Transparent heart icon with white outline and + sign.

Life's busy, read it when you're ready!

Create a free account to save articles for later, keep track of past articles you’ve read, and receive exclusive access to all RP resources.

White magnifying glass.

Search thousands of RP articles

Equipping Christians to think, speak, and act

Open envelope icon with @ symbol

Get Articles Delivered!

Equipping Christians to think, speak, and act delivered direct to your Inbox!





Red heart icon with + sign.
Family, Movie Reviews

The Court Jester

Musical comedy/Spoof 1956 / 101 min Rating: 8/10 In medieval England, the crown has been usurped, and the only surviving heir to the throne is a mere baby. So, who is left to stop the villainous new ruler, King Roderick the Tyrant? Some might think it'd be the brave Black Fox, a Robin Hood-like outlaw, who has his own band of merry rebels hiding out with him in the forest. But the hero of this story is an unlikely sort – Hubert Hawkins (Danny Kaye) is the Black Fox's minstrel, or, to say it another way, he's the outlaw band's entertainment director. This is a movie you might want to watch twice just to keep track of the convoluted plot. Hawkins ends up sneaking into the castle by taking the place of an internationally famous jester who was coming at the king's request. But little does Hawkins know, "Giacomo: the king of jesters, and jester to kings" is also secretly a highly sought-after assassin, and the king has summoned him to knock off the his remaining rivals. If you're still with me, that means the king thinks mild-mannered Hawkins is actually his paid killer. To add to the mayhem, Hawkins ends up getting accidentally hypnotized such that, at one snap of the fingers he thinks himself the greatest of all swordsmen, and at a second snap, he's back to his own defenceless self. Imagine the sword-fighting hijinks that ensue! Cautions The buffoon King Roderick does some leering early on, particularly in the direction of the heroine, Maid Jean. Thankfully, she escapes his attentions by claiming her father, his brothers, cousins, uncles, and aunts had all succumbed to "Brekenridge's scourge," but that "just because it runs in the family doesn't mean that everyone has it." Still, that bit of information cools his jets, and for the rest of the film, the king is afraid to even touch Maid Jean. Note also that a witch makes an appearance, but while she manages some hypnosis and attempts a poisoning, this doesn't get into any dark magics. Conclusion The Court Jester is a silly “Robin Hood” spoof of a story with Danny Kaye playing the bumbling jester/spy brilliantly. Check out the clip below for a sampling of Danny Kaye's mumbling, stumbling best. &...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews, Watch for free

The George Müller Story

Animated / Biography / Drama 2019 / 30 minutes Rating: 8/10 In his day, I'd imagine George Müller (1805-1898) was accused of being irresponsible, or maybe even insane. He ran orphanages that helped thousands of children, and yet he never sent out an appeal letter or solicited donations. Instead, he went to the Lord to ask for help. And again and again the Lord delivered what Müller and his orphans needed. One of the most extraordinary examples of God's providence – an account that made it into this fantastic animated biography – is the morning that there was no food for the children for breakfast. So, Müller and the children prayed, and shortly thereafter a baker showed up with fresh bread for the children that, as he put it, God had put it on his heart to donate. And a milkman came knocking, wondering if the children might like his milk, since his truck had broken down nearby, and the milk would spoil anyway. Müller's orphanages served 18,000 children over the years, all of them helped without a request being made to any but the Lord. Cautions I knew a man whose multiple sclerosis had trapped him in a wheelchair. His suffering was physical, but also brought on mentally and spiritually by the brothers and sisters in his Pentecostal circles who questioned if the reason he was in his wheelchair was because he hadn't yet prayed for healing with enough faith and trust. They thought, if you prayed the right way, then God had to do what you say. And that's not so. Our children watching this need to understand that yes, God does provide, and in extraordinary fashion sometimes – twenty years later, this same man was able to walk away from his wheelchair, his MS in remission. But God also answers in ways that might not match with our hopes, and we will simply have to trust that He knows what is best for us, even if that means difficulties and even death. Other cautions could be offered with regard to some of Müller's views, but this video doesn't really get into them. Still, he had his faults and confusions. Parents can address this, not so much by researching him and finding those flaws, but simply by directing young hearts to where their admiration most belongs. George Müller was quite a man, but he served an astonishing God! Conclusion I've seen God act in amazing ways in my own life at times, and I don't think it a coincidence that it was at times when I stepped outside my own comfort zone and acted in obedience to meet a need that I knew was beyond my own ability. I've seen the same happen, all the more so, in others' lives who have been all the more obedient to act in faith and trust. I know of how God has precisely answered prayers, sometimes providing the exact sum required and not a penny more – whether it was as small as a nickel raise, or as large as a cheque for $30,000. Müller got his milk, yes, and that's not the first story I've heard of a Christian having milk arrive out of the blue on their doorstep. I've been told of a needed house downpayment appearing in the hands of a mysterious stranger who was never seen again. Our God is our Father indeed, and He loves us, and generously provides for us. And I do wonder what He might work through us, if we were bolder still, like a Müller, a Corrie ten Boom, or a Brother Andrew (of God's Smuggler fame). This, then, is a film to watch to see what God has already done with a man obediently acting in such faith. And you can watch it for free below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Family, Movie Reviews

