Transparent heart icon with white outline and + sign.

Life's busy, read it when you're ready!

Create a free account to save articles for later, keep track of past articles you’ve read, and receive exclusive access to all RP resources.

White magnifying glass.

Search thousands of RP articles

Helping you think, speak, and act in Christ.

Open envelope icon with @ symbol

Get Articles Delivered!

Helping you think, speak, and act in Christ. delivered direct to your Inbox!





Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews

Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget

Animated 2023 / 101 minutes RATING: 8/10 Twenty-three years ago, Rocky and Ginger were trying to break out – they had to get off their farm to escape being made into chicken pot pies. This time, they have to break in to save their beloved little girl, Molly, from being turned into a bucket of nuggets. Dawn of the Nugget is that rare sequel that lives up to the original... and maybe even surpasses it. Rocky, Ginger, and their fellow chicken friend escapees have made a new and very safe life on an isolated island in the middle of a large lake and things couldn't be more idyllic. The only discontented citizen? Rocky and Ginger's young daughter, Molly, was born on the island and has never known anything else. Molly wants to see what's out there, across the water, and her mom's evasive answer – "there's nothing over there for us" – isn't doing anything to calm her daughter's wanderlust. And then the humans come a-knockin'. Across the water, the chickens see a new factory is being built, and not just any sort of factory – this "Funland Farms" facility is a chicken processing plant! Rocky and Ginger don't share this news with Molly because they think it'd be too scary for her, but in trying to protect Molly, they leave her completely in the dark about life outside of their island. That quickly becomes a problem when Molly sets off on her own, crosses over water, and ends up walking right up to a Funland Farms truck. She doesn't understand the danger, and quickly gets caught and tossed in with all the other captive chickens. Now, mom and dad have to organize a rescue mission, and here's where it gets super fun for parental viewers. There are all sorts of Mission Impossible and James Bond kinds of escapades, with laser-guided exploding robot ducks, brainwashed chicken minions, and an evil computer genius running the show. Cautions The main caution would be age-appropriateness. There are loads of cute animated characters here, which might have parents thinking this should be fine for their littles. But this is a rescue mission where the stakes are such that if they don't succeed, Molly and friends are going to be turned into bite-sized nuggets. That's definitely more peril than a normal kid flick. I think this is best for 10 and up, and I'll make my case by highlighting two scenes that happen pretty close to each other. Mrs. Tweedle is back – somehow the villain from Film #1 survived, and in this one she has another enormous fall. She lands in the giant metal funnel that sends chickens into the nuggetifier. As the machine starts gurgling, with this oversized human load, kids are going to wonder if we just saw Mrs. Tweedle get killed! And it takes a minute or two to learn that no, it isn't so – phew! She does emerge out the other end, breaded, but still entirely intact. Next, the now enraged woman goes all Jack Nicholson from The Shining as she uses her axe to peel back the roof of the chickens' getaway truck. It is only a moment, which minimizes the terror – I don't think any kids over 12 will be super scared, but all bets are off for the under 10s. Language concerns include a mention of "ye gods" and one instance each of "hell" and "blooming heck." I don't think this is trying to put us off of eating chicken, but when chickens are the good guys, and chicken nuggets are the worst thing imaginable, I can imagine that inadvertent vegan indoctrination is a possibility. Conclusion We all want to protect our own little chicks, but eventually they have to leave the nest, and we do need to get them ready! Like the original Chicken Run, this is a movie aimed squarely at parents, and what makes it special is that the moral to this story – don't helicopter-parent your kids – is one we can actually appreciate and learn from. How many Hollywood flicks can you say that about? Check out the trailer below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Children’s picture books

Bruno the Bear

by W.G. Van de Hulst 47 pages / 1978 & 2014 Rating: Good/GREAT/Give Little Rosie is sick so Mother takes her off to bed. But wait, what about her teddy bear Bruno? The little goof has slipped right out of her tired little hand onto the floor. There he lies, sitting up against the doorpost with his glass eye twinkling, almost winking, as if he had a secret joke. It’s no joke though, when Jimmy and Joe come home from school, and turn their sister’s favorite toy into a puppet on a string. They make Bruno dance and fly, and then - oh no! – they swing him about over the canal outside their window. When Bruno gets hooked on a pole sticking out of the water the string breaks, and then the two naughty boys don’t know what to do. Their sister is crying – she’s sick and wants her teddy. But they don’t dare tell Mother what they did! Bruno the Bear was originally published in Dutch, and the translators have done a wonderful job – it is a fun book to read out loud. It is also a beautiful book, with more than 25 pictures that are quite helpful in setting the scene. My three-year-old and five-year-old were both able to follow all the way through this pretty long story – I think it might have taken a half hour to finish. One thing I particularly appreciated was the author’s Christian take on the boys naughtiness. The two boys don’t want to tell Mother or Father, and they don’t. But that night, as they go to bed, we learn that Joe tried to pray, but didn’t dare. And Jimmy “had said it as fast as he could. And that was not really praying. No, Jimmy did not really dare to pray either.” When I asked my girls why the two boys didn’t dare pray, they understood exactly why, and we had a good conversation about what the boys needed to do – fess up! (Which they do indeed do a few pages later.) Bruno is one of 21 Van de Hulst children’s books the publisher sent me, and so far this is our favorite. In some of the other books I’ve had to “mute” some of the action – for example, in The Rockity Rowboat I skipped over a description of just how fierce a big black dog looked – but what might be need a bit of abridgment for a three year old will be great reading for a child in Grade 1 and 2. So, to sum up, Bruno is well translated, beautifully illustrated, thoroughly Christian, and engaging enough to keep a three-year-old’s attention for half an hour. You can order it, and the other Van de Hulst books, at Inheritance Publications....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

