Transparent heart icon with white outline and + sign.

Life's busy, read it when you're ready!

Create a free account to save articles for later, keep track of past articles you’ve read, and receive exclusive access to all RP resources.

White magnifying glass.

Search thousands of RP articles

Helping you think, speak, and act in Christ.

Open envelope icon with @ symbol

Get Articles Delivered!

Helping you think, speak, and act in Christ. delivered direct to your Inbox!

Theology

Real Talk: Sunday – rest or rules?

This episode can also be found on your favorite podcast platform: Spotify, Apple, Podbean, Amazon Music or on our website. Be sure to subscribe to our YouTube channel and our podcast profiles so you can be notified when new episodes are released. Please note that this transcript below was automatically generated and lightly edited so it may contain some errors.

*****

Opening
The Sabbath is one of the most talked about and often misunderstood topics in Christian life. Some see it as an Old Testament practice that no longer applies today, while others focus just mainly on the rules. But what if the Sabbath is much more than that? In this episode, we're joined by Reverend Peter Holtvluwer, author of Foundations, a devotional on Genesis 1-3, and we'll explore the Sabbath from creation to Christ and beyond. Why did God give us a day of rest? How does the Sabbath point us to the rest that we have in Christ? Why do Christians worship on Sunday instead of Saturday? And what should the Lord's Day look like today? We'll look at why the Sabbath begins in creation and why that foundation matters. We'll also discuss practical questions about worship, two church services, Sunday activities, and how to avoid the extremes of legalism or treating Sunday like any other day. This episode is brought to you by ARPA Canada's Foundations Conference. When a nation replaces God with man, foundations crumble. What comes next? Register at arpacanada.ca.

Intro
The world's changing fast, but what questions should we really be asking? You're listening to Real Talk, a podcast presented by Reformed Perspective, where we take God's word and apply it to the nitty gritty of life. Buckle up for real questions, real answers, and real direction. This is Real Talk.

Lucas Holtvlüwer
Well, Dad, thanks for joining me back here on the Real Talk podcast. Good to have you back for a third time. So, joining a short list of third-time repeat guests, but glad to have you. So today we're going to be talking about Foundations, talking about Genesis one through three, and then with a specific focus on the Lord's Day and its rootedness in creation and how that kind of plays forth in our practices today, and also look at maybe some church history in that regard as well. So you've written a book of meditations on those first three chapters of Genesis. So do you want to just tell us a little bit about what kind of drew you to this new project, this new opportunity, this new book? Kind of some of the questions or issues you're seeing as a pastor in your work over the years, and kind of how you arrived at hey, I think this is the time to put this work out, and what are you what are you hoping to do with this kind of project?

Peter Holtvlüwer
Yeah, so already more than 20 years ago, I preached on Genesis 1, 2, and 3, and a couple of elders back in the day, tapped me on the shoulder and said, "You know what? It would be good to put that into writing for people to pick it up and read it further and study on study it further.” So after some hesitation, I did that. I just published them as sermons way back at least 16 years ago or so, and they served a good purpose, I think, in its in their time. I've since repreached those sermons, and then I heard from various people that they would prefer to have that material in meditation format rather than a sermon format. They felt it was easier to read, so I repreached it, I refreshed the whole series, and I added a couple of sermons to it, and then indeed I basically broke up those sermons into smaller meditations and made them chapters in what's now book Foundations. And why did I even revisit these chapters and why do I think the material is still, you know, useful for people? Well, those three first three chapters of the Bible, they really truly are foundational. Like I called the book Foundations. I really couldn't think of a better term, a better title to describe. There's so many subjects that were introduced to God, ourselves, humanity, our purpose on the earth, what we're what we're meant to do with our daily lives. What is work all about? A topic like the Sabbath day, the day of rest, is in there as well. Then you can think of marriage. You can think of the fall into sin. You can think too of how the Lord and His grace rescued us from our rebellion. And there's other topics that are sprinkled in there, and in the intervening time between the first series of sermons that I preached on it and the more recent series, you know crazy things happened in the world like transgenderism and the rise of homosexuality. Like homosexuality was on the rise when I first preached it, but it just went bananas in the 2010s and transgenderism really became mainstream in the in the mid 20 teens and still is mainstream so I thought yeah more than ever we need as God's people solid a solid understanding of the these foundational teachings in that God. Us in these early chapters, we're made male and female. We're made in the image of God. These things have weight and they have import and meaning, not just for the original readers of the Bible, but for all of mankind, all of history. So we really need to be well founded on these foundational elements, these foundational teachings. So yeah, that's why I have the book, the Lord willing will be coming out this summer. In fact, Reformed Book Services, where we are recording here today, they're going to have a presale, they told me today. So anybody interested in foundations can check out Reformed Book Services for their presale of Foundations.

LH
Awesome. So when you were writing this back in the day, 16 years ago or whatnot, was it more like evolution was more kind of the issue of the day, so to speak, that let's say younger people were kind of struggling with as they kind of were working out their faith and making it their own growing up in the church, especially.

PH
Yeah, that was a… it was a very hot topic in our reformed Canadian Reformed, United Reformed churches somewhere around 2010ish. There were debates in our Clarion magazine around that time on theistic evolution. So that those topics I think are still there. I think some people still are attracted to theistic evolution, but this book does deal with that. And I just walk through the what the Bible teaches in Genesis 1 and compare it to what evolution teaches and what theistic evolution teaches, and then come with the conclusion that yeah, those other teachings are wanting.

LH
Yep, yep. It does seem like the devil always goes after like these foundational type of truths as well with these lies to get us that seem easy to believe, but then if you don't examine the root of it, can really twist up your perspective and lead to a negative outcome that way.

PH
Yeah, I think so. Like if I were the devil, I would probably want to go after some of these very root issues, like mess up marriage…

LH
Or men and women…

PH
Mess up gender, mess up the family, which is all taught in Genesis 1, 2, and 3. Mess any of those up, and you're messing up a lot of society for a long period of time, and messing up in the sense of drawing them away from following Jesus Christ to following the work of the devil.

LH
Yeah. Now you mentioned all those issues, and we can kind of all see that. Yeah, those are obviously foundational issues. It makes sense that if you were to mess with the structure of that, you were going to have negative consequences, simple consequences, and that's not going to go well, but if I think about our context today and the issue of Sunday or the Sabbath, I think a lot of people, even like in our reformed circles, would see that as, yeah, that might be important or that that might be a historical tradition of how we kind of act on the Sunday, but maybe that doesn't seem as foundational or as important as you know, men are men, women are women, the importance of the family and the importance of marriage. Like those are a lot easier to rally people around and defend those basic foundational truths. But I do think the Sunday and how we treat the Sabbath or the Sunday is less well thought of or less seems less important in our current cultural lens. And I kind of wonder why that is maybe, and do you think that's because people don't understand its rootedness in creation? Maybe kind of take us through that point a little bit of like how do you how do you believe that the Bible shows us that this is rooted in creation rather than something that was just more of an Old Testament command?

PH
So to answer your basic question, I do think yes. A part of the problem, big part of the problem, is that many folks do not relate the Lord's Day or Sunday observance or Sabbath observance to creation. I think that's a fundamental disconnect. They just they just haven't seen that connection, or they haven't thought about it. If they think about Sunday in terms of any kind of Old Testament connection, then they think of the Sabbath as we have it in the Laws of Moses, and then there are a lot of people who think that the Sabbath was a Jewish thing, just invented or not invented, but given by God at Mount Sinai, and incorporated into the 10 Commandments, yes, but actually, it's all just temporary shadows. And when Jesus Christ came and died and rose from the dead, all those shadows are gone. That we don't have to honor them or obey them anymore. They're not to be. In fact, they should not be used. Some people are quite strong that way, and so you have outside of the Reformed and Presbyterian churches, most I'll just say many Protestant folks are not teaching that the Sunday is a binding day of rest. They don't see it rooted in creation. Historically, the Reformed and Presbyterian have, but even there, there's been a weakening in certain circles about the value of the Lord's Day, Sunday, as a creation ordinance, and not everybody is like I like I said, that's where the breakdown is. They're not seeing the connect, and therefore they're not seeing the always the importance of having a day set apart, one day in seven, to worship God and to rest from your labor. So, yeah, we can go into Genesis 1 a little bit…

LH
Yeah sure, yeah. How clear is it then in Genesis 1? Because it does seem like if you look at the landscape of Christianity today, that you know there are people of sincere faith, even sincere reformed faith, as you mentioned, who would differ on how the principles of the Sabbath or the Sunday play out today. So maybe walk us through a little bit, I guess, how you see it rooted in creation there in Genesis.

PH
Yes. So I'm just going to get my Bible.

LH
Yeah, for sure.

PH
In Genesis, it's actually the beginning of Genesis 2 is where we have the reference to the day of rest. I think some of the problem comes in where in the fact that the name Sabbath or the word Sabbath does not occur in Genesis 2, it occurs for the first time in the book of Exodus, right? First Exodus 16, and then later in the 10 Commandments, but here in Genesis 1, the Lord says, "Thus the heavens, sorry, this is Genesis 2:1. Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. And on the seventh day God finished His work that He had done, and He rested on the seventh day from all His work that he had done, so God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it God rested from all his work that he had done in creation. So, is this the Sabbath day that later is incorporated into the 10 Commandments? That's sort of the fundamental issue. There are people, scholars, who say no, this is not the Sabbath day because the word Sabbath doesn't occur, and it's something other. But I think if you look at those two verses, and think about what's being said there, it's not hard to see that the seventh day is made something special from all the other days of the week, this is actually the crowning work of God's creation. For six days, He creates, and then we have this announcement that His creation, His creating work, is finished. And God could have, if you just pause over that for a moment, God could have just left…

LH
Why does God need to rest?

PH
And He doesn't, right? We know that. So God could have left the week at six days. We could have just had a six-day work week and just one day after the other, we just work, work, work because we had already had the charge in Genesis 1 that we are to be fruitful and multiply, we are to subdue the earth, we are to exercise dominion over the animals, etc. But all of a sudden, after everything's created, we get this special designation, the creation of another day, and it's a day that about some things are some marvelous things are said. God blessed the seventh day, didn't bless any of the other six days, so that already marks it as something special. He made it holy. So please note that we're before the fall into sin.

LH
Yeah.

PH
Right? Something is called holy before the fall into sin. Something is set apart from all everything else before there's sin in the world, because “on it God rested from all His work”, His creating work. God was obviously still active on the Lord's day. We know that from John's Gospel. The Lord Jesus says in response to the Pharisees who accuse him of breaking the Sabbath. He says in John 5, "My Father is working until now, and so am I.”

LH
Yeah.

PH
So God's work of providence, God's work of caring for the world. If God didn't uphold the world every moment, it would literally fall apart. So God is always working, but God was not creating. So something special is going on here, and who is to keep the day holy if it is not the creature made in God's image? Right? I mean that's the implication. Day six, man's created. He's created special, made in the image of God, and then on the next day, day seven, God makes a day, makes it holy, because God rested from His work. Now, when you go to the fourth commandment, you tell me if we're not talking about the same day. When you read the fourth commandment in Exodus 20, “Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work.” Notice that word. “But the seventh day is a Sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, you or your son or your daughter, your male servant or your female servant or your livestock or the sojourner who is within your gates. For..” – here it comes – “in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day.” That’s exactly Genesis two. “Therefore, the Lord blessed the Sabbath day.” Now he gives it the name. So he has a very tight link between the seventh day and the Sabbath day, and then it finishes off, “and made it holy.” So right there in Exodus 20, fourth commandment, God Himself links the Sabbath day to the seventh day of creation, and in Genesis 2, you have the same things marked out there. It's a day of rest because God rested.

LH
Yep.

PH
It's a day to set aside our work because God set aside His work.

LH
Yep.

PH
So we are to imitate God, and if you think about the context of the, you know, going to the 10 Commandments for a moment, 10 Commandments are a summary of God's moral law. He etched them in stone. He put them inside the ark. He repeated them a second time, right in Deuteronomy 5, and we'll get to the Deuteronomy 5 difference, I'm sure. But so these are etched in stone. Why did God etch them in stone to indicate symbolically that these are His permanent will for God's people?

LH
Yep.

PH
Permanent will includes a day of rest, the Sabbath day. And if you think about the first four commandments, it makes perfect sense, right? First commandment: whom we are to worship, only worship God. Second commandment: How we are to worship, worship God according to my instructions, my word. Third commandment: Don't take the Lord's name in vain, which is another way of saying worship me with the right attitude. So it's all about worship. One, two, and three. Now we get to day four, or sorry, the fourth commandment, and it's about worship again. The time is commanded.

LH
Yeah, when...

PH
When to worship.

LH
Yeah.

PH
That corporate element of worship is to happen on the Lord's. Sorry, on the Sabbath day. I mean, if you think about the Lord of heaven and earth commanding His people to worship Him, he also must command the time. He must give them a day to worship. Otherwise, when would they do one, two, and three? When would they come and worship God? When would they come and worship according to His word? When would they come and worship Him with that appropriate attitude? Well, it has to be that the Lord gives a day. So this ties back to Genesis 2 very clearly, and I think it's I think it is biblical to say the Sabbath was established at creation. There is a day of rest from creation, and I want to just hook in here for a moment to Hebrews 4 because in Hebrews 4 there's reference made there to the eternal rest that's still coming, and Hebrews 4, let me just get the wording here, because sometimes we're wondering about what actually is said there and what this means. So the writer of Hebrews is making the point that there is a future day or time coming, he says. So then, this is verse nine, there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God. For whoever has entered God's rest has also rested from his works, as he did from us. Let us therefore strive to enter that rest. So there's something future, right? What's he talking about there? That Sabbath rest that he's talking about is the new heavens and the new earth, where we will be fully at rest from our sin, where we will all the striving of this life that that is on account of sin and all the consequence of sin that will be behind us, and we will enter God's full rest. That doesn't mean inactivity. I think God's got other activity waiting for us, which He hasn't elaborated on yet. But there's a future rest coming, which I think is indicated in Genesis 2. If you just sort of pause for a moment and think, okay, well, why would why did God give a day of rest in a sinless world? This is before sin, right?

LH
Good question.

PH
So six days of work, seventh day was to be holy. Work was not onerous. Work was not slavish or difficult. Work would have been itself a joy. But God is saying there's more to life than the work I give you to do. There's a goal. You're working and then you rest. You you're working and then you rest, and your work, of course, will accumulate and it will build up. I mean, had we never fallen into sin, we would have presumably, under God's blessing, worked toward the goal that he had. Now he doesn't say it in so many words, but I think the implication is we would have worked toward that ultimate Sabbath rest, not Sabbath rest from sin because there was no sin, but Sabbath rest from the completion of whatever work we were given by God to do in this earth. So I think Genesis 2 is pointing in that direction, it doesn't lay it out in so many words, but Hebrews 4 picks up on that, and so the daily Sabbath, sorry, the weekly Sabbath day, the weekly day of rest, points forward to the great eternal Sabbath that God has in store for us. This is all outside of the shadows of the Mosaic Law. That's what I want to make a connection to.

LH
Yep, which is interesting too, because like, because it's for sin, the purpose of the rest is just it's purely just to worship and remind ourselves that we are here to glorify God as the chief purpose of man.

PH
You're Adam and Eve, you've been created on day six, the first day of your existence is this day. This holy day that God has declared holy. What are you going to do with that day? Of course, you're going to just spend it with your Creator. Yep, you're going to be in his company. You're going to fellowship with him. You're going to worship him. However, that looked like before the fall. We don't know exactly, but it certainly looked like fellowship. It certainly looked like being in the company of God. We know from Genesis 3:8 that the Lord would come into the garden in the cool of the day, and He would walk with His people. They recognize the sound of him coming into the garden. So this was a regular thing. That's a hint that in Genesis two, on the seventh day, God was with his people.

LH
Communes with his people.

PH
And isn't that the beauty of life? Isn't that why we're working? Doesn't that give meaning to labor?

LH
Yeah, indeed. So then, what would be the steel man or the strongest case for those who would say, "Well, yes, there is a day of rest, but that day of rest is not the Sabbath because is it only because the word is not used? Because the literal is it a translation debate, or is there more? What are the strongest points on the other side of things? Because obviously, if you can't make that connection, if that connection isn't as strong as you say, then there are a lot of other different consequences that follow from that presupposition.

PH
Yeah. So the strongest argument I've seen is that indeed the word Sabbath doesn't appear in Genesis 2. But like I mentioned, I don't find that a strong argument, really, because the word rest appears. The word "work" appears, and those two words, they appear frequently in those three verses I read, they reappear in the fourth commandment, Exodus 20, where God links the seventh day with the Sabbath day. So, to me, I don't understand how folks who say, "Well, the Sabbath day isn't there, Sabbath day is not mentioned that you can't call that the Sabbath.” I say, “well, look, you can you can call something by a different name and it's still that thing.” Later in Genesis two, Adam is given a partner. Eve, right? He's created alone, but later he's given a partner, a woman. The woman is brought to the man, and we read there at the end of chapter 2, “Therefore, a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.” Now, does anybody doubt that he's referring to marriage? The word marriage is not there. The word wedding is not there, but the description of marriage is there. Same with Genesis 1, 2, and 3. Yep. So again, I just think the argument falls flat that oh the word Sabbath is not there then therefore it's not the Sabbath day.

LH
Yeah, and there's so many like you say the work and the rest. There's so many direct parallels that it makes sense that it would be the same thing that's being talked about there, and then also the permanence of the 10 Commandments and how those apply still to us today. Like no one, no one really debates the other nine. So there's just a straight continuity argument to be had there as well. Yeah. And those 10 Commandments were also applicable at the start of the world too. Like that was God's law, so it was true in creation, it was true at Sinai, and those are still true today. So just that's what always that's one of the things that gets me of just the continuity of it. It doesn't make a lot of sense if you yank out the fourth commandment.

PH
Right, I think that's a that's a very strong argument there. The other argument I can I have heard about why people don't think that why they think the Sabbath began at Mount Sinai is they say, well, we don't read about it in all of the rest of Genesis. So even if you just leave aside Genesis 2, there's no reference to the Sabbath day after Genesis being

LH
Being practiced amongst Abram.

PH
There’s no reference to it. And to that argument, I would say, well, you always have to be very careful with an argument from silence because you can't say one way or the other definitively was it there, was it not there, based on what you don't hear. Second to that, there are a number of times in the book of Genesis where a sequence of seven are important for the for the storyline. One of those, for example, is during the flood story. Seven days they were waiting in the in the ark before the rains fell. There's a I can't think of the others off the top of my head, but the number seven and the period of seven days without referencing the Sabbath, it's true. It's there. It's there in the background as a kind of an understood thing. The week is seven days, and the period is seven days is a is an important thing. And one more counter argument is in Exodus 16. So that's before they get to Mount Sinai. The Israelites are in the desert. Exodus 16, and the Lord gives them manna to feed them because they're running out of they don't have food in the desert, and then the Lord gives an instruction, but just kind of kind of comes out of the blue. I will give you.. you're not to go out and collect manna on the Sabbath.

LH
I'll give you twice as much.

PH
Right, the day before, I give you twice as much, but he just sort of drops the Sabbath name in the middle of their travels, as if they knew what it was. Like remember the Sabbath, and everyone's like, "Oh yeah, we get that.” So the implication is the Israelites, Moses, and the Israelites knew about this thing called the Sabbath. It came into a formal regulation in the 10 Commandments, but just like they knew the other commandments, they must have known that it was not right to kill. They must have known it was not right to steal. They must have known it was not right to dishonor authority. That, but the Lord articulated that in a formal covenant and put that in stone in order for them to have clarity about His will, and they could always refer to it. It's not as if these things are for the first time occurring at Mount Sinai.