The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe

Family / Drama 2005 / 125 minutes Rating: 8/10 For those who have not read the C.S. Lewis book of the same name, this takes place during World War II. Four Pevensie children, Peter, Edmund, Susan, and Lucy, are among the thousands of children sent away from London to escape the dangers of ongoing German bombardments. They end up at the enormous house of a reclusive professor, and in exploring the house, the youngest of the children discovers a gateway into another world. No one believes little Lucy, though. They think she is just letting her imagination run away with her. But another world it is, populated by fauns, and talking beavers, and ruled over by a wicked White Witch who has kept this land of Narnia entombed in winter's embrace for more than one hundred years. There is also hope. A prophecy speaks of two sons of Adam and two daughters of Eve coming to help. So when Lucy finally manages to get her sister and brothers to come to Narnia with her, the prophecy seems ready to be fulfilled. But then Edmund disappears. And the White Witch gathers her army. And the newly arrived leader of the free animals of Narnia – a lion by the name of Aslan – doesn't seem able to stop her. Cautions While this won't be scary for kids over ten, the White Witch, her wolf minions, the battle scenes, and Aslan being killed in front of the White Witch's horde, could well be too much for younger viewers. Other cautions are of a more theological nature. The Bible speaks of God as like a lion (Hosea 5:14, Is. 31:4, Rev. 5:5, etc.) and makes other analogous comparisons between God and animals such as a mother hen, eagle, and bear (Matt. 23:37, Ex. 19:4, and Hosea 13:8). But what should we think of depicting God as a lion? On the one hand, Lewis isn't trying to say that Jesus is actually a lion – Narnia is supposed to be fantasy, not fact. But on the other hand, Lewis does make a close Aslan to Jesus connection in Aslan's sacrifice to save Edmund in The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, and Lewis is just a hair's breadth from stating the connection explicitly in The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (Book 5 in The Chronicles of Narnia), where Aslan tells Edmund and Lucy that in their world, "I have another name." Another objection is simply what Aslan gets wrong about forgiveness here. When Edmund returns to his siblings, Aslan says, "What's done is done. There is no need to speak to Edmund about what is past." But, of course, there is. Edmund didn't commit some mistake or oopsy – he betrayed everyone. It's a movie, sure, so there's only so much time, but to let Edmund reconcile without any sort of request for forgiveness or acknowledgment of the enormity of what he had done is to model the "C'mon, what's the big deal?" sort of repentance the world has on offer, which is exactly the sort that gets in the way of both true repentance and true forgiveness. Finally, in conversing with Peter, Aslan says that "there is a Deep Magic, more powerful than any of us, that rules over all of Narnia. It defines right from wrong, and governs all our destinies. Yours and mine." Insofar as Aslan represents Jesus here, Aslan is saying that there is a right and wrong apart from and above God Himself. Really? No. Good and bad aren't above Him, but their definitions spring out of the very character of God – Who He is defines what right and wrong are (see 2 Tim. 2:13, Matt. 5:48, Rom. 3:3-4, etc.). Conclusion There are three different adaptations of The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe to choose from, and this is the very best. While Netflix has plans for a fourth, it's hard to imagine how it could be better, and it is easy to anticipate – given some of the revisionist nonsense already leaking out (Aslan is to be voiced by a woman) – that it will be a great deal worse. But if you want a more gentle, calmer version, be sure to check out either the 1988 BBC TV series (a solid 6/10, with the talking animals portrayed via life-size puppets) or the quite good 1979 animated version, which rates a 7. Be sure to check out the trailer below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

Lord Jeff

Drama / Black & White / Family 1938 / 85 minutes RATING: 8/10 This is a fantastic film... and a hard sell for any modern audience. My 11-year-old gave it an 8.5 at the end, but she would never have picked it – that it's black and white would have put her off. She only watched it because she was sick, bundled up on the couch, and had gotten bored enough with her book to check out what her dad was watching. And then it won her over. The opening scene introduces us to the young and very spoiled Lord Geoffrey Braemer. His imperious ways don't endear him to the hotel staff where he's staying, but those same haughty manners put everyone off from questioning his lordship's lordship. For Geoffrey is no aristocrat at all. He's an orphan who has been taken in by two thieves, and when they visit a jewelry shop, the young "lord" fakes a faint, distracting everyone just long enough for one of his partners in crime to make off with a diamond necklace. But when their cover is blown, only Geoffrey is caught. He's sent to naval accademy for boys and told that if he doesn't smarten up his next stop will be prison. That's all just the first 10 minutes. What comes next is a hard boy gradually being soften. It's one of the most believable of cinematic turarounds – he keeps getting in trouble, makes a mess of any potential friendships, but slowly starts recognizing the opportunity he has here. Mickey Rooney plays Terry, a leading student willing to take Geoff under his wing. And when Geoff want have it, Terry helps him anyways. The reason this really is a must-watch comes near the end of story when Geoff hears from his two accomplices, who are looking for his help again. They did take him in when he had no one else, so he feels a fierce loyalty for him. But, as the Admiral spells it out for him, loyalty can be an admirable quality, but Geoff has two loyalties here, and he can only choose one: his former friends, or his new ones. So, which will it be? While no trailer seems available online, you can find some video clips here....

Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews

Chicken Run

Animated 2000 / 84 minutes RATING: 8/10 Sometimes whether you love or hate a film can be entirely about the expectations you come to it with. If you thought Chicken Run was going to be like other lightweight animated animal fare – Curious George or PAW Patrol – then you'd be disappointed. This tale of chickens trying to escape being made into pies isn't for the timid toddler. But if you were looking for a clever claymation homage to the World War II prisoner-escape films like Stalag 17 and The Great Escape, which you could share with your teens and tweens, then this is the film for you! Our story begins on a chicken farm, but with the hen houses surrounded by rows of barbwire fencing, guard towers on every corner, and a pair of vicious dogs circling the perimeter. Younger viewers might think this some rather over-the-top security for a farm, but dad can point out that this chicken farm is doubling as a POW camp. And if anyone is going to get the flock out of this camp, the right hen for the job is Ginger, the bravest of all these chickens, and clever too. In fact, it seems like Ginger could get out any time she wants, but the problem is, she can't manage to get everyone else out with her. In an opening montage we see one hilariously unsuccessful escape attempt after another. So, if they can't all get out through the gate or tunneling under the fence, what can they try next? Some of the other hens are content to stay, pumping out eggs and just keeping their cluckers down. But we find out quickly why this isn't a place they can stay: chickens that can't lay, don't live for long. Worse still, Mrs. Tweedy, the farm owner, is tired of selling eggs, and wants to get into the more profitable chicken pie business! So these birds have to fly the coop now... but how are they going to do it? Here's where Rocky the Rhode Island Rooster drops in... from the sky! Wait, what – can chickens actually fly? Well, seeing is believing, and Ginger saw it with her own two peepers. And now she has the best escape plan of all: Rocky will teach them all how to fly so they can just flap right over the fence! But why is Rocky so reluctant to help? Cautions There's all sorts of cautions that could be noted if you were watching this with kids under 10 – a chicken gets killed off screen, and all the chickens are threatened with death when an automated chicken pie-making machine shows up - this is just too tense for young kids. For twelve and up the caution would be language. When Rocky shows up, the only other rooster around, an old British soldier, calls Americans "oversexed." Other language concerns include British slang like "flippin' hell," "blooming' heck" and "thieving little buggers," along with two mice noting that eggs come out of a hen's "bum." Conclucksion This seems the type of film you'll either love or hate - no in-betweens. The stop-motion claymation trips up viewers, leading them to expect something light and fluffy, and the grit and tension that is key here leaves them with a bad taste in their mouths. But if you've watched any old war films from the 1940s, 50s, or 60s, then I think the odds are very high that you'll appreciate this too. My own kids have seen a dozen or so, and I think that's why the daughter I watched this with loved it too. So, recommended for 12 and up, with that proviso. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews

Wallace and Gromit: vengeance most fowl

Animated 2024 / 79 minutes RATING: 8/10 The penguin is back! Feathers McGraw has been sent to jail – or, rather, the Zoo – as punishment for his attempted theft of the Blue Diamond, back in The Wrong Trousers (the second of Nick Park's "Wallace and Gromit" claymation, stop-motion short films). But how can Feathers escape from behind bars? Well, it turns out it's Wallace to the rescue... sort of. Wallace and Gromit are the reason Feathers was caught in the first place in the previous film, and Feathers wants revenge. Wallace's latest and greatest invention, a robot garden gnome helper named Norbot (short for "Nifty Odd-jobbing Robot"), has turned into a business opportunity. The little gizmo can make short work of any garden tasks, and Wallace has been hiring him out to all his impressed neighbors. The little guy does so well, he gets featured on the news... where he comes to the attention of Feathers McGraw. Turns out, Wallace made Norbot with a variety of possible settings, ranging from "Good" (his default factory setting) all the way down to "Evil." Feathers manages to hack Norbot and tune him to his Evil setting, so the little gnome turns imp, makes an army of cloned Norbots, and then their garden work becomes a cover for stealing all the necessary tools they need to set Feathers free. Wallace and Gromit have always had more gadgets than the most bombastic Bond film, and this time the homage has gone even further, with Feathers doing a great rendition of the very campiest kind of Bond villain, complete with secret submarine lair. This is one mom and dad will get and enjoy more than their kids, though I think boys will like it too. I'm not sure about the girls though - the black-eyed evil Norbot might be too creepy for their liking. Cautions Early on there is a brief scene of Wallace getting bathed and dressed for the morning, ably assisted by a half dozen of his machines, one of which tosses him out of his bath down a transparent water slide. We get three glimpses - a millisecond each – of Wallace's naked backside sliding past us in the waterslide tube. It's all just a pinkish blur, though it's easy to imagine a boy slowing it down to see what he could see, and even at half speed (which the Netflix controls allow) it is about a half second of naked claymation butt sliding by. The one other instance of potty humor is a scene in which Wallace accidentally knocks away the outerwalls of an outhouse, leaving behind a man on the commode, who is barely exposed – his sweater covers most of him – though quite shocked. Someone says "heck" and "butt." Conclusion There is a moral to this story: don't trust tech too much, cause it might turn on you. That might not sound all that profound, but when you consider how smartphones have taken over our lives, with not nearly enough conscious thought on our parts, the idea that some tech might well have an "evil" setting shouldn't seem outrageous. Overall, though, this is a tamer, funnier, more family-friendly version of James Bond adventure. It does have its tense moments - the mood music will definitely set your littles on edge – and evil Norbot's black eyes are disturbing. So, best for 10 and up, unless your kids are made of sterner stuff. Very fun! ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews

Curious George: the TV series

Animated / TV / Children 2006-2022 / 24 min x 198 episodes Rating: 8/10 Curious George is a monkey – or is he? As I learned from Larry the Cucumber in an educational VeggieTales Silly Song: "If it doesn't have a tail it's not a monkey, even if it has a monkey kind of shape ...If it doesn't have a tail it's not a monkey, it's an ape." George does not have a tail, so, despite everything you might have thought you've known all your life, George is not, in fact, a monkey, but an ape. Mind blown, right? Regardless, George is curious, and his energetic investigativeness gets him bounding out into the world, making friends, seeing sights, and just generally making the most of every day. His curiosity can also get him into some trouble, but George is a good-hearted little monkey ape, so if he makes a mess, he'll do his very best to clean it up. And he also has a best friend/owner – the fellow mysteriously known only as "the Man in the Yellow Hat" – who is always looking out for him too. This is a decidedly pleasant show that models attitudes we'd love our kids to imitate, which isn't always true in children's fare. Everyone here is just so good-humored, happy, and maybe above all, innocent, whether it's George himself, or his friend Bill, a country kid who thinks George is a "city kid." This is a world in which bullies and means girls don't exist, which is just fine for its preschool audience. It's also not dumb. Some kids' stuff is so dull or repetitious that dad will be able to feel his brain cells dying off if he has to sit through more than 5 minutes of the stuff. But you can watch an episode, or two or three, of George, with nary a brain cell protesting. It is kid stuff, but clever enough to keep an adult mildly entertained as well. Cautions Our family has watched dozens and dozens of these, and aside from a single episode that I vaguely recall as being a little too "green agenda" for my liking (and it wasn't a big thing), I can't recall anything worth a caution. I rewatched the first three episodes, each of which included two stories, and found it just as fun and innocent as I remembered. One caution would concern the original book series this is based on, where George's adventures are often a result of George flatly disobeying what his friend, the Man in the Yellow Hat, just told him. But that's not so in the show – George just has stuff kind of happen to him. His mischief is of a very innocent sort. That said, some of these TV episodes include an interlude with children telling us that “George is a monkey and he can do things that you can’t.” That's a thought worth sharing with the young viewing audience. Conclusion If you've loved the TV show, there is also a film series, which, so far as I've seen, is quite good. Check out my reviews of Curious George, Curious George 3: Back to the Jungle, and Curious George: Royal Monkey. Of course, that last one should say Royal Ape, but hey, if Bill can confuse George with being a kid, I guess we can be fine with the producers mistaking George for a monkey. Either way, this is a barrel of fun! ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews, Watch for free

Hidden Blessings

Drama / Christian 2024 / 107 min Rating: 8/10 Gregory Davidson is kind of like Willy Wonka of chocolate factory fame. Both men are creative artists, with Davidson being the painter behind the series of "Hidden Blessings" canvases that were so popular not so long ago. Like Willy Wonka, he stepped away from the public eye entirely, even as everyone was dying to get a glimpse in to his "factory" to see how the product is made. Now, for the very first time Davidson has invited a documentarian into his house, a young filmmaker, Lydia Drake, who contacted Davidson about a painting gifted to her in her mom's will. The canvas had Davidson's signature, so, she was initially only hoping to find out if the painting was genuine. But then the two started texting back and forth and, eventually, Davidson put out the invite to do a documentary on his work. Like Wonka, Davidson is a quirky, frantic oddball, bouncing across the room, breaking into song, doing impressions. He is quite the character, and you'll want to get to know him. And like Wonka, he's entirely fictitious. That is not clear at the start – this is a drama convincingly presented as a documentary. To the film's credit, it was about 50 minutes in before my girls started suspecting this might be fiction rather than fact. Only when the storyline started aligning with some key points from the Prodigal Son parable were their suspicions raised, so it was impressive and entertaining how the film pulls off this genre subterfuge for so long. While there are a few different mysteries that documentarian Lydia Drake is trying to solve, the biggest relates to the "Hidden Blessing" series of paintings that brought Davidson to public attention. Each one involves a "painting of a painting" but with the interior painting always somehow obscured – a married couple stands in front contemplating, a couple of passersby just happen to be in the way, a repairman is replacing the bulb just above it, or maybe a whole crowd has gathered to see what we can never quite glimpse. It's a gimmick Davidson plays out innumerable ways, and while the public loved the series it left them with questions. What was the painting in the painting? Was it the same one in each instance? Might it be a picture of his wife? What was the "hidden blessing"? It's a lot of fun to see this mystery played out, and you're going to love the final reveal! Cautions Part of this story addresses the problem of pain: why does God allow bad things to happen to good people? That's such a tough question there is probably no entirely satisfactory answer – when you are suffering, you might know intellectually that God is going to turn this to your good, as we are promised in Romans 8:28, but it is hard to emotionally grasp it to the same degree. That promise is a big part of the answer on offer here, with Davidson's sister pointing to God's faithfulness and trustworthiness to make that transformation. But the film also offers an Arminian take, trying to divorce God from responsibility for our pain by blaming free will instead. Not to give too much away, but when one of Davidson's sons takes a Prodigal turn, we can see how his choices – his "free will" – leads directly to the pain he experiences. His injuries are self-inflicted. However, the most painful cut of all for the Davidsons – still impacting them two decades later – is the death of Gregory's wife. Her death was not the consequence of choices she made so "free will" doesn't suffice as an answer. A part of the answer to pain is that, as RC Sproul might note, there are actually no good people since if it was up to us we would all be rebels against our Creator. Thus any pain we experience is merely what we deserve, and any goodness, undeserved. But that's too edgy and too Calvinist an answer for most evangelicals to consider. One other warning would be for younger audiences – one character dies. While it happens offscreen, it is unexpected, and therefore might be quite jarring to the under ten set. Conclusion This is an incredibly creative film, and the credit there is due to the star, James Arnold Taylor, a long-time Hollywood voice actor, who does the heavy lifting, offering up a memorable performance. And while he's onscreen 90% of the time, that isn't the limit of his involvement. He was also the writer, producer, and co-director, and he even created many of the dozens of paintings we see throughout – those are his works. Hidden Blessings will be too preachy for some. These kinds of sermons-wrapped-in-cinema stories always have their contrived moments. But if you can appreciate a Kendrick brothers' Facing the Giants or Courageous then that a little subtlety is sacrificed for the sake of the sermon won't put you off. I waffled between giving this a 7 or 8, because as much as I enjoyed it, it would have been better about 15 minutes shorter, and those cuts could have also helped it make its point more subtly. But I settled on 8 because it is just so creative. This is James Arnold Taylor showing us all his gifts... and they are a multitude. Seeing him offer up his best to the glory of his God is such a delight to experience. Check out the trailer below, and watch it for free at RedeemTV.com. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews

