Transparent heart icon with white outline and + sign.

Life's busy, read it when you're ready!

Create a free account to save articles for later, keep track of past articles you’ve read, and receive exclusive access to all RP resources.

White magnifying glass.

Search thousands of RP articles

Equipping Christians to think, speak, and act

Open envelope icon with @ symbol

Get Articles Delivered!

Equipping Christians to think, speak, and act delivered direct to your Inbox!





Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Children’s non-fiction

The Moon is Always Round

by Jonathan Gibson 2019 / 32 pages This picture book is a beautiful catechism truth wrapped in a heartbreaking story of loss. Author Jonathan Gibson places his son Ben as the lead character. Through Ben, we look outside at the night sky and see the moon in its different stages. Sometimes it’s sliced like an apple. At other times it's shriveled like an orange. But no matter what shape the moon appears to be, Ben knows that the moon is always round. When Ben’s little sister Leila passes away at 39 weeks gestation, Ben must rely on faith, not sight. Although God does not appear to be good, his goodness extends even beyond Leila’s death. God is always good. Short, simple phrases leave room for the reader to pause and contemplate the story as it unfolds. Kids will love saying along with Ben’s dad, “but the moon is always round” when Ben wonders if the moon has really changed. At the climax of the book, Ben’s dad asks him what that means. It feels natural for kids and parents to answer with Ben that “God is always good.” While this book deals with heavy topics, simple sentences for big truths are what make this book profound. The book closes on a sweet note – a family picnic, a beautiful sunset, a full moon, and the words from Psalm 100:5: “For the Lord is good; his steadfast love endures forever, and his faithfulness to all generations.” Children aged 4-8 will gain the most from Gibson’s simple catechism. Younger readers will love hunting for the yellow daffodils sprinkled inside the vibrant pictures. However, even older children and adults will be touched by this sweet, sad story honoring Gibson’s stillborn daughter, Leila....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Adult non-fiction, Book Reviews

Trusting God

by Jerry Bridges 1988 / 368 pages Since the apostles Peter and Paul, and indeed Jesus, warn the Christian to expect suffering in this life on account of our faith, it would be wise for us to prepare our hearts to be able to suffer well. Trusting God is a great resource for such preparation. Bridges spends the first few chapters exploring hard questions like “Can I really trust God?” and “Is God actually in control?” Much of the value here is that Bridges doesn’t require that readers be in the depths of a trying event, but instead invites us to reflect on how well we trust God in even the smaller difficulties in life – the “stubbed toe” frustrations of daily life, or the far-away wars, that make us long for heavenly explanations. Bridges uses many examples from the Old Testament to prove to the believer that God does control the course of this world, He is very in tune with our sorrows, and He truly weeps with those who weep. While Bridges is writing for the layperson, he reminds us that we are dealing with heavy and complicated topics. Therefore, while this book is very useful for preparing our hearts to suffer well, it may be too “on the nose” for those are hurting, depressed, or struggling right now. This is best read before you ever need it. Trusting God concludes with several chapters on the love and faithfulness of God, which gives balance to the topic as a whole. Discussion questions are included at the back for each chapter, making this an excellent recommendation for a book club study....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Adult non-fiction, Book Reviews

Digital Liturgies

Rediscovering Christian Wisdom in an Online Age (with study questions) by Samuel D. James 2023 / 184 pages As I read Digital Liturgies, I kept being vaguely bothered by the title and the cover. This looks like an abstract, philosophical book – useful in its own way, but not necessarily a helpful read for the average Christian, who might pick up something like Andy Crouch’s The Tech-Wise Family instead. I only cracked it open because of a recommendation – and was surprised to find it a very accessible, relevant, and important book about our technology-immersed world. In the author’s own words, this book is about the “spiritually formative power of the web.” James points out that, as Christians, we’re very aware of the dangerous content online; but we may not realize how much we’re influenced, and not in a biblical direction, by the medium itself. He explains the underlying philosophy of “expressive individualism,” and how it plays out in many harmful and problematic ways. He describes the “liturgies” of the online world: authenticity – “my story, my truth outrage – James likens the web to a “gladiator arena” shame – “cancel culture”/online “mobs” consumption – specifically of pornography meaninglessness – “death by minutiae” James further talks about how technology is “rewiring” our brains: “Conversation is harder, reading is much more of a slog, and mental busyness is so alluring I almost feel restless when I’m not distracted.... All of us seem to feel like we’re in some kind of spiritual and intellectual haze.” Yes, some of his arguments get a little academic (like the section where James delves into personal computing’s roots in transhuman philosophy), and I admit I didn’t follow every detail. Whether you’re interested in getting quite that deep or not, though, you’ll find a lot to ponder and use in James’ book. As I finished it, I was also struck by how my first complaint with the book was actually a reinforcement of one of the book’s arguments: my Internet-trained brain wanted something catchier, splashier, more attention-grabbing. Maybe it’s time for us as Christians to start deliberately re-training our brains – with the help of resources such as this one, but, more importantly, as we’re “transformed by the renewal of our minds” through the work of the Spirit (Romans 12:2). You can listen to the author discuss his book on the What Would Jesus Tech podcast below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