LH
Got it. So now in Deuteronomy, when the law is repeated again, it's more so rooted in the redemption from Egypt. Now, why the change in focus there, and what implications does that have for the fourth commandment in this context,

PH
So indeed in Deuteronomy 5, it's the only commandment that gets two reasons when you compare the 10 Commandments in Exodus 20 and the 10 in Deuteronomy 5, the fourth commandment is the only one that's given a different reason the second time round, and let me just read that reason for you. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is a Sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, you or your son or your daughter or your male servant or your female servant, your ox or your donkey or any of your livestock or the sojourner who is within your gate, that your male servant and your female servant may rest as well as you. You shall remember that you were slaves in the land of Egypt, and that the Lord your God brought you out from there with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm. Therefore, the Lord your God commanded you to keep the Sabbath day.” So the reason given here has to do with their redemption from Egypt, Exodus 20. Remember creation. Deuteronomy 5. Remember your recreation, where God saved you from slavery to sin, or sorry, slavery to Pharaoh. And both of these are precursors to what the Lord Jesus would do for us. Now, before I get to the Lord Jesus, let me just back up a moment to Leviticus 25, if I if I may, because there's a tie-in between Leviticus 25 and Deuteronomy 5 with respect to Sabbath. In Leviticus 25, you have the Lord commanding His people to have a, not a Sabbath day, but a Sabbath year. Every seventh year, they were to let the land lie fallow, and the land was to have rest for a whole year. And God would so bless them in the sixth year that the seventh year would they could eat off the food from the sixth year, and they could they could have a whole year of rest from their labor. I mean, think about that. That's truly where the word sabbatical comes from-a whole year off of your labor. So that was actually a beautiful gift for the people. And then in that Exodus, Leviticus 25, the Lord goes on to speak about the year of jubilee. So after seven time, the seventh sabbatical year, or the Sabbath year, so that'd be the 49th year. That would be a regular Sabbath year. They were to have a special year of rest, the 50th year, which God called the Jubilee, announced by the blowing of the horn, the ram's horn on the Day of Atonement. What was special about this day? Well, again, they were to have a, they were not to work; they were to live off the produce of the land from now two seasons earlier, the 48th year, and the people were to be set free from slavery if they had been enslaved to one another, and if they had had to sell their land. Because when they got into the land of Canaan, everyone had a parcel of land. Every family had their own property. Well, in the year of Jubilee, they were given their land back. This is called the Sabbath year, like it's the Sabbath of Sabbaths.

LH
Yep.

PH
Okay? So the Sabbath year, you have to remember, like before we even get to the to the New Testament, in the Old Testament context. Before we get to the Pharisees or anything else, the Sabbath was a blessing. Like for Adam and Eve, blessing even in a sinless world, they could they were communing with their God. What more fuller joy could they have than to make that day holy and walk with their God? Right. So it's a good thing, the Sabbath. Then, after the fall into sin, we believe it's still there in Genesis. It's not talked about in Genesis, but it's there in the background. We don't exactly know how it functioned in Abraham's life. We have to admit that, but certainly it comes to the surface in the laws of Moses. And let me add that when God gives it to the people of Israel, certainly, He adds significance to it. Okay, like shadows that do point to Christ, and that when Christ arrives, the shadow element of the Sabbath falls away. We'll talk about that in a moment. But I just want to emphasize that the celebration of the Sabbath was indeed a joyful thing. It was a celebration. Like every seventh day, they got to rest from their labors. Every seventh day they could put down their back-breaking work. Every seventh day they could go to the tabernacle and have a holy consecration. Says Leviticus 23. There would be a meeting at the at the tabernacle, and they were to remember their freedom. That's the fourth commandment in Deuteronomy 5, and the Jubilee really highlights that God sets His people free from enslavement to Pharaoh, to any oppressive enemy, and now when you fast forward to what the Lord Jesus did, He sets us free from Satan, from sin, from the wages of sin, death. So it makes perfect sense that the Lord Jesus love would love the Sabbath day, and if you look at what He does in the Gospels, Luke 4 says it was his custom to go to the synagogue. What was he doing every Sabbath? He was worshiping. He was with God's people. Didn't go off to a mountain somewhere. He went to God's people in the synagogue. Opened the scroll.

LH
Yep.

PH
If when he was younger, he would have listened to the rabbi preaching the gospel. When he became a rabbi himself, he taught and he preached the gospel, and he explained the wonderful things that God has done for His people to the people, and they spent time in each other's company, no doubt singing God's praises as well. So, these two elements, these two reasons that are tucked away in the in the two renditions of the fourth commandment, we are always to remember what God did for us in creating us, and how that original creation setup was already meant for us to be in fellowship with Him on the Sabbath. And even all those six days are meant to be… we work for the Lord, and we may certainly have fellowship with him day by day, but the Sabbath day seventh is a special thing. And then in Deuteronomy we are told to remember, after the fall into sin, remember how the Lord has set you free. He's reestablished you in that relationship with Himself, and He gives you the day of rest to enjoy it, to practice it to have that that beautiful freedom a foretaste of it.

LH
Yep. So then that rest and that freedom though, like I think you make very strong case that okay it's rooted in creation. We see it again the law. This is a continuation of this command, and not only just this command, but this gift that God gives us, both before the fall into sin and still after, that much more even maybe after the fall into sin that we need that rest, need that time to commune together in worship of God. But then, what does this mean in terms of the rest in the practice in the New Testament era, right? Like because Jesus obviously spends a lot of time dialoguing with the Pharisees in his ministry, and a substantial portion of that, there are clear passages dealing with the Sabbath or the Sunday in our case, I guess. So, what does it signify that he was very clear and direct with the Pharisees in pushing back against their legalism? What can we kind of learn from that, and what does he mean when he says the Sabbath was made for man? Because I think that's a very critical one that can get perhaps misunderstood today. Because it's I think it's very easy to take that kind of teaching and go, “whoa, I'll just I'll rest, I'll do what my heart desires.” Because of all the litany of cultural entertainment that we have today, and the kind of culture that we live in, where it's you can entertain yourself to death, literally, as Neil Postman says, right? So it's very easy to spend your weekends just doing that. So how do we carefully suss through that as Christians to know this is what good rest looks like? This is what living in accordance with the fourth commandment today looks like, and how can we be on guard against legalism in the one ditch, but also complete you know chaos or perhaps do what you wantism serving yourself on the other side.

PH
Yeah, well let's maybe talk about what the Lord Jesus meant when He said, "The Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath, and the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. So the first part of that quote, "The Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath.” Well, the Lord Jesus is claiming divine authority with those words. He is saying, "son of man” is an expression that comes out of Daniel 7, which there's a figure in Daniel 7 that appears before the Ancient of Days, who would be then Yahweh. So to put it in terms of the persons of the Trinity, it's God the Son approaching God the Father, and He is given all authority. That's the vision in Daniel 7. So the Son of Man is a as a title for the Messiah, who has been given all authority, and not just all human authority, but actually divine authority. So when He says the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath, He's staking out the ground to the Pharisees that this is my day, and he actually had the right to say, "I was there in the beginning when this day was created, and this is my day, and I get to say what's the right thing to do on it, yes or no.” So the Lord Jesus lays that out. That's what that claim is all about. And then He says the sun, the Sabbath was made for man. Well, that actually takes us back to creation, right?

LH
It’s that gift idea.

PH
Yeah, and but He doesn't say. Notice He doesn't say the Sabbath was made for Israel. He doesn't say the Sabbath was made for the Jews. He doesn't say the Sabbath was made for God's people. He says the Sabbath was made for man. That's a very general word for mankind, for humanity,

LH
Broad

PH
Connects right with Genesis too. Those verses we read earlier.

LH
Yep.

PH
So actually, I think the Lord Jesus is supporting what we've been saying all the way along that the Sabbath is a gift from God. Indeed, now made for man, for man's benefit. The Pharisees had this turned around. The Pharisees were so locked in to obeying the commandments of the law for fear that transgressing those commandments would bring God's wrath down upon Israel. The Pharisees were born out of almost an overreaction to what happened at the exile, you go back to the exile to Babylon. The prophets mention that a big reason that why God removed Israel from their own land and sent them off to Babylon was because they did not give the land their rests, the Sabbath rests every seven years and so one of the things the Pharisees, when they were a party that kind of rose to prominence after the return from exile, and they rose to prominence on this idea that we have to keep the law. We have to keep the law because otherwise God's going to do this again.

LH
Yep.

PH
And one of the big things they became known for was Sabbath keeping because they read in the book of Kings and in the prophets, other prophets that the Sabbath…

LH
was disregarded.

PH
Yeah, the desecration of the Sabbath was what brought God's anger. So they actually put what they call a hedge around the law. They made something like 613 additional little laws for how the people were to protect the Sabbath and honor and honor the Sabbath and not disobey the Sabbath. They were always concerned with not disobeying the law. So, but they went so far with it that they actually undermined the very intent of the law. Like God's law has a purpose; it has an intention. There's a rationale behind it. That's the that's true in human laws generally, and you cannot just take a given law and say, "Well, I'm going to obey that law just exactly according to the wording, and then ignore what the intention was in that law. You will very soon find yourself doing something that actually runs contrary to the very thing that was intended, and that's actually what the Pharisees were doing. So they took the creation Sabbath and then the Sabbath that God gave at Mount Sinai with it, and God did give some additional commands there, but they added so many commands they made it an oppressive day, right? Like they said you couldn't you know, they accused Jesus' disciples of when they would take a stock of grain from the field and just do this in their with their fingers they said that was working that was harvesting. Well that's just a joke right and the Lord nowhere in the laws of Moses condemned the plucking of heads of grain, so that you can eat on the Sabbath. The Lord nowhere in the laws of Moses condemned the healing of a blind man or the healing of a lame man, like the Lord Jesus did a couple times on the Sabbath. That was never condemned, but they considered all that to be work. So they actually, with their accumulation of laws, they turned the day upside down, and they made they made it so that the Israelite was made for the Sabbath, instead of the Sabbath was made for all of mankind, creation, right? So Jesus is actually straightening out this great error. He's not saying, "Oh, do what you want on the on the Sabbath or the day of rest. He's not saying that at all. He’s just saying the Sabbath was made for man for man's good. Well, what is man's good? You go back to Genesis 2. Man's good. It's his highest joy is to spend quality time with his Maker. That's what that's what making the day holy is about is not going off golfing, is not going off down to the beach and hanging with your friends and just doing whatever you want. And God's far from your thoughts. No, this day is about spending it with the Lord. And I'm not saying that you can't do that at the beach, like in some measure. I'm not saying you know going to the beach is an evil thing in the evening or something like that. But I'm just saying, the mindset has to be: this day is for me, is given to me by God, for my good. What is my highest good? It's to be in the Lord's company. It's to give my heart to the Lord. It's to fellowship with my God. What higher good can there be?

LH
Yep.

PH
So he's articulating the core principle of the Sabbath-it's actually the core principle of life.

LH
Yeah.

PH
So, yeah, that was - I think that answers part of your question. Maybe you can refresh me on what the other part was.

LH
Yeah, I did ask you a long one there. Well, maybe just kind of building off what you had just mentioned there. So obviously, he repeatedly challenges the Pharisees on their Sabbath laws and the overbearing nature of the 613, as you mentioned, and so we know that Sabbath is a good gift given for man. It was made for man. It reminds us that we exist to commune with God, to worship God, to glorify Him, to live with Him, and that we long for that eternal rest. So I'm tracking with all of that still. But what does it mean to fulfill the Sabbath rather than to abolish it? Because like Christ didn't abolish the Sabbath, but He fulfills it. But how do we kind of define those two terms? And I guess we're kind of leading into like what is this? We'll get into the whole Sunday conversation, the shift over from Sabbath to Sunday. But what does it mean to fulfill the Sabbath, and how does that take us kind of into that the Sunday conversation maybe.

PH
Yeah, the concept of fulfill or the word the verb to fulfill is a bit tricky because it depends on the context in which it's used, or whether it ends up meaning something is abolished or something is in continual use. So we know, for example, that the Lord Jesus Christ came to fulfill all the law. He says that very plainly in Matthew 5:17, “I did not come to abolish the law. I came to fulfill it.” Okay, what does that mean? Well, let's just think of some other commands. Very clear commands. Did the Lord Jesus fulfill the eighth commandment, "You shall not steal." Did He fulfill that? Sure, He did. He lived it to its fullest extent. He didn't steal from anybody. He always was kind-hearted toward those in need. He did what he could for those in need.

LH
Generous, yep.

PH
Right. He fulfilled it. Does that mean it's abolished?

LH
No.

PH
No. I think everybody would agree. There's no doubt about that. And you could do the same for the ninth commandment about not bearing false witness, and the seventh commandment about sexual purity, and the sixth commandment about not killing, and the fifth commandment about honoring authority, and the third commandment about not taking the Lord's name in vain. Like you can do it for all the nine, and everybody would say, "Yeah, no, they have ongoing significance, they're still binding on all of us. We all of us must not steal. All of us must not commit adultery. All of us must honor those in authority. But somehow, with the fourth commandment, it's like, oh, that that's a big question mark for people. And I think there's been an over reading of the fourth commandment to say, oh, that's just all shadow. That's just. That's just all temporary. See, they don't root it in creation. They don't see it as part of God's permanent law. They see it only as a temporary thing. And that's where I believe the a big mistake is made and they, yeah, folks who see it that way will quickly then say, well, the fourth commandment is yeah, it's finished because the all the Sabbaths are gone. Paul doesn't Paul say in Colossians that you know those who esteem a new moon or a Sabbath or a feast or a feast or whatever I forget exactly how he puts it, but you know those things are those things have I forget exactly how he how he says it there, but he kind of dismisses them like they're no longer in force.

LH
It’s not needed. You could do that, but it's not a requirement. That sort of mindset. But then what about the Sermon on the Mount, though? Because that's the situation..

PH
Indeed. So here's where we have to distinguish between, in the laws of Moses, there are there are moral laws that are permanent, 10 Commandments. There are civil laws that apply to the state of Israel, that apply to the state of Israel as a governing as a governed nation.

LH
Sure.

PH
So long as that nation existed, basically that came to an end in AD 70.

LH
Yeah.

PH
Then there's ceremonial laws that pertain to the worship of Israel. Everything related to the tabernacle. Everything related to the temple, all the sacrifices. Well, we know from Christ's own mouth and from the book of Hebrews and the teaching of the apostles, that all those ceremonies they came to an end. They were abolished. Why were they abolished?

LH
Because Christ's sacrifice is sufficient.

PH
Right. Because they were they were set in place, not ever as permanent, the permanent moral law of God. They were set in place as a temporary teaching tools to teach the people of God about the need for the greater Messiah or the great Messiah who was to come. So they were always meant as temporary, and we the temple is no more because Christ came and He was the temple in in human flesh, and the temple today is his body on earth, the church. All the sacrifices came to a halt because he is the ultimate final sacrifice. All the laws of clean and unclean came to a halt because he brought an end to the division between Jew and Gentile. All these things are very clearly taught in the New Testament, and nobody disputes them. But the fourth commandment is sometimes lumped in with them because people say, "Oh, that's part of those shadows”, but then they get that's where the confusion comes in. They're not part of the. It's not part of the shadows.

LH
It’s not ceremonial.

PH
Right. It's not ceremonial. There's an element, and this is another layer of the confusion inside of the 10 Commandments. There are elements which are temporal. Let's say we'll just use a different word, temporal. So, a clear example is the fifth commandment, where the Lord says, you know, that He gives a promise: if we honor our father and mother, then our days will be long in the land that the Lord your God is giving you. Well, that's a reference to the land of Canaan. When we hear that today, we are not to think of the land of Canaan as our land. What are we to think of? We are to think of what the land of Canaan pointed to, because it was a pointer to the great new earth and new heavens that are coming. So we have to do a little mental translation. When we hear that, right? Because that's not our, we're not in that time frame anymore. Still valid, the fifth commandment, still God's moral law for us to honor those in authority. But there's the permanent moral element, honor authority. The temporal element, the land of Canaan. With the fourth commandment, the permanent element is one day of rest out of every seven, six days you shall work, one day you shall rest. The temporal element is the seventh day. We know that because of what the Lord Jesus, who's the Lord of the Sabbath, what He did in His resurrection and how He basically taught His disciples to honor Him by worshiping him on the Lord's Day, what the New Testament calls the Lord's Day on that new on the first day. So the fourth commandment is a moral thing. The day of rest is a moral thing. It's not a temporal thing. We, the people of God, if you just look at it practically, the people of God still need a day on which to worship. If we didn't have a command to worship on Sunday, what would the church, how would we ever get our church services together?

LH
Be a scheduling nightmare.

PH
It'd be, it'd be crazy.

LH
Yeah.

PH
So, yeah. So, so, so the fourth commandment, you know. Rooted in creation, part of the 10, written on stone, these are the core elements of why Reformed and Presbyterian churches, and not just them, but those are the ones that we're most familiar with, have always regarded them, the fourth commandment, as a permanent thing. It's God's permanent will to have one day in seven, and now and in the new covenant era, the first day of the week, to rest and to worship.

LH
That makes sense. What are some examples of maybe other commandments where like there's a temporal element to it that falls away, but like the base portion of it is still applicable today. Like, would it be like if you think about like the do not kill, like the part that would fall away would be the specific punishments for manslaughter or straight up like full cold blooded first degree murder, like in the in the nation of Israel at that time. Is that how that would kind of split out, or…

PH
So. yeah, I mean, the way that the civil laws of Israel worked, they worked out the 10 Commandments in all kinds of practical ways, right? And if you disobey, then there was these penalties. So the penalties were indeed temporal for the nation of Israel under that governing system, and we can still learn from them, by the way, we can learn principles, but we are no longer obligated by God to put into practice like our civil governments today are no longer obligated by God to orchestrate or conduct the civil affairs in exactly the same manner that Israel did, led by God in the desert. Maybe another temporal element within the 10 Commandments proper might be reference to in the 10th Commandment to you know coveting a neighbor's field or ox or donkey. Most of us aren't having oxes and donkeys around. I mean, that was really, I mean, some of us might have oxes and donkeys, I suppose, but those are just examples of things that belong to your neighbor that are valuable that that could be then envied by another neighbor.

LH
Be like your truck and your tractor today.

PH
So there’s another example of that mental translation. Like the 10 Commandments are every bit as valid today as they ever were, but we do have to make some mental translations when we hear them, and that's why we have preaching on that. Explain the 10 Commandments and go through this once in a while. That's why we explain it to our kids.

LH
So back to the Sermon on the Mount, though that's I believe the only commandment that's not mentioned there explicitly. So, what about this idea of like, well, Jesus didn't say it explicitly, but he did say the other ones. They're all kind of weaved in there.

PH
Yeah, sometimes yes, and elsewhere in the New Testament. So, the Sermon on the Mount doesn't have all the 10 Commandments weaved in. It's got a number of them, but not all of them. But elsewhere in the New Testament, you can pretty well find all of them rearticulated in so many words, but not the fourth commandment, and that has led people to say, "Oh, see, the fourth commandment's just temporal.”

LH
That is odd. That's kind of an irregularity.