The Fox and the Hound

Family 1981 / 83 minutes Rating: 8/10 This one begins with an emotional punch to the gut – we watch a fox mother, holding her cub in her mouth, running frantically through the woods, the sound of shotgun blasts and baying hounds driving her even faster. In a moment of desperation, she hides her cub beside a fence post, then takes off, leading the hunters and the hounds away. And that is the last we see of her. But the fence post belongs to a farm. And the farm belongs to the kindly Widow Tweed. When she discovers the cub, she adopts the orphan and names him Tod. Next door lives a crusty old hunter, Amos, and his faithful and fierce and huge hunting dog Chief. They've got a new addition, too, a hound pup named Copper. Soon enough, Copper and Tod meet and become the best of friends. But as they grow older, they are told by nearly everyone that they shouldn’t be friends – that foxes and hounds should be enemies! Peer pressure and circumstances convince the hound to turn his back on Tod. That drives Tod into the forest, where he makes a new friend, a female fox Vixey. Tod’s steadfastness eventually wins back Copper, and even the crusty old Amos. Cautions Language concerns are limited to a "golly," a "gee," and a couple "gosh"s. The other cautions here are all for the under-10 set. Kids older than that should be able to deal with the emotional rollercoaster. As mentioned – and like many a Disney film in which parents don't fare well – the mother fox meets her demise right at the start. Thankfully it happens offscreen. There are other frantic scenes. About a half-hour in, Tod is running from Amos and his giant old hunting dog Chief, but the tension gets relieved when Tod gets away. Then, twenty minutes later, there's a scene in which the tension isn't really relieved, with Chief getting seriously injured after chasing Todd, and Copper vowing revenge. Then, in the finale, a giant bear makes a frightful appearance. Worth a mention is how kids will get hit right in the heartstrings when the Widow Tweed decides she has to let Tod go on his lonesome. Finally, like Bambi did before it, hunting is shown to be the domain of trigger-happy lunatics, so parents will have to explain that Christians can hunt, though they'll do it a lot differently than Amos. Conclusion While some reviewers seem to miss it, this is a morality tale about racism – Copper and Tod are told their kind aren't supposed to be friends, but thankfully, in the end, they don't listen – and that's what makes it worth watching and discussing as a family. But using a fox and hound as a metaphor for racial differences does lead to a problematic portrayal of hunters who, if we were to extend the metaphor, would be the racists of the film and basically the equivalent of the "Ku Klux Klan." So that'd be worth a discussion too. Because it involves a lot of frantic action, with Amos and Chief trying to kill Tod, this would only be appropriate for 10 and up. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Family, Movie Reviews

Lassie come home

Drama 1943 / 89 minuytes RATING: 8/10 No boy has ever had a more loyal and loving dog than young Joe Carraclough – each day when school is done, he can be sure his beloved collie Lassie will be there waiting for him in the schoolyard. Lassie is brilliant, too, able to tell time, bow on command, and carry Joe's school books. The two are inseparable. That comes to an end when the Depression hits England hard, and his family is forced to sell Lassie to the local Duke who has been trying to buy her for the last three years. Joe is crushed. But Lassie isn't away for long – the first chance she gets, Lassie escapes her kennel and heads back home. That'd make for a short movie, except that the Duke's dog handler knows just where to look for the missing dog, and takes her back from the Carracloughs. Twice. When the Duke takes Lassie to Scotland, it finally seems she is gone for good. But everyone is underestimating the loyalty of Joe's best friend. Lassie escapes again, and this time has to trek through wild forest, flee angry sheep farmers, swim through swamps, and fight off angry bandits. Thankfully, Lassie also meets some companions along the way, who help her when she most needs it. Cautions Lassie is attacked and bloodied, but the biggest concern here is what happens to one of her dog friends, a little mutt named Toots. When bandits ambush Toots' master, Lassie and Toots join the fight. They say it isn't the size of the dog in the fight but the size of the fight in the dog, but that doesn't prove true this time. The football-sized Toots gets kicked aside, never to get back up. That'll be a most unexpected tragedy to any children raised on modern fare. But Lassie Comes Home was made during WW II, and maybe everyone was tougher back then, including the kids. Those different sensibilities come out right at the start with the film's opening dedication to the author of Lassie Comes Home. We are told he, "survived the First World War as a British soldier, only to die in the Second World War, killed in the line of duty in the uniform of the country he had adopted... America. With reverence and pride, we dedicate this picturization of his best-loved story to the late Major Eric Knight." Yes, sometimes good men die for a good cause. So, would we expect less of a good dog? Conclusion This is the first and very best of the Lassie movies (and the only one to be nominated for an Oscar). And it is sure to make a dog-lover out of any boy watching. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Family, Movie Reviews

