure trying. Soon he will want to be able to read the other words too, and that will encourage him to learn the rest of his phonics. What a goal! Historically, most schools were started so that people would be able to read God's Word. George will appreciate that he too is included in the Bible study. He also won't need to fuss for attention if he is already included in taking a turn. When your child is old enough to speak... When your child is old enough to speak he can pray. He might repeat after Mom or Dad, or he might add his own simple words of thanks and request. But he should not even be able to remember a time when he did not pray several times every day. Worship is the central, most important thing that we do in our entire week. It is the time that we humbly come to confess our sins, give our thanks, sing of His glory, ask for help, and learn of His grace. When we teach our children right from the start how to worship, we accomplish the most important task that we must do. Sharon L. Bratcher has a book with 45 of her RP articles in it, and a 2-year lesson plan entitled “Bible Overview for Young Children” ages 2-6 and 6-9. For information on these, contact [email protected]. This article first appeared in the Dec. 2006 issue, under the title "Sermon notes, and songs, for small fries."...

Red heart icon with + sign.
News

Saturday Selections – Aug 15, 2026

You need to be bored (6 minutes) A psychologist did experiments where people had to sit in a room for 15 minutes with nothing to do. They could sit there and be bored, or there was a button in the room they could push that would give them a painful shock. Bored or electrocuted. A vast majority picked the electric shock. Why? Because otherwise their bored brain might start thinking about things that would make many of us uncomfortable. Like, What am I even doing with my life? Or, What is the point of all of this? And rather than think on those bigger things, we will do anything to keep ourselves from being alone with our own thoughts. Most of the time the choice isn't boredom or electrocution: it's between boredom and our phones. So our phones have saved us from the search for meaning. We really do need to be bored. Paul shows us how to confront others with the Gospel "...Many of us are not nearly confrontational enough in presenting the claims of Christ to those around us. We are far too willing to soften the message..... But Paul did not flinch from proclaiming a message that he knew would be utterly offensive to his hearers." We have a playbook for college. How about one for marriage? When it comes to a good college, parents know good marks might not be enough, so they know how they can help their kids build "a compelling résumé and what to put in their application essay." They can help plot a course. But marriage doesn't just happen either; not like it did. So do we need to help with a playbook for that too? As Aaron Renn writes, he didn't prioritize marriage, but mostly because he just wasn't thinking of the future. "For a long time I said I didn’t want to have kids. What that might mean for me down the road as I got older didn’t really register. It wasn’t a consideration. "I was in my early 30s when my grandfather died. I was sad, but it didn’t cause me to reflect on my own mortality. Then, when I was about 40, my grandmother got sick and was hospitalized. My mother called to ask me to come down and take shifts staying with her. Several family members did likewise, so she had someone staying with her in the hospital 24 hours a day. "When I was with her and looked at her lying in that hospital bed, for the very first time in my life it hit me. When I’m old and lying in that hospital bed, who is going to come stay with me? The answer was, nobody. Nobody would be coming to stay with me. That was a sobering thought." Ignoble savage: what the Bible says about Ancient Man The world pitches us a primitive-cave-man-advancing-to-sophisticated-modern-man narrative. But the Bible presents us with Adam, our first man, already smart enough to name all the animals. Quite the contrast... 5 myths about Deacons I don't know if the 4th and 5th myth are all that applicable in any of our churches, but 1 through 3 do pop up sometimes.... For more, Real Talk did a great episode about Deacons with Dr. Van Dam. How God brought Nabeel Qureshi to his knees (3 min) Nabeel Qureshi was a Pakistani-American Muslim who, in university, befriended a Christian fellow university student, named David Wood. And they went at it. For months. Nabeel later went on to write Seeking Allah, Finding Jesus. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Pornography