PH
It is odd, but it's odd only in the sense if you're if you think that's what's needed, what that that somehow you know, without that we're sunk. We don't have anything a leg to stand on. We do have a lot of legs to stand on. Number one, there's no word in the New Testament that the day of rest is gone. There's no word of abrogation in the New Testament that we no longer have to be worried about any single day of the week as a day on which to worship.

LH
The Colossians text doesn't apply there?

PH
The Colossians text, and you might as well say Romans 14, those are referring to the system of ceremonies inside the laws of Moses. So inside the laws of Moses, you've got yes Sabbaths, all kinds of Sabbaths, not just the one every seven days, but you've got ones that are associated with the beginning of certain festivals and feasts so they would have a number of extra Sabbaths in in the course of a year as they began and ended certain feasts. Every new moon there was a there was a special ceremony, and I think there was also rest associated with every new moon. These are gone. That was all part of the system.

LH
Day of Jubilee, all that.

PH
The year of jubilee.

LH
Oh sorry, Year of Jubilee.

PH
And the Sabbath year, all gone because they are all they all belong to the mosaic law. That's very clear. All those are things are gone. But as I said earlier, that doesn't take away from the original seventh day of rest, like that one in seven, one in seven from Genesis 2. So the confusion sometimes is indeed that that people only think of the laws of Moses. If the Sabbath originated at Mount Sinai, then yes, it's gone. Then, then they're right. There is no special day. But if the Sabbath originated at creation, it's still with us, just like marriage is still with us, and the command to work and the command to have children. Those are creation mandates.

LH
Foundational.

PH
There’s been a change from the seventh day to the first day because Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath, and He rose from the dead on the first day of the week. And if you just think about that for a moment, doesn't that tie it all together? On the first day of the week, what's happening in Jesus' resurrection? He is the first fruits of the new creation. Right? He rises with what? His glorified body. He's the only one. Even as we speak, he's the only one that has a glorified body. Elijah doesn't have a glorified body. The saints who died…

LH
Moses

PH
…don't have glorified bodies. They're all waiting for their glorified body in heaven. Their souls waiting. But the Lord Jesus has a glorified body, a body that's filled with the spirit of God, a spiritual body, as Paul says in one Corinthians 15. We're going to get a body like that, but we're still waiting. So he's the first fruits of the new creation. Well, that ties in with Exodus 20. Remember creation. What else does Jesus' resurrection do it seals the forgiveness of our sins, right? Christ's death paid for all of our sins. 1 Corinthians 15, Paul says, yes, the crucifixion is critically important, but if Jesus didn't rise from the dead, you're still in your sins.

LH
Yeah.

PH
So the resurrection is of one piece; it completes the payment.

LH
If flips the whole thing on its head too, because it's just like the rest comes first, then the work, versus the work and then the rest in the Old Testament too.

PH
Right. So when Jesus rises from the dead, then the payment is confirmed, the victory is confirmed. That's why Resurrection Day, Easter, is such a joyful day because had Jesus not come forth from the tomb, everything else would have been for naught. Right. So the resurrection Easter Sunday is a fulfillment of the Exodus from Egypt. Easter Sunday is what Deuteronomy 5, the fourth commandment in Deuteronomy 5 is talking about. Remember that you were slaves in Egypt. Remember that you were slaves to sin. Remember that you were under the tyranny of the devil and how the Lord Jesus set you free.

LH
You were slaves. Now everything hinges on the resurrection. It flips, and you've been set free. Therefore, go live lives of thankfulness.

PH
Right

LH
In the you know following six days,

PH
exactly. And then we get every seventh days. You on the first day of the week, the people of God are gathering to worship. That that that pattern starts to emerge in the Gospels. Every one of the Gospels mentions Jesus rose on the first day of the week. The disciples were gathered on that day. Jesus met them on that day. They worshiped him on that day. A week later in John's Gospel, exactly a week later, like the next Sunday, they were gathered again. Jesus appears to them again. He shows himself to Thomas. In the Book of Acts we see the same pattern appearing. They met on the first day of the week. 1 Corinthians 16, Paul says, when you meet on the first day of the week have a collection and set aside some money so that when I come I don't have to have a special collection at that time. Do that, by the way, in Corinth and in the churches of Galatia.

LH
Yeah, so broadly applies.

PH
This was a common thing. They were they were gathering on the first day of the week. So they didn't need a special command. They understood that when Jesus rose from the dead, it was a fulfillment of the Sabbath. But that didn't mean they stopped having one day out of seven to worship. They now recognize the resurrection day as oh this is the new holy day. This is the new special day on which we can commune with our Savior and our Lord. This is the day where it all comes together, and the church has recognized it ever since.

LH
And that's fairly undisputed, like across different denominations. Like that, the Catholics obviously would do that too, Protestants…

PH
The Lutherans, the Anglicans, the Baptists. Yep, everybody mostly, as far as I know, has the first day of the week. You know, I've got a I've got a reference somewhere in my notes about that, you know that this was the practice, you see it in the in the scriptures, in the New Testament scriptures, like I mentioned. But then in the early church history, it was a, they just pick they just carried on with that practice. So Eusebius in the fourth century mentions something like in in in all the churches everywhere, on the first day of the week, people gathered to sing the Lord's praises. He just makes a reference to that, like a it's a common pattern, you know. And throughout history, in the in the Middle Ages, the Roman Church they had something called lauds and vespers. Lauds was morning worship, break of day, and vespers was evening worship. And so this idea of morning and evening, morning and evening, was a common enough thing throughout history, and the Reformation Church basically continued. You know. First of all, with Sunday as the Lord's Day worship, and then they often they had two services. Even the Lutherans had two services in the early period of the Reformation. Later on, that they dropped it, it seems, but for the early period, they were quite happy to have a catechism sermon in the afternoon. I know we're getting into something else here now, but I’m just mentioning that this whole first day of the week thing, it's not just oh a recent invention that's been going on since the New Testament.

LH
Yep. Okay, so that's pretty clear. I think we've that that's you've established that well. So okay, we're sitting here on Sunday. There's a clear continuation from creation through the laws of Moses and then into the fulfillment that translates into Sunday. Now we're in you know the Christ is come, He has risen, and we are in the New Testament regime, so to speak. How does that play out now practically? Like where does the rubber hit the road on some of these issues? So let's maybe shift gears in the back half year, and kind of get to some more of the practical or the nitty gritty, the Real Talk type questions or examples. So we put this out on social media too that we're going to be talking about the Sabbath and Sunday, and we did get quite a few submissions from listeners and stuff too. So there's a lot of interest, and I think a lot of people are working through this topic in their lives, both, I mean, obviously, just in the context of younger folks like myself establishing a family and establishing routines, and kind of seeing what you grew up with and what you're going to keep or change, whatever. But then also, just if we think about the how disruptive COVID was going back whatever it was six years now, and the rise of going to more online church and live stream as an option as well for people. So now there's more kind of considerations there and more options to weigh. So why don't we kind of wade into some of these waters? But I think for us in in a reformed context, many, most of our listeners probably grew up in a two service kind of context, going you know morning and afternoon, or morning and evening, and that's something that we're a lot of us are used to. Where does that practice come from? Is this a wise and godly practice on its own, but take it or leave it, or is this more of a command? Like, how did this kind of come about, and give us some guidance on that topic in particular?

PH
Well, I think if we go back to the fourth commandment, and even to Genesis 2, In both commands, there the Lord speaks about keeping the day holy to Him. So I think in all the practical discussions that we're about to have, we need to keep that in mind. Remember this this idea of keeping a day holy was before a fall into sin. So after the fall into sin, and even after being redeemed by Christ, we still can speak about a holy day. It's not. It's not off the table to speak about a holy day. The first day of the week is holy to the Lord. Let's keep the day holy. How do we do that? How do they do it in the Old Testament? We like to look to the Bible for examples. Well, in the Old Testament, there was sacrifices made at the altar, in the tabernacle, in the temple, every morning and every evening. That was every day of the week, but it was doubled on the Sabbath. So the priests were there first thing in the morning and first thing in the evening, and there would have been worshippers gathered around the gate or the entry to the tabernacle, praying and offering their devotion to the Lord as these things were done. We know that was common practice in the Old Testament. We have reference to morning and evening worship in Psalm 92, which is called a psalm for the Sabbath. Give praise to the Lord in the morning and in the evening, I believe it is. I'm just paraphrasing a bit there. So, if you bring that into the New Testament period, the first Christians were Jews, and then they were quickly joined by Gentiles. We have evidence from history that they worshiped also first thing in the morning and first thing in the evening, or last thing in the evening, I should say at sunset, sunrise and sunset. That was their practice in the early church, morning and evening worship. That that does a lot to help keep the day holy to the Lord. This idea that you worship in the morning and the rest of the day is for yourself, that's a problem. That's already moving away from the concept of this day is for the honor of the Lord and for my good. My good, my highest good is indeed to give my heart to the Lord, to be in the Lord's company, to think about the Lord, to fellowship with the Lord, to meditate upon the Lord, not to go off and do whatever I want, right? Isaiah, the prophet says, I believe it's chapter 58 - He also makes reference to this in chapter 56 - and the Lord through Isaiah says, "Call my Sabbath a delight. Do not do what you want on my on my day.” This is the attitude we should have. We should be looking for ways to make the day such that we can commune with our hearts with our God, and a public worship service in the morning and a public worship service either in the evening or in the latter part of the afternoon. The Lord doesn't specify hours.

LH
Fill out the day approach.

PH
Sort of almost like bookends to the day.

LH
Sure,

PH
That helps very much to keep our focus on the Lord. If we if we find ourselves resisting two worship services and thinking, “well, I don't need the second worship service,” we should ask ourselves, what's going on in my heart? Why don't I want to spend time worshiping God and hearing Him speak to us? Because He speaks to us in the preaching of the Word, right? The preaching of the Word is God speaking to us. This is one of the ordinary means of grace. He does it also in the sacraments, right? He speaks to us when the church is being gathered, when the church is being called by the Christ-appointed elders, we should, our heart should want to be there. This is the starting point for these discussions. We shouldn't be looking for well, what exactly are the parameters in Scripture? What are the do's and don'ts? That's where we get into the Pharisees, Pharisaical side of things. Remember the principle. This is a day holy to the Lord for our good, and our good is when we spend time with God. So, yeah, and all through church history, as I mentioned earlier, Eusebius mentions morning and evening, the Middle Ages, Lauds and Vespers, and then also the Reformed’s and the Anglican’s and the Presbyterian’s and the Lutheran’s all had a second service at some point in the latter part of the day, and that was common practice in the Reformation. We've gotten away from it last couple of centuries. A lot of the Protestant churches, but we are... It's not a good thing to get away from it. It's there's so many benefits to is.

LH
And then and then you layer in the additional like authority of the elders and them calling you to a second service and that whole side of things too. But you're kind of just speaking more towards like what is your heart posture towards the day, right?

PH
I think we have to start with that. Like at the at the end of the day, all of us need to be honest before God. Yep, like we're all going to stand before the Lord and ask, and He's have to give account for how we honored the fourth commandment. Did you consider my day holy? It's the Lord's Day, not the Lord's couple of hours in the morning. The Lord's Day. What did you do with my day? I gave you so many years of my day once every seven, what did you do with it? Well, if you think about that question, you think about the day of judgment. Let that let that inform how we answer, and not be glib, and not be you know posturing or not look for excuses. You're going to have to, I have to answer to the Lord. So do you. So does everybody. What are we doing on Lord's Day? Is it for me or for the Lord? Am I looking after my wants, or am I serving the Lord from the heart? Am I trying to get to know Him better? Am I trying to be in fellowship with His people better? You know.

LH
this one's a little off the wall, though it's kind of related to the heart posture side of things. What about thinking about it from like a sundown to sundown sort of approach, like because that was, I think that's how the Jews kind of deal with their Sabbath, even still today, where it's like whenever the sun goes down, to whenever goes down the next day.
So kind of a evening to evening approach.

PH
So I suppose I suppose there's freedom to do that. Like if you if you wanted to start your holy day, your day of rest on Saturday sundown, and concluded at Sunday sundown. I, I don't think anyone could say that's wrong. Our culture is such that we normally think in terms of midnight to midnight, in terms of when the day starts and ends. So, I would, but I would leave that into the freedom of a individual believers.

LH
Yeah. Okay. Interesting. I just think about that. Like it's if you're preparing for your work week or whatever too. Like my mind always tends to go there on a Sunday evening. Like okay, I'm getting up tomorrow. What am I doing on Monday? What's the day look like?

PH
Yeah.

LH
But so if you kind of like growing up, you were always big on that. Like preparing your heart or your mind for Sunday, right? So you're kind of trying to wind down on Saturday.

PH
Yeah. Well, another factor in all this too is as we're thinking about how to spend the Lord's Day in a way that's holy to the Lord and honoring to the Lord, we should think about our children. We should think about our neighbors, how we as adults act, and how we perform and do this the Sunday. People observe that our own children observe that. They will know whether we're the real deal or not. They will know whether this is this is just a dad or mom, you know, trying to get away with stuff and going to church. Yeah, but then after church, not really caring about the things of the Lord, they'll see that that's hypocrisy. They'll see that and they'll smell that, and it would be no surprise if they abandon the faith when they become adults. Also, our neighbors are looking upon us. Are we, what we do on the Lord's Day says a lot about who we worship. If we can't give the whole day to the Lord, if we're not serious about the Lord on this day. If we just go a couple of hours in the morning and then do our own thing in the afternoon, just like all of our worldly neighbors, they will understand who we really are for in this life. By contrast, if we are serious about the Lord's day, it can be a fantastic witness. I know I have a friend who, in university days, he was in architecture school, and he was hard pressed sometimes to meet deadlines for his assignments. And these architecture students, they would go 24/7 for periods of time to get their projects done. Well, he was, and they all had their studios in the same building, and so you were you know you were right beside your fellow students doing your architectural models and whatnot. Well, he would leave promptly at midnight on Saturday, and all of his fellow students were still there. They were going to go through the night because this thing was due Monday, and they had to get it done. And he would reappear Sunday at midnight, and he did this consistently, and you know, at first they were just like, "What are you doing? You're crazy!” But after a while, they respected him. They saw that he was serious about this. And you know what? His marks never suffered. The Lord blessed those efforts, and that's just a simple example of faithfulness in the little things. You know, he didn't do it to be noticed, but he was noticed.

LH
It's one of those things, and I think you see that a lot in Christian life, where like it, yeah, it doesn't make sense on the surface. Like think of a tithing in another like context, you could like oh you could take that money, you can invest it, you can make more money, then give it away later in life. But that's just not how the Lord works, and that's not what he calls us to do, ultimately.

PH
Right. It's very much like well, another example would be the giving of the first fruits. If you go back into the Israelites' history, you know the Lord was saying when you when you harvest your field, the very first portion of your harvest, bring that to the temple and give it to me, give it to the priests and give it to the personnel, the Levites, and even to the poor, don't eat it for yourself. You didn't have the rest of the crop in the barn, right? So you had to trust the Lord that He would give you the rest of the crop, that it would yet come in the barn, that there would be no storms that would flatten that crop because it was still in the field.

LH
Yeah.

PH
So the giving of the first fruits is an act of faith. You're trusting God to provide for you because you would very much like to have that first portion in your barn.

LH
Yeah, it feels safer, you know.

PH
But who you trusting?

LH
Who you trusting? Yeah.

PH
And it's the same with the seventh or the, sorry the first day, the day of rest. Give it to the Lord. Spend it with the Lord. Who are you trusting?

LH
Yep, yep. So you see, though, the company like Chick Fil A too, how they just you know, like business sense, it doesn't make any sense. You're like, that's a whole extra day. People buy a ton of fast food on Sundays. You can make so much extra money. But hasn’t hurt them at all.

PH
The Lord blesses.

LH
Yeah. Okay, live stream. Let's do that. That's a big one nowadays too. Again, that kind of arises during COVID, and that becomes more and more popular. A lot of people will use this as like an alternative to going to church, and you could make the case to yourself at least, it's easy to convince your own heart of this that this is more restful. I'm not feeling the best, and you know I've had a full day or too much social interaction in the morning service. I got to just relax. But how do we kind of treat live stream in in today's world?

PH
Well, I'm just going to underline that we all have to be honest before God. We all have to answer to God. So we all can make excuses and even have reasons and justify a lot of things to ourselves. We have to be really careful with that. Live stream service, in and of itself, can be a great blessing for those who legitimately can't come to the worship services. Let's start with that positive, okay? Compared to what we had before, with recordings and tapes and CDs, where people would have, if they were stuck at home, they were they were shut in, or they were in places where they could not get to, to they would love to be to worship at worship, but they couldn't get there. Then you know they either had a pre-recorded CD in the old and you know a decade ago. Now they can watch it live. That's a blessing. So let's acknowledge that. But if you're able to come to church and you don't have a legitimate reason for staying home, you're not doing right. You're not honoring the fourth commandment. So let's, I think, just be very clear about that. Leave it at that. It's pretty plain. Like if you stay home from worship, and you and you think that the Lord accepts live stream worship when you could go to church, that's wrong.

LH
And even as a blessing itself, and it is a blessing for those who can't go. It's not the same. It's still just there's no gathering element to that, really.

PH
100%. You are at best observing. So it's a second best option for those who are unable to go to the gathering of God's people, and then it can be a blessing because that’s all you can do. But if you're staying home by choice, you're not honoring the call of the Lord to worship on the Lord's Day.

LH
Okay, let's get in as we kind of you know bring the show to a close here. But there's a lot of good questions we have from listeners that want to kind of address. Yeah, we don't have to go rapid fire necessarily, but we'll see if we can get through them in in shorter order, if possible. Keeping in mind again this kind of idea of the two ditches, right? Avoiding the secularism or the complete you know go with my heart sort of kind of mentality of whatever I find to be restful, I should do. Like taking yourself out of the day and making sure it's focused on God would be the proper approach there. And then on the other ditch, the whole legalism side of things, of course, too, right? So maybe just high level, and then we'll get into some specifics. How would you counsel someone who struggles with one ditch or the other? Someone who says, "Yeah, like I grew up with a lot of these practices, and I think they're probably good, but also they can seem a little legalistic, and a lot of other Christians don't have these.” And I'm not sure about the biblical backing of these particular outworkings, whether that be, you know, whatever, let's take going out for dinner on a Sunday, for example, or lunch, or something. Something very common in a lot of other Christian circles, but not something that we typically practice in the Reformed tradition. How would you counsel someone on that side, and then also someone who's who kind of struggles with, yeah, it's a free world. I can do what I like, but you can kind of ensnare yourself in that as well.

PH
Well, I do think we should to just sort of take up the issue of going out to restaurants. I know that's a popular, in some places, a popular thing. And look, part of the fourth commandment is the requirement for us to rest. That's in the fourth commandment in Deuteronomy and in Exodus, it's we're also required to let our servants rest. We should not ignore that. Your male servant, your female servant, your ox, your donkey, all these creatures, the sojourner within your gates, they shall rest as well as you. Deuteronomy 5.

LH
That's what God wants.

PH
That's what God wants. So, okay, what's the principle there? Well, basically, we should not make anyone work for us to the extent possible that we can. So, when I walk into a restaurant on Sunday and order food, I am making someone work. I cannot square that with the 10th commandment, or the fourth commandment.

LH
Now, with the servants in the Old Testament context, they would have taken the day off of making food for their master.

PH
They would have, yeah.

LH
Who makes the food?

PH
I'm not exactly sure how they would have done it, but they, they perhaps they would have prepared it the night before. That seems to make the most sense practically speaking. But they were like that rest was quite serious. It was quite vigorously commanded. In they weren't even allowed to make a fire on the Sabbath day.