Adam’s Rib

Courtroom Drama 1949 / 101 minutes RATING: 8/10 There are two types of feminism: one demands equal respect for women the other demands identical outcomes for women – whatever men do, women must do to It's the flaws in this latter form of feminism that are the focus of this silver screen battle of the sexes. When Doris Attinger finds her husband with another woman, she takes a shot at him and is charged with attempted murder. Adam Bonner is assigned to prosecute the case, and to his surprise his wife Amanda Bonner takes on the defense. The thing is, Amanda doesn’t care if her client is innocent or guilty – she instead argues that her client should be set free because that’s what a jury would do if they were dealing with a man caught in similar circumstances. If a man had caught another man with his wife and taken a shot at him, she is sure this attempted homicide would have been deemed perfectly excusable. So, Amanda doesn’t want justice; she wants equal injustice for all. It’s up to Adam to convince the jury – and his wife – that equal injustice just isn’t just. This is a witty, dialogue driven movie that you have to watch right to the end for a satisfying but surprising conclusion. Cautions Topic matter, including both an affair and an attempted murder, means this isn't a film for the kids. The other caution would be that, no matter the biblical reference in the film's title, this doesn't have a Christian worldview undergirding its take on gender. It is, instead, a 1950s understanding of what makes men and women different. There is one big commonality though – Adam Bonner knows there are two sexes! That's quite the stand, both then, and especially now. But that doesn't mean he has much else right. Conclusion This is from another time, and fascinating as a reflection of that time. C.S. Lewis suggested that for every new book we read, we should read one old one because different eras have their own unique blindspots, and by sampling from times gone by, it may help us see past our own. I think that recommendation could hold for films too. The battle of the sexes has never gone away, but this is certainly a different take on it. So, watch this one old film with some friends, and get ready for a good discussion afterwards! ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Graphic novels

Eric's Greatest Race

The Inspiring True Story of Eric Liddell by Tim Challies 2025 / 128 pages Rating: GOOD/Great/Give Eric Liddell is probably best known as the man who refused to run the 100 meters at the 1924 Olympics because the finals were going to take place on a Sunday. He wanted to obey his LORD, and God's 4th Commandment: "Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your male or female servant, nor your animals, nor any foreigner residing in your towns...." (Ex. 20:8-11). Instead of the 100, Eric competed in two other events that weren't his specialty, the 200 and 400-meter races. While Hollywood played a little loose with the facts in their 1981 biopic Chariots of Fire, they got the gist right – Liddell went on to win a gold in the 400. Tim Challies' comic book biography does better than the film in keeping strictly to the facts. It also includes more of Liddell's life. He and his brother were often separated from their missionary parents, but they both enjoyed their schooling and many athletic ventures. After his Olympic win, Liddell went on to become a missionary himself in China. When the Japanese invaded China during World War II, Liddell spent his final years as a prisoner in a Japanese internment camp where he encouraged other prisoners by pointing them to the God who was still in control, even in these circumstances. Liddell died in that camp right as the war was nearing an end in 1945. Cautions None. Conclusion I liked, but didn't love Eric's Greatest Race. What I liked was the opportunity to learn a little bit more about the man I'd first encountered in Chariots of Fire. But with only about 30 words a page, this was still quite a brief overview of his life. The black and white artwork is solid, but it isn't vivid enough to grab a young reader's attention. I pitched this to my teen daughter, and she echoed my own take: this is a solid base hit, but no home run. That said, the comic format makes this more accessible to any interested audience than a book-length treatment could ever be. And those 30 words per page mean it is also a quick, easy read. I think Eric's Greatest Race would make a great addition to any Christian school library; however, there are more exciting options to consider as a gift for your kids or grandkids....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Family, Movie Reviews