The Prince and the Pauper

Adventure 1937 / 118 minutes RATING: 8/10 The swashbuckling Errol Flynn stars in one of the earliest, and still one of the best, film adaptations of Mark Twain's classic tale of switched identity. Our story begins on a murky evening in the London of 1537, with citizens raising a toast to the birth of Edward Tudor, the royal heir. His father, Henry VIII, warns the little babe that heavy weighs the crown. This same night, in the poorest corner of the London slums, another boy is born, by the name of Tom Canty. His father also has words for him, cursing the boy for being born healthy and strong, because "it's only the sickly ones that can beg a farthing." Ten years later, the pair meet when Tom, fleeing a beating from his father, hides on the palace grounds. The pair are struck by their uncanny resemblance – the two could have been identical twins (and, in fact, identical twins Bobby and Billy Mauch play the roles). As part of their play, they swap clothes. Then, in a shock to both, they are mistaken for each other, and the guards throw the rag-wearing prince right out of the palace, leaving the bewildered Tom trying to get someone, anyone, to believe that he is not the prince. Where does Errol Flynn come in? He plays Miles Hendon, a poor soldier, who mistakes Edward for addled when the boy insists he is royalty. The boy certainly seems addled. When news of the king's death spreads among the peasants, he demands that they respect his royal highness – he is after all, their new king! That doesn't go down well with any of them, and when one gent starts trying to beat the lad, others are more than willing to lend a hand. That's when Miles comes to the rescue, whisking the boy away. Miles doesn't believe the boy any more than the mob, but he is willing to humor him... for a time. With the king's death, a coronation is quickly scheduled. That means that in just days, unless the two switch back, Tom Canty will be crowned the new king! Cautions The cautions here concern violence, but it is all at a level that would bother only the very young. Errol Flynn dispatches one of the bad guys in a swordfight, but the fatal blow is hardly shown. More notable is the beatings that John Canty gives his son Tom. While the blows aren't severe – more shoving than any punching – it's the notion of a father actually beating his son that will disturb some children. Midway through the film, when a priest tries to stop John from beating Tom (though this time it is actually Edward), we see John strike the man in the head with a stick, and the priest falls dead with a spot of blood on his temple. It's not gory, especially in black and white, So, this is no “Disneyfied” retelling, but the darker aspects are still greatly muted. (Speaking of, there is an animated 1990 Disney version with Mickey Mouse playing the two title roles. There are a few language concerns – a couple uses of "gosh," at least one use of "heck," and "what the devil? – but what turned me off was Donald "comically" praying at a tense moment.) Conclusion This will be a good leap off point for discussions about the backstabbing, corrupting nature of politics and why there is a need for good people to enter into the political realm. Adults may enjoy references to this history of the time; the story is fictional, but the background is straight history. Adults will understand that the reason King Henry VIII "hates priests," as Edward shares with Tom, is because Henry booted the Roman Catholic Church out of England when the pope wouldn't grant him an annulment from his first wife. Edward was his only surviving male heir and the son of his third wife who died in childbirth. And as the film also notes, there were still more queens afterward – Henry went on to have six wives in all. But the real appeal is the pairing of Flynn and Twain – a great story with a great star. At two hours long, this may test the patience of the younger Tik-Tok generation. But if your kids are able to sit still at all, and if you have an intermission ice cream break halfway through, and equip everyone with their own popcorn bowl, many a kid, 9 and up, should really enjoy it. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

Roman Holiday

Comedy 1953 / 118 minutes RATING: 8/10 Princess Ann is on a tour of Europe, and the masses can't get enough of her. It's no better inside the palace, where minor nobles, maharajas, and even the papal nuncio, all need to shake her hand. Can't a poor girl rest her aching feet? When the prospects of yet another day of innocuous speeches and forced polite conversation drive her into a tizzy, the royal doctor gives Ann a little something to help her sleep. But the moment the doctor is gone, so is the princess, out the window and down into the streets of Rome, hoping for some kind of adventure. But it's hard to have an adventure when you've been valium-ed up. Instead, the princess falls asleep by the side of the road, where journalist Joe Bradley mistakes her for a drunk, completely unaware she is the princess. He almost passes by, but stops himself – he can't just leave a girl out there on the street. Too sleepy or too stubborn to tell him where she lives, Joe eventually has to take Ann to his apartment, offering up his couch. The next day, Joe reports in to his newspaper. The front page story? The embassy is reporting that the royal princess Ann has taken suddenly sick. Spotting Ann's picture on the front page, Joe realizes he has the story of year still sleeping right there in his apartment. So he heads back and pretends ignorance about who Ann is. And under these false pretenses Joe, and his photographer friend Irving, give Ann the footloose and fancy-free day she has been dreaming of. But is Joe really going to cash in on his royal exclusive, if it means embarrassing the young princess? Cautions Nothing untoward happens, but there are enough "misunderstandings" that this isn't one for the kiddos. Examples include a valium-ed up Ann acting as if Joe is one of her servants, and telling him he can help her undress for bed (he does not), and a cleaning lady finding Ann in a towel (covered up) and angrily chasing her around the apartment because she thinks Ann has slept with Joe (she has not). Conclusion I hadn't watched this in twenty years and what struck me upon my most recent viewing is that it might be the film that inspired a million Hallmarks. The two key ingredients are here: a royal, and a case of mistaken identity. But this is the original, and the best, starting with the Oscar-winning cast, Audrey Hepburn and Gregory Peck. Hallmark films have been set in Rome (including the Roman Holiday-homage Rome in Love) but it's not the same as seeing the almost car-free, play-in-the-Trevi-Fountain, climb-on-the-Coliseum, 1950s Rome (as one critic noted, the city is the film's third star). And then there is the ending, which is completely un-Hallmark-like, and some won't like it for that reason. But this is a conclusion that will stick with you. Charm, Rome, and some laughs make this a great one for a mom-and-dad date night. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