Porn addiction isn’t just a guy thing

“... but you’re a girl!?” If I had a dollar for every time I heard that given the context that is about to follow, I’d have about twenty bucks. Sure, it isn’t much, but then again, I’ve only told my story twenty times. It never fails. I am a mother of two, and a wife to a wonderful, forgiving, and loving husband. I have been a member of the Church since I was baptized as an infant, and I am a sinner. This is a story about grace. That’s really all it can amount to. I would love to think that I got through all of this on my own accord and by my own strength, but that isn’t the case. It’s grace. ***** When I was still in my early teens, about twelve, I was flicking through the channels on our television. I was supposed to be babysitting, and well, I was – but all my siblings were in bed. Click, click, click. Nothing. And then, I saw IT. A naked couple on the screen. It wasn’t long before my parents arrived back home, and since our window was large enough to see them coming from literally a kilometer away, I had enough time to change the channel and bolt downstairs to my bed and begin to pretend I was sleeping. It began with curiosity I never told my parents about what I saw. And instead of confiding in those who had raised me from infancy, who I literally trusted with my life, I turned to our new computer and told Google instead. I was young enough that I didn’t understand what exactly I was searching for, but I was old enough to know how to work a keyboard and spell words. The next time I found myself home alone, I pulled up a chair, typed in a few key words and found what I had been looking for. What started off as “innocent” curiosity became a full-blown addiction. Minutes turned into hours, and the hours repeated themselves every couple days. I started to like what I was seeing and soon enough, it became a part of my daily routine. I started looking forward to those private moments, but in return, started hating myself, my body, and God. I would stay home as often as I could just to go on the computer. I watched soap operas instead of going to school, and one day, I put a computer in my room. I struggled on and off for years without anyone knowing. My battle began before unlimited wifi, before I had my own smartphone, Instagram and Snapchat account, or personal laptop. It was still difficult to find and pornography sites were “restricted” to those over 18 years. Now, it’s everywhere.  It’s been a little over one year since the last time I watched pornography. It’s been a very trying yet powerful year. I struggle with it every single day, multiple times per day. In the midst of my battle, I pushed God aside. I figured that if God wasn’t in the picture, I didn’t have to worry about whether or not what I was doing was sinful. I had convinced myself that He didn’t love me anyway, so what was the point of trying to make Him happy with me. As the distance between God and myself grew, the hatred I began to see in the mirror increased. I started to compare myself to the women I had seen on the screen; my skin wasn’t smooth enough, my breasts weren’t large enough, my legs weren’t skinny enough (I was a size zero!), my nose was too long, my teeth too pointy… the list could go on and on. I began to think that if I looked like the women on the screen, maybe I would have the love that they had too. The reality If only I had known the truth about the “love” that those women were experiencing. Plain and simple - porn is often drug-induced rape. Now, who in their right mind would actually want that? It all happened so fast.  One moment they would be meeting each other and the next moment they would be on the bed. But, I didn’t fully understand the truth behind the scenes of what I was watching, so I actually had myself convinced that that was what sex was like. I suppose since it was on the screen I could pretend that it was normal. Yet, it isn’t normal. I told my mother of my struggle last year, and she said something that I had never thought of before. She said “Those women on the screen, those men too, they are someone’s sister. Someone’s daughter, mother, brother and father. They are real people, with real families and real lives.” Bam. If any statement helped me through my battle the most, that was definitely a big contender. You have to think of it in real life, because it is real life. If you were to come across a couple having sex on the street, would you grab a chair, some popcorn and indulge yourself? Nope. And yet, what I was watching on the screen was just as real as that. Satan likes the dark I remember the first time I decided I was going to stop watching pornography. It lasted a week. I had stayed up late and at that time had access to a computer. I dare say that Satan works best at night. I even remember these words running through my brain: “Go on! One minute wouldn’t hurt”. Well, I had gone a full week and I was on the road to recovery, but I hadn’t found my strength in God at that time, and the one minute became an hour which became a daily routine. Again. Why even bother trying to stop? I would argue with myself, It’s impossible, anyway! I had become so invested in my guilty pleasure that it was easy enough to come up with stupid excuses to shut my conscience up. I knew that even though a part of me wanted to stop, a very large part of me didn’t. Even times when I would fall on my knees and pray for forgiveness, deep down I knew that I actually didn’t mean it. I was a pretty techy kid growing up, so no one actually found out about my addiction. I figured if no one really knew about it, and I could pretend that nothing was different, no one would suspect anything. There was a point in my life that I actually thought I just wouldn’t tell anyone. It impacted dating But then, I found myself in a serious relationship with a man whom I now call my husband. We had been dating for a few years when I told him. He was the first person I had ever told. I remember sitting in the car before I went in to see him, praying fervently to God that he wouldn’t break up with me and that he would forgive me. He did forgive me. We dated for a long time. And well, I would love to say that my experience with pornography did not affect our relationship but unfortunately it did. It was easy to convince myself that in order to feel loved I had to be touched. After all, that is what I had polluted my brain with for many previous years! We weren’t the definition of “innocent” in our relationship and I will take most of the responsibility for those actions. I could chalk it up to the fact that we were young, or that we dated for a long time, or maybe that our hormones were raging. And sure, those might have had an effect, but when it really comes down to the heart of the matter – it’s just that, the heart. My heart, and if I can speak on behalf of my husband, his too, were not centered on God. Mine didn’t pay attention to what God says love is: “patient, kind, slow to anger….” (1 Cor. 13). To me, love was attention from my boyfriend - any attention he wanted to give, and any attention I could take. I had tried to find satisfaction in a fellow sinner, instead of looking to our one, perfect and holy God. We went through periods of lust and other periods of just finding pure joy in each other’s company. Thankfully, with a wedding ahead, our time of engagement was focused where it should have been all along, and we began to enjoy each other as God’s forgiven children. It didn’t just stop with marriage There is a saying: “Satan will do anything he can before you are married to get you into bed, and anything he can do when you are married to get you out of it.” It is difficult for me to write this next part, but it’s part of my story. I watched pornography as a wife. I took matters into my own hands when I didn’t feel like sharing my feelings or frustrations with my husband. Mainly it was just because I was bored or lonely. It happened. I hate that it happened, but that doesn’t mean that it didn’t. If there were any part of this whole struggle I could wish never happened, this would be it. My husband is so forgiving. If there is any word I could use to describe him, that would be it. He has stood by me and encouraged me in my fight against pornography more times than I dare count. He is the one to point me to my Rock. I took one evening to share with him my struggles – every last detail – all the whos, whats, whens, whys and hows. He is now my partner in my fight and I know that he would leave everything if he knew that I was being tempted, to come and help me fight. It’s been a little over a year since I have last watched pornography. I am 25, and have struggled with it on and off for more than 10 years. It is still a daily struggle: every time I go to the beach, the mall, pull out my phone, go on Facebook, Instagram, the computer. Videos and images I watched as a teenager will suddenly appear in my mind as I am washing the dishes, doing the laundry, vacuuming, sitting in church, even praying! The struggle has not left me, and I dare say it never will. God’s grace I would love to say that I have all of this under control. I don’t. God does. One year ago, I put my battle in His hands and prayed with tears that He would take this cup from me. And praise be to God, He has. He has given me the strength I need to put my smartphone away, to turn off the laptop, to double check the ratings of shows before I go and watch them. He has strengthened my faith in his Son and His forgiveness. He has given me grace and love. I have found freedom in my walk, a spring back in my step and more love for my husband than I even thought possible. I remember sitting in church one Sunday hearing a sermon on the Lord’s Supper. At one point during the sermon, the minister asked us to picture Christ hanging on the cross – I don’t remember very much after that because I knew what he meant. Picture my sin hanging there on Christ’s shoulders. I put him there. I stood before him yelling “Crucify him! Crucify him!” That is the moment I realized it wasn’t impossible. I had Christ on my side, and he had conquered sin. My sin. He put it to death! For me. So I continue on, fighting, finding my hope in God’s promises: “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God” (John 3:16-18). “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8). And as my wise mother has taught me, “Don’t be surprised by sin. Be surprised by grace.” Thanks mom. Advice from a former addict to you: Talk to your children/friends. Be the one to bring up the topic in a conversation. I often find it easier to talk about the “big topics” one on one rather than in a group. Ask them to be honest with you, and be quick to listen and slow to speak. Humble yourself as the parent/friend. Also, don’t assume that since you’ve talked to them once, they know and they won’t do it. We are all curious and sinners by nature. Pray with and for your children/friends/family. Set an example: Stay on top of what you and your children/friends watch/read. Are you setting a good example? It’s one thing to say, “Hey Jonny – don’t watch porn” but if they see you watching The Game of Thrones or even porn itself, you’re setting an example of how to be a hypocrite. Use your resources! For movies there’s www.kids-in-mind.com, and even the parents’ guide on www.imdb.com. And PluggedIn is a great resource to double check movies/books or even apps before you or your children watch them. Protect your computer. Get the laptops and smartphones out of bedrooms and into a public area. I know – it creates more clutter. But do you know what kind of clutter is more disgusting? A pornography filled mind. It’s worth a messy desk. Trust me. Password protect your wifi and change the password/turn off the wifi at a specific time at night. Don’t be afraid to discipline. Have an accountability partner. This one is tough because it requires you to be honest and open with someone. If you feel temptation, that is the time to talk with them. Not after you give in, but before that – when you feel like you might give in. As the accountability partner, pray for your friend/child. Uphold them and encourage them in their times of weakness. Encourage your children and friends in their inner beauty. Compliment them on their kindness or gentle spirit instead of their new jeans or new hairstyle. Teach each other how to put on the fruits of the Spirit instead of eyeliner and mascara. Teach your son how to look for the right kind of woman and how to put on the armor of God. If you are bored, find something to do that does not include a laptop or smartphone. The Bible is an excellent place to start. Speak highly of the love of God and show the love of God in your home. Instill in your, and your child’s heart, John 3:16-18. Model repentance to your children. For example, if you lose your temper and shout at them, ask their forgiveness. Let them see what seeking forgiveness, and turning to God in repentance looks like. Forgive. Forgive. Forgive. This article first appeared in the November/December 2016 issue of the magazine. To ensure accountability – that a writer is willing to stand behind what they write – RP doesn’t publish anonymous pieces, but for the nature of this article made an exception in this case....

Red heart icon with + sign.
News

Sophie Cunningham is tearing down transgender lies, but only God’s people can offer up His Truth

Indiana Fever’s Sophie Cunningham is a WNBA player – she plays basketball for a living – but it isn’t her skill on the court that’s made her famous. Her first foray into infamy occurred last year, when she horse-collared opposing guard Jacy Sheldon and threw her to the ground after Sheldon poked Cunningham’s marquee teammate, Caitlin Clark, in the eye. Cunningham then used her newfound fame and her good looks to get into the 2026 Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue, and get a stint as a ring girl for July’s UFC 329. While some opposing players might not have appreciated Cunningham the “enforcer,” the haters came out en masse after a July 21 interview with ESPN in which she made clear her opposition to men competing in women’s sports. "I got a lot of negative feedback about me hating trans. And I'm like, 'I never once said that,'" she says. "I think that I am here to extend love. But I also think with that love is truth, being honest. And I want to protect young girls in a locker room, or young girls in sport who shouldn't have to go against biological men." It was a common sense take, but her own coach refused to have any part of it. When asked for her take on “biological males in women’s sports,” Fever coach Stephanie White dodged, and then threw Cunningham under the bus: "I wouldn't really say that I'm educated enough from a scientific standpoint. I don't ever believe that exclusion is the answer." Exclusion is never the answer? This is a coach in the Women’s National Basketball Association which exists even though there is already a National Basketball Association that both men and women are eligible to play in. Why then does the WNBA exist? To exclude men. Because when men aren’t excluded, then women will be. There is not a single female player in the NBA, not because any rule prevents it, but because biology does. This “inclusive” coach doesn’t get that she’s in an inherently exclusive league. During a July 28 game with the Fever visiting the Seattle Storm, two teen girls were cussed out by one of the Storm’s owners because they had a sign supporting Cunningham’s stand. When the Fever played the Portland Fire on July 31, the Fire coach got asked about men in women’s sports, and he insisted he was “completely supportive of everyone.” Then, when the Fever played the Minnesota Lynx on August 2, head coach Cheryl Reeve wore a “Trans kids belong” shirt, and ESPN commentators Ryan Ruocco and Rebecca Lobos pointed it out, and encouraged viewers to “go and listen” to Reeve’s “incredibly thoughtful” comments defending procedures that mutilate and sterilize kids. Cunningham hasn’t backed down, tweeting out a picture of coach Cheryl Reeve in her shirt and captioning it “There is no such thing as ‘TRANS KIDS’” followed by a smiling clown emoji. But there is some irony in Cunningham taking a stand against men in women’s sports. Twelve years ago she played for the Rock Bridge High School Bruins when the team’s primary kicker went down with a season-ending ACL injury. Long before we started pretending boys could become girls, we were pretending that girls could play football with the boys. It’s the very same kind of biological blindness that insists girls can withstand hits from 250-pound linebackers. And what kind of lesson is it for these giant boys to tell them it’s no big thing to treat women just like men? Cunningham is certainly courageous, but in the past she’s also participated in the confusion. Sports media commentator Clay Travis offered to clear away the confusion with an Aug. 3 tweet: "Important announcement: I am upping my offer, $10 million dollars for a head-to-head basketball game between the defending WNBA champion Las Vegas Aces and a boy's high school state title team of my choice. If the Aces beat my team, I will give them $10 million." The WNBA salary cap in 2026 is $7 million for a 45-game season. Travis is calling this “inclusive” league out, offering to more than double the Aces’ salary for one extra games worth of work… if only they can beat high school boys. If there really is no difference between men and women, then why wouldn’t the very best women ballers in the world be confident about beating high school boys? Because deep down they do know what they’ve been saying about gender swapping is nonsense. We should admire Cunningham for her courage, and Travis for being willing to back his stand with big bucks. But what the world needs to hear now is the clarity that only God’s Word offers. Why is it so stupid for men to play against women? And why does the world have to pretend otherwise? It’s because they’ve rejected God’s Word, and that’s left them without any foundation to stand on. Christians know that men and women are all made in God’s Image (Gen. 1:26-27) and this, then, is the basis of our worth and our equality. But apart from God, what makes us valuable? The world has nowhere to turn but our abilities. That’s why they say we can kill the unborn, and for that matter the elderly and disabled – their lives are said to not be as valuable because they can’t do as much. But then how do they explain equality? Only by pretending that men and women can do exactly the same things. To say otherwise – to say that men can play basketball better than women, for example – is then understood to be an assault on women’s worth. So we’re all expected to ignore our eyes, and just believe that women can be oil rig workers, and “trans women are women.” God’s people are getting some help from the Cunninghams and Travises of the world in exposing these crazy lies. But the Church needs to step up and point the world to the God who defines reality. This is our moment to give Him the glory by providing the world with His answers – let’s not let it slip by. Photo is adapted from an August 2, 2026 photo by John McClellan and is used under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license....