The Court Jester

Musical comedy/Spoof 1956 / 101 min Rating: 8/10 In medieval England, the crown has been usurped, and the only surviving heir to the throne is a mere baby. So, who is left to stop the villainous new ruler, King Roderick the Tyrant? Some might think it'd be the brave Black Fox, a Robin Hood-like outlaw, who has his own band of merry rebels hiding out with him in the forest. But the hero of this story is an unlikely sort – Hubert Hawkins (Danny Kaye) is the Black Fox's minstrel, or, to say it another way, he's the outlaw band's entertainment director. This is a movie you might want to watch twice just to keep track of the convoluted plot. Hawkins ends up sneaking into the castle by taking the place of an internationally famous jester who was coming at the king's request. But little does Hawkins know, "Giacomo: the king of jesters, and jester to kings" is also secretly a highly sought-after assassin, and the king has summoned him to knock off the his remaining rivals. If you're still with me, that means the king thinks mild-mannered Hawkins is actually his paid killer. To add to the mayhem, Hawkins ends up getting accidentally hypnotized such that, at one snap of the fingers he thinks himself the greatest of all swordsmen, and at a second snap, he's back to his own defenceless self. Imagine the sword-fighting hijinks that ensue! Cautions The buffoon King Roderick does some leering early on, particularly in the direction of the heroine, Maid Jean. Thankfully, she escapes his attentions by claiming her father, his brothers, cousins, uncles, and aunts had all succumbed to "Brekenridge's scourge," but that "just because it runs in the family doesn't mean that everyone has it." Still, that bit of information cools his jets, and for the rest of the film, the king is afraid to even touch Maid Jean. Note also that a witch makes an appearance, but while she manages some hypnosis and attempts a poisoning, this doesn't get into any dark magics. Conclusion The Court Jester is a silly “Robin Hood” spoof of a story with Danny Kaye playing the bumbling jester/spy brilliantly. Check out the clip below for a sampling of Danny Kaye's mumbling, stumbling best. &...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Children’s fiction

Akimbo and the Lions

by Alexander McCall Smith 1992 / 66 pages Rating: Good/GREAT/Give Alexander McCall Smith is best known as the author of the The No. 1 Ladies' Detective Agency but it turns out he's written a number of children's books as well. And they are good. Really good! Akimbo is a boy who has access to all the coolest animals in Africa – his dad is chief ranger in charge of a wild game reserve, which means that from one book to the next Akimbo is having adventures with snakes and baboons and elephants and crocodiles, oh my! In Akimbo and the Lions he accompanies his father to trap a lion harassing a small village. But things don't go as planned – instead they trap a cub and scare the momma away. That means someone needs to take care of this wee little lion, and Akimbo convinces his dad that he is just the boy for the job! McCall does a wonderful job of balancing the tension in the book. There were moments where my 5 and 7-year-old were covering their mouths (and sometimes their eyes) but these moments didn't last too long. This is just a good old fashioned adventure, perfect for their age group. It is short – a book that can be read in an hour – exciting, sometimes sweet, with gentle humor along the way too. And in this first story, there is absolutely nothing to object to – Akimbo doesn't talk back to his parents, or teacher. No sex, no language, no weird philosophies. The only downside would be God's absence. In an adventure where God's creation has such a big role, it would be only natural to give God his credit for these wonderful creatures. But it seems that Akimbo and his parents are not Christians. And if I was going to add one other nitpick I'll also say this is not the sort of children's book that works equally well as an adult book (this is no Narnia, for example). The story is too simple and predictable for older folk. I only mention that because, since this is by a well known, and well-loved adult-fiction author, that might raise some expectations. But while these are very good kid's books, they are kid's books. There are five in all, in this order: Akimbo and the Lions Akimbo and the Crocodile Man Akimbo and the Elephants Akimbo and the Snakes Akimbo and the Baboons The others In addition to Akimbo and the Lions we've now read the other four in the series. Akimbo and the Crocodile Man was a bit scarier as there is an actual crocodile attack. It all turns out fine in the end, but that extra bit of tension means I was glad we did read things in order, starting with Lions before Crocodile Man – that order meant even in Crocodile Man's scariest bit, my girls understood that this sort of book was going to have a happy ending. Akimbo and the Elephants had Akimbo going behind his dad's back to stop ivory (which comes from elephant tusks) poachers. He has good intentions, but lies a number of times, and even steals some ivory to serve as bait for the poachers. We had to explain to the girls that Akimbo was doing something downright dumb here - that he should be talking his plan over with his dad. So while we enjoyed reading it together, I would have some reservations about my children reading this by themselves. In Akimbo and the Snakes we come along as Akimbo visits his Uncle Pete's snake farm for a month and learns what it means to "milk" snakes. My nine-year-old enjoyed learning more about snakes but said this was definitely a day time and not bedtime book. The only objectionable bit would be in the notes after the story where it briefly mentions that snakes are thought to have evolved from lizards. In Akimbo and the Baboons a "baboon lady" comes for a visit. This is a visiting scientist who has come to study that baboons, and Akimbo and his cousin Kosi get jobs as her assistants. The author believes in evolution, and while that only comes out clearly in a section in the back – "Brilliant baboon facts" where McCall notes baboons are not in the same genetic family as human beings – the scientist, Jen, notes a few times in the story, how the baboons are "a lot like us" or "just like us." True, in some ways, but when we read between the lines here, we can see this is about being similar in an evolutionary sense. I'm making much of this and will note my nine and under kids didn't even notice the evolutinoary angle. So if I was getting these for a school library, I would get the first two – two very enthusiastic thumbs up! – but maybe give the third a miss, and the fourth and fifth with a note about evolution in the front. What's the ideal age range? I'd think kids in Grades One to Three are sure to enjoy them. Akimbo and the Lions is available at Amazon.com and Amazon.ca....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Children’s fiction