Gold Rush

Comedy / Silent (sort of) 1925 / 96 min RATING: 7/10 It's been 100 years now since Charlie Chaplin crafted his most famous film. He had two goes at this, actually, with the first, silent version coming out in 1925. Then, in 1942 he decided to re-release it, but this time with sound effects, music, and narration, garnering this updated edition a couple of Oscar nominations in the musical score and sound categories. If you are ever going to do a dive into silent films then you have to check out Gold Rush, Chaplin's best and most iconic go at his Tramp character. It is an all-time classic (even if there are a few even better silent films by Buster Keaton), making it onto the American Film Institute’s list of the 100 best films of the last 100 years. It begins with the Tramp heading to the Yukon to prospect for gold. The Tramp has the worst of luck – Chaplin’s films always have a good mix of tragedy thrown in with the comedy – so before too long the Tramp gets mixed up with a couple tough characters, gets lost in a snowstorm, becomes so hungry he eats his shoe, and then, after all that, he falls in love with a beautiful girl who barely notices he’s alive. Of course, in the end the girl can’t resist the Tramp’s simple charms – Chaplin’s films all do have happy endings. Cautions None to really note. Conclusion If you've never watched a silent film before, this should not be your first. Give the shorter and quicker-paced Buster Keaton movies Seven Chances, or Sherlock Jr. a go instead. Afterwards, if you've enjoyed those, then consider this all-time classic. Find a fully restored version, and think of it as a time-travel experiment, looking back at not just another era, but almost another world. The actual Alaskan Gold Rush took place just 25 years before this film was first made, so while I'm not pitching this as a realistic look, it is intriguing as a comedic take on what was then, pretty recent history. Check out the trailer for a restored 1942 version (it says 1925, but that's wrong) of the film below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews

Chicken Run

Animated 2000 / 84 minutes RATING: 8/10 Sometimes whether you love or hate a film can be entirely about the expectations you come to it with. If you thought Chicken Run was going to be like other lightweight animated animal fare – Curious George or PAW Patrol – then you'd be disappointed. This tale of chickens trying to escape being made into pies isn't for the timid toddler. But if you were looking for a clever claymation homage to the World War II prisoner-escape films like Stalag 17 and The Great Escape, which you could share with your teens and tweens, then this is the film for you! Our story begins on a chicken farm, but with the hen houses surrounded by rows of barbwire fencing, guard towers on every corner, and a pair of vicious dogs circling the perimeter. Younger viewers might think this some rather over-the-top security for a farm, but dad can point out that this chicken farm is doubling as a POW camp. And if anyone is going to get the flock out of this camp, the right hen for the job is Ginger, the bravest of all these chickens, and clever too. In fact, it seems like Ginger could get out any time she wants, but the problem is, she can't manage to get everyone else out with her. In an opening montage we see one hilariously unsuccessful escape attempt after another. So, if they can't all get out through the gate or tunneling under the fence, what can they try next? Some of the other hens are content to stay, pumping out eggs and just keeping their cluckers down. But we find out quickly why this isn't a place they can stay: chickens that can't lay, don't live for long. Worse still, Mrs. Tweedy, the farm owner, is tired of selling eggs, and wants to get into the more profitable chicken pie business! So these birds have to fly the coop now... but how are they going to do it? Here's where Rocky the Rhode Island Rooster drops in... from the sky! Wait, what – can chickens actually fly? Well, seeing is believing, and Ginger saw it with her own two peepers. And now she has the best escape plan of all: Rocky will teach them all how to fly so they can just flap right over the fence! But why is Rocky so reluctant to help? Cautions There's all sorts of cautions that could be noted if you were watching this with kids under 10 – a chicken gets killed off screen, and all the chickens are threatened with death when an automated chicken pie-making machine shows up - this is just too tense for young kids. For twelve and up the caution would be language. When Rocky shows up, the only other rooster around, an old British soldier, calls Americans "oversexed." Other language concerns include British slang like "flippin' hell," "blooming' heck" and "thieving little buggers," along with two mice noting that eggs come out of a hen's "bum." Conclucksion This seems the type of film you'll either love or hate - no in-betweens. The stop-motion claymation trips up viewers, leading them to expect something light and fluffy, and the grit and tension that is key here leaves them with a bad taste in their mouths. But if you've watched any old war films from the 1940s, 50s, or 60s, then I think the odds are very high that you'll appreciate this too. My own kids have seen a dozen or so, and I think that's why the daughter I watched this with loved it too. So, recommended for 12 and up, with that proviso. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Children’s fiction

Pollyanna

by Eleanor H. Porter 1913 / 198 pages Pollyanna’s father and mother were poor missionaries, and when they died she was sent to her Aunt Polly who is not poor, and not very nice – she’s the sort who thinks children shouldn’t be seen or heard. So how is Pollyanna going to win over her crusty aunty? With her sunny disposition of course! Before he died, Pollyanna’s father taught her the “glad game” where the pair would search out the silver lining for their troubles. So when Pollyanna was hoping a doll might come with the latest mission barrel, and all it had was a pair of crutches, she was glad that at least she didn’t need them. When Pollyanna brings the glad game to her new town she manages to charm even the grumpiest of residents... including her aunt. While this is a 100-year-old story, it is still a readable treat. Do buy a copy with a modern cover, to help your daughter want to pick it up. Or read it to your children yourself – you’ll benefit as much as them, learning how to see things like Pollyanna does. There is one shocking/sad moment that could cause young listeners some distress – Pollyanna gets hurt quite badly. I peeked ahead and made sure that the chapter with the accident was the first one I read that night, and then I kept on reading the next couple chapters so we could finish on a happier note. That helped my audience work through this tense section. Recommended for readers in Grade Two and up....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews

Wallace and Gromit: vengeance most fowl

Animated 2024 / 79 minutes RATING: 8/10 The penguin is back! Feathers McGraw has been sent to jail – or, rather, the Zoo – as punishment for his attempted theft of the Blue Diamond, back in The Wrong Trousers (the second of Nick Park's "Wallace and Gromit" claymation, stop-motion short films). But how can Feathers escape from behind bars? Well, it turns out it's Wallace to the rescue... sort of. Wallace and Gromit are the reason Feathers was caught in the first place in the previous film, and Feathers wants revenge. Wallace's latest and greatest invention, a robot garden gnome helper named Norbot (short for "Nifty Odd-jobbing Robot"), has turned into a business opportunity. The little gizmo can make short work of any garden tasks, and Wallace has been hiring him out to all his impressed neighbors. The little guy does so well, he gets featured on the news... where he comes to the attention of Feathers McGraw. Turns out, Wallace made Norbot with a variety of possible settings, ranging from "Good" (his default factory setting) all the way down to "Evil." Feathers manages to hack Norbot and tune him to his Evil setting, so the little gnome turns imp, makes an army of cloned Norbots, and then their garden work becomes a cover for stealing all the necessary tools they need to set Feathers free. Wallace and Gromit have always had more gadgets than the most bombastic Bond film, and this time the homage has gone even further, with Feathers doing a great rendition of the very campiest kind of Bond villain, complete with secret submarine lair. This is one mom and dad will get and enjoy more than their kids, though I think boys will like it too. I'm not sure about the girls though - the black-eyed evil Norbot might be too creepy for their liking. Cautions Early on there is a brief scene of Wallace getting bathed and dressed for the morning, ably assisted by a half dozen of his machines, one of which tosses him out of his bath down a transparent water slide. We get three glimpses - a millisecond each – of Wallace's naked backside sliding past us in the waterslide tube. It's all just a pinkish blur, though it's easy to imagine a boy slowing it down to see what he could see, and even at half speed (which the Netflix controls allow) it is about a half second of naked claymation butt sliding by. The one other instance of potty humor is a scene in which Wallace accidentally knocks away the outerwalls of an outhouse, leaving behind a man on the commode, who is barely exposed – his sweater covers most of him – though quite shocked. Someone says "heck" and "butt." Conclusion There is a moral to this story: don't trust tech too much, cause it might turn on you. That might not sound all that profound, but when you consider how smartphones have taken over our lives, with not nearly enough conscious thought on our parts, the idea that some tech might well have an "evil" setting shouldn't seem outrageous. Overall, though, this is a tamer, funnier, more family-friendly version of a James Bond adventure. It does have its tense moments - the mood music will definitely set your littles on edge – and evil Norbot's black eyes are disturbing. So, best for 10 and up, unless your kids are made of sterner stuff. Very fun! ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews

Curious George: the TV series

Animated / TV / Children 2006-2022 / 24 min x 198 episodes Rating: 8/10 Curious George is a monkey – or is he? As I learned from Larry the Cucumber in an educational VeggieTales Silly Song: "If it doesn't have a tail it's not a monkey, even if it has a monkey kind of shape ...If it doesn't have a tail it's not a monkey, it's an ape." George does not have a tail, so, despite everything you might have thought you've known all your life, George is not, in fact, a monkey, but an ape. Mind blown, right? Regardless, George is curious, and his energetic investigativeness gets him bounding out into the world, making friends, seeing sights, and just generally making the most of every day. His curiosity can also get him into some trouble, but George is a good-hearted little monkey ape, so if he makes a mess, he'll do his very best to clean it up. And he also has a best friend/owner – the fellow mysteriously known only as "the Man in the Yellow Hat" – who is always looking out for him too. This is a decidedly pleasant show that models attitudes we'd love our kids to imitate, which isn't always true in children's fare. Everyone here is just so good-humored, happy, and maybe above all, innocent, whether it's George himself, or his friend Bill, a country kid who thinks George is a "city kid." This is a world in which bullies and means girls don't exist, which is just fine for its preschool audience. It's also not dumb. Some kids' stuff is so dull or repetitious that dad will be able to feel his brain cells dying off if he has to sit through more than 5 minutes of the stuff. But you can watch an episode, or two or three, of George, with nary a brain cell protesting. It is kid stuff, but clever enough to keep an adult mildly entertained as well. Cautions Our family has watched dozens and dozens of these, and aside from a single episode that I vaguely recall as being a little too "green agenda" for my liking (and it wasn't a big thing), I can't recall anything worth a caution. I rewatched the first three episodes, each of which included two stories, and found it just as fun and innocent as I remembered. One caution would concern the original book series this is based on, where George's adventures are often a result of George flatly disobeying what his friend, the Man in the Yellow Hat, just told him. But that's not so in the show – George just has stuff kind of happen to him. His mischief is of a very innocent sort. That said, some of these TV episodes include an interlude with children telling us that “George is a monkey and he can do things that you can’t.” That's a thought worth sharing with the young viewing audience. Conclusion If you've loved the TV show, there is also a film series, which, so far as I've seen, is quite good. Check out my reviews of Curious George, Curious George 3: Back to the Jungle, and Curious George: Royal Monkey. Of course, that last one should say Royal Ape, but hey, if Bill can confuse George with being a kid, I guess we can be fine with the producers mistaking George for a monkey. Either way, this is a barrel of fun! ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Family, Movie Reviews