Unsung Hero

Drama / Christian 2024 / 112 minutes Rating: 8/10 This is a bio-pic on the Smallbone family, and if you haven't heard of them, you've probably still heard their music. The oldest daughter was famous in the 1990s and early 2000s under her professional name, Rebecca St. James, and two of her younger brothers, Joel and Luke, are making it big now in their band For King & Country. This will have some instant appeal if you know any of those names. But even if you don't, there's lots to love here. The story starts back in Australia, in the early 1990s. The unsung hero of the title is matriarch Helen Smallbone who is shown, in the opening minutes, living the good life: a big house, large family, her supportive parents close by, and a husband, David, who loves her, and loves his job as a concert promoter for Christian acts touring Australia. But, of course, something bad has to happen. Hoping to score a home run with an Amy Grant tour, David over-extends their finances. Then Australia's economy takes a massive downturn and by the time Amy shows up to sing, no one has money for luxuries like concert tickets. At tour's end David is a half million dollars in debt, and with no job prospects. Who wants to hire a failed promoter? With employment impossible in his homeland, David takes a job offer in America and arrives with his wife and five kids (and number 6 on the way), and his last dime. And then his job offer falls through. That leaves David under all sorts of pressure. While every man who's lost a job will empathize, you can't help but feel even more for Helen, who is now suddenly poor, practically homeless, and miles away from her extended family... and none of it is her doing. So how are they going to get out of this mess? By sticking together, overcoming any pride that they might still have left. They can't be above scrubbing toilets or accepting help from their local church; God hasn't given them any room for that sort of sin. The rise, fall, and rise again story has been told many times before, so what sets this apart is that it is true. Helen might not be a great fictional character – a little too levelheaded to be realistic – but as a real-life mom and wife, she is an inspiration. She just keeps moving forward. At one point, she shares the story of how Alexander the Great landed on his enemies' shores and then burnt his own ships. Why'd he do it? So they'd have no way to retreat. It was onward to either death or triumph, with no other options. At their lowest low, Helen stops in at a local park with a playground pirate ship. Right before the children pretend to storm the structure their mom issues a challenge that takes this game of pretend and applies it to their own troubles. “Before we attack there’s one thing left to do.” “What is it?” one of the kids asks. “We burn the ships – all of them.” “Even ours? How do we get back?” “We don’t. It’s going to be dangerous. And scary. And it’s going to be hard. So hard that you want to go back. But if you know that you can go back, you will. And giving up, giving in, it’s not an option. We’ve got to fight our way forward! We have to win.” Caution This courage is inspirational, but is also a bit of troubling point too. This same "no retreat" slogan could also be pigheadedness in different circumstances. Shucks, in these circumstances a full reversal sure seemed in order – heading back to Australia might have been the wisest and best option. That said, I think what the producers were probably trying to encourage Christians to do is follow God with no retreat in mind. The only other caution regards the Smallbones' first Sunday at an American church. As they come in, a woman, off camera is making announcements for upcoming congregational events, and then begins reading the Bible text. Is this a female pastor? That seems an odd possibility, especially considering the time period. Or does this church have members take turns reading the Bible text for the congregation before the pastor then starts preaching? It's odd, and thankfully brief. Conclusion This is a film about togetherness – family first, but also the church. In keeping with that togetherness, the Smallbone family seem to have all participated in the making of Unsung Hero, with For King & Country's Joey Smallbone playing his own dad, David, and co-directing (along with Richard Ramsey who also did The Song), and other siblings show up in small bit parts. Unsung Hero has got some superb performances, a little bit of music (though less than you might expect considering the family involved), and even some grit, presenting David in far from airbrushed fashion, with his shortcomings for all to see. It was one of the best Christian films of 2024. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

Roberta

Musical 1935 / 106 minutes RATING: 8/10 It's 1935, and Huck Haines (Fred Astaire) and his band, the Indianians of Wabash, Indiana have just gotten off the boat, landing in Paris after a long trip over from America. There's just one problem: the Russian restauranteur who hired them to play at his place thought he was hiring Indians, the Native American sort, and not Indianians, the pale-faced sort. So Alexander Petrovich Moskowitz Voyda is not pleased, and he fires Haines. Or at least he tries to. Haines' best and much larger buddy John Kent decides that Mr. Voyda just has to stay long enough for a listen. So the former football star holds Mr. Voyda steady as Haines and the rest of the boys – a dozen of them – do a comic musical act. Everything in this film is really just an excuse for another song or dance routine, and this time Haines has his fellows transform into a human organ – when he hits their hands, they hum a note. It's weird and wacky and wonderful, but it still doesn't win Mr. Voyda over. So it's on to Plan B. They'll look up any friends they can think of that live in Paris. The pickings are slim – Kent has an aunt. But it turns out she is the world famous fashion designer Roberta. When they all show up on her salon's front step, it's time for some more music, with dancing quick to follow. I could tell you more of the plot, but while it's sweet – two romances for the price of one – the plot really isn't the point: this is about finding opportunities for Fred Astaire to dance with Ginger Rogers, and do they have some great numbers. I put this on when my kids were wandering around, not knowing whether it would grab them. It did. The tap dancing routines will get your own toes tapping – you won't be able to help it. There's also an interesting historical background that explains the large Russian presence in the French capital. This is the Paris of the 1930s, which is where many of the exiled Russian aristocracy, academics, and politicians fled after the Russian Revolution of 1917. They were among the elite in their homeland, but here, as refugees, they've had to settle on mostly minor positions. So the doorman at Aunt Roberta's salon is a Russian prince, and her righthand woman, Stephanie, is a Russian princess. Cautions There's lots to love here, but some silliness too, with the song "I'll be hard to handle" possibly being the silliest. However, it is so obviously dumb that it isn't at all dangerous. The singer promises any potential suitor that she'll be a handful, and urges him to just go away. Which is what any sensible fellow would do with an invitation like that. This takes place in a fashion house, and at one point, one of the models comes out in a tight black dress that's low cut in front and back. It isn't all that immodest by today's standards, but that said, Huck Haines's description nails it: "like a peeled eel." Kent is even more pointed: "It's the worst-looking thing i ever saw." So, minor immodesty, but to make a point in modesty's favor (later on Huck tells a reporter that Roberta's design house believes that "if clothes are to clothe, then they should  clothe." Or, as Kent says it more pointedly again, they should be, "not so naked." Language concerns would be limited to a bunch of "Gee, that would be swell"s. Kent does also get drunk in one scene, though his foolishness is made plain for all to see. Conclusion Watching Roberta is a delightful history lesson on France, Russia, the 1930s, black and white musicals, and more. I'll share that during a couple of lullaby numbers, where the lead sang in an old-fashioned warbling voice, I did use the fast-forward button to cut both 3-minute songs in half. I don't empty the fast-forward button much (and nowhere else in this film) but that style of singing was so foreign it came off as off-putting, and I didn't want to make it hard for my kids to enjoy. Turning a 106 minute film into a 103 minute film did the trick. So two thumbs up – this is a great one for parents and older kids, so long as they have appreciated black and white films in the past. And if you love Roberta, there are other Fred Astaire movies to enjoy, but a few that really let a messed-up plot get in the way of the dance numbers. Give a miss to The Gay Divorcee, and You'll Never Get Rich, both of which which make light of affairs. Shall We Dance? runs too long to quite measure up to Roberta, but it does have Astaire and Rogers flying around the room once again. Easter Parade has Astaire paired with Judy Garland (of The Wizard of Oz fame), and the problematic part here is simply that they talk quite a bit about the Easter Parade and nothing at all about what Easter is about. The opening 8 minutes, with Astaire doing a solo dance routine in a children's toy shop is astonishing! ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Movie Reviews, Watch for free

Sherlock Jr.