Red heart icon with + sign.
News

Saturday Selections – Aug 1, 2026

Here I am Three gents, singing up a storm, with lyrics based on Genesis 22:10-13 – this is a foot-stomping hand-clapping delight! The delightful duty of married sex "God commanding a husband and wife to have sex is like a master commanding his servants to throw a party out of his own larder, using the best wine and best dishes. It’s like a boss commanding his employees to give themselves a raise and a paid vacation to Bali...." "Here you have been commanded, as man and woman, to engage regularly in something that God designed to give you moments of literal ecstasy and unifying, self-forgetful delight. Of all the hobbies you could engage in together — tennis, chess, movies — this is the only hobby you’ve been told not to neglect." A liturgy with a pause – for the killing The Anglican Church of Canada has given out a liturgy to be performed during medically assisted murders. How compassionate. Did BC really just defund SOGI 123?  That's what the Conservative Party was saying, but that isn't quite what happened. As ARPA Canada writes, they did cut funding, but the work already done is already in place. Meet the ad expert who inspired today's anti-population propaganda (10 min. read) God says children are a blessing, but for more than two centuries now, we've had influential figures and forces insisting that more children will kill the planet. This is the story of how that lie was pushed, and an explanation of why it was always shortsighted. This is a longer read, but there is a lot of great history and insight offered up in this article. Maybe the earth is flat? Or, how the Bible helps us address runaway skepticism There are a lot of people pushing lies in the world, whether that's: our public educational system saying, by their silence, that God is irrelevant to anything and everything worth learning evolutionists saying God's fingerprints are not evident in the world all around us government, doctors, and psychologists saying God did not make us male and female, and, in fact, you determine your gender, and you can go from one to the other our judicial systems saying life doesn't begin at conception the UN and others pushing overpopulation hysteria COVID's many government, media, and medical figures making statements with certainty they later revised without apology the 215 bodies reported as buried at a Kamloops residential school With so many "experts" lying to us, how can we know who or what to believe? It's almost enough to have a guy wondering if his crazy conspiracy-spouting friend might have a point. So how can we find the truth of the matter – any matter? In the video below Jeff Durbin gives an answer as to how we can know that the earth is not flat, and here's the principles he touches on: God says that truth can be established on the testimony of two or three eyewitnesses (Deut. 19:15) We have to contend with whatever Scripture has to say on the matter. We can't treat the Bible as irrelevant, or an afterthought, to be refashioned to fit with whatever conclusions we've already come to To expand on these two points a bit, Mark 14:57-59 makes clear that the witnesses do also have to be credible. We can discount witnesses who out themselves with contradictory testimony, including testimony that conflicts with God's Word (2 Peter 2:1-3). Now, if you've met a Christian who holds to a flat earth, he's going to tell you he agrees with these two points. What his mistrust is based on is: not trusting the (mostly) secular experts who discredit themselves by also, for example, speaking of a universe billion of years old... which conflicts with what God tells us in His Word trusting the Bible as being authoritative even when the experts say otherwise So two points follow: We sometimes make the mistake of thinking that a discredited witness proves the opposite, and it isn't so. Would that liars were so reliably consistent, but, sadly, no one is perfect, and that's true even of the liars. So we can't find the truth by just bouncing off the liars, and here that'd mean that even though NASA pushes evolution that does not prove that everything they've said – like the earth being round – is just one more lie in an ongoing never-ending series of lies. What it does mean is, if an issue needs to be settled and is worth investigating then we'll want to find more reliable witnesses to rely on. Which is what we have here in the video below. Sola Scriptura is not the same as Solo Scriptura – the first speaks to the Bible being our authoritative guide, and the second speaks to my interpretation of Scripture being my guide – what the flat earth folk have gotten wrong is how we should read Scripture, and they could benefit from a good Bible study with others that brings up passages that are metaphorical, historical, and even hyperbolic. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Politics