Belle and Sebastian

Drama 2013 / 99 minutes Rating: 8/10 In the middle of World War II, Sebastian, a seven-year-old orphan, lives  with a grandfather figure, César, high in the French Alps. There are two enemies they have to contend with – "the Beast," a wild dog who is killing sheep, and the Nazis, who are are also taking what they will from the farmers. The Nazis are also trying to stop the flow of Jews escaping through the nearby mountain passes that lead into Switzerland. Sebastian is largely left to wander around on his own during the days – César doesn't making him go to school. During his wandering the boy learns more than the adults suspect. He knows about the refugees. And he knows something no one else does: the "Beast" isn't a wild dog at all. Maybe something is killing the sheep, but the giant dog he met is friendly, and would never think about eating sheep. Sebastian cleans the gray dog up, turning her white, and names her Belle. This being a dog drama, Belle is not beloved as quickly by the rest of the town, or by César, who still think her a sheep-killer. But she wins them over, one by one, by coming to their aid, against wolves, and against the Nazis. Cautions Sebastian doesn't tell César about Belle at first, and young viewers should be told that they shouldn't keep secrets from their parents (or, parent-figure, in this case). One oddity: as he is being put to bed, Sébastien asks an adult sister-figure, Angélina, whether she licks her boyfriend's ears, because he's heard that's what "real lovers" do. It is a passing question, quickly swatted away with a smile that is meant to show Sebastian is indeed a seven-year-old boy, yet to develop any filters between what's in his brain and what comes out of his mouth. When it comes to language, the English dub seems to be problem-free, but if you watch it in the original French, bastard and ass come up in the English captioning, though that's pretty much it. There's lots of guns, but only a little violence. A sheep gets killed right at the start, and later on Sebastian gets saved from a Nazi soldier when Belle jumps in and bites the German. A smidge of blood is shown. The most frightening scene is when Belle gets shot. It might be unexpected for younger viewers, which will make it all the more shocking, though you can offer reassurances that Belle will recover. Finally, adults will realize that César's family and friends think he drinks too much (and they are right), but I don't know that kids will even notice. Conclusion This is a much loved story that has been retold again and again. It started as a French TV live-action series in 1965, became a popular French children's novel in 1966, spawned a Japanese anime adaption in the 1980s, before being adapted for the silver screen in this version. And it has returned to TV since, in a French-Canadian production in 2017. Though it is not a true story, it is true that Jews escaped through the Pyrenees mountain passes, and were helped by the locals, who were risking their own lives in offering aid. So this is a fun one from a historical perspective. Titled Belle et Sébastien in the original French, its foreign origin gives it a slightly different rhythm and style that brings with it a novel appeal. Wide, lingering shots of the snowy mountain tops and valleys, and frequent quiet conversations give this an overall calm feel, but it isn't too much so – there are still Nazis to contend with and wolves to chase away. That said, it might be too calm for littles used to non-stop frenetic action. And the scary scenes will be a bit much for under 9 too. The English-dubbed version is more readily available, but if you don't mind reading captions, try to find the original French edition, Belle et Sébastien. I think hearing the actors' own voices will draws you further in, or, at least, it did so for me (though there are a couple few words - see cautions above). And the French version seems to be about 5 minutes longer, though I didn't notice any additions. Overall, a great family film for 9 and up, so long as your littles are up for a few short frightening scenes. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

The Miracle Worker

Drama / Biography 1962 / 106 min Rating: 9/10 The one-sentence synopsis is: seven-year-old Helen Keller, blind and deaf, learns to communicate through the discipline and unpitying love of her teacher Anne Sullivan. But this teacher has more to overcome than just her student's disabilities. Helen's parents have let their pity stop them from disciplining Helen – she does whatever she wants, even eating off everyone else's plates during meals. When Miss Sullivan won't have that, Helen has a fit... and her parents do too! But her new teacher won't give in to any of their tantrums because she knows to do so would leave Helen trapped in a dark, silent world. It certainly ain't easy – in once scene Sullivan ends up playing defensive linebacker, just to get the charging Helen to stay in her chair. The scuffle goes on for ten minutes at least, with Helen even managing to flip Sullivan! But this isn't an action comedy – these are the dramatic actions of a teacher eager to reach a spoilt child who is in desperate need of help. Cautions Like many a Hollywood version, there are liberties taken, mostly for reasons of length, but as far as I can tell, these are mostly minor. The biggest abridgment is probably Anne Sullivan's back story. I suspect audiences of the day probably knew something of it before buying a ticket, because if you don't (like we didn't) it is a bit hard to figure it all out just from the flashbacks shown. There is one scene where Anne shares her time in an asylum. After losing most of her sight as a child, then losing her mother, and being abandoned by her father, she was sent to a poorhouse/hospital with her younger brother, who died soon after. It gets worse – that hospital was investigated for atrocities. When she mentions the atrocities to Helen's parents, she lists among them that there were some who kept "after girls, especially the young ones," a reference, I think, to pedophiles. Horrific, but quickly stated, and it will go over the heads of any young teens watching. (Anne was eventually rescued, and sent to the Perkins Institute for the Blind where her rough manners garnered her a rough landing. But she did learn, and graduated as valedictorian... and soon after headed out to educate Helen.) The only other concern would be for something not in the film. Helen's accomplishments earned her countrywide name recognition, which she used to popularize causes, including socialism and, at least for a time, eugenics. So you might ask, why even watch her film? How about for what it says about even a disabled girl's inherent worth? And, more pointedly, for what it teaches about the destructive nature of the pitying, belittling "love" that her parents offered. Destructive "love" motivated the eugenics of the past, and everything from euthanasia to the confusion around gender today, so this remains powerfully instructive. And, again, it doesn't even cover Helen's adult life. Conclusion What it does cover is a remarkable student/teacher relationship, and importance of discipline in raising a child (Proverbs 13:24). That's what makes this such a powerful and important watch – can you believe it, but Hollywood is preaching here that love isn't simply a feeling, and it certainly isn't just giving in to whatever demands a child makes! The story has been retold many times, but this 1962 version won two Oscars and remains the very best (and far better than the forgettable 2000 Disney remake). It is very good. Tearjerker, madcap in parts, a fantastic discussion-starter, and a black and white film that our whole family, 11 and up, enjoyed. I'd suspect this might be a hard sell to boys, but if you preview some of the 10-minute defensive linebacker scene, it might get them hooked too. Check out the trailer below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Graphic novels