Bad Badger

by Maryrose Wood 2024 / 184 pages Rating: GOOD/Great/Give This was a wonderfully strange book that left me wondering where it was going to go next. It is about a badger that isn't bad at all, though Septimus – that's his name – thinks he might be bad at being a badger. After all, he doesn't act like all the other badgers do. For one, he lives in a cottage, near the ocean, not a den deep in the forest. And he quite likes opera, which other badgers are quite indifferent to. So we have this one lonely badger who wears clothes and shops in town amongst the humans and it is never explained why no one else thinks this the least bit odd. He would like to have a friend, so when a seagull drops by, he invites the bird for tea. But, seagulls aren't great conversationalists – all Gully (the name he gave her) ever says is "Caw!" But Septimus seems very good at deciphering just what Gully means with each particular caw. In another quirky twist, Septimus eventually meets other seagulls, and that lot does speak in sentences. It's such a fun silly journey, with the rules turned all upside down and sideways. Are these animals "people"? Septimus certainly is. But Gully didn't start off seeming so – it looked like he might just be a regular bird. But then we discover his seagull relatives are "people." This is fun, but what makes it a particularly good read, in our present cultural climate, is the lesson Septimus learns about who he is. He is worried he isn't a badger because he does so many non-badger like things. I was wondering if this book was going to turn into some woke work, with Septimus deciding that he was actually a gull instead. But no, he eventually learns he might be quite the atypical badger, but a badger he remains. And isn't that good to know? Bad Badger is, then, a kind, gentle, and counter-cultural little animal tale....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews

The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe (1979)

Animated / Children 1979 / 95 minutes RATING: 7/10 This is the oldest surviving film version of C.S. Lewis's famous classic. It is absolutely fascinating as a curiosity, and I had some fun comparing the animated version to the 2005 live-action one. This starts off a little different – we see Lucy bursting out of the wardrobe shouting, "I'm back, I'm here." While both films are loyal to the book, small difference pop up throughout, the most notable being how the "Deeper Magic" is treated here. I suspect these scriptwriters might have been Christian and thus better understood the connection Lewis was making, while the Disney script was likely not by Christians. Cautions The cautions for this film would amount to the same warnings the book would get. As I share in my live-action review, the Bible speaks of God as being like a lion (Hosea 5:14, Is. 31:4, Rev. 5:5, etc.) and makes other analogous comparisons between God and animals such as a mother hen, eagle, and bear (Matt. 23:37, Ex. 19:4, and Hosea 13:8). But what should we think of depicting God as a lion? On the one hand, Lewis isn’t trying to say that Jesus is actually a lion – Narnia is supposed to be fantasy, not fact. But on the other hand, Lewis does make a close Aslan to Jesus connection in Aslan’s sacrifice to save Edmund in The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, and Lewis is just a hair’s breadth from stating the connection explicitly in The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (Book 5 in The Chronicles of Narnia), where Aslan tells Edmund and Lucy that in their world, “I have another name.” Conclusion If they'd never remade Wardrobe as a live action film, then this might have become a family favorite for many. It really isn't bad – it even won an Emmy back in 1979. I was initially going to give this a 6, but it keeps getting better and better as the story goes. There is a lot to like here! Visually, it isn't nearly as good as the 2005 update. You can get a feel for that difference watching the brief feature on it below. But for the passionate Narnia fan, it will be very fun to see another version of a favorite story. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Family, Movie Reviews

