Meanwhile, in Canada, the government’s Bill C-11 would give the government enormous power over the Internet. So, like our American counterparts express below, we need to call on our government to “shut this down.”
Jonathon Van Maren reviews RP contributor Chris Martin‘s new book, and shares how: “In order for people to use social media responsibly—i.e., not get addicted—we essentially have to use these platforms in ways that they were not designed to be used.”
The Fraser Institute has found support drops off dramatically for three new government spending programs when a cost is mentioned. It seems much of the initial support was based on an assumption that the programs would cost nothing. But isn’t this like going out for a meal and then being all surprised when the bill comes? Don’t we all know, there is no free lunch?
No. As Henry Hazlitt noted, “The world is full of so-called economists who in turn are full of schemes for getting something for nothing.” Governments tout the benefits of their program but seldom spell out all the costs, so it may well be that taxpayers have been tricked into thinking that lunch will be free. Or the answer might be found on a different front: some support might have come from people who thought they would get the benefit, and someone else the cost.
It comes down to trade-offs… that politicians aren’t even willing to acknowledge.
Canada’s federal, in-person voting on Election Day has each vote counted by a poll clerk, as well as representatives from all the major parties. That means there isn’t just one count, but at least four (Election Canada’s, plus counts from the Liberals, Conservatives, and NDP). This process precludes not only the possibility of fraud but even the appearance of it. Our in-person voting procedure is secure and it is spectacular. In contrast, mail-in ballots leave possibilities like this…
“The pain of infertility is real and deep, and the desire for children is natural, inherent, and good. It’s a tragedy whenever someone who embraces this desire is unable to experience it. At the same time, we question the use of certain artificial reproductive technologies. Ours is a culture in which adult happiness is prioritized over the rights of children, both in the taking and the making of preborn life…”
If you’ve thought about visiting the life-size model of the ark they’ve built down in Kentucky, you won’t find a better preview than this 1-hour tour with Answers in Genesis founder Ken Ham and Babylon Bee’s editor-in-chief Kyle Mann. Mann brings some of the funny, but in a surprising twist, Ham proves to be quite the sardonic wit!