LH
Yeah. See. So, but that specific example that would be like okay, that's away with the ceremonial laws. Like that's the shadows, right? We cast that away, so why not cast away that that kind of component of it as well?

PH
Well, because the rest element, we're commanded to rest. That's an ongoing command, and we're also commanded to give our servants a rest.

LH
Yeah, but is that an ongoing command, though?

PH
I don't see how you can separate those two. Like, isn't it? Wouldn't it be selfish of me to say, "Well, I'm going to rest, but now I'm going to I'm going to make my servants work.” Like imagine I'm a I'm a boss. You're an employer, so you go to church, but you make your employees work on Sunday. Would that's would that be fair?

LH
No, no.

PH
No. And that's the principle I'm talking about. I think the fourth commandment is talking about you let your employees. Rest, even if they're not Christians, you give them that day. It's a the Sabbath was made for man.

LH
Yeah.

PH
So we should do whatever we can to not make people work for us. So like and you know when you go to the restaurant, yeah, people have to serve you. Well, if you didn't go and if enough people didn't go; the restaurant wouldn't open on Sunday. And I recognize that my one action, your one action, isn't likely to change the actions of others. But the principle of it is now: are we are we giving the opportunity for rest to that other person? And then I would say, you know what? We can do better. We can just stay home. We don't have to go to the restaurants on Sunday. Invite people over for fellowship, and I recognize there's a busyness on at home.

LH
There's a lot of serving that goes into that too.

PH
Yes. And I recognize that, but you know I think that way is you're having fellowship. There's ways I think to maybe make the fellowship a little easier going in terms of meal prep on a Sunday. It used to be the habit in in many Dutch Reformed churches, Dutch Reformed homes to have the soup made Saturday night, and maybe even to have the buns cut up Saturday night or whatever, so that basically meals like lunch and supper were simple fare, soup and buns, but you didn't have to do a lot of prep. I recognize you know some of that's changed, but maybe we can think in terms of hey, what kind of easy meals can we have on Sunday and make it easy for mom? I recognize that moms are often busy on Sundays, so I'm not saying we got we got we do everything right or perfect. I think I think we can think a lot harder about how to do Sundays better, how to honor the Lord, how to how to make it holy to the Lord, how to bless our own hearts by communing with God more richly than maybe we do now, rush, rush, rush, rush, rush all the time. Can we can we rethink that? I think there's lots of room to rethink things, and maybe we can also rethink how we do Saturday nights so that Sundays can be easier. Again, the principle of rest and worship those are those are key, and to lay aside all unnecessary work.

LH
Yeah. But then, yeah, you still have to draw some lines in terms of like travel kind of comes into play, vacations come into play. That's usually where you see a lot of principles get bent is on vacation in particular. So how do you kind of square that circle for when your vacation, which is explicitly for your rest, it's kind of your extension of multiple you know Sundays in a row, so to speak, maybe, but it's a different kind of rest there. So how are we defining rest nowadays? I think that's a key question.

PH
Yeah. So Lord's Day rest is setting aside your physical work or your everyday work, I should say. Like I want to just quote something from the Synod of Dordt 1618 1619. Synod of Dordt made six statements about the Sabbath day, day of rest. One of them is the Sabbath of the Jews having been abolished, the day of the Lord must be solemnly hallowed by Christians. That's a principle. The day of the Lord must be solemnly hallowed by Christians, and then another statement: This day must be so consecrated to worship that on that day we rest from all servile works, so ordinary works of our everyday labors, except those which charity and present necessity require, and also from all such recreations as interfere with worship. So there's a there's some principles there, and I think these are very healthy principles that have been followed by Reformed Churches, not just the Dutch Reformed, because the Synod of Dordt was an international synod, and this statement would have been appreciated by many Protestant churches. That we rest and we do what we can to give others that rest, even if they're not Christians. And when we plan our holidays, you mentioned holidays. Let's plan our holidays so that we can have rest and proper worship, proper rest and worship on the Lord's Day. Like in this day and age, more than any other day and age with the internet access, can we not think ahead and plan ahead, so that we're not traveling extensively, at least, on the Lord's Day, so that we're not bothering other people on the Lord's Day with our needs. That we're somewhere, and we are given that we look for an opportunity to be somewhere where there's a faithful church where we can gather with the local saints and be under the preaching of the word. Can we not do that? Man, we you can pick you can go on the internet, you can you can pick a faithful church, find them all over the world.

LH
Well, you can use live streaming, see what they actually operate as too. Check out some sermons.

PH
Right. So that we actually have less excuse now. But what you said earlier is. As I think, it's what we what we're doing in our hearts. We're we want to cut corners because there's other things that are competing for our heart.

LH
It's a preparation challenge more than anything, maybe then. Which is also kind of the Sunday, just to take the specific Sunday example too, if you're not preparing for it well on a Saturday, it's that much more of a temptation. For example, if you're not prepared for your meals or something, to be like, ah, just grab, grab a quick dinner and just whatever pick up some McDonald's or something, if you're in a rush.

PH
Yeah. And if I don't believe that this day is holy to the Lord creation, ordinance, then I guess it doesn't matter if I drive six hours on a on a Sunday and I'm and I'm tired and fatigued, and I'm and during those six hours, I'm not really communing with God. Like I, you know, this is where, this is where the root concept at creation. If we can get that back clear in our minds, then we're going to treat this day differently. We're going to treat it wholly, you know. And if we don't give our time to the Lord, like I can't be bothered to take. I want to drive home for my holiday on Sunday because I need to be back in work Monday. Well, I don't need to be back in work Monday, but I don't want to take Monday off.

LH
Yeah, it's a different thing.

PH
I don't. That's the that's a different thing. We all have the flexibility to take Monday off, make that a travel day, but actually, I don't want to do that because I want to save that holiday because you only have so many in a year for the next holiday. So, what's really going on there?

LH
Yeah, what do you actually value?

PH
It's more my pleasures and choices for me than it is the Lord's honor in the Lord's day. So the Lord's day is one of those days that it gives. It's a, it's like a litmus test. You know what's really going on in our heart. Where does our time really go? If you want to know what a whether a person is a sincere believer, follow their money and follow their time. What are they giving their money to? What are they giving their time to? Those things will tell the tale of what's going on in their heart.

LH
Yep. Similar, I don't know if we have this in our list here, but similar with sports on Sundays and stuff too, like how people try to fit that in where they can, sort of thing. But you inevitably end up against this rub, or even if you don't, you just you're making it so much more busy and harder to focus on what, how it's a holy day and how it's set apart.

PH
You come out of church in the morning and you got softball game. Your you know your kids got a little league game at 2 o'clock in the afternoon. Well, what is that child now thinking? What are you as a parent now thinking when you go to the game? It's all about the game.

LH
Yeah, gotta change in the van after church and then go out there and…

PH
It's all about you've lost the sense of this day is holy to the Lord. You can't tell me that you're going to the to the your child's softball game, and it's a you're thinking about the Lord, and you're communing with the Lord. No, you're not. You're all about that softball game, or the soccer game, or the hockey game, or whatever you've got going on in terms of sports. Sports is another idol of our age, and as Christians, we had better be careful that we don't make it our idol. It's all around us as an idol, there's so many idols around us, but sports is one of them. So I just want to mention that that again, the honesty before God. I have to answer to the Lord what I do with my child on the Lord's day, and have I treated the Lord's Day as a holy day by putting my child in a sports league that plays on Sunday, and that a day that's set aside to be holy to the Lord. Have I really done what is pleasing to the Lord? I can't square that in my conscience. Yeah, and it's not actually at the end of the day my conscience. I can't square it before the Lord.

LH
Yeah, yep. No, when you start with how we did right with in creation and work it all the way through, yeah, it it's applicable for us today. It's a day of rest. It's a holy day, and it's commanded still today to take that seriously. So, to intentionally put extra distractions into your Sunday is at best unwise.

PH
I'll give another example from my own when I was my own youth. When I was when I was a teen, we would have like friends would come over for lunch and we'd play board games.

LH
Yeah.

PH
Okay, that was nice, but I'm a kind of a competitive person, so I don't really like to lose board games, or maybe more so back in those days. So we'd be playing like a board game, like Monopoly or something like that. Monopoly can take a couple of hours, so we'd play between services, and then my friend would come back after the second service. Well, what was I thinking about during the second service?

LH
You should have bought Park Avenue.

PH
Yeah, I was thinking about all these purchases I should have made and what I was going to do when I get back home and you know, I'm a I'm a teenager in church, and I caught myself a number of times thinking about the game at home, sitting in church, and I, it, you know, the penny, I'm a bit of a slow guy that way, like the penny slowly dropped, and I realized at a certain moment, you know what? Like these competitive games, I like I'm not saying for other people maybe they can play them and they don't think about them. I know I can't. I can't think about… so I stopped doing that. I stopped playing competitive games like that between the services because I knew it was ruining my concentration for the afternoon, and I wasn't honoring the Lord. Another thing I've stopped doing for the most part is watching really intense movies or TV shows on a Saturday night because I, this is just me, okay, so we all have to sort of work these things out for ourselves. But, for me, I'd be thinking about that fairly intense drama, let's say, on Sunday, I'd find my mind going back and forth to what I was watching last night. So I just thought, I'm not going to do that. I want to be ready for the Lord's Day. I want the mind ready for worship, and that's what the Lord wants for me, so I can engage as fully as I can. So you know we have to all of us again. I come back to that. We all have to think through for ourselves how to honor this principle of rest and worship and giving the day wholly to the Lord. What can I do to make myself ready so that when Sunday morning comes, and not just the morning but the day that I am I'm here to give my heart to God. I'm here to do what He's given me this day for to commune with Him. What can I do to make that happen to the best? And I think if we work that out, we'll all find a good track to follow.

LH
What are what are some positive things that you can do to fill that day well in between the time where you're engaged or where when you're not engaged in corporate worship on a Sunday, if especially if your church has two services, so that's only so much time of the day. But like we got a question from a from a listener about if you're a young single person, you can actually tend to have quite a bit of time on Sundays. And how do you kind of fill that well? Like, is that engaging in fellowship? Like that's a common thing we always talk about. Like, what does that look like exactly? Like, you don't, you know, you probably don't have to necessarily spend the entire day in the Word. That might be a good thing to do, but that's a pretty intense approach to do every seven days. Like, what’s a good practice?

PH
I do I do believe that that fellowshipping with God's people, both inside the worship service and outside the worship service, is totally a Sunday thing to do. Totally appropriate. Like if you think of what Paul commands or describes the church as in 1 Corinthians 12, as the body of Christ, each with its each member being a part of the body, each part has its own role to play. Well, how can we possibly play a role in each other's lives if we aren't in each other's lives. So 1 Corinthians 12, same with Romans 12, implicitly is calling for us to understand each other, get to know each other, have conversations together, have fellowship together, meet together, have lunch together, have meals together. Not that long ago, we had a fellow over for coffee between services. He was kind of new to the Christian faith, and he hadn't really been to church before. So I said to him, "You want to come over for fellowship” And I didn't really think of the word I used. And he said, "Oh, what's fellowship?” “Oh,” I said, "Well, that's just you know it's just visiting together and hanging out together, getting to know each other.” “Oh,” he says, "Sure.” And then he came back to that word later on. He says, "I like this fellowship thing”, and so we kind of kid about it now. But you know, that's fellowship is a Sunday thing to do. The Lord Jesus says in one of his you know repartees to the Pharisees, "It is lawful to do good on the Sabbath.” Well, how can we do good to our fellow members in the body of Christ? A basic thing is get to know each other. A basic thing is how be in each other's lives. So, for a young single guy, or for even for marrieds, yeah, where you can have people over or inquire whether you can go and visit. And I encourage the non singles to think of inviting singles over, beautiful thing to do. Can be done both directions, but yeah. So I think spending time in each other's company, you know, maybe like things like reading good upbuilding literature doesn't necessarily have to be the Bible. Of course, that's excellent too, but it could be Christian literature of different kinds. What about thinking of way of visiting those who are shut in? You know, there are those who would love to be in church, right? You've got elderly members of the church can't make it out. Well, what about you know popping around and having a cup of tea with elderly Mrs. So and So or shut in Mr. So and So, or what have you? Maybe there's an old age home in the neighborhood that could use, again people there could use visits. These are just the tip of the iceberg. I think if we think about ways we can do good to God's people without overtaxing ourselves, because it is a day of rest, we should also absorb the physical rest and come out of the day refreshed physically and spiritually. The spiritual rest, of course, is primarily in Christ. Like we physically, we spiritually rest in Christ for the forgiveness of our sins. That's where our that's where that that great the greatest of all rest is found is in Christ. But there is a physical rest that the Lord grants us too, with the cessation of labor one day in seven. Yeah, we should we should we should benefit from that.

LH
Yeah, we are body and soul. You need both components that way too. What about works of necessity on the Sabbath? Because yeah, I always find this one to be a tricky one in particular. Because, like, one man's work of necessity is another man's like hobby or leisure activity.

PH
Yeah, and that is that is a tricky thing. And here again, I think we have to just be very honest with ourselves before the face of the Lord. Like between you and the Lord, you should be able to figure out whether this is a work of necessity, or whether this is a work of I want to do it because I like it. So I don't know that there's a straight up answer to that question, you know. And I realize that we live in a work world that's so integrated, where things move from one, like some industries are going 24/7, and you couldn't even stop them if you wanted to because they're going 24/7, and like the internet, the telephone services, hydro services, yeah, these are these are almost works of necessity in our time, so it's very difficult. At the same time, I would say let's as believers do what we can to honor the Lord's Day and to be free on that day to worship. So you take, let's take the work of nursing. We have lots of nurses in our reformed churches who serve in, it's a work of necessity. No one's going to dispute that, right? We need nurses in hospitals. They need to work on Sunday at some points. But lots of the nurses I know they're careful with they try to minimize their Sunday shifts or only take them when they, you know, when there's when there's a when there's a need, so that because they love church, they want to be in church. They recognize they have to take their turn once in a while, and that's appropriate. But you know, so we should be looking for ways to minimize Sunday, even works of necessity, minimize that on Sunday, so that we can maximize the attendance at worship service, and the involvement with the body of Christ.

LH
It’s kind of the same principle, though, as not making other people work on Sunday, right? If you're going to treat that in the restaurant context, right? If you're a nurse and there's whatever I don't know, 50 nurses and they rotate in and out of this various shift, and you know that, like practically speaking, maybe a lot of other people don't give a hoot about the Sunday, and they'll work at whatever. But out of a hey, like I know that the work needs to get done. It is necessary work, right? And you could make an argument based on the principle you outlined earlier that you should actually claim an equal amount of your appropriate shares of the Sunday work if you're trying to be consistent with that principle.

PH
Yeah, I can, I can, I can track with that argument. You know the difference between the two scenarios is the coworker who may want the Sunday shift, the difference between let's say like you're not making this person work. You're this person is would actually like the work. Like the job the job has to be done. Unlike a restaurant, the job does not have to be done. That's, I don't think you can say a restaurant is a work of necessity.

LH
What about hotel restaurant? We have that list on there too. But like business trips, if it goes over a weekend, over a Sunday, how do you kind of handle that, right? Or even just travel arrangements, like a lot of people, like we have it in our business too, where it's like, um, like there'll be a training course that runs from like Monday to Thursday or Monday to Friday, and it's like, okay, like, how do you want to handle that, right? Do you want to take the red eye and like get in at like six a.m. and then you know grab a coffee and go and get to class? Well, you're not going to be physically rested certainly, but you might have been able to make both services, or do you make it calculated? Like, okay, I'll fly out at seven, I'll catch the live stream when I'm sitting in the airport waiting for my flight to here, and I'll go to the morning service.

PH
Well, I mean, probably businessmen, Christian business businessmen would be better able to answer this question. But I know of a number of Christian business people who would, in that scenario would leave Saturday night or Saturday, and they would they would rest on Sunday in their in their destination and find a church there. Hopefully there is one, and then Monday they would go to their thing. So they would it would cost them an extra day, but they would do it for the sake of the Lord's Day.

LH
Yeah, but then I would weigh that against the cost of you missing out on fellowship with your local church, your home church, and then also your family in most cases as well. So I guess that's just a weighing of the principles there.

PH
Yeah, which one which one allows you to keep the Lord's Day holy? I guess you'd have to work that out. And again, honesty in the face of the Lord is your best guide in such decisions

LH
In honoring your duties as a husband and as a father too? That's another day you're away from your wife and your children.

PH
So there, yeah, I think you have to weigh those things. You can't ignore those responsibilities.

LH
Fair enough. Okay, we did get through quite a bit of questions there. Maybe one that we haven't touched on, which is a super relevant one, just this idea of a digital Sabbath and smartphones, and this is-it's funny that we're talking about this. This has been your thing for many years, and I've definitely pushed back on that. But you know, I you get a little older, you get a little smarter and less dumb. Maybe you do see the wisdom in there. Like personally, I try to set it aside as best I can, but I'm not making a strict, you know, legalistic thing. I tend to just leave it at home, but we usually take one phone between the two of us to church, just so you have in case you need it. But I'll leave it in the car or something, right? And then I'll pick it up more, tends to be after second service, unless you have people over. Then you don't end up looking at it much till you know 8 o'clock or something.

PH
Indeed. So, you know, to the start of the decision-making process for what to do with all the tech on the Lord's Day has to be what's going on in your heart. What what's what am I trying to do with the tech? What what's my goal here? What am I, why do I want access or don't want access to it? To avoid legalism, you have to know why you're doing what you're doing, and then do it with the integrity of your heart. So, yes, I think everyone needs to be making their own decision here. Like, is it is it right or wrong to have a cell phone in your pocket at church? In and of itself, it's not right or wrong. For the one person, it may be the wiser way to celebrate the Lord's Day because to have a phone in their pocket, they're more distracted. They can't not hear the thing vibrate. They can't not check email. They can't not answer a text. They're better off leaving it plugged in at home. For the next person, it's not a bother, and they don't have that kind of connection with their phone, and they actually have their Book of Praise on their phone, so they and they e transfer their amounts for the deaconry from their phone. So this is where you we need to leave each other free. Like if a practice by itself is not contravening the Lord's Day or some principle of Scripture. Then we need to leave each other free. But this is where I would encourage us to think in terms of best practices. And again, you have to start with the purpose of the Lord's day. What's going on in your heart? What's going on in my heart? You know, for us, and you know that. Like growing up, we just had a house rule, and I tried to explain that to you, you kids, that it was a house rule that we weren't going to watch, weren't going to have screens. We're just keeping all screens off. Like it was even before the cell phone thing, but we worked the cell phones into it. Why? So that we were distraction free, and we could give our time and attention to worship and to fellowship; those were that was sort of thing. And I made a point, at least I tried to, you know, telling you and your siblings, look, other people might decide it's okay to watch, be it TV or a movie or something on a Sunday evening or whatever it was. And I'm not saying that's a sin. I'm just saying, your mom and I don't think that's best practice, and certainly for our family, we don't think that's a good practice. So we're just keeping the screens off. Also, when the sports were on, like we didn't watch, as you know, somewhat to your chagrin, if I recall, Stanley Cup playoffs, we didn't we didn't have the TV on Sundays. World Cup, we just didn't have the TV on, and that was an effort to keep the distraction away and to show, indeed, or to honor the Lord. So the focus was on the Lord. So we all have to give that thought, and again, we all have to answer for these things. So we should we need to be honest before the Lord. We have to have a humility also toward other people. Like the practice in our home doesn't mean doesn't set the standard for the practice in somebody else's home, right? There are such a thing as house rules, which may be good and beneficial for our home, but they're not mandatory for the next home and we have to be careful that we don't impose that on each other.