The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe

Family / Drama 2005 / 125 minutes Rating: 8/10 For those who have not read the C.S. Lewis book of the same name, this takes place during World War II. Four Pevensie children, Peter, Edmund, Susan, and Lucy, are among the thousands of children sent away from London to escape the dangers of ongoing German bombardments. They end up at the enormous house of a reclusive professor, and in exploring the house, the youngest of the children discovers a gateway into another world. No one believes little Lucy, though. They think she is just letting her imagination run away with her. But another world it is, populated by fauns, and talking beavers, and ruled over by a wicked White Witch who has kept this land of Narnia entombed in winter's embrace for more than one hundred years. There is also hope. A prophecy speaks of two sons of Adam and two daughters of Eve coming to help. So when Lucy finally manages to get her sister and brothers to come to Narnia with her, the prophecy seems ready to be fulfilled. But then Edmund disappears. And the White Witch gathers her army. And the newly arrived leader of the free animals of Narnia – a lion by the name of Aslan – doesn't seem able to stop her. Cautions While this won't be scary for kids over ten, the White Witch, her wolf minions, the battle scenes, and Aslan being killed in front of the White Witch's horde, could well be too much for younger viewers. Other cautions are of a more theological nature. The Bible speaks of God as like a lion (Hosea 5:14, Is. 31:4, Rev. 5:5, etc.) and makes other analogous comparisons between God and animals such as a mother hen, eagle, and bear (Matt. 23:37, Ex. 19:4, and Hosea 13:8). But what should we think of depicting God as a lion? On the one hand, Lewis isn't trying to say that Jesus is actually a lion – Narnia is supposed to be fantasy, not fact. But on the other hand, Lewis does make a close Aslan to Jesus connection in Aslan's sacrifice to save Edmund in The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, and Lewis is just a hair's breadth from stating the connection explicitly in The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (Book 5 in The Chronicles of Narnia), where Aslan tells Edmund and Lucy that in their world, "I have another name." Another objection is simply what Aslan gets wrong about forgiveness here. When Edmund returns to his siblings, Aslan says, "What's done is done. There is no need to speak to Edmund about what is past." But, of course, there is. Edmund didn't commit some mistake or oopsy – he betrayed everyone. It's a movie, sure, so there's only so much time, but to let Edmund reconcile without any sort of request for forgiveness or acknowledgment of the enormity of what he had done is to model the "C'mon, what's the big deal?" sort of repentance the world has on offer, which is exactly the sort that gets in the way of both true repentance and true forgiveness. Finally, in conversing with Peter, Aslan says that "there is a Deep Magic, more powerful than any of us, that rules over all of Narnia. It defines right from wrong, and governs all our destinies. Yours and mine." Insofar as Aslan represents Jesus here, Aslan is saying that there is a right and wrong apart from and above God Himself. Really? No. Good and bad aren't above Him, but their definitions spring out of the very character of God – Who He is defines what right and wrong are (see 2 Tim. 2:13, Matt. 5:48, Rom. 3:3-4, etc.). Conclusion There are three different adaptations of The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe to choose from, and this is the very best. While Netflix has plans for a fourth, it's hard to imagine how it could be better, and it is easy to anticipate – given some of the revisionist nonsense already leaking out (Aslan is to be voiced by a woman) – that it will be a great deal worse. But if you want a more gentle, calmer version, be sure to check out either the 1988 BBC TV series (a solid 6/10, with the talking animals portrayed via life-size puppets) or the quite good 1979 animated version, which rates a 7. Be sure to check out the trailer below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews

Horton Hears a Who! (1970)

Animated / Family 1970 / 30 minutes Rating: 7/10 Based on the Dr. Seuss classic picture book of the same name, this is the story of what a caring elephant heard, and what he did. With ears as big as his heart, Horton the elephant heard what no one else could – he heard the cry of some microscopically tiny people crying out for help. It seems there was an entire town of tiny persons – Whos is their name – living on a small speck of dust.  And with the wind blowing their speck about, a cry went out for assistance... and Horton came to their rescue. Why? Well, because, as Horton notes, "a person's a person, no matter how small!" He cushioned their fall, putting their speck on a clover fluff. While Dr. Seuss was not pro-life – at least according to his second wife – his story most decidedly is. Horton knows what others in the jungle do not: that size doesn't make the person. No one else believes that anything that tiny could have life on it, so they try to lock up Horton, and, in a vindictive twist, they try to boil the clover! But it doesn't matter what they all believe – it only matters what's so, and so, Horton fights on, while begging the tiny Whos to make themselves heard. Will their personhood be recognized? Will the murderous mob be turned? We can only hope so, because, as is true of the unborn, and Whovians alike, "a person is a person no matter how small." There is a 2008, full-length feature film version that might also be worth checking out, but I have yet to see it. You can watch the trailer for this half-hour version below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Family, Movie Reviews

