Transparent heart icon with white outline and + sign.

Life's busy, read it when you're ready!

Create a free account to save articles for later, keep track of past articles you’ve read, and receive exclusive access to all RP resources.

White magnifying glass.

Search thousands of RP articles

Equipping Christians to think, speak, and act

Open envelope icon with @ symbol

Get Articles Delivered!

Equipping Christians to think, speak, and act delivered direct to your Inbox!

A A
By:

Saturday Selections – Aug. 23, 2025

Distinguishing between Soft and Hard Christian Nationalism

Because certain Reformed folk support a form of Christian Nationalism, others will be strongly against it… but what exactly is the it they are against? After all, as John Stonestreet notes in the video below, the term has a broad variety of definitions.

If we were to let the Left define the term, you might hear them equate any Christian political involvement as being an attempt to bring in a theocracy that would require everyone to make the choice to either go to church or go to jail. Thinks that’s an oversimplification? Just remember the women who came out to protest Canadian Reformed politician Sam Oosterhoff while wearing the red outfits from Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. That book and TV series is based on a future “Christian” dystopian theocracy that perpetuates ritual rape. And what did Sam Oosterhoff do to deserve such a malicious, ridiculous protest? He’s a professing Christian, and he’s in politics. That’s just like Atwood’s dystopia, so they say.

So, before you say you aren’t a Christian Nationalist, you’ll want to ask what definition is being used. If all that’s meant is Christians acknowledging God is sovereign over the political realm too, do you want to side against that?

(John Stonestreet also moderated a 90-minute debate on Christian Nationalism here.)

Economic nationalism is a dead end

Some Christians who reject any sort of “Christian nationalism” will rally around the notion of a Canada-first “economic nationalism.” But why would nationalism be good so long as it is economically, and not religiously, motivated? I don’t know the answer to that question.

The linked article isn’t Christian, but highlights how any sort of economic nationalism – Liberal- or Conservative-run – presupposes that whoever the Prime Minister will be, he will know better than you as a consumer what products you should buy, for what prices, and from whom. That’s what tariffs, supply management, and business subsidies are about. Any sort of economic nationalism also presumes that whoever our PM will be, he will know better than you as a producer whether your business should be taxed, or whether you can be one of the lucky companies to be gifted taxpayer dollars. But history shows that top-down management of a country’s economy doesn’t work because no one is smart enough to know best for everyone else what they want and need.

History has shown it, so this columnist didn’t have to make an explicitly Christian argument to counter economic nationalism. But we didn’t have to wait for the Soviet Union to fall, and for China to struggle, or for Canada to go through its own socialist doldrums to know better already. Any sort of biblical understanding of Man’s fallen nature, our susceptibility to temptation, and our fallibility would have made the point already, long before we would have had to endure the painful consequences that always come with economic arrogance. That, then, is a reason not simply to reject economic nationalism, but to stop being shy about sharing God’s truth. We can save our neighbors pain, both eternally and here in this life as well by sharing the truth about Man and his limitations. We do need a supreme intellect to lead us, but that will only be found in our God, not our government.

Why it’s important to read bad books about bad ideas

“A meme on social media quotes my colleague Glenn Sunshine as saying, ‘If I had a gun with two bullets, and I was in a room with Hitler, bin Laden, and Jean Jacques Rousseau, I’d shoot Rousseau twice!’ Glenn insists he never said that, but then quietly admits he wishes he had.”

Killing for organs – who could possibly object?

When murder becomes medicine – when euthanasia is legal – then it’s inevitable that the line is going to be pushed on when someone is “dead enough” for organ donation. When doctors don’t think life is sacred, then what worry is there, really, if someone in a bad state has their life ended a little prematurely? The slippery slope is no fallacy when the world can’t find any brakes to stop the slide. The only answer is a complete return to understanding that our lives are gifts from God, and thus not ours to dispose of as we might wish.

Why Christians shouldn’t use IVF

“…IVF kills twice as many babies as abortion. [In the US] there are a million babies aborted every year, but IVF kills almost 2 million babies a year.”

Jimmy Clifton’s “Proof of God”

An intriguing anti-evolution, pro-life song…

Enjoyed this article?

Get the best of RP delivered to your inbox every Saturday for free.



Red heart icon with + sign.
News

Saturday Selections – Aug. 16, 2025

Life's building blocks: everything, everywhere, all at once (1 minute) You can build some of the basic elements of a cell in a lab. But there's no process that can build them all together, which is what you need for life. In other words, even with a blueprint at the ready – scientists have cells they can observe – and refined materials and supercomputers and skilled geniuses, they not only can't make life in a lab, they demonstrate how it could never happen by accident out in the wild. The amazing ways fathers matter "Involved fathers made an especially big difference for girls’ mental health, with 10 times the number of female students being diagnosed with depression and risk of self-harm when they had disengaged or absent fathers." 6 ways that Christianity answers the "problem of pain" ... and also worth noting, the world doesn't have much of any answer at all. Should we ban smartphones from our schools?  Jonathan Haidt thinks so. Here are five key quotes from his book, The Anxious Generation... On "replacement theology" Rev. Witteveen on God's plan for Israel today... What's wrong with censorship Prov. 18:17 is known by some as the journalist's proverb, but its value extends to far beyond just reporters. It says: "The first to present his case seems right, until a second comes and questions him." This, in a nutshell, is the Christian case against censorship. What we know of fallen human nature means that we don't trust any one person or institution to have the necessary brilliance or character to always be right. The Christian case for free speech is also, essentially, the freedom to pursue God, and His Truth. All sorts of questions and skeptical arguments could be allowed in this pursuit.... though blasphemy need not be. We have good reason to be for free speech... but not without restriction. After all, God is our god, not free speech. ...