Comedy / Family 1924 / 44 minutes RATING: 8/10 If you want to get your kids interested in the golden oldies, Sherlock Jr. may be the perfect introduction. This is a black-and-white classic with the frenetic pace of a Saturday morning cartoon – the action never stops! Buster Keaton plays the part of a movie theater janitor/projectionist who has ambitions about becoming a great detective and winning the hand of a certain beautiful girl. But he's not the only fellow interested in the lass. Standing in his way is a tall, dark, and handsome rival who, we quickly find out, has no scruples – when no one's looking this scoundrel steals a watch from the girl's dad. But wait, there's a theft? Isn't this an opportunity for a detective wannabe to show his stuff? Buster offers to do an investigation, but he is humiliated twice over when the clever scoundrel frames him for the theft, and then the girl's father asks Buster to leave and never come back. Things are looking bad for Buster, but the story just keeps getting better and better. Dejected, Buster returns to the theater in time for the afternoon showing and gets the movie started. But as it's playing, he falls asleep, and in his dream he joins in on the action. It just so happens to be a detective story. And it just so happens that Buster dreams himself in as the suave and savvy star detective. In this film within the film it goes a lot better for Buster, as he brilliantly tricks and evades a whole horde of villains. The best action scene in the movie is when Buster, in hot pursuit of the villains, hops on the front handlebars of a motorbike being driven by his trusted sidekick. But, unbeknownst to Buster, just as the motorbike started off, his sidekick fell off – Buster is on it alone, up front on the handlebars of the speeding bike, urging the absent driver to be a little more careful about the way he's driving! But what's going to happen when Buster wakes up? Well, even as he's solving mysteries in his dream world, his beautiful girl is figuring out things in the real one. CAUTIONS There are moments of peril, and a brief occasion or two of fisticuffs that might be a bit scary for the very young. CONCLUSION At just 44 minutes, and jammed pack with action, this might be the best silent film to share with modern audiences. And – added bonus! – this film is so old it is in the public domain, and can be watched for free in the video below or by clicking here. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

Run Silent, Run Deep

Drama 1958 / 93 minutes RATING: 8/10 After a Japanese destroyer, the Akrikaze, sinks his submarine, Commander P.J. Richardson is assigned desk duty, giving him plenty of time to think over how he could turn the tables, if ever given the chance. When the Akrikaze sinks three more US subs, Richardson gets his wish – he's given another submarine command, and told to patrol the same section the Akrikaze was last seen. But to get command again, Richardson had to step on the toes of the sub's executive officer, Jim Bledsoe, who was expecting to become captain himself. The crew isn't happy, particularly when Richardson starts drilling them hard. When he ignores Japanese transports sailing past the crew starts wondering, is their new captain a coward? Sometimes when my girls are playing with the neighbors I'll watch a movie I know they won't be interested in because I don't want to tempt them to join me and interrupt their fun. That was my intent this time around –  what kid wants to watch a black and white film about submarine warfare? Well, as it turns out, all of them. The attraction? This wasn't like anything they'd seen before, with about 90 percent taking place in the close quarters of the USS Nerka. It also helped that both stars – Burt Lancaster as second-in command Bledsoe, and Clark Gable as Captain Richardson – have quite the onscreen presence. And it helped that they had their dad along to explain some of the basics of World War II submarine warfare. Like how a submarine's best defense was to hide underwater, but to go on offense it had to surface to be able to see the ships it was shooting at. I had to explain what depth charges were and how, when a submarine dived, the enemy's destroyers would drop depth charges all around its last location, just hoping one would explode near enough to cause some damage. I had to explain who Tokyo Rose was – when the crew listens to the radio, every now and again the music is interrupted by a pleasant sounding woman who provides updates on the war, but with a very anti-American slant. The broadcast was coming from Japan, the music an enticement to stay around for the propaganda. And apparently US commanders didn't care if their troops tuned in, because everyone knew better than to believe anything Tokyo Rose said. Cautions While there's no warnings needed for adult viewing, if your kids are watching too then there are a couple of concerns. First, we see a young sailor whom we've gotten to know dies when a loose torpedo drops from its rack and lands on him. We see the torpedo dropping through his eyes, coming towards the camera and then everything cuts to black, so it isn't graphic. The other caution concerns a pin-up picture – the typical World War II sort, the woman clothed but wearing short shorts – hanging in the mess hall/ The crew gives her a pat on her butt as they run to their battle stations. The weirdness of this practice really comes out when you try explaining it to your kids. Conclusion I've rated this an 8, in large part because that was what my girls gave it. I'd give it an 8 myself, but often tone down my ratings, knowing that most folks don't appreciate a black and white film quite as much as I do. But if these three – aged 10 through 14 – think it's an 8 too, then I'm going to run with that. It is a classic for a reason, with a great running conflict between the captain and his passed-over second-in-command, but both of whom are eager to take down the Akrikaze. The crew has their own divided loyalties, even as they stay dedicated to their mission. And the biggest selling feature: loads of action! SPOILER ALERT: While I've included the trailer below, this is one of those old -fashioned trailers that sum up the whole movie and doesn't worry about giving things away. There's a whole whack of spoilers here, so I'm quite glad I didn't watch the trailer before I saw the movie. I'll also add, the film is quite a bit better than this makes it look, which is one more reason you might want to give the trailer a miss. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

Sarah, Plain and Tall

Drama / Romance 1990 / 98 minutes Rating: 8/10 In 1910, Jacob Witting, a Kansas farmer and widower, places a newspaper ad asking for a woman interested “in making a difference” in the lives of his two small children, Anna and Caleb. Sarah Wheaton responds to his ad and agrees to a one-month visit. She brings with her a cat, a collection of seashells and a streak of stubbornness that is the young widower’s match. When Sarah arrives she quickly learns that while Jacob's wife Katherine died six years ago, he is still grieving. He's packed away all his wife's pictures, and blankets, and anything else that reminds him of her. And he hasn't sung since her death. But little Caleb loves to sing and Sarah does too. Anna isn't as quick to warm up to her, but when Sarah arranges to have Katherine's pictures hung back up, she starts to win the little girl over too. Sarah's love for the two children, and her better understanding of what they need pits her against their father, so when the month is done, will Jacob even want her to stay? Or will he start to love her as his equal... and his match? Caution No real cautions to offer. This does deal with the topic of losing a mother, and the children worry that they might lose Sarah at month's end, so there is some tension here that younger viewers might find harder to deal with. Especially when the neighbor goes into labor early and the delivery is not an easy one. But it comes to a beautiful resolution. This is very much a film for the whole family. Conclusion This is based on the book by Patricia MacLachlan which won the 1986 Newbery Medal for best American children's book of the year. It's a loyal rendition, as the screenplay was written by MacLachlan too, and I think it's one of those rare times where the film really does equal the book. It’s a wonderful quaint, quiet, and beautiful flick, sure to bring a tear to your eye. That means some boys might have a bit of trouble sitting through it during the early going, and maybe it just isn't for them. But if they can be settled, with their own bowl of popcorn perhaps, then I can't imagine a lovelier film for a family movie night. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Family, Movie Reviews