Perhaps you should run

Obedience belongs to us. The results belong to the Lord. ***** Every four years, for a brief season, nomination papers open and the question becomes concrete: who will step forward to govern our towns and cities? Budgets and bylaws will be passed, libraries and parks funded, streets and neighborhoods planned, and public moral judgments made. Decisions will be made. The question is, by whom, and according to what vision of justice and the public good? I write to suggest that some of you should step forward, and that those who do must let God’s Word govern the campaign and leave the result to the Lord. I write this while running for municipal council in my home city of Peterborough, Ontario. I do not write from the safety of hindsight. The campaign is underway, and whatever attention or pressure may come as election day approaches has not yet come. That is part of why I want to think clearly now. I have said that I am not running despite being a Christian, but because I am a Christian. I believe public office is a responsibility before God and a trust from the people. That means honesty, stewardship, justice, neighbor-love, and service. That confession must govern my campaign, my exercise of office if elected, and my response to the result if not. Furthermore, that confession raises a more basic question. Is Christian faith merely a private motive a candidate brings into politics, or is civil office itself under Christ? The prevailing ideal of religious neutrality draws the line there: Christians may hold office, but they must not insist that God’s Word governs the office. Scripture and our confessions reject that division. “I don’t have enough time” Perhaps your first objection is your calendar. You have a job, perhaps two. You have children. You serve as an elder or deacon, sit on a school board, help govern a Christian organization, teach Sunday school or catechism, care for aging parents, practice hospitality, and seek opportunities for evangelism. You already have more good work before you than hours in which to do it. Those responsibilities may be why you should not run. But municipal elections generally come only every four years. The opportunity to stand is not permanently available, and for many of us a truly quiet calendar is not a few months away but decades away. If we wait until our responsibilities have thinned out and life finally feels manageable, the nomination period will have closed and someone else will have stepped forward. Scripture warns us against burying what has been entrusted to us, and it tells us that whoever knows the good he ought to do and fails to do it sins. That does not mean every capable Christian is commanded to become a candidate. Capability is not identical to calling. But capability does create a responsibility to discern. I ran as a federal candidate in 2021. I did not win. Campaigning did take time. Yet I learned that public service need not simply subtract from family life. At times it can be woven into it. My family came with me to rallies, debates, and candidate events. They helped deliver literature. My oldest daughter baked cupcakes for the campaign. We traveled, talked, worked, and learned together. Time itself is finite, but family life is not simply a ledger in which every hour spent in public service is an hour stolen from one’s children. A child who comes to a debate, helps deliver flyers, watches his father speak with an opponent, or prays for an election is not necessarily being deprived of family life. He may be receiving a memorable form of Christian instruction. The campaign became part of our life together. My children saw that public responsibility was not merely something their father discussed at the dinner table. It was something a Christian family could practice. This must not be romanticized. A man who neglects his wife and children while claiming to save the country has misunderstood Christian service. A wife should not be steamrolled by political ambition, and children should not be treated as campaign props. Some families are in seasons when candidacy would plainly be irresponsible. Still, “I have a family” or “I am already serving” should not always end the discussion. When the cost became personal After the 2021 federal election, the Peterborough Public Library began hosting “Drag Queen Story Time” events for children. A friend and I organized two peaceful protests, one in September 2022 and another in January 2023. We said publicly that God made human beings male and female, that this created distinction is good, and that deliberately blurring it is harmful, particularly when children are involved. In the days before, during, and after the second protest, the opposition became much more intense and personal. Some people involved in the counter-protest found my employer through LinkedIn. They tweeted at the company, telephoned, and tried to have me fired. That was wicked behavior. I wish I could say that I met the pressure with calm confidence. I did not. When people began contacting my employer, the possible cost was no longer theoretical. I had a wife and nine children to provide for. I found myself thinking about what would happen if I lost my job and how I would continue caring for them. I was afraid, and I am ashamed that I did not trust God’s fatherly care more readily. Thankfully, I did not withdraw what I had said or abandon the stand we had taken, and I discovered then that willingness in principle, and steadiness under pressure, are not quite the same thing. Courage is not the absence of fear. It is obedience while fear is still present. In the end, I was not fired, although I was placed under pressure at work. That experience made me more active in seeking other employment. In time, an opportunity arose with ARPA Canada. The public advocacy that some people had tried to make a professional liability became an asset and part of the experience that fitted me for my present work. There was other good as well. My friend and I were quoted in the local newspaper saying plainly that God made human beings male and female, and that this is good. My friend was later interviewed on national radio, where he had a further opportunity to speak about the issue. The truth about God’s created order went out more widely than it otherwise might have. We did not persuade the library to stop hosting “Drag Queen Story Time,” so we did not achieve the immediate result we had sought. But silence did not have the last word. God has not promised that every Christian who speaks publicly will keep his job or quickly receive a better one. Faithful Christians have lost employment, income, professional standing, friendships, and much more. But, as Lord’s Day 10 teaches, “all things, in fact, come to us not by chance but by his fatherly hand.” I can now identify several ways the Lord used that period for good. At the time, I could not see them. That is often the nature of obedience. We are called to obey before we are shown what the Lord intends to do with it. An opportunity to speak plainly Running for office can give you the opportunity to share truth with people you might never otherwise communicate with. I am now in another campaign, and if attention increases as election day approaches, I expect some questions concerning my previous advocacy, and my Christian beliefs. I welcome those questions. If reporters, voters, or opponents ask me about abortion, transgender ideology, drag events directed at children, or my belief that Jesus Christ is Lord of public life, I hope to answer plainly. Public attention can bring pressure, but it can also widen the audience for truth. The concern is not that people may discover what I believe. The concern is whether, when pressed, I will speak with the clarity, charity, and confidence that those beliefs require. Honest scrutiny is not persecution. A candidate asks the public to entrust him with authority. Voters and journalists are entitled to ask about his record, beliefs, judgment, and character. Some criticism may be true and necessary for me to hear. A difficult question is not an attack simply because I would have preferred an easier one. There is, however, a subtler danger. A candidate can begin responding to opposition before it arrives. He imagines the headline, the social-media campaign, the accusation of bigotry, or the votes that may be lost. Then he edits himself in advance. No one has ordered him to deny what he believes. He simply learns to say less and less of substance. A Christian who had worked on many political campaigns once told me about a pro-life candidate who had spent years counseling women outside an abortion clinic. Her faith and concern for preborn children were central to why she was running, and the first draft of her brochure said so. Then came a series of individually plausible revisions. The campaign did not want her to appear to be a one-issue candidate. Voters needed to learn more about her family and background. Some of the material about abortion no longer seemed to fit the brochure’s tone. By about the tenth draft, the brochure described a brave and bold woman who would defend the oppressed, but it no longer told voters what she had spent years bravely doing. Nothing in the handout was an explicit lie. Yet the overall picture was no longer candid. A campaign message must be selective. It may not be deceptive. That is why the 9th Commandment matters so much. Prudence asks how, when, and where a relevant truth should be spoken. Fear asks how much truth can be removed while leaving every remaining sentence technically accurate. A candidate under the 9th Commandment The Heidelberg Catechism’s Lord’s Day 43, in unpacking the 9th Commandment, treats lying and deceit as works of the devil. We are taught that God is forbidding here not only false testimony, but also twisting another’s words, gossip, slander, and rash condemnation. Positively, the 9th Commandment requires us to love the truth, speak it candidly, and defend and advance our neighbor’s honor and reputation. That is a demanding political ethic. It means a Christian candidate not only shouldn’t tell explicit falsehoods, he mustn’t even deliberately cultivate a false impression. Obviously, a Christian candidate will not be able to include everything he believes in every campaign piece. But he should ask whether a reasonable voter would feel deceived if an omitted conviction became public the next day. When asked a direct and relevant question, he should answer it rather than hide behind words designed to leave opposite audiences with opposite impressions. The same commandment governs how we speak about our opponents. Christians on the political right are not immune to gossip, exaggeration, rash judgment, or caricature. We may call abortion the killing of preborn children. We may say that gender ideology rebels against the created order. We may identify attempts to have a man fired for lawful Christian speech as wicked. The 9th Commandment calls for moral clarity. We may not twist an opponent’s words, invent motives, repeat allegations we have not verified, or treat every person on the other side as though he were guilty of everything done by anyone associated with his cause. We may oppose a policy as foolish, unjust, destructive, or contrary to God’s law without pretending to know every motive in the heart of the person promoting it. The commandment also requires truthfulness about the office itself. Candidates should not promise powers the office does not possess. A municipal councillor must not pretend to be able to solve every social problem, command every public institution, or repair every failure of federal and provincial government. Exaggerating our own authority is also a form of false witness. Finally, the commandment applies when falsehood favors us. If supporters exaggerate our accomplishments, circulate an untrue allegation against an opponent, or attribute an endorsement we did not receive, we may not quietly enjoy the advantage. We should correct flattering falsehoods as readily as accusations made against us. The Christian candidate should be difficult to intimidate and difficult to provoke. He should refuse both cowardly concealment and slanderous combativeness. Why municipal office? Municipal politics may offer a particular opportunity for principled Christian service. Municipal elections in Ontario are non-partisan, so candidates do not run under formal party banners. That removes one important part of the machinery of compromise. A municipal councillor is not formally required to defend an entire federal or provincial platform, submit to a party leader, or vote according to the direction of a caucus whip. He can own his judgment and explain his vote issue by issue. That can make it easier to act as a principled Christian. It does not make faithfulness easy. There are still media narratives, activist groups, professional associations, donors, influential residents, council colleagues, city staff, and informal voting blocs. There is still the desire to be liked. There is still the fear of being treated as unreasonable, extreme, ignorant, or hateful. In some ways, municipal pressure can be more personal. There is no national party organization absorbing the criticism. The councillor meets his opponents at the grocery store, the arena, the library, and the school event. The people affected by his decisions may be his neighbors, former colleagues, customers, fellow church members, or parents whose children play with his own. Municipal independence therefore creates both an opportunity and a responsibility. A councillor has greater freedom to act according to principle, but he also has fewer excuses when he does not. Municipal government is also wonderfully concrete. It concerns public order, roads, taxes, libraries, parks, planning, policing budgets, infrastructure, and whether families can use public spaces in safety. Christian political involvement cannot be limited to dramatic protests or national controversies. We also need Christians who will read reports, steward tax dollars, protect neighborhoods, maintain good order, and carry out ordinary public duties faithfully. A Christian candidate should be prepared not only to advocate or protest, but to govern. Obedience and results The author, in front of where he seeks to serve: “A candidate should take the office seriously and take his campaign seriously too, genuinely seek to win. You want to win because winning provides an opportunity to govern. But victory must remain a means of service rather than becoming a god.” A phrase I once heard in a sermon has stayed with me: “Obedience belongs to us. The results belong to the Lord.” Proverbs 21:31 expresses the same truth: “The horse is prepared for the day of battle, but deliverance is of the Lord.” That horse must still be prepared. Confidence in providence is not an excuse for carelessness, passivity, or half-hearted work. A candidate should take the office seriously and take his campaign seriously too, genuinely seek to win. You want to win because winning provides an opportunity to govern. But victory must remain a means of service rather than becoming a god. Victory does not vindicate sinful methods, and defeat does not transform poor preparation, unnecessary harshness, or dishonesty into faithfulness. My loss in the 2021 federal election did not mean that the candidacy had been pointless. It formed my family, gave me experience, and contributed to later opportunities. Yet I could not know those results in advance. I was responsible to act faithfully and leave the consequences to God. The same is true now. I do not know whether I will win my municipal election. I do not know what attention or pressure may come before election day. I do know that Christ’s lordship will not be strengthened by my victory or weakened by my defeat. Perhaps you should run Our churches contain men who manage employees, read financial statements, chair meetings, teach clearly, withstand conflict, make difficult decisions, and carry heavy responsibilities. Some serve as elders or deacons. Others sit on school boards, own businesses, work in the trades, farm, practise law, teach, manage organizations, or serve in the professions. Those existing responsibilities may be reasons not to run, but they may also be evidence that God has given you gifts public office requires. You need not already be an expert in municipal law or public finance. Much of that can be learned. The question is not whether you are already a fully formed politician. It is whether the Lord has given you something your neighbors presently need. It is therefore worth asking whether refusing to step forward could itself sometimes be unfaithful. That question should not be answered quickly, but with prayer, Scripture, counsel from family and church leadership, and honest examination of motive. Are you declining because you already carry responsibilities that must not be abandoned, or because political office is public, costly, and likely to bring criticism? Are you guarding your family, or guarding your comfort? Are you exercising humility, or burying a talent? You may never have spare time. You may not feel fearless. You may lose. Do not confuse ambition with calling or candidacy with entitlement to office. But if, after prayer and counsel, you believe God is calling you to offer yourself as a candidate, step forward. Speak plainly. Tell the truth about yourself, your opponents, and the office. Defend your neighbor’s good name. Refuse to make public approval your master or electoral victory your god. Someone will govern your community, and that government will act from some moral vision. The question is which one. Obedience belongs to us. The results belong to the Lord. Paul Lawton wrote this while running for municipal council in Peterborough, Ontario. You can find his campaign website here. The sidebar article that accompanies his article in the Sept/Oct 2026 issue can be found below.   *****   Christ is Lord of the magistrate too The apostle John calls Jesus Christ “the ruler of the kings of the earth.” Psalm 2 commands kings and judges to serve the Lord with fear and to kiss the Son. Civil rulers are not autonomous authorities who may acknowledge God if they find it personally meaningful. They are servants who receive their authority from Him and will answer to Him. Belgic Confession Article 36 speaks with refreshing directness: “…because of the depravity of the human race, our good God has ordained kings, princes, and civil officers. He wants the world to be governed by laws and policies so that human lawlessness may be restrained and that everything may be conducted in good order among human beings.” The Confession does not stop at saying that government should keep traffic moving and prevent theft. It says that civil rulers are called “to contribute to the advancement of a society that is pleasing to God.” They are to act subject to God’s law, remove obstacles to the preaching of the gospel and divine worship, resist anti-Christian power, and do so while refraining from absolute authority and remaining within the office entrusted to them. This is neither statism nor religious neutrality. The magistrate does not administer the sacraments or exercise ecclesiastical discipline. Those responsibilities belong to Christ’s church. Yet civil rulers are not therefore free to act as though Christ has no claim on public life. They should acknowledge Christ, govern subject to God’s law, protect the free course of the Word, and resist anti-Christian power by the lawful means entrusted to their office. The magistrate must not usurp the government of the church, but neither may he pretend that civil government is religiously neutral. A Christian understanding of government therefore includes the restraint of evil, the protection of the good, the preservation of public order, the honoring of marriage and family, respect for private property, the protection of preborn children, and recognition of the created distinction between male and female. It also includes the restraint of government itself. Civil rulers are not saviors, and their authority is never absolute. Some of these matters are primarily the responsibility of federal or provincial government, rather than municipal. A city council cannot change Canada’s Criminal Code or determine federal abortion law, for example. But no municipal decision falls outside God’s moral order. At times the moral vision is unmistakable, as when councils fund Pride events, fly the Progress Pride flag on civic property, or use municipal bylaws to restrict the delivery of pro-life literature depicting the victims of abortion. More often, that moral vision is expressed less dramatically through decisions about libraries, public spaces, policing budgets, taxation, zoning, neighborhoods, and the treatment of families. In either case, council is acting from some view of the human person and of what a good society ought to be. Because Christ is Lord, politics matters. Because Christ is Savior, politics cannot save. That should make Christians more willing to serve and less willing to compromise. We can work seriously for a good political result without acting as though an election decides the fate of Christ’s kingdom....

