Transparent heart icon with white outline and + sign.

Life's busy, read it when you're ready!

Create a free account to save articles for later, keep track of past articles you’ve read, and receive exclusive access to all RP resources.

White magnifying glass.

Search thousands of RP articles

Equipping Christians to think, speak, and act

Open envelope icon with @ symbol

Get Articles Delivered!

Equipping Christians to think, speak, and act delivered direct to your Inbox!

Log In Create an Account Contact Us

Save articles for later, keep track of past articles you’ve read, and receive exclusive access to all RP resources.





Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Children’s fiction

Pollyanna

by Eleanor H. Porter 1913 / 198 pages Pollyanna’s father and mother were poor missionaries, and when they died she was sent to her Aunt Polly who is not poor, and not very nice – she’s the sort who thinks children shouldn’t be seen or heard. So how is Pollyanna going to win over her crusty aunty? With her sunny disposition of course! Before he died, Pollyanna’s father taught her the “glad game” where the pair would search out the silver lining for their troubles. So when Pollyanna was hoping a doll might come with the latest mission barrel, and all it had was a pair of crutches, she was glad that at least she didn’t need them. When Pollyanna brings the glad game to her new town she manages to charm even the grumpiest of residents... including her aunt. While this is a 100-year-old story, it is still a readable treat. Do buy a copy with a modern cover, to help your daughter want to pick it up. Or read it to your children yourself – you’ll benefit as much as them, learning how to see things like Pollyanna does. There is one shocking/sad moment that could cause young listeners some distress – Pollyanna gets hurt quite badly. I peeked ahead and made sure that the chapter with the accident was the first one I read that night, and then I kept on reading the next couple chapters so we could finish on a happier note. That helped my audience work through this tense section. Recommended for readers in Grade Two and up....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews

Curious George: the TV series

Animated / TV / Children 2006-2022 / 24 min x 198 episodes Rating: 8/10 Curious George is a monkey – or is he? As I learned from Larry the Cucumber in an educational VeggieTales Silly Song: "If it doesn't have a tail it's not a monkey, even if it has a monkey kind of shape ...If it doesn't have a tail it's not a monkey, it's an ape." George does not have a tail, so, despite everything you might have thought you've known all your life, George is not, in fact, a monkey, but an ape. Mind blown, right? Regardless, George is curious, and his energetic investigativeness gets him bounding out into the world, making friends, seeing sights, and just generally making the most of every day. His curiosity can also get him into some trouble, but George is a good-hearted little monkey ape, so if he makes a mess, he'll do his very best to clean it up. And he also has a best friend/owner – the fellow mysteriously known only as "the Man in the Yellow Hat" – who is always looking out for him too. This is a decidedly pleasant show that models attitudes we'd love our kids to imitate, which isn't always true in children's fare. Everyone here is just so good-humored, happy, and maybe above all, innocent, whether it's George himself, or his friend Bill, a country kid who thinks George is a "city kid." This is a world in which bullies and means girls don't exist, which is just fine for its preschool audience. It's also not dumb. Some kids' stuff is so dull or repetitious that dad will be able to feel his brain cells dying off if he has to sit through more than 5 minutes of the stuff. But you can watch an episode, or two or three, of George, with nary a brain cell protesting. It is kid stuff, but clever enough to keep an adult mildly entertained as well. Cautions Our family has watched dozens and dozens of these, and aside from a single episode that I vaguely recall as being a little too "green agenda" for my liking (and it wasn't a big thing), I can't recall anything worth a caution. I rewatched the first three episodes, each of which included two stories, and found it just as fun and innocent as I remembered. One caution would concern the original book series this is based on, where George's adventures are often a result of George flatly disobeying what his friend, the Man in the Yellow Hat, just told him. But that's not so in the show – George just has stuff kind of happen to him. His mischief is of a very innocent sort. That said, some of these TV episodes include an interlude with children telling us that “George is a monkey and he can do things that you can’t.” That's a thought worth sharing with the young viewing audience. Conclusion If you've loved the TV show, there is also a film series, which, so far as I've seen, is quite good. Check out my reviews of Curious George, Curious George 3: Back to the Jungle, and Curious George: Royal Monkey. Of course, that last one should say Royal Ape, but hey, if Bill can confuse George with being a kid, I guess we can be fine with the producers mistaking George for a monkey. Either way, this is a barrel of fun! ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Family, Movie Reviews

Belle and Sebastian

Drama 2013 / 99 minutes Rating: 8/10 In the middle of World War II, Sebastian, a seven-year-old orphan, lives  with a grandfather figure, César, high in the French Alps. There are two enemies they have to contend with – "the Beast," a wild dog who is killing sheep, and the Nazis, who are are also taking what they will from the farmers. The Nazis are also trying to stop the flow of Jews escaping through the nearby mountain passes that lead into Switzerland. Sebastian is largely left to wander around on his own during the days – César doesn't making him go to school. During his wandering the boy learns more than the adults suspect. He knows about the refugees. And he knows something no one else does: the "Beast" isn't a wild dog at all. Maybe something is killing the sheep, but the giant dog he met is friendly, and would never think about eating sheep. Sebastian cleans the gray dog up, turning her white, and names her Belle. This being a dog drama, Belle is not beloved as quickly by the rest of the town, or by César, who still think her a sheep-killer. But she wins them over, one by one, by coming to their aid, against wolves, and against the Nazis. Cautions Sebastian doesn't tell César about Belle at first, and young viewers should be told that they shouldn't keep secrets from their parents (or, parent-figure, in this case). One oddity: as he is being put to bed, Sébastien asks an adult sister-figure, Angélina, whether she licks her boyfriend's ears, because he's heard that's what "real lovers" do. It is a passing question, quickly swatted away with a smile that is meant to show Sebastian is indeed a seven-year-old boy, yet to develop any filters between what's in his brain and what comes out of his mouth. When it comes to language, the English dub seems to be problem-free, but if you watch it in the original French, bastard and ass come up in the English captioning, though that's pretty much it. There's lots of guns, but only a little violence. A sheep gets killed right at the start, and later on Sebastian gets saved from a Nazi soldier when Belle jumps in and bites the German. A smidge of blood is shown. The most frightening scene is when Belle gets shot. It might be unexpected for younger viewers, which will make it all the more shocking, though you can offer reassurances that Belle will recover. Finally, adults will realize that César's family and friends think he drinks too much (and they are right), but I don't know that kids will even notice. Conclusion This is a much loved story that has been retold again and again. It started as a French TV live-action series in 1965, became a popular French children's novel in 1966, spawned a Japanese anime adaption in the 1980s, before being adapted for the silver screen in this version. And it has returned to TV since, in a French-Canadian production in 2017. Though it is not a true story, it is true that Jews escaped through the Pyrenees mountain passes, and were helped by the locals, who were risking their own lives in offering aid. So this is a fun one from a historical perspective. Titled Belle et Sébastien in the original French, its foreign origin gives it a slightly different rhythm and style that brings with it a novel appeal. Wide, lingering shots of the snowy mountain tops and valleys, and frequent quiet conversations give this an overall calm feel, but it isn't too much so – there are still Nazis to contend with and wolves to chase away. That said, it might be too calm for littles used to non-stop frenetic action. And the scary scenes will be a bit much for under 9 too. The English-dubbed version is more readily available, but if you don't mind reading captions, try to find the original French edition, Belle et Sébastien. I think hearing the actors' own voices will draws you further in, or, at least, it did so for me (though there are a couple few words - see cautions above). And the French version seems to be about 5 minutes longer, though I didn't notice any additions. Overall, a great family film for 9 and up, so long as your littles are up for a few short frightening scenes. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