LH
Yeah, transpose those over. Is that kind of like when Paul talks about like not what is the passage there where it's like if your brother if they have if it hurts their conscience like don't press them on it sort of like the eating or the following the ceremonial laws

PH
Romans 14 is a bit tricky because it's very… Romans 14 is about those who were Jewish Christians taking what they believed were mandatory things from God's from the Mosaic laws and imposing them on fellow Christians who didn't think they were mandatory.

LH
Ah, okay.

PH
I think that's a bit of a different kettle of fish than me saying to you, "Look, you can't watch TV at all because I think it's wrong.” That's a different. I think Romans 14 isn't about that.

LH
Okay, it's saying don't burden your brother sister their conscience. That whole idea, or is not that's not the idea.

PH
Well, I the Bible does not give me any right to say to you that what I deem to be appropriate for my family, in this case, not watching TV, is therefore mandatory on your family. I may not say that, right, and that's why I'm very careful to say it's not a sin, I just don't think it's best practice for the Lord's Day. And that’s what I'm doing. I'm in charge of my house, so I have to. That's how we're doing it here. And maybe you can just you know later on you can tell me what's best what you think is best practice, and we can talk about it.

LH
Yeah, you can engage on the principles at play there.

PH
And I might and I might change my mind later on and say you know what maybe your practice is actually better than mine. I've observed by the way, and I think that's really good to take a look around what other people are doing? Serious Christians. How are they celebrating and honoring the Lord's Day? Are there things to be learned? Can we benefit from how they're thinking about it? Let's talk with each other. What are the thoughts about how? What are best practices to honor the Lord's Day? Yeah. Wouldn't that be an uplifting thing for all of us?

LH
Totally. Yeah. Because it can get stale over time too, right? If you think that oh no, I've kind of figured it out, and this is how it's done, right? And then it just becomes this rote thing, and yeah, you have to has to be living in your heart and considering it more often. What about I know I said we're almost at the end here, but there's one other maybe good one to touch on, which is just this the idol of family, and how we talk a lot about fellowship, right, in this episode, and that is good and well to engage in fellowship with family, with friends, with believers in the church, and or anybody really in that regard. But are we at a danger of making an idol out of family? Because that's, I think, culturally, like it's you mentioned sports for sure, that's a massive one where the world tries to fill the hole of the seventh day and put entertainment in there, but I think if you say like if you try to defend your Sunday position as someone else who's not a Christian, you say, oh, like we go to church and we spend time with family, and you know. Not saying you're a bad person, we just this is how we do it, and these are the things we spend our time on. And people kind of get that, but I think there's just like a real high value of a family in that context, and is that something we should be aware of as Christians and think through?

PH
Yes, I think we should be aware of it. I think it's something we can fall into, like when if we have a large family and we have adult kids in our own congregation, it would be very, let's say, easy, natural, just to have our family over for coffee after services. A lot of us have a custom of having coffee after the morning service, and then your yeah your family comes over if they're available, or they might come for supper, and then what happens is not by choice, like not by a deliberate decision, but other people don't get invited because you've already got people coming over. And I do know I've that some people even think of Sunday. Well, Sunday is a family day, and then I would just say I would just caution to say, look, it's beautiful that you that that we, you, we celebrate the Lord's Day with family, but trying to broaden that out. Like, don't forget the family of God. The family of God is of critical importance, and I recognize your blood family is often part of the family of God. But can we look beyond our families to see the needs of others in the congregation? Because if we only focus on our families, we do run the danger of having cliques where we're just about we basically have a little you know taken to its extreme you have a church within the church basically this large family hangs together and not a lot of people are interpenetrate that circle that'd be an extreme that wouldn't be healthy.

LH
No.

PH
I think we want to honor the whole body of Christ. We want to that would be healthy if we interact with more people and we have people over, we go to their homes if we get invited. If there is a social activity, sometimes there's a fellowship activity on a Sunday night. The young people might have a games night, or somebody says, "Oh, there's an open house at our in our backyard tonight” on a nice summer evening. Well, then you know, then you go there. Please don't stay home and say, "Well, it's our family night”, and you never show up at these events. So yes, there's a risk of it. I I'd never have met anybody that is let's say doing that on purpose. It didn't fall into it. So let's everyone just give it a thought and see if we can expand the love to include the whole body of Christ.

LH
Yep. Cool. Okay. Well, I think we covered a ton of ground. Come back to the theme of heart posture and being honest with yourself and before your Maker, and obviously just noting the importance of this holy day that is set apart and how that starts in creation and continues all the way through. So thanks for coming on. Appreciate it. That was, yeah, a lot of fun to kind of walk through this with you and hope people enjoyed it. We probably didn't get to every last little piece of the outline and all the questions we had. But I think we covered a lot of the core themes here, and if you're still listening at this point, I hope you really enjoyed it because it was probably a long one. And yeah, if you have any questions, comments, concerns, send them in, and if we need more discussion on this, we're happy to do so as well. And don't forget to check out Foundations if you're interested in purchasing a copy at Reformed Book Services. So thanks, Dad. Appreciate it. Thank you. Thanks, listeners. Till next time, Real Talk.

Red heart icon with + sign.
Theology

Proverbs: a different sort of devotional

“Do you have a devotional that you would recommend?” I get asked this question in various forms from time to time, and I think my answer sometimes surprises or disappoints people, because I don’t recommend what they might expect. I don’t really find most devotionals fruitful. But in my mid 20s I came across the Steven K. Scott’s book The Richest Man Who Ever Lived, a book which lays out “King Solomon’s secrets to success, wealth, and happiness.” The author describes how he went through nine jobs in five years, constantly failing at everything he tried, and convinced he would never succeed. Then he was challenged by a friend to read one chapter of Proverbs, write down his insights, and find ways to apply those insights to his day-to-day activities. And do that every day again for two years. The author went on to find success in his financial and business ventures and credits it to the wisdom of Solomon. I don’t remember much else of the book, but I did take up the same challenge, though not quite as long. How I read the book of Proverbs every day for eight months, reading Proverbs 1 on the first day of the month, Proverbs 2 on the second, and so on, 31 chapters for a month with 31 days (yes, sometimes you’ll have to read a few more chapters per day for the shorter months). Each day I would read a chapter and write down my own takeaways in a notebook, leaving enough room between the notes on each chapter so I had space for the following months’ notes. I would write down verses that really stood out to me, some months word-for-word, and other months challenging myself to write it in my own words. Some months I would listen to the audio version, and some months I would read it in a different translation, to break up the monotony of reading the same words over and over, and to see if there were verses that would stand out to me more than in other translations. Why Did I become wise overnight? No, but I can attribute much of my own personal growth to studying the book of Proverbs consistently. I still refer back to my notes from years ago, and I still read through the entire book of Proverbs once or twice a year. Proverbs is chock full of wisdom on relationships, avoiding temptation, being a good steward of God’s resources, surrounding yourself with godly people, and bridling your tongue (an area where I need constant encouragement). Proverbs can be challenging to read at times. Some proverbs seem to conflict with one another, which can be confusing: how do we know when it’s the right time to “answer a fool” (Prov. 26:4-5)? Some proverbs can be very convicting and make us uncomfortable. But these proverbs are given by God not just for wisdom information (good for our head only); these proverbs are meant for the transformation of our hearts and lives. I’m grateful for Solomon’s wisdom, gifted to him by God. And I’m grateful for the one who was greater than Solomon (Matthew 12:42). It can be difficult at times to see Jesus Christ in Proverbs, and that’s going to be my next focus as I read through the book again. So when people ask which devotional I recommend, I encourage them to read Proverbs. Read one chapter every day and record your own insights. It’s been very fruitful for me and for those that I’ve recommended it to. Andrew Lootens is a disciple of Jesus Christ, a husband and father, a resident of Chilliwack, BC, and a voracious reader who is kindling the flame to write a little bit more and read a little bit less....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Christian education - Sports, Theology

God and the 2014-15 Seattle Seahawks

All about God’s sovereignty, Man’s free will, and American football ***** When the editor suggested I write a piece about American Football, I was a little taken aback. Firstly, this did seem like an odd subject for a magazine like Reformed Perspective. “But still,” I thought, “I suppose we can hardly claim on the one hand that Christ is Lord over all of life, then on the other hand rule American Football as being off-limits.” The second reason was even more fundamental. I’m a Brit. And not a Brit that has any love, let alone knowledge of American Football. In fact, I’ll put my cards on the table right now: the game has about as much fascination for me as the game of cricket probably has to the average US Football fan – that is to say none whatsoever. So I was relieved as I read through the editor’s request to find that the American Football bit was somewhat incidental, and I was not being asked to spend hours watching old Giants vs. 49ers games on YouTube. Rather, the request was to try and make some sort of sense of comments made by Russell Wilson, the Seattle Seahawks quarterback, after his side’s victory over the Green Bay Packers in January (2015), which sent Seattle to the Superbowl. The most improbable of comebacks For those not familiar with what happened, with less than four minutes left in the game and trailing 19-7, the Seahawks staged a dramatic recovery, tying the game to take it into overtime, before going on to win 28-22. What was especially amazing was that the Seahawks’ quarterback, Russell Wilson, went from playing one of the worst games of his life, throwing four interceptions, to scoring three touchdowns in the game’s final 6 minutes. Wilson then caused a stir with his post-match comments when he was asked to explain how his team has gone from being down and out without any hope to being victorious a few minutes later: "That's God setting it up, to make it so dramatic, so rewarding, so special." Of course, this set the whole Twittersphere afluttering with many ridiculing his claim. It also set off a series of articles on the web with titles like, “Does God play a role in picking the winning team?” What are our options? So what should we make of Wilson’s comments? I think we have to break our answer into two parts, one of which deals with the general question of God’s relationship with His creation, and the other which deals with the more specific question of whether He intervened in this particular instance. The first and more general question is basically a question about the nature of God’s sovereignty, and I think the best way to look at this is to examine all the other possible answers that could have been given as to whether God really did intervene to make the match so dramatic. These positions are: God has nothing to do with Seattle Seahawks games because there is no God. God has nothing to do with Seattle Seahawks games because He does not deal directly with the created order. Although God is sovereign, He has nothing to do with Seattle Seahawks games because He could care less about US Football. God has everything to do with Seattle Seahawks games, foreordaining their results, and so when Wilson threw his interceptions, that was because of God’s direct “interception.” God has everything to do with Seattle Seahawks games, foreordaining their results, yet he does so in such a way that does not involve the kind of direct intervention Wilson suggests We can further categorize these positions as follows: God is in control of nothing because he is not there (Atheistic). God created the universe, winding it up like a watch, and then left it to its own devices (Deistic) God has created the universe, but He is only interested in “spiritual things” (Pietistic) God is sovereign and controls everything that happens, to the extent that no-one has free will (Ultra Sovereignty) God is sovereign and is involved in everything, yet in such a way that man has liberty to act and to make choices (Sovereignty) Narrowing it down I trust that readers of Reformed Perspective can see that both the first two positions are highly illogical, not to mention unbiblical. It is highly illogical to believe that something came from nothing – and by that I really mean nothing: no time, no space, no matter – not to mention also believing that the something was then capable of organizing and sustaining itself into an amazingly complex order. It is also highly irrational to believe that a creator would go to the trouble of creating an amazingly complex order, only to walk away with total disinterest, leaving it to itself. What of position three? It actually turns out to be quite odd, since it refutes the very claim it makes. Those who hold to this position tend to be loud about the “sovereignty of God,” yet they then extend this sovereignty to include about 0.000000001% of the universe that God created. Well, if God is sovereign, He is sovereign over all creation and so the idea that He cares nothing for certain parts of His creation – especially “physical things” – is a denial of His sovereignty. What of positions four and five? They actually share many things in common. Both agree that God is sovereign over all things, including Seattle Seahawks games. Both agree that God foreordains the results of Seahawks games. Both agree that God upholds all the players involved and without this the game could not have been played, let alone played out so dramatically. Yet the difference is that whilst the fourth point understands this to mean that God controls everything, down to the last interception, and so basically micromanages His creation, which seems to me to be closer to Greek fatalism than biblical Christianity, the fifth view understands this in a way that retains God’s sovereignty, but also insists on man’s “free will.” Personally I take the fifth view to be the correct one. Free will?!? I realize that this might spook some readers. “We don’t have free will,” some might say, “as we lost it in the Fall.” My response is as follows. What we lost when Adam sinned was communion with God, righteousness, holiness and spiritual life, so that we need to be saved, and have no free will to choose salvation. We are by nature dead in trespasses and sins – as dead spiritually as Lazarus in the grave was physically – and as you know, dead people can’t bring themselves to life. However, this is not the same as saying that we lost our ability to make choices in all other areas of life, though of course those choices will be dictated by our sinful hearts. So as I sit here typing, did God foreordain it? Yes. Am I doing it out of free will? Yes. This seems impossible and counter-intuitive, but then He is an "impossible and counter-intuitive" God. Here is how chapter three of the Westminster Confession puts it: "God from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass; yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; nor is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away, but rather established." This is a grand and frankly amazing statement. The God it presents is infinitely bigger than our imaginations can grasp. Look at it like this. Can you imagine a God who sets up the world and then gives perfect free will to his creatures so that He doesn’t know what is going to happen next and can’t control it? Yes, I can easily imagine Him. What about a God who unchangeably ordains whatsoever comes to pass, and does so by micro-managing every single detail to the nth degree? Yep, I can get my head around Him too. But what about a God who unchangeably ordains whatsoever comes to pass, yet does so without infringing on the liberty of His creatures to make choices of their own “free will”? I must confess that I am unable to comprehend such a God, or to understand how this is possible, but then again I have no understanding of how a universe can be spoken into existence either, or how the eternal Son of God can become a baby. Such things are too high for me, and I accept them by faith. What I am suggesting is that God is neither a deist God who is uninvolved in His creation, nor a pietistic God who is sovereign over a tiny portion of His creation, nor is He a micromanager who manages every aspect of it in the kind of minute details we understand by micromanaging. Rather, He is in sovereign control, upholds everything by the Word of His mouth, foreordains all things, yet does so in such a way that He is not in the business of micromanaging Russell Wilson’s passes. Conclusion But moving on to the second question, couldn’t He do that if He wanted? Doesn’t God intervene in His creation? Of course He does, and the Bible is full of instances of His interventions in human affairs. But the question is not whether He can intervene, but rather did He intervene in this specific instance? The question here hinges to a large extent on just how much priority God puts on the results of American Football games. Now as someone who upholds the sovereignty of God in everything, and the Lordship of Christ over everything, I understand that God cares about all of His creation and this includes American Football. But is this the same as saying that He cares about it to the extent that He is prepared to intervene to “change the result” and give the watching audience a good time? Emphatically no. Pietists (number three in the positions mentioned above) often want to reduce the things God cares about to “spiritual things” such as salvation, worship, prayer and Bible-reading, with everything else reduced to nought. Then over in the other ditch, there are others who want to flatten everything to make out that God cares for all things equally. This is not so. Just as we hierarchies of importance in our lives, it is fairly clear from the Bible that God has hierarchies of interest and importance. Yes, He is interested in American Football, in that He created the players, gave them the ability to play what is essentially a perfectly okay game (well cricket is better of course), and in that He calls on man to do things with all their might and for the glory of God. However, this is not the same as saying that He is interested enough in it to intervene in a game to make the game more exciting and give everyone a good time (except of course for Green Bay fans). In conclusion, though God cares about His entire creation, and though He ordained the surprising events and the result in the match between the Seahawks and Green Bay Packers, I think Russell Wilson would have a hard time making a Scriptural case that God intervenes directly in such matters. This was originally published in the March 2015 issue under the title "God and the Seahawks."...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Theology

#3 - The unknown Commandment

“You shall not take the Name of the LORD your God in vain, for the LORD will not hold him guiltless who takes His Name in vain.” – Exodus 20:7 ***** It takes just a quick flip through the TV channels to find someone using God’s name in vain. CLICK! An old Friends rerun, and there’s Phoebe using it as a synonym for “okay!” CLICK! A few channels further one of Doctor Who's companions is using God’s name instead of exclaiming “oh no!” CLICK! On the sports channel a commentator decides that “Wow!” just doesn’t suffice. Yes, it’s easy to find people using God’s name in vain, but it’s hard to figure out why they do it. It doesn’t make sense. While TV writers and producers regularly offend viewers, they rarely do so without reason. In a show like Game of Thrones, for example, the producers show a steady diet of sex and violence, knowing it will offend some viewers. But even as Christians are turning off the program, countless others are tuning in for the sex and sleaze. So TV producers are willing to offend, as long as it get them more viewers than it loses. That’s why it’s hard to understand why anyone swears on TV. Using God’s name in vain is sure to offend some viewers, but it’s doubtful anyone out there really watches a show for the swearing. So why do they do it? The same question could be asked in a number of other settings as well. Why is God’s name misused in newspapers, at the office, and in casual conversations? In many of these same settings the dialogue will be remarkably free from crudities – the f-word and others are strictly off limits. But God’s name is still open to abuse. Why? Ignorance isn’t bliss I’m convinced the answer is ignorance. God’s name is abused because Christians don’t object, and because we don’t object, TV scriptwriters, newspaper columnists and even our friends don’t realize that using God’s name in vain is offensive. They’re totally clueless. How clueless? Some years back, when I screwed up the courage to ask a teammate on my rec-league basketball team to stop swearing he was quite willing to oblige. So the next time he missed a shot, instead of stringing God’s name together with the word d--n (as was his usual habit) he restricted himself to just misusing God’s name. He knew d--n was a swear, so he stopped using it, but he continued using God’s name in vain because no one had ever told him it was offensive. Not everyone is this clueless, but it is surprising how many are. It is even more surprising how willing people are to accommodate a request not to swear. When our basketball team’s manager called an impromptu meeting about swearing everyone agreed to try and curtail it. (One player noted that a similar request had been made when he played college ball. Interestingly enough, on that team it wasn’t a Christian who had made the request, but a Mormon.) The non-Christians even had a bunch of questions about which words were more and less offensive. Many of them still swore afterwards, but it was a habit they were trying to break. And all we had to do was ask. How do you ask? The toughest part is the asking. How do you bring it up without sounding holier than thou? The manager on our basketball team took the straightforward approach. He announced that since there were a number of Christians on the team, we would appreciate it if people didn’t swear using God’s name. He said it, everyone agreed, and it was done with. He made it look so very simple. And it should be simple. Not easy, mind you; as simple as it looked, he was the only Christian on the team to actually get up and say what needed to be said. It still takes courage. One of my aunts uses a rather different technique. When someone misuses God’s name while talking with her, she interrupts and asks, “Are you praying?” This generally prompts a very puzzled reply, something to the effect of, “What? Why would you think I was praying?” “Because you just mentioned God’s name, and since we weren’t talking about God, well, why else would you be mentioning God? Or were you just using God’s name for emphasis? Maybe you don’t know, but using God’s name like that is very offensive to Christians, and to God Himself. Please don’t do that.” A friend has written to a popular newspaper columnist who blasphemed. He alerted her to the offensive part of her column and then continued: …many people don't know this, but the way you used God's name there would actually be a violation of the third commandment - You shall not take the Name of the Lord your God in vain. Obviously it would be fine to use God's name if you actually were addressing Him, but in this instance you used it more like an expletive, or as a way to emphasize your point. I know that columnists don't seek to offend without purpose (sometimes they do so with purpose, but that is part of the job) so I thought I would make you aware of this, and ask you to please be careful about it in the future. Thank-you. The columnist never replied but, in the days and weeks that followed, did not abuse God's name again. Conclusion Not everyone is going to honor a request to stop swearing. Some will swear just to tick us off. But our friends and neighbors will care. Employees will listen, if only to cozy up to the boss. Waiters will want nice tips. TV scriptwriters want us to watch their shows. All these people have reasons to listen to what we like and don’t like. We don’t like it when they use God’s name in vain, so let’s let them know. This article was first published in July 2018....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book excerpts, Book Reviews, Theology

A passage from "The Hiding Place" I can't manage to read out loud...