Sir Ladybug

by Corey R. Tabor 2022 / 68 pages Pell is a roly-poly bug with a mission: he wants everyone to know just how important his friend is. Who is his friend? As Pell puts it, he is "duke of the dandelion patch," "the champion of truth and justice," "the one, the only, Sir Ladybug!" Sir Ladybug is different from most other bugs in that he has a sword. Pell is his self-appointed herald, and their snail friend Sterling serves as Sir Ladybug's very slow, but trusty, squire. More importantly, in a Dr. Who-ish quirk, Sterling's shell seems to be bigger inside than out, with bedrooms for all three, a kitchen, hot tub, and, of course, a video game room. In this, their first adventure, Sir Ladybug is recruited to stop a chickadee from eating a caterpillar. Now, birds gotta eat, and caterpillars aren't wild about getting eaten, so how is this dilemma going to be solved? Well, not wanting to give it all away, I will note that Sir Ladybug doesn't have to unleash his fierce swordsmanship skills... though he does have to get baking. And, of course, by comic's conclusion, everyone is friends. Caution The word "poop" makes an appearance, when a couple of worms pop up, and one notes that the chickadee shouldn't eat them either, because "Worms are very important to the ecosystem, you know. We aerate the soil. The whole world is built on our poop." There is also a "gosh" in the second book in the series, Sir Ladybug and the Queen Bee, and a mention of "bum" when Pell notes that the queen "has a very sharp stinger on her bum." In the third book, Sir Ladybug and the Bookworms, they briefly help a dung beetle, who is – as dung beetles do – rolling a dung ball around. So, a smidge of potty humor, but again, as with the instances above, the juvenility here is in keeping with reality, so I find it pretty inconsequential. Conclusion There are two others in this charming series of graphic novels for young readers. In Sir Ladybug and the Queen Bee they have to deal with a queen who is a bully, and in Sir Ladybug and the Bookworms our favorite bug knight sets out on a quest to return an almost overdue library book. Speaking of libraries, these come in hardcover, so they will stand up to some library usage. This trio of Sir Ladybug adventures are sweet, goofy, and have just a bit of quirk that'll appeal to parents too – these would make for a fun read together on the couch with your little ones. I sure hope the author keeps creating more....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Graphic novels

Wire Mothers: Harry Harlow and the Science of Love

by Jim Ottaviani and Dylan Meconis 2007 / 84 pages Many horrors have been done in the name of science. Wire Mothers is the story of how Harry Harlow combatted one of them. In the first half of the 20th century, psychologists were warning parents not to show too much affection to their children. That might not seem so crazy; after all, we all know parents who spoil their kids. But what exactly is this "too much affection" they are talking about? Here is how one prominent psychologist put it: "Never hug and kiss them." What? Really? Yup. American Psychological Association President John B. Watson encouraged parents to shake hands with their children rather than hug. That really was being promoted! This is misinformation that Christians at that time should have been able to see through. since there is a lot of kissing and embracing going on in the Bible – just think of Jesus's story of the prodigal son being embraced by his father (Luke 15:11-31). Many in the world swallowed this pseudo-science whole, but scientist and psychologist Henry Harlow wasn't one of them. He doesn't seem to have been Christian (at least, not from what this book shares), but he did understand that parents hugging their children wasn't the problem it was being made out to be. In fact, he knew it was a good thing and set out to prove it, using monkeys. Harlow rigged up an experiment in which monkey babies were "raised" by two surrogate "mothers" – each surrogate was a simple wireframe monkey body, with no arms or legs, topped with a simple-looking head. On the first "mother," the researchers included a milk bottle inside the wireframe, with the bottle nipple situated so the baby monkey could cling to the wire and suckle at this "breast." The second mother had the same wireframe body and simple head, but didn't have a bottle. Instead, it had soft terry cloth wrapped around the wire body. So which "mother" did the baby have an emotional response to? The one that fed it, or the one with the terry cloth body? While the baby monkey would feed on the "bottle mother," it would spend less than an hour a day on it, quickly returning to the cloth mother afterwards, where it would spend as many as 17 hours per day cuddling. As pale an imitation as this was to a mother's cuddling – this cloth surrogate had no arms to hold the monkey baby – it was a great deal better than the bare wire body of the first surrogate mom. Harlow also discovered that when a frightening stimulus was brought into the setting – a noisy wooden creature – the monkey would go to the cloth mother. And, after seeking comfort, it would then feel secure enough to go investigate this clanking noisy creature. Harlow showed that if a monkey was to learn, it needed affection and comfort and cuddling, even if only from this surrogate mother. That Harlow presumed what was true for monkeys would be true for mankind shows an implicit evolutionary bias, but it is never made explicitly. And while Harry Harlow probably had evolutionary beliefs, his findings are just as useful to Christians. An evolutionist might assume that monkeys and men have this common need for touch because we are related, but as Christians, we know that this is a matter of us both having a common Designer. God is love, so is it any wonder that love is also apparent in some forms and fashions in the animal kingdom? No, not at all. Rather than bolstering evolution, this story highlights what happens when we have science untethered from God. Why did these scientists convince so many not to hug their children? Because the world listened more to these supposed experts than to what God says in His Word. And that's never a good idea. Cautions I'll note a couple of language cautions: "crap" and "stupid ass." In the interest of thoroughness, I'll also note that while this isn't remotely titillating, there is a depiction of what might be the side of a naked woman, though with all the key bits covered up. There is also an episode in which Harlow gets rescued by a group of drunk navy sailors who sing (in the background) "I love to go swimming with bow-legged women, and swim between their legs." Any kid old enough to want to read this will not be impacted by either of these two concerns. Conclusion This is a great one for adults and older teens. It's important that both we and our children remember the many times and many ways that all-knowing "Science" has messed up in the past. As Wire Mothers shows, there are many scientists who are making pronouncements that go far beyond their findings. So, this small comic is actually quite an important book....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Graphic novels