Red heart icon with + sign.
News

Saturday Selections – July 25, 2026

When they mock the Bible, question the question One of my friend's university professors had, as a clear goal – if I recall right, he even stated it to his class – to convince his conservative Christian students to stop believing in a literal 6-day creation. His tactics involved undermining their trust in the Bible's accuracy, scientifically-speaking. So, in one of his tests he asked students to explain why the Bible only applied the word "barren" to women. After all, we know today that men are as responsible for infertility as women. The answer he wanted students to give? That back in biblical times, they just didn't know better, so they presumed that it was only and always women who were the cause and never men. Thankfully, in our more modern scientific age we, of course, know better than the Bible writers did. That, then, was an example of why we shouldn't trust the Bible over science. My friend found this compelling – though she still believed Jesus was her Savior, the professor's question seemed to convince her that when it came to origins, we should go with the millions of years over the Bible's six-day account. But what if we questioned the question? His students presumed the question was fair, but the prof had an agenda, so why would we simply take his word for it? Does the Bible only speak of women as being barren? And if so, might there be a reason for that, other than that the Bible is unreliable? How might we approach this question if we weren't trying to undermine the Bible? Well, we might ask at least three questions: 1. Do we think the human authors of the Bible were idiots? The question presumes that in OT times, people didn't know men could be responsible for infertility. But these were farmers, raising stock, so they would have known about bulls and rams that couldn't breed. We also read about eunuchs – males made deliberately infertile. Or what of Ruth, whose had no children by her first husband, Mahlon, but had a child, Obed, when she married Boaz? Do we think nobody knew that males could be infertile? 2. If the Bible does only use it with women, why might that be? There are only about a half dozen women in the Bible specifically described as barren, or not able to have children: Sarah, Rebekah, Rachel, Hannah, Elizabeth, and Manoah's wife. Then of these six, half – Sarah, Rachel, and Hannah – were in polygamous marriages where their husbands had at least one other wife who was able to have children. So in three of these six we know the man is fertile. Of the other three marriages, is it possible that the woman was infertile and the man was fertile? It could be, couldn't it? So, then, one possible answer to the prof's question – an answer that doesn't concede the Bible's reliability – is that these women might have been described as barren because they were barren. 3. Is the prof's question even true? Does the Bible only describe women as barren? There is at least one instance in which the Bible speaks of males as among those who won't be barren. In Deut. 7:14 Israel is told that if they keep God's commands in this new land “You shall be blessed above all peoples; there will be no male or female barren among you or among your cattle" (NASB). The professor's question wasn't fair and instead of answering it straight up, his students should have challenged the premises. And as this video below highlights, there's other instances too, where Christians really need to question the question. Seventeen babies born alive — and then left to die in Alberta "Seventeen babies were born alive in Alberta following labour-induced late-term abortions in 2025 and left to die..... As a columnist more than 25 years ago, Danielle Smith called such second- and third-trimester abortions a 'horrific practice,' describing how 'nurses used to induce labour then withhold fluids from the baby until it died.'” But now they are happening under her government. Social media pushes pornography on children within minutes, report finds "Social media is now one of the primary pipelines to porn addiction for both children and young adults." 3 thoughts on how to choose your career John Newton, and Tim Keller had this trio of questions: Affinity: Do you enjoy it? Ability: Do others think you can do the job well? Opportunity: Is there an open door? Transgenderism - why we need Logic 101 in our schools "Would you rather have a live son or a dead daughter?" Parents around the world, wondering and confused about whether they should let their daughters "transition," got hit with this question. But was the only way to keep their daughter alive to allow the doctor to put her on experimental drugs to derail her puberty? Did they have to let the surgeon remove her healthy breasts? Dead, or drugged and disfigured? Were there any other possibilities? A false dichotomy is when someone presents an either/or situation when there are actually more than just two choices. Here it's being used to push people in one direction, by highlighting the only other possibility as even more unattractive. But it can show up in other ways. Rick, an abortion advocate, thinks pro-lifers can only speak up for the unborn if they're willing to adopt the children. Shut up, or adopt, he says, those are the only two options. But if someone attacked Rick, would he only expect people to come to his aid if they were also willing to provide food and housing for him? Nope – he'd be happy for any help, even if it didn't come with room and board. Beethoven's wig is very big (Symphony #5) Our school's music teacher had my youngest listening to selections from Beethoven's Wig, a clever musical group who sings lyrics set to the classical music you already know. If you liked this one, be sure to check out their Beep beep beep, also known as Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Politics