The InBESTigators

Children's show / TV 2019-2020 / 15 minutes x 40 episodes RATING: 9/10 Ava, Maudie, Ezra, and Kyle are four fifth graders with a knack for solving crimes. Or, rather, the brilliant and hyper-observant Maudie, has a real knack for solving crimes... and she couldn't do it without help. Maudie is smart, but her weakness is social awareness – she'll sometimes blurt out something that is certainly true, but might not be appropriate or polite. The other girl on the team, Ava, is the more emotionally-aware one, and the most compassionate and bubbly, always raising money for this charitable project or that. The two boys could be summed up as geek and dumb jock, and while that's a bit simplistic, it isn't far off. Ezra is very smart, particularly with computers, but smart like you or me can be – he's still not the Sherlock Holmes-kind of smart that Maudie is. His best friend is the energetic, athletic, and easily distracted Kyle. who likes every sport and is the best at all of them. He's the biggest comedic factor, but he's not really dumb. He's probably the most age-accurate of the bunch – he doesn't get things that the watching kids wouldn't get either, so when he asks questions to clear away his confusion, that helps the elementary-aged viewers too. After coming together to solve a mystery in the first episode, the four friends decide to start a detective agency to help solve cases around their school and neighborhood. They call themselves The InBESTigators, and after each crime is solved they record their thoughts on a vlog which turns into the episode we watch. It's a little bit like a faux reality-show, though we get to see much more than what their video camera records. There's loads of humor here, and all of it the good clean goofy sort. Cautions Language concerns in  the six episodes I watched were limited to one instance of "oh my goodness." To clarify, I didn't watch the whole series. I just sat down to watch the first half dozen, five of which were easy to recommend without reservation. While they are tackling  "crimes" they are of a pretty kid-appropriate sort – someone claims someone else's homework as their own, for example. The one episode I had issue with was the fifth, called "The Case of the Sleepover Secret," which had a classmate's parental divorce as a subtext. Divorce is common, so I understand why the writers might have thought it no big deal to have as an element in the story. But as divorce is also one of the most worrisome things that could happen to a child, it's not something I want to introduce as concern for my own kids. But, quizzing my family on the other 34 episodes, they can't recall any other material that, like this, is too heavy for this otherwise lightweight carefree show. I'll also take issue with how some of the "criminals" do their wrong-doing for reasons that are made a bit too understandable. The InBESTigators don't quite go as far as excusing the crime, but they can veer in that direction, so parents may need to emphasize that wrong is still wrong, even when someone else has been mean first. Conclusion The InBESTigators is the kind of show that could get big laughs from kids 8 to 12, and smiles from everyone else – mom and dad really won't mind checking out an episode or three. My kids have watched them on repeat, seeing each episode probably three or four times. Part of the appeal for me is that each episode is just 15 minutes long, which makes this easy to watch for just a short time – you don't have to commit to the 90 minutes a movie would take. It seems to move around on the various streaming services, but as of writing is available on Netflix and BYUtv.org. Check out the trailer below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

Lord Jeff

Drama / Black & White / Family 1938 / 85 minutes RATING: 8/10 This is a fantastic film... and a hard sell for any modern audience. My 11-year-old gave it an 8.5 at the end, but she would never have picked it – that it's black and white would have put her off. She only watched it because she was sick, bundled up on the couch, and had gotten bored enough with her book to check out what her dad was watching. And then it won her over. The opening scene introduces us to the young and very spoiled Lord Geoffrey Braemer. His imperious ways don't endear him to the hotel staff where he's staying, but those same haughty manners put everyone off from questioning his lordship's lordship. For Geoffrey is no aristocrat at all. He's an orphan who has been taken in by two thieves, and when they visit a jewelry shop, the young "lord" fakes a faint, distracting everyone just long enough for one of his partners in crime to make off with a diamond necklace. But when their cover is blown, only Geoffrey is caught. He's sent to naval accademy for boys and told that if he doesn't smarten up his next stop will be prison. That's all just the first 10 minutes. What comes next is a hard boy gradually being soften. It's one of the most believable of cinematic turarounds – he keeps getting in trouble, makes a mess of any potential friendships, but slowly starts recognizing the opportunity he has here. Mickey Rooney plays Terry, a leading student willing to take Geoff under his wing. And when Geoff want have it, Terry helps him anyways. The reason this really is a must-watch comes near the end of story when Geoff hears from his two accomplices, who are looking for his help again. They did take him in when he had no one else, so he feels a fierce loyalty for him. But, as the Admiral spells it out for him, loyalty can be an admirable quality, but Geoff has two loyalties here, and he can only choose one: his former friends, or his new ones. So, which will it be? While no trailer seems available online, you can find some video clips here....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Children’s fiction