The Miracle Worker

Drama / Biography 1962 / 106 min Rating: 9/10 The one-sentence synopsis is: seven-year-old Helen Keller, blind and deaf, learns to communicate through the discipline and unpitying love of her teacher Anne Sullivan. But this teacher has more to overcome than just her student's disabilities. Helen's parents have let their pity stop them from disciplining Helen – she does whatever she wants, even eating off everyone else's plates during meals. When Miss Sullivan won't have that, Helen has a fit... and her parents do too! But her new teacher won't give in to any of their tantrums because she knows to do so would leave Helen trapped in a dark, silent world. It certainly ain't easy – in once scene Sullivan ends up playing defensive linebacker, just to get the charging Helen to stay in her chair. The scuffle goes on for ten minutes at least, with Helen even managing to flip Sullivan! But this isn't an action comedy – these are the dramatic actions of a teacher eager to reach a spoilt child who is in desperate need of help. Cautions Like many a Hollywood version, there are liberties taken, mostly for reasons of length, but as far as I can tell, these are mostly minor. The biggest abridgment is probably Anne Sullivan's back story. I suspect audiences of the day probably knew something of it before buying a ticket, because if you don't (like we didn't) it is a bit hard to figure it all out just from the flashbacks shown. There is one scene where Anne shares her time in an asylum. After losing most of her sight as a child, then losing her mother, and being abandoned by her father, she was sent to a poorhouse/hospital with her younger brother, who died soon after. It gets worse – that hospital was investigated for atrocities. When she mentions the atrocities to Helen's parents, she lists among them that there were some who kept "after girls, especially the young ones," a reference, I think, to pedophiles. Horrific, but quickly stated, and it will go over the heads of any young teens watching. (Anne was eventually rescued, and sent to the Perkins Institute for the Blind where her rough manners garnered her a rough landing. But she did learn, and graduated as valedictorian... and soon after headed out to educate Helen.) The only other concern would be for something not in the film. Helen's accomplishments earned her countrywide name recognition, which she used to popularize causes, including socialism and, at least for a time, eugenics. So you might ask, why even watch her film? How about for what it says about even a disabled girl's inherent worth? And, more pointedly, for what it teaches about the destructive nature of the pitying, belittling "love" that her parents offered. Destructive "love" motivated the eugenics of the past, and everything from euthanasia to the confusion around gender today, so this remains powerfully instructive. And, again, it doesn't even cover Helen's adult life. Conclusion What it does cover is a remarkable student/teacher relationship, and importance of discipline in raising a child (Proverbs 13:24). That's what makes this such a powerful and important watch – can you believe it, but Hollywood is preaching here that love isn't simply a feeling, and it certainly isn't just giving in to whatever demands a child makes! The story has been retold many times, but this 1962 version won two Oscars and remains the very best (and far better than the forgettable 2000 Disney remake). It is very good. Tearjerker, madcap in parts, a fantastic discussion-starter, and a black and white film that our whole family, 11 and up, enjoyed. I'd suspect this might be a hard sell to boys, but if you preview some of the 10-minute defensive linebacker scene, it might get them hooked too. Check out the trailer below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Graphic novels

Sir Ladybug

by Corey R. Tabor 2022 / 68 pages Pell is a roly-poly bug with a mission: he wants everyone to know just how important his friend is. Who is his friend? As Pell puts it, he is "duke of the dandelion patch," "the champion of truth and justice," "the one, the only, Sir Ladybug!" Sir Ladybug is different from most other bugs in that he has a sword. Pell is his self-appointed herald, and their snail friend Sterling serves as Sir Ladybug's very slow, but trusty, squire. More importantly, in a Dr. Who-ish quirk, Sterling's shell seems to be bigger inside than out, with bedrooms for all three, a kitchen, hot tub, and, of course, a video game room. In this, their first adventure, Sir Ladybug is recruited to stop a chickadee from eating a caterpillar. Now, birds gotta eat, and caterpillars aren't wild about getting eaten, so how is this dilemma going to be solved? Well, not wanting to give it all away, I will note that Sir Ladybug doesn't have to unleash his fierce swordsmanship skills... though he does have to get baking. And, of course, by comic's conclusion, everyone is friends. Caution The word "poop" makes an appearance, when a couple of worms pop up, and one notes that the chickadee shouldn't eat them either, because "Worms are very important to the ecosystem, you know. We aerate the soil. The whole world is built on our poop." There is also a "gosh" in the second book in the series, Sir Ladybug and the Queen Bee, and a mention of "bum" when Pell notes that the queen "has a very sharp stinger on her bum." In the third book, Sir Ladybug and the Bookworms, they briefly help a dung beetle, who is – as dung beetles do – rolling a dung ball around. So, a smidge of potty humor, but again, as with the instances above, the juvenility here is in keeping with reality, so I find it pretty inconsequential. Conclusion There are two others in this charming series of graphic novels for young readers. In Sir Ladybug and the Queen Bee they have to deal with a queen who is a bully, and in Sir Ladybug and the Bookworms our favorite bug knight sets out on a quest to return an almost overdue library book. Speaking of libraries, these come in hardcover, so they will stand up to some library usage. This trio of Sir Ladybug adventures are sweet, goofy, and have just a bit of quirk that'll appeal to parents too – these would make for a fun read together on the couch with your little ones. I sure hope the author keeps creating more....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Graphic novels