Should Alberta Separate? Why one Christian decided to vote no

“Canada is like an old cow. The West feeds it. Ontario and Quebec milk it. And you can well imagine what it’s doing in the Maritimes.” ~ attributed to Tommy Douglas, premier of Saskatchewan from 1944-1961 I am a true-blue Albertan, born and raised in this province, and I truly haven’t found a better place to live. However, with a referendum looming in October I’ve been presented with the choice of whether my allegiance is to Alberta or to my country Canada. In October, Albertans will vote on the question: “Should Alberta remain a province of Canada, or should the Government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada?” Maybe your back goes up immediately – with words like disloyal, unpatriotic, and betrayal going through your mind. Or maybe you feel disillusioned with Canada and understand why a province would want to separate. If I’m perfectly honest, I never felt like Alberta independence was a real thing. It’s been an idea at the back of Alberta political dialogue for my whole life, but mostly proposed in a joking way – “Wouldn’t we be better off if we were our own country?” But now the sentiment is real enough to send enough signatures on a petition to get the question put to a referendum. Despite my skepticism of independence, I have always been sympathetic to western alienation. But my instinct was still to vote “stay” – that there was something good about loyalty, that grievance wasn’t enough of a reason to leave, that respect for my country meant not tearing it apart. But my instinct was not enough. So, when faced with writing this article, I knew what I had to do – I had to go beyond my own feelings and impressions. I needed to go out and talk to other Albertans, to figure out what exactly was going on, and to hear in their own words why they supported or did not support independence. But more importantly than that, I needed to compare their thoughts and opinions to the Word of God. What should Christians think of all this separatism talk? Background Let’s first start with the “why” behind the independence movement. I have sympathy for western alienation, and in my view it started with the eastern provinces viewing the development of the West as a resource for them to profit from. And while that makes sense from the perspective of Central Canada, the West never felt fully included in Canada. Oil complicated this picture. It turned Alberta from a “have not” province based on farming to a “have” province based on oil, and gave it some power in terms of financial wealth. However, the federal government saw this as further resources to profit from, and implemented a series of taxes and programs to spread the financial wealth around the rest of Canada. For example, here is how one prominent supporter of Albertan independence, Tim Stephens, put it in a speech on April 10: “Alberta, having about 12% of the population of Canada, contributes nearly 20% to the federal tax revenue. And when this takes place, we have very little influence over the political future of our country. For instance, many of the elections are decided by Ontario and Quebec. And before people here even cast their vote, who our next government is going to be has already been decided.” There is a feeling in Alberta that many provinces in Canada are happy to take our money as long as we don’t have any opinions on either how the country is run or what the federal government wants to do in our own province. Separatists will argue that through all these years, Albertans have tried through various political means to reform this system, to give Alberta a louder voice in a country they fund. Their conclusion is that the lack of success makes separation our only option. So this is why I’m sympathetic to some of the arguments of the separatists. However, this raises several questions. Is “grievance” enough of a reason to base a new country on? Or even just the simple fact of being treated unfairly? God calls us to respect and obey our leaders, which means we have some responsibility in the place where we’re at. When do we judge we’ve made “enough” effort and our responsibility has come to an end? Lastly, there’s the question of the harm it would cause to our brothers and sisters in the rest of Canada. Even the mention of separation causes some economic instability. Is this justified? I’m sympathetic and yet I feel a deep loyalty to Canada, and the home it provided to my Dutch ancestors fleeing the aftermath of WWII, to my husband when he immigrated, and now provides to our family. “Personally, I argue that Alberta independence is compatible with biblical Christianity,” says Michael Wagner, another well-known supporter of independence, “but desiring Canada to stay together can also legitimately be a Christian perspective. So I don’t think the Bible requires Alberta Christians to support independence.” Each Christian needs to think about why they are voting one way or the other. Love for country, love for neighbor While the motivations for separation are understandable, so is the backlash against the idea. For those who love Canada, it stirs up strong emotions. It’s like a sibling threatening to leave the family or to go “no contact.” This is true not only in the rest of the country, but in Alberta itself. While much of Alberta feels alienated from the political apparatus out East, many still feel deep loyalty and patriotism for Canada itself. Some have even become Canadian citizens specifically because they love Canada, and don’t want to be part of a different country. This is why this issue has become so divisive. I began to reach out to various friends to hear how they’ve been thinking this issue through. “We have also been given political responsibility as those who vote,” one says to me. “In a small way, we are those who bear the sword when we vote, when we choose what we believe is right for our nation. It is not evil to make what one believes to be the right choice in that vote. What is evil is insurrection, rebellion, and violence. But a referendum (democratic vote) is none of those things. Nor is a free discussion about why we think a political decision is right or wrong. Christians should concur with the legitimate result of the election, but they are free to think and vote as they see fit.” It is true that mechanisms for provinces to leave have been worked out by the courts, and Alberta is not the first province to explore the option of leaving (see Quebec and Nova Scotia). It’s not immoral to explore an existing legal pathway to independence. But the motivations and reasons behind doing so may be. Take the issue of grievances. “It’s one thing to forgive a grievance when it’s in the past,” the same friend tells me. “It’s another to remain complicit when that injustice is still ongoing. We can love (an act, not a feeling) our nation without believing that the nation has our best interests at heart.” However, another friend argues, “As a father, I do not want to raise my boys to think that if you feel like you are treated unfairly, the answer is to threaten grievous harm to get what you want. That’s extortion and sinful.” He goes on to add, “A sovereign God has overseen this election, Carney is doing some good things in which I can rejoice, and I can pray for God’s hand in those areas that concern me and trust in Him.” Next, I decide to reach out to my sister and get her opinion. She texts back to me: “One of the things that comes up the most often in the Bible is ‘take care of the widows and orphans and the poor’ – will separating improve people’s lives? Right now equalization payments benefit poorer provinces – isn’t that a good thing from a Christian perspective?” I quickly text back, “One argument would be that the Bible teaches us to voluntarily help the poor, not that other people (the government) should make us help the poor.” She replies, “I would say that it’s more that we should have an attitude of helping the poor – including through the government.” That resonated with me, because it put into words something I had been struggling to articulate. If I want to keep Alberta’s money because I resent helping others like me in the rest of Canada, maybe my motivation is wrong. I might not agree with exactly how the government takes the money, but I should maintain my care for others even while I might advocate for better use of the money we send. Lastly, I decide to listen to a speech available on YouTube on a Christian perspective on Albertan independence. In it, Clint Humfrey, senior pastor of Calvary Grace Church in Calgary, urges Christians to support the cause: “That is what we need today here in Alberta. We need to expect great things from God and attempt great things for God... We ought to seek the relief of our neighbors groaning. We ought to seek the relief of our own groaning in our churches, but we also ought to seek the relief of our children’s future and the provision for them... If you have no hope, you will not be able to have the drive to see what could be done. And it starts with having hope in Jesus Christ for eternal life. And that then gives you the ability to have hope to try things… to try things all for the glory of God.” For a brief moment, his excitement fired me up. But his vision was not my vision, though I certainly care about doing great things for God. The energy and effort required to build a new nation is not where I feel God calling me to work today, even as I try to care for my neighbors around me in my quiet, ordinary life. Love for God I feel somewhat lost in all the arguments for and against. My husband is one of the people whose opinions I value most in this world. So, on a recent trip out of town I took the opportunity of discussing it with him. “Why don’t you support independence?” I ask. “Because it’s about money,” he says. “What are we supposed to do when we’re afraid? Rely on God and keep our eyes fixed on Jesus. Yes, things are hard for people and gas prices are high. But – ” he gestures at the fields as we drive by, “wouldn’t you say Alberta is rich?” “Ye-es,” I answer, thinking of the not-so-rich country my husband grew up in. “So Alberta is prosperous, let’s trust God will continue to prosper us.” “Okay, so what about this,” I say. “The argument is that the federal government does a lot of unchristian things with our money, and if we kept more of it we could use it for more Christian things.” “Really?” he says. “Do you really think Alberta is more Christian? Alberta isn’t more Christian.” “Why do you say that?” “We have all the same issues as the rest of Canada.” “But maybe statistically the number of Christians is slightly higher in Alberta?” “Think about it,” he says. “Say the Prime Minister gives us what we want – more say, and lets us keep our money. We’d be happy, right? We say it’s all these unchristian laws, but that makes me think it’s about the money.” I nod along because in my discussions I had come across many supporters of having more sovereignty but staying in Canada (and using this referendum as leverage to get it), or arguments that threatening separation had worked for Quebec so we should do it too. I think there are ardent separatists for whom nothing but independence would satisfy, and I hope Christians who vote to leave are not primarily motivated by the idea of leverage – but this group is smaller than the number of people who might vote “leave.” “So, biblically,” I say, “what would you say the Christian thing is to do?” “What does the Bible say? ‘Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s.’ That goes deeper than money – it goes to everything: respect, support, everything unless the government comes against our faith.” I nod again, thinking of something similar John Calvin said that I’d read a while back: “But Peter requires something more of us when he says, ‘Honor the king’ (1 Pet. 2: 17); and Solomon, when he says, ‘My son, fear thou the Lord and the king’ (Prov. 24: 21). For, under the term honor, the former includes a sincere and candid esteem, and the latter, by joining the king with God, shows that he is invested with a kind of sacred veneration and dignity...” My husband looks over at me. “And you know what? The government is coming against our faith. Why not fight that more? We’re willing to stand up for our money, to fight taxes, etc. We’ll fight when the government takes our money and gives it to someone else, but otherwise we stick to ourselves because we don’t want to rock the boat.” He pauses. “There’s a reason God gave us this government, and put these people in power over us. Maybe it’s to teach us how much we need to call on Him.” I think about all the energy that had gone into this separatism debate, and whether it was distracting us from other things. He reaches over and grabs my hand. “Look at Psalms 35-40. I’ve been reading these in the morning lately. It’s all about the poor being oppressed. But who rescues them? God. Who fixes injustice? God. We need to cry out to Him. He’s the one who has our lives in His hands.” Later, I look up Psalms 35-41. In Psalm 37, I read: Trust in the Lord and do good; dwell in the land and enjoy safe pasture. … Be still before the Lord and wait patiently for him; do not fret when people succeed in their ways, when they carry out their wicked schemes. Refrain from anger and turn from wrath; do not fret – it leads only to evil. For those who are evil will be destroyed, but those who hope in the Lord will inherit the land. We can spend a lot of time fretting in our lives, over what we perceive as unfair, over evildoers “getting away” with something, over what might happen in our futures. But we don’t need to despair when God is on our side. *** I want to be fair, so I reach out to Michael Wagner by email. He replies: “The federal government in recent years has imposed policies on Alberta that undermine the well-being of many Albertans and their families. Looking for an alternative that provides a better future for Alberta has nothing to do with greed, ungodly grievances, or threats. Independence is an option that would make it possible for Albertans to choose political leaders who will adopt policies that will benefit Alberta rather than harm Alberta.” He also says, “It’s about justice, not greed.” I think about the issues at hand for many evenings as I rock my baby to sleep, staring at her beautiful face and wondering about the kind of future I want for my family. For me, my journey over the past couple years has been learning to fully trust God with everything in my life. To let go of control and really believe God will take care of my life. What kind of country do I want my daughter to live in? I think about the “what if” vision that the supporters of independence have put forward, a vision of a more Christian nation we could build if we could just start over from scratch. I think about how much easier it is to tear things down rather than to build them. I think about Canada stagnating, losing its place in the world, and what that would look like for my daughter’s future. I think about the nation that I love and what I would want to tell her about it. Ultimately I don’t have control over the future. It is enough if my daughter is able to trust herself into the hands of God. And in the end, I will stay Albertan AND Canadian. I don’t see a compelling vision of Alberta as a sovereign nation yet, and I haven’t given up on Canada. I haven’t done everything in my power to change the country I love for the better yet. And so I will continue to trust myself and my family into God’s hands....