Survival Scout: lost in the mountains

by Maxwell Eaton III 2023 / 144 pages Scout and her big brother have gone on a four-day backpacking trip in the mountains, but while he thinks of himself as a "nearly professional local guide," her brother hasn't known where they are for the last three days. So he can't get them home. Then, when he drops both his GPS tracker and phone in the river (what horrible luck!), they have to turn to the compass that Scout brought along. But, wouldn't you know it, a bear shows up, and her brother takes off with compass in hand, not to be seen again until story's end. So, that's the setup: Scout is now all alone, lost in the middle of the woods, with some of the basic supplies you should always have when hiking, minus a compass, tent, stove, and water treatment supplies, which are all with her brother. So how is she going to survive and help her rescuers find her? This might sound a little tense, but with the goofy brother starting things off, and a skunk providing Scout companionship, this is low-key throughout. It's meant to be instructional. We see Scout devising a shelter, and learn about others she could have made. Similarly, Scout shows us all sorts of ways to get a fire started, and the proper way to ensure it burns safely. There's all sorts of other lessons to be learned, but it's done in such an engaging style that even kids who'd never want to be out amongst the worms and bugs will want to read Scout's adventure. Cautions No warnings of note in this book but a sequel, Survival Scout: Tsunami, has a handful of evolutionary assumptions popping out about the age of the earth, so, you can give that one a miss. Conclusion This graphic novel is a lot of fun and would make a great gift for any kid who loves the outdoors. And for everyone else it will be a great borrow from the library. A third book in the series has been announced, Survival Scout: Lost at Sea, and I look forward to checking it out....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews

The Fox and the Hound

Family 1981 / 83 minutes Rating: 8/10 This one begins with an emotional punch to the gut – we watch a fox mother, holding her cub in her mouth, running frantically through the woods, the sound of shotgun blasts and baying hounds driving her even faster. In a moment of desperation, she hides her cub beside a fence post, then takes off, leading the hunters and the hounds away. And that is the last we see of her. But the fence post belongs to a farm. And the farm belongs to the kindly Widow Tweed. When she discovers the cub, she adopts the orphan and names him Tod. Next door lives a crusty old hunter, Amos, and his faithful and fierce and huge hunting dog Chief. They've got a new addition, too, a hound pup named Copper. Soon enough, Copper and Tod meet and become the best of friends. But as they grow older, they are told by nearly everyone that they shouldn’t be friends – that foxes and hounds should be enemies! Peer pressure and circumstances convince the hound to turn his back on Tod. That drives Tod into the forest, where he makes a new friend, a female fox Vixey. Tod’s steadfastness eventually wins back Copper, and even the crusty old Amos. Cautions Language concerns are limited to a "golly," a "gee," and a couple "gosh"s. The other cautions here are all for the under-10 set. Kids older than that should be able to deal with the emotional rollercoaster. As mentioned – and like many a Disney film in which parents don't fare well – the mother fox meets her demise right at the start. Thankfully it happens offscreen. There are other frantic scenes. About a half-hour in, Tod is running from Amos and his giant old hunting dog Chief, but the tension gets relieved when Tod gets away. Then, twenty minutes later, there's a scene in which the tension isn't really relieved, with Chief getting seriously injured after chasing Todd, and Copper vowing revenge. Then, in the finale, a giant bear makes a frightful appearance. Worth a mention is how kids will get hit right in the heartstrings when the Widow Tweed decides she has to let Tod go on his lonesome. Finally, like Bambi did before it, hunting is shown to be the domain of trigger-happy lunatics, so parents will have to explain that Christians can hunt, though they'll do it a lot differently than Amos. Conclusion While some reviewers seem to miss it, this is a morality tale about racism – Copper and Tod are told their kind aren't supposed to be friends, but thankfully, in the end, they don't listen – and that's what makes it worth watching and discussing as a family. But using a fox and hound as a metaphor for racial differences does lead to a problematic portrayal of hunters who, if we were to extend the metaphor, would be the racists of the film and basically the equivalent of the "Ku Klux Klan." So that'd be worth a discussion too. Because it involves a lot of frantic action, with Amos and Chief trying to kill Tod, this would only be appropriate for 10 and up. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Family, Movie Reviews