Corrie Ten Boom's autobiographical The Hiding Place is best known for its account of her war time experiences. But one of the many powerful sections in the book is about something that happened decades before, in the year 1919. Corrie's describes her Tante Jans as a Christian social activist, who helped the poor, and also wrote tracts and pamphlets decrying such evils as mutton sleeves and bicycle skirts. In other words, a busy, well-meaning, but generally humorless lady, who was trying to earn her way to heaven. When the doctor diagnoses her with diabetes it is quite a shock as there was no real treatment at that time. It meant that Tante Jans had very little time left, maybe a few years. Her response? "And from then on she threw herself more forcefully than ever into writing, speaking forming clubs and launching projects." But then one day her weekly blood test came back black. Black meant she not longer had years or months, but merely days, three weeks at most. The family learns this before Tante Jan, and as they consider how to tell her Corrie's father hopes that: "Perhaps she will take heart from all she has accomplished. She puts great store on accomplishment, Jans does, and who knows but she is right!" So upstairs to her room they all go. "Come in," she called to Father's knock, and added as she always did, "and close the door before I catch my death of drafts." She was sitting at her round mahogany table, working on yet another appeal... As she saw the number of people entering the room, she laid down her pen. She looked from one face to another, until she came to mine and gave a little gasp of comprehension. This was Friday morning, and I had not yet come up with the results of the test. “My dear sister-in-law,” Father began gently, “there is a joyous journey which each of God’s children sooner or later sets out on. And, Jans, some must go to their Father empty- handed, but you will run to Him with hands full!” “All your clubs…,” Tante Anna ventured. “Your writings…,” Mama added. “The funds you’ve raised…,” said Betsie. “Your talks…,” I began. But our well-meant words were useless. In front of us the proud face crumpled; Tante Jans put her hands over her eyes and began to cry. “Empty, empty!” she choked at last through her tears. “How can we bring anything to God? What does He care for our little tricks and trinkets?” And then as we listened in disbelief, she lowered her hands and with tears still coursing down her face whispered, “Dear Jesus, I thank You that we must come with empty hands. I thank You that You have done all – all – on the Cross, and that all we need in life or death is to be sure of this.” This article was first published in January 2019...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Theology

Practicing the Sabbath: on living out the 4th Commandment

It is not uncommon. Under pressure at the office or on the job, at school or right at home, vacation can’t come soon enough. “Ah,” we console ourselves, “Three weeks away from it all, filled with hiking, camping, touring, biking, sailing, and maybe even a trip to Disneyland itself.” When it finally arrives, we throw ourselves into our leisure, making the most of every moment, wringing every last drop of excitement out of our all too brief respite from the drag of our daily grind…and come home plumb worn out. We go back to working, lamenting the brevity of our respite, grudgingly facing the unwelcome demands of the job once more, trapped into knowing we have no other choice: it’s the only way to keep the wolf from the door. Whatever happened to real, solid rest, the kind that refreshes our spirits so deeply it reinvigorates us all the way down to the very depths of our beings, or, as Psalm 23 would describe it, “restores our souls”? Vacation is not enough What happened is that we confused rest with respite, as if a 30-second timeout in the fourth quarter makes athletes as full of energy as when the game began. A vacation is merely a respite (which we all need, just like a good night’s sleep); it’s far from the kind of deep rest the Bible calls a “Sabbath.” Vacations don’t cut it; real Sabbaths do. No wonder our Father commanded that we practice Sabbath every week and he used plenty of words to insist upon it. Have you ever noticed that in the NIV, the Exodus 20 version of the 4th commandment is 99 words long? The final five commandments, altogether, take up just 53 words. God has almost twice as much to say about remembering the Sabbath day than He does about murder, theft, adultery, lying, or coveting combined, suggesting to us that one of the most powerful defenses against immorality of all kinds is (did this ever occur to you?) a soul saturated to the full with God’s kind of deep rest. And then, as if to give it even more firepower, would you observe that it’s the only commandment which reinforces its demand by insisting that we face up to the compelling reality that this is what God Himself did, as if to both warn us that we best follow our Creator if we know what’s good for us, and besides, call us to humble ourselves enough to learn just how to do it from His example. If you came home tired from vacation, or, more seriously, if you sense a weariness in your soul so deep that not even a full night of sleep (induced by medication), or a day of surviving demands (eased by your regular dose of Xanax) gives you the kind of relief you crave, perhaps it’s time to seriously reconsider practicing Sabbath as devoutly as you practice your fitness routine. In other words, have you ever considered fitting, into the rhythm of your week, a 24-hour period where you stop living as a human “doing” and actually enjoy living as a human “being”? If you’re even slightly curious enough to keep reading, then let me be audacious enough to prescribe for you the pathway to deep rest: watch how God rested, and then, go and do thou likewise. The commandment makes it as simple as imitating God. Of course, where it gets complicated is trying to figure out just how God did it. But He has not left us without a description: He finished his work: “Thus the heavens and the earth were completed in all their vast array. By the seventh day God had finished the work He had been doing (Gen. 2:1-2a). He savored the goodness of his workmanship: “God saw all that He had made, and it was very good (Gen. 1: 31). He ceased from all working: “…so on the seventh day He rested (NIV footnote: “ceased”) from all His work. …because on it He rested (NIV footnote: “ceased”) from all the work of creating He had done (Gen. 2:2b, 3b). Each dimension deserves such careful scrutiny, we’ll ponder them one at a time. Finished work God entered into his Sabbath by first having completely finished the work he set out to do during his “work week.” If we are to enter into deep rest, we simply must get our work done first. The commandment is firm on this: Six days you shall labor and do all your work. Finish your homework, your housework, or your assignments at the office. If you have work that was supposed to have been finished during your six days of labor, and could have been finished, but wasn’t due to your own procrastination, I can virtually guarantee this: that undone work is going to infect any rest you try to find on your “day off.” It will weigh on you. It will preoccupy you. You’re compromised! Now I can just hear it already: “My work is never done.” A mother’s work is never done. A farmer’s work is never done. A teacher’s work is never done. True enough, but then God’s work is never done either. Jesus said that his father was always at his work to that very day (John 5:17). But, what was finished was the work of creating. That was completed. True enough: much remained to be done in this creation. There was no pizza or lasagna. Nobody had written poetry yet, and the only music came from birds because there were no violins. There was so much yet to do, which we call culture. But the work of creation itself was fully completed. Every day has its task; every week, its duties; every meeting, its agenda. You want to know what really kills our rest? Work that should have been finished, and could have been finished, but isn’t finished. Unfinished assignments absolutely bar the way into joyful rest. So, be like your Father. Do it. Get ‘er done, even if you have to work extra hard as your particular work week approaches its final day or hours. Nothing relaxes us more than being able to look back upon a truly finished task, be it anything from a reading assignment, having made the required number of sales calls, or having done our rounds in the hospital. The finest picture of such profound rest in Scripture is the utterly still body of the One who had just said, “It is finished” lying quietly and calmly in a borrowed grave even while His spirit savored the joys of Paradise. Imagine the depth of His holy rest having fully drunk the cup of God’s wrath to the very last drop! Can there be any rest deeper than that? The wonderfully good news of the gospel is that, through Jesus, we are called and welcomed to enter into and savor that finished work. There is no richer Sabbath. Savoring accomplished work When He finished creating, God savored his accomplishment. Scripture puts it like this: “God saw all that He had made, and it was very good” (Gen. 1: 31). That is how He entered into His rest. Now that is something most of us moderns hardly take the time to do. Look back? Savor what you’ve done? Who has time for that? Who even thinks of that? Especially on our days off! We’re just glad to be away from the scene of the grind. I recall a breakfast I had with a friend, a highly paid professional in a tough line of work: lawyering! His iPhone lay next to his plate. His eyes darted toward it frequently as we munched on our muffins. I could tell he was preoccupied. I asked him, “Don’t you ever give yourself a break from that thing?” “I can’t,” he said; “in fact, I can’t afford to.” “When do you ever rest?” I probed. “Well,” he said, “I try to rest on the weekends but….” I waited. “But what?” Then he opened a glimpse into his uptight world I’ve never forgotten. “I never get a full weekend of rest because already on Sunday afternoons, right around 3, every week, it starts,” he continued. “What?” I asked. “This tightness in my gut; I can just feel the pressure rising. The stuff waiting for me in my office on Monday morning starts forcing its way into my mind, and from that point on, I’m toast. I can forget about getting any more rest.” “In other words,” I gently teased, “you actually show up at the office about 17 hours before your body gets there?” “You’re not kidding!!” he moaned. I suspect my friend has plenty of company. Our driven hearts are forever pushing us forward, even to the point that we are so focused on what lies ahead, Monday pushes itself up into our Sundays, as unbidden as acid reflux, and as sour. Not so the Trinity! As God entered into His rest, this is the exercise He went through at the end of the sixth day: He looked backward. He surveyed his workmanship. He paused to delight over it. He admired the beauty of Eve, marveled at the masculinity of Adam. He saw all with His all seeing eye and rejoiced over every one of His works. That’s the exercise God Himself went through as He entered his rest. He studied what He had done, and celebrated it. In fact, He ended every day savoring what He had done on that particular day, but at the end of the sixth day, He savored the whole panorama of His creativity, from the light He created the first day to the light-clothed humans He created on the sixth, and He rejoiced over all his works (Psalm 104: 31). A second key to entering a place of deep rest calls us to imitate God and look back, savoring all that He enabled us to do during the previous six days. The doctor looks back in her imagination upon the faces of the patients she has treated. The waitress, the customers she has served. The trucker, the loads he delivered. The teacher, the lessons his students learned. Looking back moves the soul from anxiety to celebration as it disciplines itself to survey the beauty of a steady stream of accomplishments, each a trophy to the God who was right there empowering us every step of the way. That simple exercise has immense power to lay a soul down into deep rest by stiff-arming the intrusions of future “undones” as it relishes the joys of past “dones.” For what the soul is doing at such moment is supercharging itself with wonder and gratitude at the remarkable faithfulness of God who was right there with us during every moment of those six days past, assuring it that so much went well, once again. I wonder if my neighbors just might think I’m nuts. Like all good Lyndenites, I edge, trim and mow my lawn faithfully every Saturday. It’s a rite around here. When finished, I stow my equipment and then do something which, if they are watching, might suggest to them I’m a little “off.” I take a good ten minutes and just walk around my lawn, and yes, frankly, I admire what I and my equipment have just achieved! I marvel at the sharp edges around the flowerbeds and savor the smells of newly mown turf. Odd? No. Like God? Yes. Now God did something there that is crucial to being able to rest. He affirmed his work as valuable; He gave it worth. He savored its beauty. He celebrated His accomplishment. The three persons of the Trinity rejoiced in what They had made, rejoiced in Their workmanship. They stopped, turned around (unlike the other six days which were all forward looking, this was backward looking; from all the undone work ahead to the finished work behind), looked back, and They delighted in Their finished work. Do you ever do that at the end of your work week? Your day of rest begins by looking back. Let’s say you deliver and pick up mail. Do you ever think back to all the people you serve every week by bringing them their mail? Think of the hundreds of people who every week find something in their mailbox they have just been waiting for – and you brought it to them. Now that is something to savor, to celebrate. Most of us try not to think about our work on our day off. Not God. God entered his Sabbath by ruminating, savoring, delighting in what he had just done. One of the key elements of deep rest is savoring a sense of accomplishment. This is what shelters us from the tyranny of future tasks charging in and infecting our rest. You rest when you learn to resist this “Oh, there is so much I have yet to do” (which is very true for all of us) to “But look at what we have managed to accomplish.” We are so driven by the demands of the future that we have forgotten to pause and take delight in the regular accumulation of the accomplishments of our lives. Ceasing from all work There is a third Sabbath practice to consider, but be forewarned: you may not like this. In fact, you may think I’m just being a fussy old legalist. We cannot truly Sabbath, unless every 7th day we totally cease, as much as is reasonably possible, our daily work for 24 hours and refuse to come anywhere near it. We don’t even check our phones for work-related text messages. Why? Because of the explicit prohibition in the commandment itself: “On it you shall not do any work.” Worship? Yes! Play? Sure. Work? None. Zilch. Nada. When deadlines, demands, homework and duties bear down on us relentlessly this may seem hard. Who can afford this, especially in today’s highly competitive, low profit margin, economy? Close up shop, one day a week? Ridiculous. Students stay away from studies a full day in every seven? Sure way to flunk out! Really? Are you so sure it’s ridiculous? Have you checked that with conservative Southern Baptist Truett Cathy, who, from the beginning in 1946 insisted that his fast food Chick-fil-A restaurants be closed every Sunday? Today there are over 2,200 of them, and they are flourishing. In 2014 the chain was #9 in total profit among all fast food restaurants, but #1, by far, in profitability per store. Each store earned $3.2 million vs. second place McDonalds at $2.6 million. They have been #1 in customer service for years. Rested and cared for employees are much more industrious and compassionate, and the result is customer loyalty that creates long lines in the drive-in lane and tidy profits at the bank. And they are closed everywhere, every Sunday. But perhaps that’s not convincing. Then consider this remarkable story. My town of Lynden, Washington has a mother, Phoebe Judson, who founded our city, arriving here in 1871. She promoted Sunday closure. Here’s why. In May, 1853, Phoebe and her husband Holden joined a covered wagon train near Kansas City hoping to reach Washington Territory by mid-October, a distance of more than 2,000 miles over the rough Oregon Trail. Like all wagon trains, they elected a captain. His word was the law. Well, they chose Rev. Gustavus Hines, only to be surprised one Saturday night when he announced the train would never travel on Sundays. Phoebe was shocked. They had half a continent to cross, at oxen pace (15-20 miles per day on a good trail), with at least four mountain passes and innumerable river crossings ahead of them. She sat in her wagon and just fumed. One family deserted the train and joined another. On their first Sunday, while they stood still, one train after another passed them by. But, being the daughter of a minister herself, Phoebe felt they had no choice but to honor their captain’s scruples. They started out again on Monday, bright and early, only to reach their first river cross on Tuesday evening. A long line of wagons stretched out ahead of them, waiting for the single “ferry” to carry them across. They waited 3 days. On Saturday they resumed the journey, only to be told they would still rest the whole next day. Phoebe was livid. This made absolutely no sense to her. Still, the minister’s daughter obeyed. Then, a few weeks later she began to see scores of dead oxen, mules and horses along the trail. They had been driven so relentlessly, they had collapse and died. She grudgingly admitted that perhaps the animals needed a day of rest. A few weeks later, she ruefully admitted that maybe the men needed it too, since they walked most of the time. Then she slowly began to notice that as they worshipped, ate, rested and even played together on Sundays, it had a remarkably salutary effect upon people’s spirits. There was less grumbling, more cooperation. She even noticed that they seemed to make better time the other six days. Finally, what totally sold her on the value of the Sabbath happened one Sunday evening: the family that had deserted them came limping into their campsite, humbly asking to rejoin them. She had assumed they were at least a week ahead; in fact, they had fallen behind. Their own wagon train had broken down! Of course they welcomed them back. And so it happened that they reached their destination in plenty of time, as friends, and out of the 50 head of cattle with which they began, only two were lost. Conclusion May I be so bold as to caution us about spiritualizing the meaning of the Sabbath commandment so much that we forget its literal and physical side? Bodily stepping entirely away from all work for 24 hours is clearly what is prescribed. Its benefits are enormous. For one day, it moves us from life as a “human doing” to life as a “human being.” For one day, it compels us to recalibrate our hearts back to the stubborn fact that “…God is the only source of everything good, and that neither our work and worry nor His gifts can do us any good without His blessing” (L.D. 50, Q&A 125). For one day it allows our souls to catch up with our bodies, or vice versa! For one day it arrests our drive for profits by reminding us that our real wealth is not in what we have but in whom we love and in who loves us. For one day it slows us down enough to ease our anxiety over reaching our destination to actually enjoy the journey. And for one day it brings us back to that Light, in Whose Light, we see the light which brightens every day. Rev. Ken Koeman is a retired pastor living in the quite restful town of Lynden, WA. A version of this article first appeared in Christian Courier and is reprinted with permission. It was first printed in RP in February 2018....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Theology