Red heart icon with + sign.
In a Nutshell

Tidbits – July 2026

If Dad told only dinosaur jokes - Part II How can you tell a dinosaur from a peanut? Try lifting it up. If you can’t, it’s probably a dinosaur. (Though it might be a heavy peanut.) What’s the difference between a dinosaur and a pencil? A dinosaur is harder to sharpen. Why did the dinosaur cross the road? It was the chicken’s day off. What’s the difference between a dinosaur and a cup of coffee? A dinosaur doesn’t keep you awake at night. (Usually.) What’s red, has a long neck, and hates to be touched? A dinosaur with sunburn. How are dinosaurs and bluebirds alike? They both have wings. Except for the dinosaurs. What do you do with a green dinosaur? Wait until it ripens. What do you do with a blue dinosaur? Cheer him up. What do you do with a white dinosaur? Try not to lose him in the snow. Source: inspired by, and some borrowed from Charles Keller’s “Colossal Fossils: Dinosaur Riddles” How he learned he needed to preach Mark 2:28 Some years ago, on an early Sunday morning, a young Dutch pastor faced a quandary. A snowstorm had closed the roads between his house and the church and there seemed no way he could make it there to preach. But then he had an idea. The canal running behind his house went right to the church, so he could still make it there if he skated. But was that a good idea? Bringing the Word was important; however his church was very firm on Sunday observance, and skating was simply not an acceptable Sunday activity. He hemmed and hawed before finally deciding that if it was at all possible, he just had to conduct worship. So the pastor strapped on his skates, and though the wind was howling, he managed to speedily make his way down the frozen canal right to the church building. When he walked up the steps, he saw the congregation was already in place, and as he stepped in the door, the consistory was there waiting for him, grim expressions all. The elders weren’t pleased, but they liked their young pastor and weren’t eager to publicly rebuke him. So after some hurried discussion among the men, one elder asked the pastor a question: “Did you enjoy the skating, reverend?” “No,” he replied, “I didn’t enjoy it at all.” “Phew!” the consistory said as one. It was all right – skating on Sunday could be allowed, just so long as there was no joy in it! Source: adapted from Michael Hodgin's “1001 More Humorous illustrations for Public Speaking” Big Brother can’t be father or mother “We fear the government may be powerful enough to destroy families; we know that it is not powerful enough to replace them.” – Ronald Reagan Never read a Bible verse Mark Twain once quipped that a cat that’s sat on a hot stove will never do so again… but he’ll never sit on a cold one either. In other words, that the lesson the cat learned had been applied broadly, even to circumstances where it isn’t warranted. That notion – that we shouldn’t overlearn our lessons – has biblical backing. God regularly tells us to do one thing in one place, and nearly the opposite elsewhere. The starkest contrast is Proverbs 26:4-5, where God begins with why we shouldn’t answer a fool (lest we appear like him), before, in the very next verse, telling us why we must answer a fool (lest he appear wise in his own eyes). So when should you do which? That’s where wisdom is required. Another contrast? Solomon’s advice to be like the hard-working ant who diligently plans ahead (Prov. 6:6-8), and Jesus’ encouragement not to be anxious about tomorrow (Matt. 6:25-34). Contradictions? Not at all – just different lessons for different circumstances. Solomon’s advice was for the lazy, and Jesus’ correction was to those fixated on the here and now rather than on God. So don’t be like Twain’s cat who let one incident shape its whole understanding. God gave us a Book, not just a verse, so we should be sure to never read just a Bible verse – read His Word in the context of what else God thought it important for us to know. Know your history "Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian!" – commonly attributed to Henry Ford, but without any clear sourcing. Whether from him or not, the truth it captures makes clear the foolishness of socialist schemes. Have scientists created life? Every few years media outlets share a startling scientific advancement about how a group of scientists have "created life." A couple recent examples include J. Craig Venter back in 2010 for creating "the world's first synthetic life form," and Elizabeth Strychalski and her crew in 2021 who "crafted a single-celled synthetic organism that divides and multiplies just like the real thing." Why is this so important? Because there's only two explanations for how life began: God, or godless. And these supposed "creations of life" are seen as steps towards coming up with a godless explanation. So have scientists actually created life? No. They've tinkered, placing engineered DNA in already living cells. So, they began with life and ended up with life.  And as Jonathan Sarfati noted: "It took an enormous amount of intelligence to make this cell, and they borrowed a lot of information from already-existing cells. In particular, they synthesized the genome of Mycoplasma mycoides, with 1.08 million base-pairs (bp)3 and about 985 genes.... it cost US$40 million and 200 man-years to produce." So with their brilliant minds, supercomputers, lab equipment, refined chemicals, all sorts of intentionality, and a living cell to start with they've managed to create life. Which is supposed to show us something about how it all could have happened accidentally and unintelligently? Tell that to a devoted evolutionist and they'll probably tell you it's only a matter of time before scientists figure it out. But time hasn't proven to be their friend. When Darwin proposed his theory, he thought the cell was made up of "membrane, nucleus, and nucleolus" which was all that could be seen under his day's microscopes. The ribosomes, Golgi apparatus, mitochondria and other microscopic machines were missed entirely, and the nucleus was a black box – unknown and disregarded – which made it a lot easier to ignore God's fingerprints evident all over the cell's design. But since then every new discovery has shown how much more complicated single-celled life is than previously realized. That means the more we are discovering, the more and more impossible abiogenesis – life from non-life – is revealed to be. And the more obvious the need for a great Genius to be behind it all. Just be yourself, they say There’s a story told about Abe Lincoln, that when he was at a hometown soiree, he approached the lady of his interest and told her, “Mary Todd, I want to dance with you in the worst way.” And after a turn around the floor together, she could only say, “You wanted to dance in the worst way, and you certainly did.” Why not fund my educational trip to Europe too? Our professor had written for the local daily newspaper for decades, and explained that before universities started offering journalism programs, his newspaper would put all their new hires through a 3-month training program. When journalism degrees became a thing, the paper cut back their own training program to just a month or two, and required all applicants have a journalism degree. So a young man or woman who wanted to be a journalist now had to invest 2 to 4 years of their life, and a lot of their own money and taxpayer money too on tuition, to get a piece of paper that would save the newspaper just a month or two of training. That doesn’t math. Meanwhile the government could talk about how it was directing so much new money towards post-secondary institutions so we could have a more educated workforce. But at what cost? As has been said: “If your college degree doesn’t have enough value for you to pay it off, it certainly doesn’t have enough value for me to pay it off.” Boys, do you want this to happen to you? Dinosaurs didn't read. And now they're extinct. When John MacArthur visited a philosophy class… We, as Christians, are called to walk humbly (Micah 6:8). But let’s not get confused about who or what we are being humble about. It’s us, not God. That’s a point worth pausing on. We so often get things wrong and muddled, so we have good reason to be humble. But not about God or His Word. Yet somehow, there are all sorts of topics the Bible is crystal clear on that we’re still acting quite “humbly” about, reluctant to speak up in His Name. It’s time to get confident. For inspiration, here’s a story from the late John MacArthur. This is a man who’d proclaim God’s Truth just as boldly sitting across from a newscaster as he would standing up in a pulpit, but the point here isn’t his example, but his basis – he had God’s Word. "As a Christian, you and I share this in common: I see things clearly. I see the world clearly. In fact, I often wonder why I'm not on more programs giving the right answer to everything. It's all very clear to me. Everything is clear to me. I understand where the world came from, where it's going. I understand all of that. I understand why things happen the way they happen. I understand life and death and life after death and heaven and hell and morality and immorality. I understand it all. I understand why the world is the way it is. Why people act the way they act. Am I particularly intelligent? No. Am I particularly wise? No. I just have the mind of Christ here in this book. “I remember one time, years ago, being invited to Cal State Northridge to speak to the philosophy class and the professor was a former rabbi who liked to chew on an occasional fundamentalist. And so, I was going to be the bone for that experience. I went to the class and I was supposed to talk on the subject of Christianity and culture. Well, I didn't want to talk about Christianity and culture. I wanted to talk about the gospel. I think I opened by saying, something like, ‘….I know this is a philosophy class, and I know that you're searching for the truth, and I'm here to bring your search to an end.’ “That was enough to lose them all. They looked like somebody had shot off a gun in the room. So, I said: ‘I'm here to tell you the truth. Tell you the truth about the origin of the universe. Tell you the truth about why the universe holds together. Things that Einstein couldn't figure out. I'm here to tell you where the universe is going in the future, how it will end. I'm here to tell you about life and death and the afterlife, morality, everything you want to know. I'm here to tell you all of it.’ “And when I said this, the rabbi professor was as stunned as everybody else. “I said, ‘But no matter what I say, you're not going to understand it and you're not going to believe it.’ “And one student at that moment spoke for all of them and said, ‘How do you know? How do you know we won't understand it? We won't believe it?’ “I said, ‘Because there's a prerequisite. For you to understand this, you have to have been transformed by faith in Jesus Christ so that your understanding is opened.’ “To which he replied, ‘Well, how does that happen?’ “And I said, ‘Good. Now we'll talk about how you become transformed by Jesus Christ.’ And so I went into the gospel, which was no small irritation to the professor. I remember an extended time of sharing the gospel with some of the students out in the hall after the class was over. A number of them came to church and a couple of them actually joined our ministry here and professed Christ. The Word brings light to absolutely everything." ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Assorted