Wire Mothers: Harry Harlow and the Science of Love

by Jim Ottaviani and Dylan Meconis 2007 / 84 pages Many horrors have been done in the name of science. Wire Mothers is the story of how Harry Harlow combatted one of them. In the first half of the 20th century, psychologists were warning parents not to show too much affection to their children. That might not seem so crazy; after all, we all know parents who spoil their kids. But what exactly is this "too much affection" they are talking about? Here is how one prominent psychologist put it: "Never hug and kiss them." What? Really? Yup. American Psychological Association President John B. Watson encouraged parents to shake hands with their children rather than hug. That really was being promoted! This is misinformation that Christians at that time should have been able to see through. since there is a lot of kissing and embracing going on in the Bible – just think of Jesus's story of the prodigal son being embraced by his father (Luke 15:11-31). Many in the world swallowed this pseudo-science whole, but scientist and psychologist Henry Harlow wasn't one of them. He doesn't seem to have been Christian (at least, not from what this book shares), but he did understand that parents hugging their children wasn't the problem it was being made out to be. In fact, he knew it was a good thing and set out to prove it, using monkeys. Harlow rigged up an experiment in which monkey babies were "raised" by two surrogate "mothers" – each surrogate was a simple wireframe monkey body, with no arms or legs, topped with a simple-looking head. On the first "mother," the researchers included a milk bottle inside the wireframe, with the bottle nipple situated so the baby monkey could cling to the wire and suckle at this "breast." The second mother had the same wireframe body and simple head, but didn't have a bottle. Instead, it had soft terry cloth wrapped around the wire body. So which "mother" did the baby have an emotional response to? The one that fed it, or the one with the terry cloth body? While the baby monkey would feed on the "bottle mother," it would spend less than an hour a day on it, quickly returning to the cloth mother afterwards, where it would spend as many as 17 hours per day cuddling. As pale an imitation as this was to a mother's cuddling – this cloth surrogate had no arms to hold the monkey baby – it was a great deal better than the bare wire body of the first surrogate mom. Harlow also discovered that when a frightening stimulus was brought into the setting – a noisy wooden creature – the monkey would go to the cloth mother. And, after seeking comfort, it would then feel secure enough to go investigate this clanking noisy creature. Harlow showed that if a monkey was to learn, it needed affection and comfort and cuddling, even if only from this surrogate mother. That Harlow presumed what was true for monkeys would be true for mankind shows an implicit evolutionary bias, but it is never made explicitly. And while Harry Harlow probably had evolutionary beliefs, his findings are just as useful to Christians. An evolutionist might assume that monkeys and men have this common need for touch because we are related, but as Christians, we know that this is a matter of us both having a common Designer. God is love, so is it any wonder that love is also apparent in some forms and fashions in the animal kingdom? No, not at all. Rather than bolstering evolution, this story highlights what happens when we have science untethered from God. Why did these scientists convince so many not to hug their children? Because the world listened more to these supposed experts than to what God says in His Word. And that's never a good idea. Cautions I'll note a couple of language cautions: "crap" and "stupid ass." In the interest of thoroughness, I'll also note that while this isn't remotely titillating, there is a depiction of what might be the side of a naked woman, though with all the key bits covered up. There is also an episode in which Harlow gets rescued by a group of drunk navy sailors who sing (in the background) "I love to go swimming with bow-legged women, and swim between their legs." Any kid old enough to want to read this will not be impacted by either of these two concerns. Conclusion This is a great one for adults and older teens. It's important that both we and our children remember the many times and many ways that all-knowing "Science" has messed up in the past. As Wire Mothers shows, there are many scientists who are making pronouncements that go far beyond their findings. So, this small comic is actually quite an important book....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Graphic novels

Survival Scout: lost in the mountains

by Maxwell Eaton III 2023 / 144 pages Scout and her big brother have gone on a four-day backpacking trip in the mountains, but while he thinks of himself as a "nearly professional local guide," her brother hasn't known where they are for the last three days. So he can't get them home. Then, when he drops both his GPS tracker and phone in the river (what horrible luck!), they have to turn to the compass that Scout brought along. But, wouldn't you know it, a bear shows up, and her brother takes off with compass in hand, not to be seen again until story's end. So, that's the setup: Scout is now all alone, lost in the middle of the woods, with some of the basic supplies you should always have when hiking, minus a compass, tent, stove, and water treatment supplies, which are all with her brother. So how is she going to survive and help her rescuers find her? This might sound a little tense, but with the goofy brother starting things off, and a skunk providing Scout companionship, this is low-key throughout. It's meant to be instructional. We see Scout devising a shelter, and learn about others she could have made. Similarly, Scout shows us all sorts of ways to get a fire started, and the proper way to ensure it burns safely. There's all sorts of other lessons to be learned, but it's done in such an engaging style that even kids who'd never want to be out amongst the worms and bugs will want to read Scout's adventure. Cautions No warnings of note in this book but a sequel, Survival Scout: Tsunami, has a handful of evolutionary assumptions popping out about the age of the earth, so, you can give that one a miss. Conclusion This graphic novel is a lot of fun and would make a great gift for any kid who loves the outdoors. And for everyone else it will be a great borrow from the library. A third book in the series has been announced, Survival Scout: Lost at Sea, and I look forward to checking it out....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews

The Fox and the Hound

Family 1981 / 83 minutes Rating: 8/10 This one begins with an emotional punch to the gut – we watch a fox mother, holding her cub in her mouth, running frantically through the woods, the sound of shotgun blasts and baying hounds driving her even faster. In a moment of desperation, she hides her cub beside a fence post, then takes off, leading the hunters and the hounds away. And that is the last we see of her. But the fence post belongs to a farm. And the farm belongs to the kindly Widow Tweed. When she discovers the cub, she adopts the orphan and names him Tod. Next door lives a crusty old hunter, Amos, and his faithful and fierce and huge hunting dog Chief. They've got a new addition, too, a hound pup named Copper. Soon enough, Copper and Tod meet and become the best of friends. But as they grow older, they are told by nearly everyone that they shouldn’t be friends – that foxes and hounds should be enemies! Peer pressure and circumstances convince the hound to turn his back on Tod. That drives Tod into the forest, where he makes a new friend, a female fox Vixey. Tod’s steadfastness eventually wins back Copper, and even the crusty old Amos. Cautions Language concerns are limited to a "golly," a "gee," and a couple "gosh"s. The other cautions here are all for the under-10 set. Kids older than that should be able to deal with the emotional rollercoaster. As mentioned – and like many a Disney film in which parents don't fare well – the mother fox meets her demise right at the start. Thankfully it happens offscreen. There are other frantic scenes. About a half-hour in, Tod is running from Amos and his giant old hunting dog Chief, but the tension gets relieved when Tod gets away. Then, twenty minutes later, there's a scene in which the tension isn't really relieved, with Chief getting seriously injured after chasing Todd, and Copper vowing revenge. Then, in the finale, a giant bear makes a frightful appearance. Worth a mention is how kids will get hit right in the heartstrings when the Widow Tweed decides she has to let Tod go on his lonesome. Finally, like Bambi did before it, hunting is shown to be the domain of trigger-happy lunatics, so parents will have to explain that Christians can hunt, though they'll do it a lot differently than Amos. Conclusion While some reviewers seem to miss it, this is a morality tale about racism – Copper and Tod are told their kind aren't supposed to be friends, but thankfully, in the end, they don't listen – and that's what makes it worth watching and discussing as a family. But using a fox and hound as a metaphor for racial differences does lead to a problematic portrayal of hunters who, if we were to extend the metaphor, would be the racists of the film and basically the equivalent of the "Ku Klux Klan." So that'd be worth a discussion too. Because it involves a lot of frantic action, with Amos and Chief trying to kill Tod, this would only be appropriate for 10 and up. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Family, Movie Reviews

Lassie come home

Drama 1943 / 89 minuytes RATING: 8/10 No boy has ever had a more loyal and loving dog than young Joe Carraclough – each day when school is done, he can be sure his beloved collie Lassie will be there waiting for him in the schoolyard. Lassie is brilliant, too, able to tell time, bow on command, and carry Joe's school books. The two are inseparable. That comes to an end when the Depression hits England hard, and his family is forced to sell Lassie to the local Duke who has been trying to buy her for the last three years. Joe is crushed. But Lassie isn't away for long – the first chance she gets, Lassie escapes her kennel and heads back home. That'd make for a short movie, except that the Duke's dog handler knows just where to look for the missing dog, and takes her back from the Carracloughs. Twice. When the Duke takes Lassie to Scotland, it finally seems she is gone for good. But everyone is underestimating the loyalty of Joe's best friend. Lassie escapes again, and this time has to trek through wild forest, flee angry sheep farmers, swim through swamps, and fight off angry bandits. Thankfully, Lassie also meets some companions along the way, who help her when she most needs it. Cautions Lassie is attacked and bloodied, but the biggest concern here is what happens to one of her dog friends, a little mutt named Toots. When bandits ambush Toots' master, Lassie and Toots join the fight. They say it isn't the size of the dog in the fight but the size of the fight in the dog, but that doesn't prove true this time. The football-sized Toots gets kicked aside, never to get back up. That'll be a most unexpected tragedy to any children raised on modern fare. But Lassie Comes Home was made during WW II, and maybe everyone was tougher back then, including the kids. Those different sensibilities come out right at the start with the film's opening dedication to the author of Lassie Comes Home. We are told he, "survived the First World War as a British soldier, only to die in the Second World War, killed in the line of duty in the uniform of the country he had adopted... America. With reverence and pride, we dedicate this picturization of his best-loved story to the late Major Eric Knight." Yes, sometimes good men die for a good cause. So, would we expect less of a good dog? Conclusion This is the first and very best of the Lassie movies (and the only one to be nominated for an Oscar). And it is sure to make a dog-lover out of any boy watching. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Family, Movie Reviews