The Found Boys

by S.D. Smith 2024 / 172 pages Rating: Good/Great/GIFT Author S.D. Smith is best known for his rabbits-with-swords Green Ember series, and while this is quite a departure, it is every bit as good. Set in the US south of the 1980s, The Found Boys struck me as Hardy-Boys-meets-the-Ku-Klux-Klan, except they have a black friend, they're all around 12-ish, and everyone goes to church. Friends Tommy and Scott were just hanging out after the service. Their parents never left their Valley Baptist Church early – they sure loved to chat afterwards – so the boys had plenty of time to hit the swings behind the church and then explore the creek behind. And further back yet is an old junkyard, complete with a lost treasure the boys left behind when their exploration was cut short by a couple of junkyard dogs. The boys have made plans to recover their treasure, but the plans always fall short, often because Scott gets a stomach ache at just the wrong time. It ain't just the dogs he's worried about – the junkyard is owned by a wizard! But this time they've got a new friend to help them. Well, he wasn't a friend to start. Tommy and Scott first chased him up a tree. That wasn't all that friendly. But it was because Dooley – that's his name – scared them silly when Tommy and Scott were exploring the nearby graveyard. And, of course, they had to get him back. Dooley is from the black Baptist church on the other side of the creek, and good Christian lads that they all are, peace negotiations were quickly had and a plan was hatched. Together they'll brave the junkyard and get their treasure back from the wizard. I won't give more away, but to say we discover the wizard isn't the magical sort the boys imagine, but the KKK kind. Cautions The cautions here would just be age appropriateness. Racism is a nasty sin, and particularly in the American South – the most shocking section shares how the Klan burned a cross in the black pastor's lawn. Scary stuff for the 10-year-old target audience that this would be best for. Conclusion That said, The Found Boys has the kind of grit kids need to read, and in this classic-in-the-making, we have not just boys having an adventure, but parents stepping in to take the lead. Parental involvement is rare in a children's story, and even here they only come in at about the two-thirds mark. But their appearance is both calming and instructional: author Smith showcases what it looks like when godly men – and their whole congregations – step up. Racism isn't just experienced; it is fought. Yes, there is some grit to this story, and that's what makes it the perfect boy's book. The world had villains, and our boys need to learn what it looks like to stand up and defend what and who God has entrusted to them. I'd recommend it for 10 and up. That said, my girls love this too. The heroes are all boys, but girls seem to be able to get over that a lot better than boys would ever do the reverse....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Graphic novels

Sleuth Family Robinson: fighting evil around the world

by Christopher P.N. Maselli 2025 / 160 pages Rating: GOOD/Great/Gift The Robinsons are an undercover spy family working for the UK. When someone hacks the British spy database, the Robinsons are the only spies whose cover wasn't blown, so they are called up to see if they can track down the hacker. Mom and dad are up for it, and brother and sister Edgar and Christie are ready too. In a nod to James Bond, they have their own super secret spy gadget supplier, a genius named W. The four of them end up traveling around the world, fighting an evil AI set on ruling the world. This is an explicitly Christian comic from Focus on the Family, an organization dedicated to building up the family. They've had a decades-long-running audio drama called Adventures in Odyssey, and the "author" of this comic, Wooten,  is one of the fictional characters from that drama. The comic itself was first serialized in Focus's Clubhouse magazine for kids, with two-page spreads each issue. My daughters read a few of these chapters so they were very excited to get their hands on this complete collection of the whole 44-chapter Sleuth Family Robinson adventure. That amounts to 88 pages, so what's in the rest of this 160 page book? There's some Sleuth Family Robinson trivia, and some background bios for the characters, but the bulk of the rest of the book is two page almost-devotional type reflections on the adventure. They explore questions like: What is a family?, Is it okay to fight? and The deal-o on adoption. I don't know if kids will spend much time in this second half, but if they do, it offers a solid conservative Christian perspective Cautions The only caution I'd offer is for this second half, and only because the "author" Wooten will sometimes ask questions that would be better addressed together with parents, and not by a kid reading alone. For example, on page 142 Wooten asks, "Do you believe God answers prayers? Why or why not?" I like the question, but I would like to help my kids answer it. But, again, I don't know how much time kids will even spend in this second half, unless a parent is reading it with them. Conclusion Christian comics are noted for their lack of nuance – the bad guys will change from story to story, but subtlety is always the enemy, and right and wrong will always be belabored. There's some of that here too, but the art is fantastic, the story fast-paced, and the target audience young enough that being a bit obvious isn't so bad. I'd pitch this to 10 and up, maybe all the way up to 16 if your family ever got Clubhouse magazine. I think even older teens will enjoy it then for the nostalgia....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Graphic novels