Lassie come home

Drama 1943 / 89 minuytes RATING: 8/10 No boy has ever had a more loyal and loving dog than young Joe Carraclough – each day when school is done, he can be sure his beloved collie Lassie will be there waiting for him in the schoolyard. Lassie is brilliant, too, able to tell time, bow on command, and carry Joe's school books. The two are inseparable. That comes to an end when the Depression hits England hard, and his family is forced to sell Lassie to the local Duke who has been trying to buy her for the last three years. Joe is crushed. But Lassie isn't away for long – the first chance she gets, Lassie escapes her kennel and heads back home. That'd make for a short movie, except that the Duke's dog handler knows just where to look for the missing dog, and takes her back from the Carracloughs. Twice. When the Duke takes Lassie to Scotland, it finally seems she is gone for good. But everyone is underestimating the loyalty of Joe's best friend. Lassie escapes again, and this time has to trek through wild forest, flee angry sheep farmers, swim through swamps, and fight off angry bandits. Thankfully, Lassie also meets some companions along the way, who help her when she most needs it. Cautions Lassie is attacked and bloodied, but the biggest concern here is what happens to one of her dog friends, a little mutt named Toots. When bandits ambush Toots' master, Lassie and Toots join the fight. They say it isn't the size of the dog in the fight but the size of the fight in the dog, but that doesn't prove true this time. The football-sized Toots gets kicked aside, never to get back up. That'll be a most unexpected tragedy to any children raised on modern fare. But Lassie Comes Home was made during WW II, and maybe everyone was tougher back then, including the kids. Those different sensibilities come out right at the start with the film's opening dedication to the author of Lassie Comes Home. We are told he, "survived the First World War as a British soldier, only to die in the Second World War, killed in the line of duty in the uniform of the country he had adopted... America. With reverence and pride, we dedicate this picturization of his best-loved story to the late Major Eric Knight." Yes, sometimes good men die for a good cause. So, would we expect less of a good dog? Conclusion This is the first and very best of the Lassie movies (and the only one to be nominated for an Oscar). And it is sure to make a dog-lover out of any boy watching. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Family, Movie Reviews

The Prince and the Pauper

Adventure 1937 / 118 minutes RATING: 8/10 The swashbuckling Errol Flynn stars in one of the earliest, and still one of the best, film adaptations of Mark Twain's classic tale of switched identity. Our story begins on a murky evening in the London of 1537, with citizens raising a toast to the birth of Edward Tudor, the royal heir. His father, Henry VIII, warns the little babe that heavy weighs the crown. This same night, in the poorest corner of the London slums, another boy is born, by the name of Tom Canty. His father also has words for him, cursing the boy for being born healthy and strong, because "it's only the sickly ones that can beg a farthing." Ten years later, the pair meet when Tom, fleeing a beating from his father, hides on the palace grounds. The pair are struck by their uncanny resemblance – the two could have been identical twins (and, in fact, identical twins Bobby and Billy Mauch play the roles). As part of their play, they swap clothes. Then, in a shock to both, they are mistaken for each other, and the guards throw the rag-wearing prince right out of the palace, leaving the bewildered Tom trying to get someone, anyone, to believe that he is not the prince. Where does Errol Flynn come in? He plays Miles Hendon, a poor soldier, who mistakes Edward for addled when the boy insists he is royalty. The boy certainly seems addled. When news of the king's death spreads among the peasants, he demands that they respect his royal highness – he is after all, their new king! That doesn't go down well with any of them, and when one gent starts trying to beat the lad, others are more than willing to lend a hand. That's when Miles comes to the rescue, whisking the boy away. Miles doesn't believe the boy any more than the mob, but he is willing to humor him... for a time. With the king's death, a coronation is quickly scheduled. That means that in just days, unless the two switch back, Tom Canty will be crowned the new king! Cautions The cautions here concern violence, but it is all at a level that would bother only the very young. Errol Flynn dispatches one of the bad guys in a swordfight, but the fatal blow is hardly shown. More notable is the beatings that John Canty gives his son Tom. While the blows aren't severe – more shoving than any punching – it's the notion of a father actually beating his son that will disturb some children. Midway through the film, when a priest tries to stop John from beating Tom (though this time it is actually Edward), we see John strike the man in the head with a stick, and the priest falls dead with a spot of blood on his temple. It's not gory, especially in black and white, So, this is no “Disneyfied” retelling, but the darker aspects are still greatly muted. (Speaking of, there is an animated 1990 Disney version with Mickey Mouse playing the two title roles. There are a few language concerns – a couple uses of "gosh," at least one use of "heck," and "what the devil? – but what turned me off was Donald "comically" praying at a tense moment.) Conclusion This will be a good leap off point for discussions about the backstabbing, corrupting nature of politics and why there is a need for good people to enter into the political realm. Adults may enjoy references to this history of the time; the story is fictional, but the background is straight history. Adults will understand that the reason King Henry VIII "hates priests," as Edward shares with Tom, is because Henry booted the Roman Catholic Church out of England when the pope wouldn't grant him an annulment from his first wife. Edward was his only surviving male heir and the son of his third wife who died in childbirth. And as the film also notes, there were still more queens afterward – Henry went on to have six wives in all. But the real appeal is the pairing of Flynn and Twain – a great story with a great star. At two hours long, this may test the patience of the younger Tik-Tok generation. But if your kids are able to sit still at all, and if you have an intermission ice cream break halfway through, and equip everyone with their own popcorn bowl, many a kid, 9 and up, should really enjoy it. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Teen non-fiction