The Prince and the Pauper

Adventure 1937 / 118 minutes RATING: 8/10 The swashbuckling Errol Flynn stars in one of the earliest, and still one of the best, film adaptations of Mark Twain's classic tale of switched identity. Our story begins on a murky evening in the London of 1537, with citizens raising a toast to the birth of Edward Tudor, the royal heir. His father, Henry VIII, warns the little babe that heavy weighs the crown. This same night, in the poorest corner of the London slums, another boy is born, by the name of Tom Canty. His father also has words for him, cursing the boy for being born healthy and strong, because "it's only the sickly ones that can beg a farthing." Ten years later, the pair meet when Tom, fleeing a beating from his father, hides on the palace grounds. The pair are struck by their uncanny resemblance – the two could have been identical twins (and, in fact, identical twins Bobby and Billy Mauch play the roles). As part of their play, they swap clothes. Then, in a shock to both, they are mistaken for each other, and the guards throw the rag-wearing prince right out of the palace, leaving the bewildered Tom trying to get someone, anyone, to believe that he is not the prince. Where does Errol Flynn come in? He plays Miles Hendon, a poor soldier, who mistakes Edward for addled when the boy insists he is royalty. The boy certainly seems addled. When news of the king's death spreads among the peasants, he demands that they respect his royal highness – he is after all, their new king! That doesn't go down well with any of them, and when one gent starts trying to beat the lad, others are more than willing to lend a hand. That's when Miles comes to the rescue, whisking the boy away. Miles doesn't believe the boy any more than the mob, but he is willing to humor him... for a time. With the king's death, a coronation is quickly scheduled. That means that in just days, unless the two switch back, Tom Canty will be crowned the new king! Cautions The cautions here concern violence, but it is all at a level that would bother only the very young. Errol Flynn dispatches one of the bad guys in a swordfight, but the fatal blow is hardly shown. More notable is the beatings that John Canty gives his son Tom. While the blows aren't severe – more shoving than any punching – it's the notion of a father actually beating his son that will disturb some children. Midway through the film, when a priest tries to stop John from beating Tom (though this time it is actually Edward), we see John strike the man in the head with a stick, and the priest falls dead with a spot of blood on his temple. It's not gory, especially in black and white, So, this is no “Disneyfied” retelling, but the darker aspects are still greatly muted. (Speaking of, there is an animated 1990 Disney version with Mickey Mouse playing the two title roles. There are a few language concerns – a couple uses of "gosh," at least one use of "heck," and "what the devil? – but what turned me off was Donald "comically" praying at a tense moment.) Conclusion This will be a good leap off point for discussions about the backstabbing, corrupting nature of politics and why there is a need for good people to enter into the political realm. Adults may enjoy references to this history of the time; the story is fictional, but the background is straight history. Adults will understand that the reason King Henry VIII "hates priests," as Edward shares with Tom, is because Henry booted the Roman Catholic Church out of England when the pope wouldn't grant him an annulment from his first wife. Edward was his only surviving male heir and the son of his third wife who died in childbirth. And as the film also notes, there were still more queens afterward – Henry went on to have six wives in all. But the real appeal is the pairing of Flynn and Twain – a great story with a great star. At two hours long, this may test the patience of the younger Tik-Tok generation. But if your kids are able to sit still at all, and if you have an intermission ice cream break halfway through, and equip everyone with their own popcorn bowl, many a kid, 9 and up, should really enjoy it. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Teen non-fiction

Finding My Vocation

by William Boekestein 2024 / 154 pages William Boekestein wants to help young readers figure out how they can pick the right job, and like the good Reformed pastor that he is, he offers up three points.... or, rather, parts. In Part 1, “Pondering Vocation,” he covers what work is, and the different reasons that Christians have to want to work, like providing for our family, serving others, and as a means of expressing our gratitude to God. Part 2 gives us biblically-grounded tips on how we can start “Preparing for Your Vocation.” We need to make ourself valuable to an employer by fostering key character traits – honesty and respect for authority might seem bare minimums, but they can really set a Christian apart – and by developing specific marketable skills, like welding, framing, accounting, etc. The author encourages readers to be ambitious to make the most of the skills God has given you. And he reminds us also of the other vocations God has called us to, like parent, elder, friend, and more. Then in Part 3, “Practicing Vocation,” we’re challenged to work hard, and reminded that God does give us a weekly Sabbath rest. This is a solid primer, and could be a great tool for high schoolers, Grade 9 or 10, as they start planning for their post-school years. It'd be best used with a parent or teacher along for the ride. If I were to pick a nit, it would be with a couple of the appendices – “Is my vocation compromised by sin?” and “Is Military a Good Option for Me?” – that raise important topics, but in what struck me as too cursory a manner. The military question, for example, raised some cautions about women in the armed forces, but didn’t even touch on the issue of women in combat roles. It's one thing for women to serve in the armed forces when male and female differences are understood and appreciated, and another thing for women to serve in the military when the higher ups have started to pretend that men and women are interchangeable and want to have women leading the charge. But this critique – not for what Rev. Boekestein said, but for what more I wish he had addressed – is indeed a nitpick, faulting his 154-page book for not being a dictionary-sized tome instead. And he offers us some of that more I was after in his great conversation with Lucas Holtvlüwer in the Real Talk episode below, so be sure to check it out. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

Saboteur

Drama / Mystery 1942 / 109 minutes RATING: 7/10 This is World War II as seen from the other side of the ocean. Barry Kane is one of the hundreds of employees at an airplane factory in Glendale, California, and when the plant suspiciously burns down, he becomes one of the chief suspects. Barry knows he's innocent, and thinks the real saboteur might be a man named Fry, who he bumped into just before the fire started, But Fry doesn't seem to exist – the factory never employed anyone by that name – which makes Barry look even more suspicious. With the authorities looking in the wrong direction, Barry decides he has to track Fry down himself and takes off. He has only one key clue, and to make it even more difficult, police departments across the country are now on the lookout for him! Love-interest Patricia Martin is a girl he meets along the way, and whose blind uncle somehow knows that Barry is trustworthy, no matter what the police might think. Patricia isn't quite so sure, and seems as likely to turn Barry in as to help him. Together they follow the clues and cross the country, uncovering a network of fifth columnists – Nazi sympathizers and agents amongst the highest echelons of American society. But now that they know who's responsible, will anyone believe them? This cast does a solid job, and while there's no one you'll recognize, the director is a name you'll know: Alfred Hitchcock. He always brings the stark, dramatic shots, of course, but also a bit of oddness. His quirkiness shows up in this picture when Barry and Patricia hitchhike a ride on a circus caravan and hide out among the circus sideshow performers – a midget, bearded lady, set of Siamese Twins, and more – who end up arguing it out about whether they'll help the pair. And this being an Alfred Hitchcock film, we can expect the director to make a brief appearance on screen – look for his cameo just after the one-hour mark. Cautions The caution here is also a feature: this is a film for discussion, not just consumption, and the conversation will be of a Romans 13 sort (or more specifically, Rom. 13:1-7) – when should we, and when shouldn't we listen to the appointed authorities? Barry is fleeing the police because if he doesn't, the true saboteur will get away, and because the police, however unwittingly, are aiding the fifth columnists. But while his motivation is clear, some of the people who choose to help him are defying those same authorities for tenuous reasons. Patricia's uncle, for example, trusts Barry based on little more than gut instinct. Conclusion This was already well into development before Japan's 1941, Dec. 7 bombing of Pearl Harbor pushed the United States into World War II. That might be why the focus was on the homefront – American soldiers weren't fighting in the trenches yet when the script was being written.Regardless, Hitchcock wanted his audience to know the fight was already going on, behind the scenes, right on American soil. This is an enjoyable film, but not the sort you'd pitch folks who aren't already up for black-and-white films. Start them on other World War II fare like Casablanca, The SeaHawk, and  Desperate Journey instead, and if they love those, then they'll be more inclined to enjoy Saboteur for the great war film it is. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