Celebrating the Sabbath

“Many people see the Sabbath or the Lord’s Day, as an infringement of their personal liberty – a day that God has taken from them, instead of a gift that He has given to them, for rest, worship and celebration” – Rev. Bruce Ray ***** Scientists and secular historians can account for the division of time into years, seasons, months and days on the basis of ancient observations of the cycles of nature. The year and the day obviously are tied to the cycle of the sun and the rotation of the earth. A month finds its origin in the cycles of the moon. But secular historians are puzzled by the week. There is no natural basis for the week, and since they reject Holy Scripture as a historical source they can’t turn to it for an explanation. However, whether they acknowledge it or not, the weekly, seven-day pattern of work and rest has its origin in God’s work of creation. We have the week because God ordained it, and indeed this is the origin of Time, not only of the week, but all divisions of Time. God is the Sovereign over Time. This is one of the first points that Bruce Ray makes in his book Celebrating the Sabbath. And he notes that if God is sovereign over time, then it only makes sense that He is sovereign over what we do with time, both work and rest: "Six days you shall labor" God said, “but the seventh is the Sabbath of the Lord your God. In it you shall do no work.” The Sabbath through time Now many people assume that work is the result of the Fall, but Adam had a job assigned to him before the Fall (Gen 2:18-20) so that assumption is wrong. And just as Adam had work do before the fall, so too there was a Sabbath rest before the fall. In fact Bruce Ray identifies from the Scriptures four distinct stages in the Sabbath: 1. Creation Sabbath – Sabbath rest before fall into sin 2. Exodus Sabbath – Sabbath rest given to Israel 3. Resurrection Sabbath – New covenant, new Sabbath 4. Final Sabbath – Christ’s return ushers in this final rest Intention of the Sabbath "The Sabbath was designed as a day of gladness and not as a day of gloom," notes Ray. It was intended by its Creator to be a day of rest and worship in celebration of God’s wonderful works. The Sabbath promised both physical and spiritual refreshment for the whole man. The Sabbath was a day off from work, a day when men and women, their families and servants, visitors, and even livestock could enjoy the gift of rest from God. It was a day for "complete rest" (Exodus 35:2), a day to leave the briefcase at the office, and the tools locked up in the shed. Even during the busy times of the year, during the plowing season and the harvest (Ex. 34:21) the people were commanded to rest on the seventh day in honor of, and in obedience to, the Lord who made heaven and earth. "Moonlighting" was prohibited on the Sabbath. The worker who tried to get ahead of others by working on the Sabbath was even subject to the death penalty! Exodus 23:12 reads: "that you may REST" and rest here isn’t only about “not working." The Sabbath was appointed to minister to the whole person, and it was therefore also a day of spiritual rest. Legalism Bruce Ray writes an interesting little chapter on the "Babylonian Sabbath." During the Babylonian Captivity the elders and Rabbis of Israel became very interested in spelling out precisely what people could and could not do on the Sabbath. Eventually they came up with over 1000 rules. The spirit and intention of the law became lost in a sea of technicalities. When Jesus came, that is, when God, the eternal Son, took upon Himself the nature of a man and visited His people, He came to set the captives free, including the captive Sabbath. Jesus challenged the Pharisaic distortions of His holy day. He repeatedly and purposely did things on the Sabbath that violated their legalistic understanding of Sabbath keeping. But make no mistake, Jesus came to restore the Law, including the fourth commandment, not to dismantle it (Matt 5:17-20). So Jesus blasted the Pharisaic Sabbath, but in doing so, he did not harm the biblical Sabbath at all. Indeed He liberated it, restored it, and filled it full of meaning once again (Matt 5:17) Ray examines one by one, the six skirmishes Jesus had with the Pharisees over the Sabbath Day: 1. The Battle of the Wheat Field (Mark 2:23-28) 2. The Shrivelled Hand skirmish (Mark 3:1-6) 3. The crippled-woman conflict (Luke 13:10-17) 4. The Dropsy disaster (Luke 14:1-6) 5. The Battle of Bethesda (John 5: 1-9) 6. The Spit Spat (John 9:1-41) These texts are well worth looking up and show, as Ray puts it, how "the conflict was not so much a conflict between Jesus and the Pharisees, as a conflict between the Holy Sabbath of God and the painfully distorted Pharisaic Sabbath. It was part of Jesus’ mission to liberate, heal and redeem the Sabbath from captivity.” Do’s and Don’ts? Coming to our modern day celebration of the Sabbath/Lord’s Day, Ray speaks about keeping the Sabbath "Holily and Happily," saying: "In the fourth commandment, God declares that He is sovereign over time (He made it), and over our use of it (He made us!). He has from the very beginning of time appointed one day in seven as a day for rest and refreshment in Him" "All people observe the Sabbath, all people everywhere do. Sunday comes along once every week without fail, and we all do something with the day. The question is not whether we observe, but how we observe it." Now, finally the reader may be thinking to yourself: "He is going to get to what I wanted in the first place. I can still have my laminated, wallet sized card with "do’s and don’ts" after all." Sorry folks – as author Bruce Ray writes, life just is not that simple. It is about thinking out principles. That is the real hard part. Many of us would like to have someone in authority – a pastor perhaps – tell us what to do and what not to do in great detail. That would certainly make life simpler and tidier. May I jog on Sunday? Go sailing in the afternoon? Mow my lawn? Go shopping at the Mall? Fire up the grill for a barbeque? And so on. But don’t despair. The good news, Ray writes, (that is if you are a Christian), is that you have everything you need to figure out what God wants you to do on the Sabbath. God has given you His Word and His Spirit. What then are the general principles that will help us to keep the Sabbath as the Lord wants us to? The author mentions four: Keep it Holily, Happily, Honestly and Humbly. Keep it Holily This includes gathering with the Lord’s people on the Lord’s Day and realizing that corporate worship is necessary, not optional. Keep it Happily The author stresses the great importance of bringing joyful worship to our God, and quotes Psalm 100 "shout for joy to the Lord, all the earth. Worship the Lord with gladness; come before Him with joyful songs." Keep it Honestly The Sabbath is also a day for physical, emotional, and even intellectual "rest." God is concerned with our bodies as well as with our souls. On the Sabbath we need to cease from our works and pause and refresh in God’s rest. Rest, however, does not require idleness. Rest can also be active. Throughout the Old Testament rest is defined as refreshment. The prophet Isaiah zeros in on the essence of the Lord’s Day (Is. 58:13-14 – this is another great text to look up). He brings into clear and bold focus: whose Day is it? Who is the Lord of the Sabbath and will I bow before Him? How does the Lord of the Sabbath want me to use the day for my good and His glory? Keep it Humbly The Sabbath is admittedly a problem for many Christians, but that problem is primarily spiritual in nature. That is because of the rebellion in our hearts. We must remember not to come into our King’s presence and to our spiritual family reunion tired, late and unprepared to worship Him Conclusion In conclusion: Sabbath keeping is a means of Grace to all who love the Lord. Someone said about this book:" Bruce Ray’s book is a wise and balanced book, helpful, biblical and encouragingly, taking a fresh look at what the Lord’s Day should be for every Christian." Definitely recommended....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Theology

Will animals go to Heaven?

What happens when animals die? The question of whether animals exist in heaven has been debated for centuries. Do people share the same spirit and afterlife destination as animals? Will pet owners see their beloved pet again? Will their pet go to heaven? For many these are sentimental, frivolous questions. For others they are important. Children especially will want to know about the fate of their dead pets. What are we going to tell them when they ask? Cats, dogs, birds and more Children are routinely told that their pet has gone to heaven. Someone wrote to Randy Alcorn, the author of Heaven, "My children are hoping extinct animals will be in Heaven, maybe even dinosaurs." Alcorn thought it a possibility, arguing that the primary beings shown articulating God's praise in Heaven, along with the angels and human beings, are animals. Even in secular society many people tend to believe in an afterlife for our fellow creatures. Gift shops sell collector plates depicting “feline paradise” showing that the lost kitten enjoys a magnificent afterlife in paradise. A Hollywood version of dog afterlife is described in the full-length feature film All Dogs Go To Heaven. Evangelical author Angela Hunt argues in her 2005 novel Unspoken that birds and horses and creatures are in heaven now. For proof she refers, for example, to Elijah being taken to heaven by a chariot of fire and horses (2 Kings 2:11). She says that when her “buddy Justus” (a 275-pound mastiff dog) died, she promised him that she would meet him in heaven. “My heavenly Father loves me, he loves his creatures, and I am almost certain I'll meet my beloved Justus in eternity.” Cute little furry almost humans? Why have so many people in North America become so sentimental about their pets? Some suggest that the growth of cities and suburbs has deprived most North Americans of instrumental contacts with animals. Many suburbanites have never spent time on a farm and with farm animals. They have not seen what they are like. Consequently, they romanticize animals as quite human-like, though more innocent and pure. This humanization of pets encouraged sentimentalism. Many pet owners keep photos of their pets in their wallets or on their desks; some celebrate their pets' birthdays. Estates have been left to cats and dogs. Some even use the services of pet psychologists. While no one would wish to denigrate pets, our modern affluent society frequently puts more value on pets and even wild animals than on people. The current trend toward the humanization of animals contributes to the blurring of the boundaries between man and animals. The theory of evolution, New Age philosophy, and the rhetoric of the animal rights movement have greatly impacted our society's attitude toward animals. The recent movement for the protection of animals usually labeled "animal liberation" or "animal rights" is often in the news. The more uncompromising among the animal liberationists have demanded equal moral consideration on behalf of cows, pigs, chickens, and other apparently "enslaved and oppressed" animals. Many animal liberationists put their ethic into practice by becoming vegetarians. In Rattling the Cage. Toward Legal Rights for Animals Steven M. Wise, a lawyer promoting animal rights, declares that it should be obvious that "the ancient Great Wall" that has for so long divided humans from every other animal is biased, irrational, unfair, and unjust. He believes it is time to take it down. Consequently, in his book he strongly argues for the extension of personhood to chimpanzees. The “talking” gorilla But if chimpanzees are supposedly people, why can't we communicate with them? This type of thinking led to research on animal communication and intelligence. Several historic attempts were made to teach human language to animals. In the 1960s R.A. and B.T. Gardner, in extensive studies carried out in America, considered the possibility that although primates might be unable to vocalize speech, perhaps they could learn to communicate with their hands via sign language. So they set out to teach an eleven-month female chimpanzee – Washoe – the sign language used by deaf people. But it should be noted that the sign language they taught (called Ameslan) is constructed differently from spoken or written language, so direct comparison with human speech is difficult. Experiments have also been made with a gorilla. The American Gorilla Foundation portrays gorillas as part of the human family. In 1972 Penny Patterson began to teach sign language to Koko, a gorilla born in the San Francisco Zoo. This experiment promoted the idea that animals have human qualities. It also contributed to the animalizing of man. The Gorilla Foundation's funding appeal stated that Patterson's experiment resulted in "an astonishing breakthrough in our understanding of the world. The news is that a very remarkable gorilla named Koko has changed myth into fact...by speaking to humans." The public was invited to "become part of Koko's extend family." Christian author Angela Hunt expresses some interesting but speculative thoughts about animals in her novel Unspoken, a story about a talking gorilla. In the novel Unspoken Christian author Angela Hunt writes that many years ago she saw a video about Dr. Penny Patterson and Koko, and she thought then that their story contained the seeds of a novel. Recently she saw an updated version of the video and that's when she knew the time to write had come. Besides the video inspiration, Hunt's novel shows indebtedness to the views of Randy Alcorn, who combines Biblical exegesis, evangelical theology, and imaginative speculation about heaven and the new heaven and earth. It is not surprising, therefore, that Unspoken is highly recommended by Alcorn. The main characters in Hunt's novel are a young woman named Glee Ganger and Sema, a western lowland gorilla, who was entrusted to the care of Glee. Glee – not a Christian in the beginning of the book, conducts unique research in the field of interspecies communication. She teaches Sema, who is fascinated with words, how "to talk" by using American Sign Language. She says that her research has proven that Sema not only understands the words for most common things and activities; she also has a firm grasp on many abstract concepts. Glee believes that Sema is a thinking animal. She frequently evidences signs of advanced intelligence, even intuition. Glee treats Sema as her child and calls the young gorilla "sweetie" and other endearing names. She reads picture books aloud to her. She even asks, which book do you like to read? Sema answers: "Pumpkin Patch." Sema also knows God and communicates with Him. Glee asks, “Sema? Why did you talk about God?" Sema replies, "Because God is." Sema also says, "Word made world, word loves Sema, word made gorillas people apples bears." "Sema good gorilla Sema loves God thanks." Will Sema go to heaven? To be with God? Sema believes she will. "God make trees sky. God make home gorillas people." How does she know? Sema says a shiny angel had told her these things. At the novel’s conclusion Sema meets a tragic, but heroic end. She dies protecting Glee from a tiger which got loose in the zoo and charged at Glee. She saved Glee's life by tackling the tiger. As Sema is dying she says, "Shiny man say... Sema go now. Sema happy. Sema love." Glee, therefore, believes she will see Sema in heaven. Sema's sacrificial death is also instrumental in Glee becoming a Christian. And Glee testifies, "How ironic that animal could be used to bridge the gap between me and God." Many questions The humanization of animals, pretending they are so much like us, is also an animalization of humans. The humanization of animals and the belief that they go to heaven raises many questions. Historically, people didn't always view animals in a positive light. Negative qualities of animals are often mentioned in reference to humans such as "as evil as a hyena," "as sly as a fox." In the early fourteenth century, Dante had condemned to the eighth circle of his Hell those guilty of "the sins of the wolf": seducers, hypocrites, conjurers, thieves and liars. In the Bible there is also a reference to animals capable of being possessed by an evil spirit. Jesus allowed a demon to enter a herd of pigs who rushed into the lake and were drowned (Mark 5:1-13). William Barclay adds his comments about those who criticize Jesus for allowing the death of the pigs: "We do not, presumably, have any objections to eating meat for our dinner, nor will we refuse pork because it involved the killing of some pig. Surely if we will kill animals to avoid going hungry, we can raise no objection if the saving of a man's mind and soul involved the death of a herd of these same animals.... in God's scale of proportions, there is nothing so important as a human soul." Are animals able to "talk"? Alcorn claims that this is possible. He refers to the account of the serpent speaking to Eve in the Garden of Eden. He argues, "There's no suggestion Eve was surprised to hear an animal speak, indicating that other animals also may have spoken." He also mentions the story of Balaam and his donkey (Numbers 22). He suggests that the wording of the text doesn't suggest God put words in the donkey's mouth, as in ventriloquism – He "opened the donkey's mouth," permitting it to verbalize what appears to be actual thoughts and feelings. I believe Alcorn and Hunt are mistaken. For example, the vocal tracts of gorillas are constructed so they can't speak. They can be trained to make signs. But they can't produce verbalized speech. They do not have structured grammatical language. They are deprived of reason and forethought. And they cannot, which may be highly significant, draw representational pictures. Newspapers have reported on monkeys daubing on a canvass and receiving an art award. But at best they only doodle. Furthermore, it is not possible for them to search for a solution to a puzzle, let alone ask them what they see or hear or smell, or what they think of their cage-mates, or of us and our experiments. Man can verbalize his thoughts in speech. The uniqueness of human language reveals man's intellect, will, emotion and general ideas about space and time, and abstract concepts. It is man's key to communicate concerning the past, the present and the future. Calvin brings human speech in its proper Biblical framework. He notes: "The use of the tongue and ears is to lead us into the truth by means of God's Word that we may know how we were created incorruptible and that when we are passed out of this world there is a heritage prepared for us above, and in short to bring us to God." Do animals have a soul that continues to exist after death? On the one hand Alcorn argues that they have "non-human souls." On the other hand he says that though man continues to exist after death, it "may not be the case for animals." But the Bible does not say that animals have souls. But neither does the Bible deny this. The question whether animals have a soul is not new. The medieval theologian St. Thomas Aquinas decreed animals were soulless, and graded them according to their utility to people. Wolves, bears, and hairy beasts useless to human comfort were demonic. The twentieth century Reformed theologian R.C. Sproul observes: "Traditionally many have been persuaded that there is no future life for animals. The Bible does not teach that animals go to heaven. One of the key arguments against the idea that animals do not survive the grave is the conviction that animals do not have souls. Many are convinced that the distinctive aspect that divides humans from animals is that humans have souls and animals do not." Will animals be with the Lord in the intermediate heaven, the stage of eternal life before the coming of the New Heaven and Earth? An animal is not religious. Man is incurably religious. Even in his denial of God man struggles with the God question. Dr. J.H. Bavinck comments that: "in his religion man is aware that he is not alone because he knows that he is living in the immediate presence of someone who is infinitely greater than he." Only in man do heaven and earth meet each other. Animals were not created for a life in the heavenly realms. The Bible clearly states that eternal life is not merely "life after death" (cf. John 3:16). The twice born have eternal life right now. But the Gospel does not only mention heaven, but also hell. Apart from the saving work of God carried out when He gave his Son for our sin on the cross of Golgotha, He would have to assign us the agony of hell. The Gospel also proclaims that there is only one way to God the Father. "Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved" (Acts 4:12). Our Lord Jesus said, "No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him" (John 6:44). These texts do not include animals being drawn to the Father through Jesus Christ. Only man is capable of having a personal relationship with the infinite personal triune God. Man created in the image of God The Bible affirms the dignity of man. Man is sharply distinguished from the rest of God's creation. He is unique! Nothing in creation can be greater or have more dignity than man, for God alone is greater (Ps. 8). Man is different from all other creatures; he is created in the very image of God. Man, as God's image bearer, is elevated above animals and destined to have dominion over all the world (Gen.1:16, Ps. 8:5-9). Of all God's acts of creation recorded in Scripture, this is the only one preceded by the statement that God, as it were, consulted Himself before acting ("And God said, 'Let us make man'" (Gen. 1:26)). This formal fact alone is of great importance because it shows that this creative act differs from all the others. It is the fact that God created only man and woman in His image and likeness (vv.16-27). In the New Testament mankind is also referred to as being "made in God's likeness" (Jam. 3:9). The apostle Paul describes Christ as the perfect image of God. He says, “And we, who with unveiled faces all reflect the Lord's glory, are being transformed into his likeness with ever increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit" (2 Cor. 3:18). Scripture testifies that man is a worker and developer. He is the steward of God's world and has been called by God to responsibly enfold creation through his work. Animals and plants are under his dominion. Adam named the animals (Gen. 2:19,20). Scripture also shows that people are allowed to use animals as work animals and for food (Gen. 9:3). Man is the scientist at work in God's laboratory – earth. People may speculate whether animals go to heaven. But Scripture shows that the world is to be understood only in relation to man. Calvin notes, "The Lord Himself by the very order of creation has demonstrated that He created all things for the sake of man." The world created and endowed as a habitation for man in such a way as to serve his true destiny in the worship and adoration of God. The first question of The Westminster Larger Catechism asks, “What is the chief and highest end of man” The answer? “Man's chief and highest end is to glorify God, and fully enjoy him for ever.” The same belief is expressed by John Calvin. He states that God made man erect, unlike the other creatures, that he might know and worship God. He wrote, "God created us after His own image in order that His truth might shine forth in us." The New Heaven and Earth When our Lord establishes the New Heaven and Earth upon His return with renewed men and women, will animals also be redeemed? According to Hunt the new earth will be populated with animal life. Alcorn argues that animals will be on the New Earth, which is a redeemed and renewed old earth, in which animals had a prominent role. He believes that on the New Earth, after mankind's resurrection, animals (pets included) who once suffered will join God's children in glorious freedom from death and decay. Alcorn refers to Romans 8:21-23 for proof text. He assumes animals – as part of a suffering creation – are eagerly awaiting deliverance through mankind's resurrection. As I see it The first chapter of Genesis reveals that God's purpose was that nature in paradise be at peace with itself. Isaiah 66:22 says that the Lord will make the New Heaven and the New Earth. It is making something new from the old. Therefore, no new creation, but recreation, renewal. The New Earth will be the renewal of the old. Isaiah anticipates an eternal Kingdom of God on the New Earth. He describes the glorious future which God's people prayerfully and eagerly anticipate. He points to a time of the renewal of the old paradise where predator and prey will lie down together and be at peace. “The wolf and the lamb will feed together, and the lion will eat straw like the ox...They will neither harm nor destroy in all my holy mountains, says the Lord” (Is. 65:25). Will there be animals on this new world? Apparently there will be plants, rocks, trees and animals on the New Earth. But asked exactly what it will be like, we cannot say because Scripture has not revealed it to us....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Theology

The problem with "pan-millennialism"