The God Proofs: How Science Points to YOUR Creator

by Douglas Ell 2024 / 207 pages Rating: Good/GREAT/Gift A blue square with legs, arms eyeballs and mouth, wants to prove to his red rectangle friend that God exists, and he offers up three separate "proofs." This is a fun educational comic, but problematic in that this initial set-up implies that the evidence for God is not patently obvious to all, which is contrary to what Romans 1:19-20 tells us is so. "...since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities – his eternal power and divine nature – have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse." So trying to "prove" God's existence to an agnostic or atheist, is less about them having intellectual or logical objections, and more a matter of stubborn rebellion. God says someone who doesn't acknowledge His existence can only do so by suppressing the implications o everything he sees around him in God's brilliant creation. Apologetics – defending the faith – is less about debate, and more about declaring what's what. It's akin to the approach you'd take with a child who can't hardly speak because his mouth is too full, even as he protests he doesn't know anything about any missing piece of cake. We can't and shouldn't take his protest seriously. We need to understand that atheists and agnostics are liars more than doubters. But can we lie to ourselves, and so convincingly that we believe it? Yes indeed. We live in a time when folks are literally saying, with straight faces, that a 6'5" guy with a beard can be a girl, and this sort of self-deception isn't limited to folks with multiple degrees (though it does seem to find a particular harbor there). So there can be some benefit to, as Paul writes in 2 Cor. 10:5, demolishing "arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God." We can help the sincerely confused by helping them work through their self-deceptions. The book also pitches "Science" as the final arbiter of truth. But this makes an idol of Science, placing it above God. The scientific method is a great tool, but like everything else in our fallen world, it can be twisted by bias and fallibility. Have we mentioned that we humans are really good at lying to ourselves? With that in mind, this comic could be a great tool for helping the confused, and for our own encouragement, since this highlights some astonishing fingerprints God has left on His creation. The blue square offers up three proofs, but I'll touch on just one: "the numbers proof." The numbers proof highlights that all of life is built on incredibly complex "code" that could never have come about by chance.  What's this code? DNA, and not only do we come with code, all of our cells come with miniaturized code - or DNA – printers. This numbers proof is built on the fact that you have "3.2 billion letters of DNA code in almost all of your thirty trillion cells." That's a lot of letters, and like the letters of the alphabet, they don't mean anything unless they are assembled in a precise order.   Blue square goes on to illustrate that the odds of getting a particular order of even something as small as the paragraph just above - the one in bold - just by chance is beyond infinitesimal. "Suppose that every atom in the universe is also a blind chicken pecking at a keyboard. ...And suppose each of these atoms/chickens is typing at lightning speed: one hundred million trillion, trillion, trillion letters per second. .... If you all type for a trillion, trillion years, and don't take any bathroom breaks, you still have an almost unimaginably small chance...any of your atom/chicken friends would ever type this short phrase." There's much more to this odds argument, spelling out how it is more impossible than even this makes it out to be. So how is this a "proof" of God? Well, if chance and time can't make us, then the alternative is that we are the intentional product of a Supernatural Mind. Cautions There is, on page 120, a brief appearance of God as a grey-bearded white robed painter, painting canvases of DNA and animals He's designed. It is just the one panel, but why? Conclusion The comic format makes some otherwise complicated scientific information pretty accessible. I think any high schooler would be able to work through this, and the engaging format means at least some of them will want to too. These are engaging evidences, but we need to remember how to use them. Don't attempt to prove God's existence: proclaim it, and then use this material to show how God's creation shouts His Name too. It might seem a subtle difference, but it is a significant one. It's the difference between elevating Man's intellect, or glorifying God instead. So... a good tool for Christians, but not a book you should just hand out to unbelievers....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Book Reviews, Graphic novels

Pearl

by Sherri L. Smith and Christine Norrie 2024 / 144 pages Rating: GOOD/Great/Give This is a very different slice of World War II history. Amy is a Japanese-American teenager, living in 1941 Hawaii. The US is not at war with Japan... not yet. So when news comes that her Japanese great-grandmother, her sōsobo, is sick, maybe even dying, the family decides to send 13-year-old Amy to go tend to her. So on to a boat she goes, and off Amy heads, to a farm just outside of Hiroshima, and a country where everything is so very different. She is supposed to be there for just a few months. But then on December 8, 1941, news comes that the Japanese Navy has launched a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. Now the American Amy is living in enemy territory, though amongst cousins and uncles, aunts, and her dear sōsobo who are all part of the... enemy? She's in an entirely unexpected situation, and what's a mere child to make of all this? Her relatives tell Amy, "You are Japanese now." But she is American too. So, Amy wonders, can she be both? Her English skills are noticed by an officer. He takes her away from her Japanese family and assigns her to a team of women listening to and translating American radio broadcasts. Amy wonders, is she a traitor? Or could her work help end the war, by helping Japan understand America? Then rumors start coming in, of the US locking up Japanese Americans in prison camps. Amy can't believe it... but finds out the rumors are true. Her parents have been imprisoned, and her little baby brother has died in the camps. Amy stops worrying about being a traitor. She does the work she is assigned. This is the story of a girl trapped between nations. Yes, in World War II there was a clear divide between the wicked aggressors and the good Allied forces – we're not trying to muddy the waters or make equivalences where they don't exist. But in our broken world, even the "good guys" aren't good always. That nuance might make this a hard one for some kids to read and contend with. What would they have done in Amy's shoes? Did she betray her country? Did it betray her? Cautions That'd be the big caution: this isn't for kids who can't wrestle through the moral grays yet. So this is for older teens. The other caution would regard some imagery after the atom bomb is dropped on Hiroshima. The horror is most certainly muted, but horror still. It's not the stuff to give nightmares though - I think any kid old enough to deal with the nuances will be easily old enough to deal with the visuals. But you won't want this somewhere where the littles can get hold of it. Conclusion In a world in which the choice too often is portrayed as being between a Trump Derangement Syndrome, or a Trump Worship Syndrome, understanding that no one is as depraved as they could be, or as good as they should be, is a lesson that many are in need of learning. This book could help....

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8