Roman Holiday

Comedy 1953 / 118 minutes RATING: 8/10 Princess Ann is on a tour of Europe, and the masses can't get enough of her. It's no better inside the palace, where minor nobles, maharajas, and even the papal nuncio, all need to shake her hand. Can't a poor girl rest her aching feet? When the prospects of yet another day of innocuous speeches and forced polite conversation drive her into a tizzy, the royal doctor gives Ann a little something to help her sleep. But the moment the doctor is gone, so is the princess, out the window and down into the streets of Rome, hoping for some kind of adventure. But it's hard to have an adventure when you've been valium-ed up. Instead, the princess falls asleep by the side of the road, where journalist Joe Bradley mistakes her for a drunk, completely unaware she is the princess. He almost passes by, but stops himself – he can't just leave a girl out there on the street. Too sleepy or too stubborn to tell him where she lives, Joe eventually has to take Ann to his apartment, offering up his couch. The next day, Joe reports in to his newspaper. The front page story? The embassy is reporting that the royal princess Ann has taken suddenly sick. Spotting Ann's picture on the front page, Joe realizes he has the story of year still sleeping right there in his apartment. So he heads back and pretends ignorance about who Ann is. And under these false pretenses Joe, and his photographer friend Irving, give Ann the footloose and fancy-free day she has been dreaming of. But is Joe really going to cash in on his royal exclusive, if it means embarrassing the young princess? Cautions Nothing untoward happens, but there are enough "misunderstandings" that this isn't one for the kiddos. Examples include a valium-ed up Ann acting as if Joe is one of her servants, and telling him he can help her undress for bed (he does not), and a cleaning lady finding Ann in a towel (covered up) and angrily chasing her around the apartment because she thinks Ann has slept with Joe (she has not). Conclusion I hadn't watched this in twenty years and what struck me upon my most recent viewing is that it might be the film that inspired a million Hallmarks. The two key ingredients are here: a royal, and a case of mistaken identity. But this is the original, and the best, starting with the Oscar-winning cast, Audrey Hepburn and Gregory Peck. Hallmark films have been set in Rome (including the Roman Holiday-homage Rome in Love) but it's not the same as seeing the almost car-free, play-in-the-Trevi-Fountain, climb-on-the-Coliseum, 1950s Rome (as one critic noted, the city is the film's third star). And then there is the ending, which is completely un-Hallmark-like, and some won't like it for that reason. But this is a conclusion that will stick with you. Charm, Rome, and some laughs make this a great one for a mom-and-dad date night. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Graphic novels

Marley's Ghost

by Charles Dickens adapted by Harvey Kurtzman, Josh O'Neill, and Shannon Wheeler illustrated by Gideon Kendall 2017 / 129 pages This is a fantastic and faithful graphic novel adaptation of Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol using much of the story's original dialogue, with only the lightest (and very helpful) bit of modernization. The revisions are limited, with the biggest probably being a change of the Ghost of Christmas Past from an old, child-like, man, to now being a waif-like girl. Not sure why the change was made, but it doesn't impact the story. Then there is also the general abridgment, with the comic coming in at probably half the text of the original story. The original has some problematic spiritual content – ghosts of various sorts, including those of Christmas Past, Present, and Future – and this adaptation shares the same. So if you disliked the original for that reason, you won't like this one either. But I'd argue that is a mistake, as this story isn't meant to teach anything about ghosts or the afterlife. Dickens lesson is entirely about the here and now – he wants us to understand that money brings cold comfort – Scrooge treats gold as his god, and this deity only brings him misery. What's actually problematic is the alternative "god" Dickens proposes. While the God of the Bible is made mention of (less in the comic than in the original) He is not the source of happiness in this story. The god here – in both original and adaptation – is generosity. If you are generous, then you will be happy and your life will have meaning. Oh, Dickens, so near and yet so far! Still, with that shortcoming understood, this classic can be appreciated – Christmas is made much of, and if we remember what this day commemorates, then we can see Scrooge's transformation as a small reflection of the generosity and humility Christ showed in coming down to earth. Cautions This book has a loose connection to Harvey Kurtzman, a cartoonist most famous for his work with Playboy and Mad magazines. However, the comic is not written or drawn by him but is only based in part on a treatment he produced, so this connection is really rather irrelevant. I only mention it to note that as good as this book is, his other work isn't. Other cautions would be limited to the unnecessary additions of two words – "bugger" and "bloody" – to Dickens' original text. Would that this bit of "modernization" had been forgone! Conclusion This is a loyal and inventive rendition that will be more enjoyable to read than the original for most of today’s readership. And they may get more out of it than they would, struggling through the original....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews

Tangled

Animated / Family 2010 / 100 min RATING: 9/10 In the original Rapunzel tale, her hair is very long, but still just hair. In Tangled, these long tresses are used as a whip, swing, and even as rope to tie a bad guy up. But the biggest upgrade is that her hair now has the power to restore youth. It's this last addition that caught the attention of a very old witch. Our story starts with Witch Gothel whisking the baby Rapunzel away to a hidden tower deep in the woods. The magical restoration only works if it's adminstered regularly, so the witch wants to keep Rapunzel forever, so the witch can be young forever. Years later, a teenage Rapunzel is still in the tower, but not a captive exactly. As far as she knows Gothel is her mother, and if Mother says Rapunzel needs to stay in to stay safe, then that's what Rapunzel is going to do. Even if she doesn't like it. Then the roguish, handsome, thieving Flynn Ryder shows up, fleeing from this story's version of the police. He's the first man Rapunzel has ever seen, so, quite naturally, she hits him with a frying pan. Was it love at first "clunk"? Maybe not quite the first, but there were clunks to follow, so it might have been one of those. Rapunzel convinces Flynn to help her explore the outside world. Soon this becomes a chase film, with Mother Gothel, and all the King's men, trying to capture one or the other of the pair. As I reread the original Rapunzel fairytale I was struck by how it's more problematic than the Disneyfied retelling. The original has Rapunzel's mom and dad stealing a plant, rapunzel, from their neighbor. Their neighbor is a witch, but still, when did stealing become something the good guys did? In the fairytale, Rapunzel gets impregnated by the prince before they are married, though children might not even realize (parents will clue in when Rapunzel talks about how, for some reason, her clothes are getting tight). So, Disney improved on the original by cutting these elements. Cautions The weirdest parts of this movie are a couple of brief appearances of a small, old, bearded outlaw who wears nothing but a diaper and wings. He seems to be imitating a baby Cupid. Really, really odd but, thankfully, very brief. There's lots of comic violence, with people getting hit repeatedly in the head with a frying pan. No big thing, except if you have kids young enough to think this is something they can imitate. There is an element of magic, but played mostly in a negative light – the witch Mother Gothel is the villain of the piece. Conclusion A niece loves this film and introduced it to our daughters, and in the half-dozen times we've seen it since, we've all enjoyed it every time. It might be a bit too frantic and at times scary for the under-10 group, but for everyone else, this will be a very fun pick for family movie night. Check out the trailer below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

Little Women (1994)

Drama 1994 / 118 min Rating: 9/10 Taking only minor liberties with Louisa May Alcott's book, Little Women tells the tale of Marmee March’s four daughters: Meg, Jo, Beth, and Amy as they grow up in the shadow of the US Civil War. Each sister is quite the character, with Meg, the older sister, who dreams of marriage and starting her own family, Jo the tomboy who wants to write, the sickly but caring Beth who is always thinking of others, and the spoiled littlest sister Amy who does some growing up, becoming a lovely young lady. This is all about family, coming together in hardship when Beth gets sick, and coming together for family fun too, like when all the sisters take parts in a play written by Jo. Oh, and there's also falling in love too! Cautions Nowadays, if a film isn't made by Christians, it seems almost a given that it is going to have some sort of vulgarity, blood-splattering violence, or woke agenda. Little Women has none of it. Yay! The worst I can think of is a few strange references to Transcendentalism (an early New Age movement) but it is referred to only in passing. Conclusion This may be appreciated more by the ladies: a female friend has watched this 10 times while her husband thought once was more than enough. However, if you are a fan, you'll want to check out the 1949 version, which is both funnier and sadder, but also a bit harder to follow if you aren't already familiar with the book. A 1933 version is over the top, but the 1940 sequel of sorts, called Little Men, is another good one. Check out the trailer below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

12 Angry Men

Drama 1957 / 96 min. Rating: 9/10 A movie that takes place in a single room? All dialogue, and no car chases or explosions? 12 Angry Men might not seem like it has the makings for an amazing film, but whoever I've watched it with over the years has always been impressed. This courtroom drama begins with eleven men eager to declare the defendant guilty – it's an open-and-shut case, so why waste time? But the twelfth (Henry Fonda) isn't so sure. And he isn't willing to convict a man without carefully working through the evidence... even if other jurors were looking forward to their weekend plans. So in the middle of a sweltering heat wave, stuck in close quarters with complete strangers, they start going through the evidence. 12 Angry Men is an absolutely fascinating look at how personal histories and prejudices can play a part in a jury decision. Cautions I can't think of any concerns for this one. There's some racism evident, but the worst language is a juror talking about "those kind of people." This is an adult film in the sense that your smalls aren't going to be interested. But it is a family-friendly film in the sense that kids of any age could be in the room with you and you wouldn't need to worry about what they might see or hear. The closest thing to a caution I can think of is that the 1997 remake has language problems (and isn't close to as good anyway). Conclusion I don't want to geek out on the film, but I will share one neat bit on its cinematography. If you're like me, you don't really note how a film is shot unless it's bad and gets in the way of the story. That said, there is one neat trick used here you might want to look for: watch for how the camera slowly descends as the tension rises. We start just above eye-level, and by the time the climax arrives, lots of shots are now coming from below, giving jurors an ominous shadowed look. It's cool what different camera angles can do. But the reason you should watch it is for what it wrestles with. This is looking at the whole idea of justice, and how apathy, prejudice, and even people's limited ability to logic things out, can shape the verdict. God has told us that it'd be better for a guilty person go free than an innocent man be punished (that, and innocent until proven guilty, are the implications of texts like Deut. 17:6 and Deut. 19:15), but is that how our justice system works? In 12 Angry Men we've got a behind-the-scenes look with a man willing to stand against the room to do what's right. Check out the trailer below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