“I’m not amillennial, postmillennial, or premillennial. I’m pan-millennial.” “Huh?” “Yep, I’m pan-millennial—I believe it will all pan out in the end!” I’ve occasionally heard this humorous remark made when the end times are discussed. Technically, if we believe in the biblical gospel, we should all be panmillennialists. The risen and ascended Christ will return and everything will “pan out” for believers who will ultimately enjoy “new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells” (2 Peter 3:13). But the person who tells the “panmillennial” joke, and really means it, isn’t interested in details about the end times. He realizes that eschatology (the study of last things) is loaded with difficulties, and says, “I’m not going to think much about end times doctrine anymore. Jesus is going to make everything right when He comes again, and that’s good enough for me.” This man hasn’t just given up on figuring out what “a thousand years” means in Revelation 20, but has decided that thinking about the end times beyond generalities is just too hard and ultimately fruitless. There’s a major problem with the panmillennial mindset. The Bible does speak about the particulars of the end times, so to ignore those verses is to disregard what the Holy Spirit made sure was included. Furthermore, when we skip over those passages, we lose more than just knowledge. God has spoken in understandable ways about the end times to give us hope and joy Transforming grief The Thessalonian believers enthusiastically awaited the return of Christ (1 Thess 1:9-10). But after Paul was forced out of town by persecution, some believers died, sending the remaining Christians into a state of hopeless grief (4:13). They didn’t just miss the deceased believers, but apparently thought the dead believers would miss out on some blessing at Christ’s return. Paul addressed the Thessalonians’ ignorance by speaking of some of the details about the day of Christ’s return. In 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17, he gave an order of some of the events of that day: “The Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the voice of an archangel, and with the sound of the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will always be with the Lord.” In the first frame of a Peanuts comic strip, Lucy is looking out the window and says, “Boy, look at it rain… What if it floods the whole world?” Linus responds, “It will never do that…In the ninth chapter of Genesis, God promised Noah that it would never happen again, and the sign of the promise is the rainbow.” Lucy replies, “You’ve taken a great load off my mind…” So Linus concludes, “Sound theology has a way of doing that!” Paul wrote to the Thessalonians about the return of Christ and the resurrection of the dead in order to give them sound theology so they could take a great load off of their minds. They needed to know that their beloved sleeping believers (4:13) wouldn’t miss anything when Jesus came back. Instead, they would have front-row seats! With that kind of information, their grief would undergo a dramatic transformation. Paul refused to ignore the details about the return of Christ in addressing the Thessalonians, because he understood how relevant and encouraging that information really was. He even charged them to “encourage one another with these words” (4:18). What words? The specific words about the believers who had died and their participation in the events surrounding Christ’s return. Blessed is the one… Revelation is full of end times information, yet it is one of the most neglected books of the Bible due to interpretive difficulties. However, in his opening comments John promises, “Blessed is the one who reads aloud the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear, and who keep what is written in it, for the time is near” (1:3). We should humbly admit when we are confused about certain aspects of Christ’s return. Yet, not everything that God has said about the end times is puzzling. Read those verses carefully and thoughtfully, and blessing is sure to follow. Copyright © 2013 Steve Burchett (www.BulletinInserts.org). Permission granted for reproduction in exact form....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Christian education, Theology

Why biblical poetry matters

Skim through any modern Bible and you will notice something peculiar: many pages are laid out as poetry, with appropriate spacing and indents. But have you ever wondered what makes these verses poetic? For most people, this subject remains an enigma, and some will wonder why they should even care. Poetry seems like the wrapping around a present, or the envelope for a card — superfluous and largely decorative. It is the message that is important, and paying attention to the form may be a distraction. Of course, for a believer that should be a flimsy argument. Surely God loves beauty and complexity (Gen 1:31, Psalm 139:14), and although beauty is fleeting (Prov. 31:30), that is no excuse to ignore it.1 It does not make sense when Christians stand in awe of a gorgeous sunset, or we all hang the same poem about footprints on our walls, but we cannot be bothered to learn how the Psalms were composed. Beautiful in any language The astonishing thing about biblical poetry is that it generally translates into any language. The principal technique is not a matter of meter or rhyme: it has to do with the structure of the lines. In most cases, two or more lines run parallel to each other. Consider Psalm 122:7: May there be peace within your walls and security within your citadels. You can see that the terms run parallel. Peace and security mirror each other, as do the walls and citadels. The name for this type of poetry is Hebrew Parallelism. In what follows, we’ll explore how this poetic technique works and why it matters. Robert Lowth’s rediscovery of Parallelism It was the Anglican Bishop Robert Lowth who in the 18th century rediscovered Hebrew Parallelism. For centuries, Christians had been confused about how best to describe biblical poetics. According to Lowth, Hebrew parallelism typically follows one of three patterns: Synonymous Antithetic Synthetic2 Let’s take a closer look at each of these. The example we just looked at is a form of synonymous parallelism. In such cases, the same idea is repeated in similar language. One of the more famous examples of consistent synonymous parallelism is Psalm 114: 1 When Israel came out of Egypt, Jacob from a people of foreign tongue, 2 Judah became God’s sanctuary, Israel his dominion. 3 The sea looked and fled, the Jordan turned back; 4 the mountains leaped like rams, the hills like lambs. 5 Why was it, sea, that you fled? Why, Jordan, did you turn back? 6 Why, mountains, did you leap like rams, you hills, like lambs? 7 Tremble, earth, at the presence of the Lord, at the presence of the God of Jacob, 8 who turned the rock into a pool, the hard rock into springs of water. In this psalm, every verse consists of a mirroring of terms. Lowth felt that parallelism might be compared to the way two choirs can sing back and forth — a type of chant known as antiphony. Lowth speculated that the Jews might have incorporated something similar in their worship. Think of Psalm 136, where the refrain “His love endures forever” is a repeated response. Lowth’s second type, antithetic parallelism, involves a sharp contrast. It is particularly common in the book of Proverbs: A cheerful heart is good medicine, but a crushed spirit dries up the bones. (Prov. 17:22) The poor plead for mercy, but the rich answer harshly. (Prov. 18:23) The idea is that when we reflect on such contrasts, we can grow in wisdom. Finally, Lowth used synthetic parallelism as a catch-all category for anything that is not synonymous or antithetic. Synthetic parallelism typically involves a progression of ideas, so that one thing follows another. Take this passage from Psalm 84: 5 Blessed are those whose strength is in you, whose hearts are set on pilgrimage. 6 As they pass through the Valley of Baka, they make it a place of springs; the autumn rains also cover it with pools. 7 They go from strength to strength, till each appears before God in Zion. While the end of verse 6 may contain an element of synonymous parallelism, these verses are more about developing an idea. In keeping with the focus on pilgrimage, the emphasis is on movement. Two of Lowth’s examples of synthetic parallelism eventually came to have their own names. The first is now usually called staircase or climactic parallelism. Psalm 93:3-4 provides a dramatic example: 3 The seas have lifted up, Lord, the seas have lifted up their voice; the seas have lifted up their pounding waves. 4 Mightier than the thunder of the great waters, mightier than the breakers of the sea— the Lord on high is mighty. The repetition of phrases (like a staircase) creates a crescendo that builds to a climax. In this passage, we can imagine the waves growing in size! Another type of synthetic parallelism is commonly called numerical parallelism. This is a poetic use of counting, something that is used to great effect in Amos 1: 3 For three sins of Damascus, even for four, I will not relent. The same device occurs four more times in the rest of the chapter. The Sharpening Theory Robert Lowth established the basics of Hebrew Parallelism, yet his simple categories were not beyond criticism. Scholars objected that the synthetic category was ill-defined, that the term parallelism may imply too much similarity between the lines, and that parallel structures are not exclusive to poetry, but can be found elsewhere in the Bible as well. The most forceful critique came in 1981 from James Kugel, the author of The Idea of Biblical Poetry: Parallelism and Its History.3 Kugel developed what we might call the “Sharpening Theory” of Hebrew Parallelism. To understand what he meant, it is good to reflect on the nature of proverbs. Proverbs are a bit like riddles. When someone says, “the apple does not fall far from the tree,” it takes us a moment to figure out what that really means. A proverb makes us stop and think. James Kugel points out that in the Bible this quality is sometimes described as a certain sharpness. A proverb pricks our conscience and makes us reflect on the proper way to act. Unfortunately, the fool feels the prick, but does not benefit from it: Like a thornbush in a drunkard’s hand is a proverb in the mouth of a fool. (Proverbs 26:9) If we take these observations about proverbs and apply them to Hebrew Parallelism, then we see that the parallel lines also force us to slow down and consider their relationship. At first, we might observe mostly repetition, but a closer look reveals that there is more to the picture. The unique features of each line stand out in sharp relief. This makes reading the Bible exciting. The following verse provides a good example: Through love and faithfulness sin is atoned for; through the fear of the Lord evil is avoided. (Proverbs 16:6) Is the same thought expressed twice? Not really. Not only do the lines mention different, yet related actions (love and faithfulness; the fear of the Lord), but the verse makes us contemplate the connection between atonement and avoidance of sin. Atonement might make up for past transgressions, whereas avoidance is about future temptations. In this way, the proverb creates a complex picture that encourages the righteous to live wisely. Midrash James Kugel further pointed out that Jewish rabbis who interpreted the Bible preferred to focus on the differences between parallel lines. In the Jewish tradition, the word Talmud refers to a variety of rabbinic texts that came to supplement the Old Testament books. After the return from exile in Babylon (6th century BC), the Jews increasingly developed an oral tradition that interpreted the Torah (the five books of Moses) and added further regulations and customs. Written compilations of the Talmud stem from as early as the third century AD. The act of interpreting the Talmud and the Bible came to be known as Midrash. This word refers to both rabbinic interpretation and an actual written collection of such interpretations. Rabbis who practiced Midrash (especially during medieval times) often came up with ingenious ways to contrast poetic lines that seemed to say the same thing. Let’s look at a couple of examples that Kugel provides. First, we read in Genesis 21:1: Now the Lord was gracious to Sarah as he had said, and the Lord did for Sarah what he had promised . Sounds the same. But at least one commentator suggested that the last “he” might refer to Abraham. A couple of verses earlier (Gen. 20:17), Abraham had prayed on behalf of Abimelek: Then Abraham prayed to God, and God healed Abimelek, his wife and his female slaves so they could have children again. Taking this line into consideration, Gen. 21:1 might be interpreted to mean: Now the Lord was gracious to Sarah as he had said, and the Lord did for Sarah what he, Abraham, had spoken to God about in his prayer, namely to provide fertility. Suddenly the two lines become quite different in meaning. The second pronoun he now refers to Abraham. Here is another example, from the instructions for Passover celebrations: Do not eat it with bread made with yeast, but for seven days eat unleavened bread. (Deuteronomy 16:3) A midrashic reading might note that these are two different commandments—a negative and a positive one. Not only must bread with yeast not be eaten, but unleavened bread must be eaten. It is in part because medieval rabbis were so focused on the differences that a full understanding of Hebrew Parallelism was lost during this time and had to be recovered by scholars such as Robert Lowth. At the same time, the Midrash does remind us not to assume that parallelism is always about exact similarity. The differences are important! A dynamic movement Kugel’s Sharpening Theory has us examine each set of parallel lines on its own terms. Instead of reducing parallelism to a few main types, we look for a wide variety of features. For each verse, the question is, how does the second line (B) extend the first (A)? To use Kugel’s wording, it’s not “A=B” but “A, and what’s more, B.” Instead of Lowth’s three main categories, we can now have any number of relationships between A and B. It is up to each reader to meditate carefully on the subtle similarities and differences between the lines. The scholar Robert Alter, expanding on the work of James Kugel, provides a great description of this relationship between A and B. He talks about a “dynamic movement.”4 The second line should never seem predictable or merely repetitive. There’s something captivating about the way the thought is extended. For Alter, the second line often includes an intensification or focusing of the first thought. You can compare it to seeing something and then getting out the binoculars or microscope to take a closer look. The tricolon (a triple parallelism) in Psalm 100:3 provides a great example: Know that the Lord is God. It is he who made us, and we are his; we are his people, the sheep of his pasture. Each line zooms in a little. Each line makes the thought more specific. This dynamic movement between the lines requires our participation. As readers, we are drawn into the text. If that sounds like a lot of work, then recall that Hebrew Parallelism is also quite slow-moving and unhurried. Each idea is expressed in multiple ways. The effect is somewhat like hearing a choir sing in a cathedral, repeating phrases and letting their voices echo through the cavernous space. This is not to say that an Old Testament psalm is like a Bach aria, but that in both cases the speed and cadence is measured and controlled. Important phrases and ideas come back in new form, so that we do not only listen for individual lines, but we also gradually gain a sense of the whole piece. The big picture Speaking of the composition as a whole, the final step is to put it all together. It is one thing to spot parallel structures, but it requires more practice to discern how the lines work together. For example, Psalm 133 has quite a neat and tidy structure, with two similes (verses 2 and 3a) framed by an opening statement (1) and a conclusion (3b): 1 How good and pleasant it is when brothers live together in unity! 2 It is like precious oil poured on the head, running down on the beard, running down on Aaron’s beard, down on the collar of his robe. 3 It is as if the dew of Hermon were falling on Mount Zion. For there the LORD bestows his blessing, even life forevermore. Verse 2 is a great example of what Robert Lowth called staircase parallelism. This technique is all about movement and intensification. Just as the oil runs down the high-priest’s beard, so the lines flow on and on. The liquid imagery is extended in the comparison to dew. Clearly, the author of Psalm 133 thought carefully about best to match the form of the poem to the content. The poetry helps to express the message. In other words, not only should brothers live in harmony, but the psalm itself has to have a sense of “unity.” Conclusion In addition to Hebrew Parallelism (the main feature of biblical poetry), God’s Word displays many other poetic techniques (personification, chiasmus, etc.). For a long time, Christians have been content to ignore these features, whereas in reality the beauty of the Bible provides an incredible appeal. Why is a passage such as Isaiah 53 so moving? Why do we memorize Psalm 23 or 103? The poetry in these passages does not detract from the truth of scripture, but makes it resonate in our hearts. I imagine many conversion stories also include an element of awe at the sublimity of Holy Scripture. Mission work is enhanced by bringing out those qualities that make the Bible the Great Book. I would therefore encourage Christian parents and educators to know the basics of biblical poetry, not only for their own appreciation, but also so they can teach children to marvel at the beauty of the Bible. Psalm 19 describes how the heavens “pour forth speech” (verse 3), before adding, paradoxically, “They have no speech, they use no words; / no sound is heard from them.” Creation can speak of the glory of God, without using actual words. Indeed, we teach children that Nature displays God’s goodness and faithfulness. But Psalm 19 points out that God’s Word (the “law”) is likewise worth meditating on, and it does contain words and speech. The “precepts of the Lord” are “sweeter than honey” and give “light to the eyes.” The fact that the Psalmist used paradoxes, metaphors, and parallelism to describe his delight in the Word can only mean that biblical poetry is an equally nourishing and eye-opening experience. So, take the time to study and appreciate the poetry of the Bible, not just to know why some lines are indented on the page, but to truly savour the divine artistry of the Word. Dr. Conrad van Dyk is Professor of English at Concordia University of Edmonton, where he teaches everything from medieval literature to children’s classics. Recently he has started creating online literary courses from a Christian perspective (and for a reasonable price). The very first course is a detailed introduction to biblical poetry which you can find at LitCompanion.com. Portions of this course have been used in this article. He attends Immanuel Canadian Reformed Church in Edmonton. Endnotes 1) Quotations from the Bible are from the NIV, with one exception. For Psalm 133, I have reintroduced the word “brothers.” 2) I have used G. Gregory’s English translation (1753) of Robert Lowth’s On the Sacred Poetry of the Hebrews, which is freely available online. 3) See James Kugel, The Idea of Biblical Poetry: Parallelism and Its History (Yale UP, 1981). The examples of Midrash are taken from Kugel, pp. 98-106; the discussion of how A and B relate can be found on p. 8. Kugel’s ideas were developed by S. E. Gilllingham, The Poems and Psalms of the Hebrew Bible (Oxford UP, 1994), who suggests that we tend to see three patterns of parallelism, i.e., A=B (comparison and contrast), A>B (the second line is subordinated to the first), and A<B (where the second line develops the first, for example through intensification or comparison). A summary of Gillingham’s approach can be found in William W. Klein, Craig L. Blomberg, and Robert L. Hubbard, Jr., Introduction to Biblical Interpretation (Thomas Nelson, 2004), p. 289ff. Personally, I prefer Kugel’s less formulaic approach, where each set of lines is treated on its own terms. 4) Robert Alter, The Art of Biblical Poetry (Basic Books, 1985), p. 10....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Theology

What is Grace?

Through sheer repetition, some Christian words seem to blend into each other and we forget their distinct meanings. That's why the word grace is sometimes used as a synonym for niceness – "Oh, she is such a gracious lady" we might say. Now, in our Reformed circles we know this word, grace, is important - we regularly hear that it is only through the grace of God that we are saved, but what does the word mean in this context? Would the word “niceness” be equally applicable here? Or if we were going to use a more theological term, could we substitute in mercy as a replacement? But no, grace is much more than “niceness” and while God is indeed merciful, mercy is very different from grace…and the difference between these words really matters if we are going to start to understand the extent of what God has done for us. So to better understand what God does for his people, let’s take a look at four key theological terms – grace, mercy, justice and persecution – and provide three short definitions that cover all four. JUSTICE is about getting what you do deserve. God’s justice requires that sinful man be punished. Jesus took our deserved punishment on himself and thus fulfilled God’s requirement for justice. MERCY is about not getting what you do deserve. God is merciful when He doesn’t punish for our sins. We deserve to go to hell, but due to God’s mercy we His children do not get what we do deserve. Both GRACE and PERSECUTION are about getting what you don’t deserve. But obviously, the two are very different. Recall that justice is about getting punished when you deserve it – when you’ve done something bad. Well, persecution is about getting punished when you’ve done nothing wrong, or done something good (like handing out a Bible in China). Persecution is, therefore, getting something bad that you don’t deserve. Grace is getting something good that you don’t deserve. God in His grace rewards us with eternal life, even though we have done nothing to merit this reward. We deserve Hell, but we get Heaven due only to God’s grace. We did nothing to deserve this, but Jesus has covered everything, dying for our sins on the cross, and taking our punishment on Himself so that He could have us as His sheep. So what is grace? It is getting good in return for evil. It is the embrace given by a loving parent to a disobedient child. It is Christ the King dying to save the rebels who oppose his rule. It is deserving Hell, but getting Jesus. A version of this article appeared in the December 2011 edition....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Theology

What a cross-continent trek taught one pioneer about Sunday rest

My town of Lynden, Washington has a mother, Phoebe Judson, who founded our city, arriving here in 1871. She promoted Sunday closure. Here’s why. In May, 1853, Phoebe and her husband Holden joined a covered wagon train near Kansas City hoping to reach Washington Territory by mid-October, a distance of more than 2,000 miles over the rough Oregon Trail. Like all wagon trains, they elected a captain. His word was the law. Well, they chose Rev. Gustavus Hines, only to be surprised one Saturday night when he announced the train would never travel on Sundays. Phoebe was shocked. They had half a continent to cross, at oxen pace (15-20 miles per day on a good trail), with at least four mountain passes and innumerable river crossings ahead of them. She sat in her wagon and just fumed. One family deserted the train and joined another. On their first Sunday, while they stood still, one train after another passed them by. But, being the daughter of a minister herself, Phoebe felt they had no choice but to honor their captain’s scruples. They started out again on Monday, bright and early, only to reach their first river cross on Tuesday evening. A long line of wagons stretched out ahead of them, waiting for the single “ferry” to carry them across. They waited 3 days. On Saturday they resumed the journey, only to be told they would still rest the whole next day. Phoebe was livid. This made absolutely no sense to her. Still, the minister’s daughter obeyed. Then, a few weeks later she began to see scores of dead oxen, mules and horses along the trail. They had been driven so relentlessly, they had collapse and died. She grudgingly admitted that perhaps the animals needed a day of rest. A few weeks later, she ruefully admitted that maybe the men needed it too, since they walked most of the time. Then she slowly began to notice that as they worshipped, ate, rested and even played together on Sundays, it had a remarkably salutary effect upon people’s spirits. There was less grumbling, more cooperation. She even noticed that they seemed to make better time the other six days. Finally, what totally sold her on the value of the Sabbath happened one Sunday evening: the family that had deserted them came limping into their campsite, humbly asking to rejoin them. She had assumed they were at least a week ahead; in fact, they had fallen behind. Their own wagon train had broken down! Of course they welcomed them back. And so it happened that they reached their destination in plenty of time, as friends, and out of the 50 head of cattle with which they began, only two were lost. This an excerpt from a Pastor Ken Koeman's longer article on the 4th Commandment which you can read here: Practicing the Sabbath. This first appeared in the Jan/Feb 2018 issue....

1 2 3 4