Finding My Vocation

by William Boekestein 2024 / 154 pages William Boekestein wants to help young readers figure out how they can pick the right job, and like the good Reformed pastor that he is, he offers up three points.... or, rather, parts. In Part 1, “Pondering Vocation,” he covers what work is, and the different reasons that Christians have to want to work, like providing for our family, serving others, and as a means of expressing our gratitude to God. Part 2 gives us biblically-grounded tips on how we can start “Preparing for Your Vocation.” We need to make ourself valuable to an employer by fostering key character traits – honesty and respect for authority might seem bare minimums, but they can really set a Christian apart – and by developing specific marketable skills, like welding, framing, accounting, etc. The author encourages readers to be ambitious to make the most of the skills God has given you. And he reminds us also of the other vocations God has called us to, like parent, elder, friend, and more. Then in Part 3, “Practicing Vocation,” we’re challenged to work hard, and reminded that God does give us a weekly Sabbath rest. This is a solid primer, and could be a great tool for high schoolers, Grade 9 or 10, as they start planning for their post-school years. It'd be best used with a parent or teacher along for the ride. If I were to pick a nit, it would be with a couple of the appendices – “Is my vocation compromised by sin?” and “Is Military a Good Option for Me?” – that raise important topics, but in what struck me as too cursory a manner. The military question, for example, raised some cautions about women in the armed forces, but didn’t even touch on the issue of women in combat roles. It's one thing for women to serve in the armed forces when male and female differences are understood and appreciated, and another thing for women to serve in the military when the higher ups have started to pretend that men and women are interchangeable and want to have women leading the charge. But this critique – not for what Rev. Boekestein said, but for what more I wish he had addressed – is indeed a nitpick, faulting his 154-page book for not being a dictionary-sized tome instead. And he offers us some of that more I was after in his great conversation with Lucas Holtvlüwer in the Real Talk episode below, so be sure to check it out. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

Saboteur

Drama / Mystery 1942 / 109 minutes RATING: 7/10 This is World War II as seen from the other side of the ocean. Barry Kane is one of the hundreds of employees at an airplane factory in Glendale, California, and when the plant suspiciously burns down, he becomes one of the chief suspects. Barry knows he's innocent, and thinks the real saboteur might be a man named Fry, who he bumped into just before the fire started, But Fry doesn't seem to exist – the factory never employed anyone by that name – which makes Barry look even more suspicious. With the authorities looking in the wrong direction, Barry decides he has to track Fry down himself and takes off. He has only one key clue, and to make it even more difficult, police departments across the country are now on the lookout for him! Love-interest Patricia Martin is a girl he meets along the way, and whose blind uncle somehow knows that Barry is trustworthy, no matter what the police might think. Patricia isn't quite so sure, and seems as likely to turn Barry in as to help him. Together they follow the clues and cross the country, uncovering a network of fifth columnists – Nazi sympathizers and agents amongst the highest echelons of American society. But now that they know who's responsible, will anyone believe them? This cast does a solid job, and while there's no one you'll recognize, the director is a name you'll know: Alfred Hitchcock. He always brings the stark, dramatic shots, of course, but also a bit of oddness. His quirkiness shows up in this picture when Barry and Patricia hitchhike a ride on a circus caravan and hide out among the circus sideshow performers – a midget, bearded lady, set of Siamese Twins, and more – who end up arguing it out about whether they'll help the pair. And this being an Alfred Hitchcock film, we can expect the director to make a brief appearance on screen – look for his cameo just after the one-hour mark. Cautions The caution here is also a feature: this is a film for discussion, not just consumption, and the conversation will be of a Romans 13 sort (or more specifically, Rom. 13:1-7) – when should we, and when shouldn't we listen to the appointed authorities? Barry is fleeing the police because if he doesn't, the true saboteur will get away, and because the police, however unwittingly, are aiding the fifth columnists. But while his motivation is clear, some of the people who choose to help him are defying those same authorities for tenuous reasons. Patricia's uncle, for example, trusts Barry based on little more than gut instinct. Conclusion This was already well into development before Japan's 1941, Dec. 7 bombing of Pearl Harbor pushed the United States into World War II. That might be why the focus was on the homefront – American soldiers weren't fighting in the trenches yet when the script was being written.Regardless, Hitchcock wanted his audience to know the fight was already going on, behind the scenes, right on American soil. This is an enjoyable film, but not the sort you'd pitch folks who aren't already up for black-and-white films. Start them on other World War II fare like Casablanca, The SeaHawk, and  Desperate Journey instead, and if they love those, then they'll be more inclined to enjoy Saboteur for the great war film it is. ...

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Evolve Digital logo.   Benchpress theme logo.   Third Floor Design Studio logo.
Bench Press Theme by Evolve Digital  & Third Floor Design Studio