The Shop Around the Corner

Drama/Romance 99 min / 1940 Rating: 9/10 While Jimmy Stewart is best known for his other Christmas movie, It's a Wonderful Life, this is the one that mom and dad should watch for an in-home date night. Stewart plays the young Alred Kralik, top salesman at the Matuschek and Company giftshop in Budapest. As top salesman, he serves as confidant and all-around-right-hand man to his boss, Hugo Mastuschek. When a young lady, Klara Novak, comes in looking for a job, it is Alfred's sad duty to inform her that there just aren't any positions available. But strangely Alfred's boss, in a fit of independence, decides to override Alfred and hires Klara. From the start, it's clear that Alfred and Klara have a little chemistry, but he decides she isn’t the girl for him. Maybe it was how they first met, but whatever the reason, the two of them just can’t get along. And besides, Alfred already has a girlfriend of sorts. He has a heart-to-heart, mind-to-mind connection with his long-time pen pal, and how can mere physical attraction compare to something like that? It just can’t! Before he rushes off to marry his pen pal, Alfred decides he should probably meet her once first. And it's at this first date that he finds out his pen pal looks a lot like the new store clerk…an awful lot like her! Turns out, Shop Around the Corner is a great counter to the Hollywood notion of love at first sight – this is love done write! Cautions The one caution here regards a backstory and the reason why Mr. Mastuschek decided to override his top salesman. He suspects Alfred of having an affair with his wife. It turns out that while Mr. Mastuschek is wrong about which salesman it is, he is right about the affair, and that drives him to attempt suicide. Thankfully he is saved by the store's delivery boy. This mature topic matter means this isn't one for the whole family, even though it is delicately handled. Conclusion Shop Around the Corner has been in Time magazine's Top 100 Films list, has a 99% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, and was popular enough to spawn two remakes. A musical adaptation, In the Good Old Summertime (1949), was done less than a decade later and stars Judy Garland and Van Johnson. This time the two letter-writers are working in a music store. Not as good as the original, but it is a solid 7. Van Johnson isn't as charming as Jimmy Stewart, and near the end even comes off as a bit creepy. That said, it is fun to see how this remake compares and contrasts with the film that inspired it. Another sequel is Tom Hank's You've Got Mail (1998), which was super popular, but which also takes God's name in vain. If you enjoy Shop Around the Corner, you may also like a couple more from the same director, Ernst Lubitsch. His To Be Or Not To Be (1942) is about a Shakespeare acting troop surviving World War II. And Ninotchka (1939) is a comedy about a loyal Russian communist who comes to Paris and falls in love with a man who represents everything about the West that she despises. There are some good and educational laughs in that one! Check out Shop Around the Corner's trailer below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Family, Movie Reviews

Twelve

Family / Sports 2019 / 92 minutes RATING: 7/10 Kyle Cooke is an 11-year-old baseball prodigy who's always the best kid on the field. When he gets cut from an all-star team – the coach picks his own kids instead of the best kids – his already impressive work ethic goes into overdrive. Kyle is going to make his next season the best ever, so he can take whatever team he's on all the way to the 12-year-olds' World Series. That sums up both what's great about Twelve and what's wonky with it too. If you have kids who aren't overly obsessed with sports then showing them a film about a 12-year-old who lives, sleeps, and breathes his sport could be a good bit of inspiration. If they really want to make their high school basketball team, or get onto the junior high cross-country team, then they need to put in the work. They could do with being more like Kyle. But Kyle, and his dad too, are quite a bit too invested in baseball. The saving grace is that theirs is a love-of-the-game kind of obsession and not a win-at-any-costs kind of thing. The dad proves he's too into baseball when he lets his generally solid sportsmanship slip after his son gets cut unfairly from the all-star team. And Kyle shows he's too obsessed in that his life doesn't have anything else to it but baseball. That said, he is respectful to coaches and to his dad. And even though he is by far the best player on his new team, he doesn't have an inflated ego around his teammates. So, the pluses are some fun training montages, cute interactions between him and his big brother (and his big brother's girlfriend, who is rooting for him), lots of drive and determination, and a fairly low tension level, which might be nice for the 10-12 year-old target audience – there's never really any doubt that Kyle is going to go all the way. Cautions The most notable negative is, again, just how seriously this family takes baseball, getting pretty close to a substitute religion, moderated only by the fact that the two boys aren't obsessed with winning (Kyle is super confident he will win, but he doesn't get all stressed out about it). Language concerns are minor: Kyle's brother "X" almost says a bad word, starting off with "bullsh..." before ending on a better note with "....shoes." Dad does it once too. Oh, and if you try to stream this, beware of the 2010 film of the same name which is about drugs, not sports. Conclusion The consensus in our house rated Twelve a solid 7. The one holdout didn't like the abrupt ending and dropped her initial 10 all the way down to a 0 – she wanted a little bit longer with these characters, but the final credits start just a couple of minutes after the climax. So, take that for what you will. If you're looking for sports flick with some good camaraderie, and not too much of an edge, this will fit the bill... as long as your kids aren't as sports-obsessed as Kyle. Check out the trailer below for a good overview of the admirable and the obsessive. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

Unleashing Mr. Darcy

Drama / Romance 2016 / 84 minutes Rating: 7/10 My favorite movie of all time is a modern-day Mormon-produced Pride and Prejudice update. So, I am up for retellings. Whether you like or loath the Hallmark-produced Unleashing Mr. Darcy will largely depend on if you are too. This twist in the tale this time is that it takes place in the New England dog show circuit. Mr. Darcy is rich, of course, but he's also a dog show judge. And Elizabeth is a school teacher and a dog handler. The Bennet family has largely been excised, though her goofy mom remains. And Darcy's aunt, Lady Catherine de Bourgh in the original, shows up here as his Aunt Violet, every bit as snooty. What I liked about it, was all the thought put into translating the gist of Jane Austen's original into such a foreign setting. I thought it quite clever. What I didn't like about it was some of the acting. The male lead, in particular, is stiff – he got this on his looks, rather than his acting chops, I suspect. Cautions The only caution I can think of would be a brief glimpse of Mr. Darcy as he gets out of a swimming pool. He is shirtless for about a minute and, of course, has a six-pack. That relates to one other caution that would apply to most other Hallmark films: candy, in moderation, is a wonderful thing, but not as something to binge on. We all know that there aren't enough billionaires or royal suitors to go around, and since you are what you eat, too many Hallmark films might have a young teen thinking she's going to have to settle for someone ordinary. But choosing reality over fantasy isn't settling! Conclusion To sum up, this is a clever script, with okay performances, safe for the whole family. There is a sequel, Marrying Mr. Darcy, that might interest some. But because it takes things past the conclusion of Austen's book, there isn't the same clever reworking of her classic. This sequel is a wholly original story, but too much like every other Hallmark story to be at all original. If you liked the actors, then you may like the sequel too – it is another dose of safe viewing. But if, like me, you appreciated the first movie for how it put a new spin on Pride and Prejudice (this time with dogs!), then the sequel won't satisfy. I almost didn't include Unleashing Mr. Darcy's trailer, because it's terrible. The film isn't going to win an Oscar, but it is way better than this makes it look. ...

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8