Ruin and restoration and our part

When the world falls into spiritual darkness and all you see around you is chaos and misery, what then? Kin Jong-un and Vladimir Putin meeting in China last year – North Korea has been supplying Russia with troops for their war with Ukraine since as early as 2024. 1 Isaiah, in chapter 24, spoke of how “The earth is utterly broken, the earth is split apart, the earth is violently shaken.” Was he speaking only to the people of his day about the earth being broken? Was he judging the nations of his time about the world being violently shaken? Or was he also speaking to the nations of the world today? Are our present lives, and the lives of those around us, in a state of rebellion against Almighty God? Ruins all around Most people enjoy eating a fine smorgasbord. As a matter of fact, the Chinese Mandarin restaurant is one of my favorite places to dine. To walk by the mouth-watering dishes displayed, and to anticipate dining, is delightful. To deposit a little scoop of this and a tad of that on a warm, hand-held plate, creates thankful moments. There are other smorgasbords displayed to us, however, which do not generate pleasure. The world is actually a smorgasbord right now – a literal smorgasbord of brokenness – of ruin. No matter where we turn in the newspapers, no matter what we turn to on our laptops, there are ruins we can choose to read about, or literally see misery portrayed on our screen. Grim headlines underline this actuality. Our plate of daily current events is filled with somber, unappetizing incidents. Is this where Canada’s Bill C-9 will take us? Finnish Member of Parliament, and former leader of the Finnish Christian Democrats, Päivi Räsänen was found guilty of hate speech earlier this year by her country’s Supreme Court for a booklet she and a Lutheran bishop co-authored in 2004 opposing same-sex “marriage.” 2 For example, it has of late been disclosed that the North Korean president, Kim Jong Un, is supporting a policy that requires soldiers to commit suicide on the battlefield to avoid capture, while fighting Russia’s war against Ukraine. For example, it has been verified that twenty-nine Christians were massacred in the Islamic state of Nigeria, during a soccer match in the spring of this year, 2026. The attack took place on a Sunday, included the torching of a church, and most of the victims were youths and women. For example, earlier this year of 2026, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Canada, investigated a Dr. MacLean of London, Ontario. Dr. MacLean diagnosed a man with inflammatory bowel disease while sitting with him in a car outside a Tim Horton’s. Afterwards, he personally drove this man, who was prone to depression, to a MAiD location where his life was ended. Dr. MacClean was only verbally cautioned by CPSO. For example, Canadian Bill C-9, also known as the Combatting Hate Act, passed the House of Commons, Senate and received Royal Assent. It removed the religious defence to hate speech in the Criminal Code. For example, the horrible tragedy of the earthquakes which have hit Venezuela. Venezuelan morgues are filling up rapidly. At the end of June 2026, the actual death toll was reported to be more than 2,300. However, the projected number of people missing and presumed dead, is running into many thousands more. Dead children arrive at morgues, so badly decomposed that they are unrecognizable. These smorgasbord current events detail a world that is a far cry from the “It was good” phrase, in Genesis 1. They reflect a world fallen into sin. Are we part of God’s restoration? Should we, therefore, mourn and lament over these present evil times? It is a fact, that like Jeremiah lamented, it is not a bad thing for us also to weep over worldwide sin. However, it is also a good thing to sit down and examine ourselves, to study our own hearts carefully, to make sure that our motives, our interactions with others and our priorities, are not in any way contributing to the evil around us. For example, do we encourage our next-door neighbors to live without fear? Does our joy in the prospect of life eternal, reflect in loving our neighbors, in bringing them both soup and the Gospel? For example, do we speak openly about these disasters with people we meet? Do we know our Bible well enough to testify with a smile that “God is our refuge and our strength” and that “therefore we will not fear” (Ps. 46)? When those nearby have a cast-down soul, can we boldly, like the Reformers before us, boost the spirits of those around us with personal anecdotes of answered prayer and songs of cheer? It is said of Luther, who loved the 46th Psalm dearly, that when his companions were cast down because of the seeming strength of the opposition, he would say: “Come, let us sing the Forty-Sixth Psalm, friends.” For example, do we testify to those dying in pain on a hospital bed, Jesus’ words in John 14 that their hearts ought not to be troubled? And can we explain why their hearts ought not to be troubled? Can we percolate the steadfast faith of Job to friends? Can we say with certainty to others, “I know that my Redeemer lives”? The evangelist, John Wesley, died on March 2,1791, at the age of 87. As he lay dying, with a group of friends gathered around his bed, Wesley’s last words were from Psalm 46, “The best of all is, God is with us.” He repeated this as he lifted his arms: "The best of all is, God is with us.” My niece’s daughter, Amy, died more than a month ago. She was thirty-five years old and had special-needs – but a person who knew and loved the Lord Jesus. A small story was told of her during the funeral. Amy had a friend whose name was Melissa. Melissa could not speak. During a Special Olympics day for those with special-needs, there was a race – a walking race from one point to another. Amy’s friend was participating in that race. But as she began to walk with all the other contestants, she suddenly froze. She seemed to be afraid and not able to move. Amy saw that her friend was afraid and walked away from the sidelines where she was watching and came up to Melissa. She took Melissa’s hand and told her it was all right. And Amy and Melissa finished that race together. And though this world, with devils filled, should threaten to undo us, we will not fear, for God has willed His truth to triumph through us. ***** 1 Photo credit: The President of the Russian Federation website www.kremlin.ru, and used under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. 2 Photo credit: Modified from a picture by Lauri Heikkinen and the Finnish Government and used under a CC by 2.0 Attribution 2.0 Generic license....

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41