Good Sam

Drama / Family / Romance 2019 / 89 minutes RATING: 8/10 Kate Bradley is a TV news reporter following the "bummer beat" in New York City, covering fires and other tragedies. That's left her a little cynical, and her boss is worried that it's also left her more than a little jaded about the dangers she risks to get her stories. So when a story breaks about an anonymous good samaritan leaving a bag of $100,000 outside a financial-strapped older lady's door, Kate's boss decides to give her this safer assignment. Kate isn't happy about her new beat, and presumes there has to be some sort of angle behind the good deed. As she tells her cameraman, "It's hard to believe that there's somebody out there doing good deeds and expecting nothing in return." But when the money keeps coming the mystery only deepens; "Good Sam" leaves a second bag of cash with a doctor who isn't in any sort of need. The third recipient, a carpenter who'd been laid up with an injury, has no connection to the first two. And the news just keeps getting better when folks who've heard about Good Sam start acting like him, and starting their own Good Samaritan clubs, to do anonymous good deeds in their neighborhoods. Good Sam would have been too sugary-sweet if it'd keep on this track, but we find out that Kate's cynicism isn't baseless: a tech programmer claims to be Good Sam, but Kate quickly exposes him as a fake. And that's not the only dirt that Kate uncovers. I appreciated a romance angle that was less predictable than most. Kate gets two love interests, both pretty stalwart sorts... or so it seems. Kate's father is a US senator, and when she meets charming hedge fund manager Jack Hansen she initially turns him down, as she has a rule against dating anyone in her father's political circles. Eric Hayes is a firefighter Kate keeps bumping into in her day job. He is as brave as he is private... or might the right word be secretive? Which of these two will she end up with? That's another mystery, and viewers are left in suspense for most of the movie. Cautions No language or violence concerns to share. There is some kissing, right at the end, but exchanged in a public park. The more notable caution is for what the movie doesn't have – this is a part of Netflix's "Faith and Spirituality" category, but it isn't either. While the original Good Samaritan story (Luke 10:25-37) teaches us what it means to live out the Second Greatest Commandment, this one avoids any mention of God. Conclusion The moral of the story trends in a humanist direction – people aren't as bad as we think as they will sometimes do things for completely unselfish reasons. However, the Calvinist in me can recast this in a more orthodox direction, seeing it as an illustrated of how the world is broken but not utterly depraved, and the cyclical Kate has no right to be so in the face of the many undeserved blessings she (and we) receive daily. While this is just a Hallmark-ish kind of romance, I'd give it two thumbs up for being way better than the average sort. The acting is solid throughout, the mystery and romance will keep most viewers guessing for the first three quarters of the film, and the lack of problematic content make this one you can watch with almost the whole family (though I don't know if it'll grab the under 8s). That makes Good Sam a pretty rare treat. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Animated, Movie Reviews

PAW Patrol: The Mighty Movie

Animated / Children 2023 / 87 minutes Rating: 8/10 This sequel to 2021's PAW Patrol: The Movie is bigger, maybe better, and certainly more intense. This time, things begin with a bang: the pups' headquarters is destroyed by a meteor, drawn to earth by the miscalculations of mad scientist Victoria Vance. Soon after the pups discover the meteorite houses seven different crystals – one for each pup – that give them all different superpowers. Chase is super fast Marshall can produce and shoot fire Skye can fly and is super strong Rubble can become a wrecking ball Rocky has the power of magnetism Zuma can become, and can control, water Liberty (eventually) learns she is super stretchy The pups remain every bit as helpful and kind as ever, but with these powers, they decide to rebrand. Rubble suggests, "How about 'The PAW Patrol, but more...with just a little bit extra,'" but his buddies aren't convinced. They settle on "The Mighty Pups." There are two bad guys this time around, with the mad scientist paired with the corrupt Mayor Humdinger from the last movie. The two of them engineer a jail break and set out to steal the pups' super-power crystals. Cautions Two most notable cautions here: the first is that this is sure to be too intense for the lower end of its 4 to 10-year-old target audience. A giant-ified mayor repeatedly tries stepping on and squashing the pups, and the mad scientist keeps firing off lightning bolts (it has to be for 10 minutes straight), so the peril for our heroes is sure heightened compared to the TV show. At the 75-minute mark, Skye, briefly, even seems to die (though about a minute later, we learn she was just knocked out). The other significant caution concerns not what is in this film, but what’s happened in the extended PAW Patrol Universe. Producers introduced a “non-binary” character into a September 2023 episode of a Paw Patrol spin-off show, Rubble & Crew. So if your kids are able to watch a movie and enjoy it on its own, without needing to explore the universe behind it, great. But if they start telling their friends, uncritically, that Paw Patrol is awesome, then they aren’t ready to see this. And I don't know that many little kids will be that mature. Language concerns would be limited to "My goodness." Conclusion What do we do with familiar favorites that go woke? PAW Patrol has been a parental favorite for years because of all the admirable qualities the pups and their human "dad" exhibit: teamwork, perseverance, loyalty, bravery, self-sacrifice, and love for each other and their city. But then that love – rooted not in God's wisdom, but simply the producers' feelings – has them promoting non-gender nonsense to kids. That's not loving; that's going to harm confused kids. Thankfully, this nonsense doesn't show up in The Mighty Movie, but is what's good in this film reason enough to watch it, knowing what's going on elsewhere in the PAW Patrol universe? You can check out the trailer below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

The Great Dictator

Drama / War / Black and White 1940 / 125 minutes Rating: 8/10 Long before Hitler adopted it, Charlie Chaplin made the "toothbrush mustache" famous. Once Hitler adopted it, you might wonder why Chaplin still kept it. Might this 1940 film be the answer? Chaplin had been planning to take on Hitler even before World War II began, and his mustache helped him manage a fantastic impersonation of history's most infamous dictator. Chaplin plays two parts here, the hero and the villain. Adenoid Hynkel, the "Phooey" of Tomainia, a satiric take on Adolph Hitler, the Führer of Nazi Germany, The Jewish barber who fights for Tomainia during the First World War, and then loses his memory for the next 20 years When the barber leaves the hospital to finally return home, he opens up his barbershop, not knowing two decades have passed. He also doesn't understand why a man is painting the word "Jew" on his shop window, and goes outside to stop him. The barber was a soldier just yesterday in his own mind, so he won't stand for this! But two stormtroopers against one barber isn't a fair fight. Thankfully, the fight stops underneath the heroine's apartment window, allowing the beautiful Hannah to make good use of her frying pan, applying a solid "bong" to each stormtrooper's head. This being a Chaplin film, the poor barber gets a misaimed blow too, resulting in a hopscotching staggered dance up and down the street. From the moment we see Chaplin playing both parts, we know that the barber is going to save the day by replacing the "great dictator." But what a ride it is, getting there! Hitler isn't Chaplin's only target either. Benzino Napaloni, the Diggaditchie of Bacteria (think Benito Mussolini, il Duce of Italy), comes by for a visit, and the two compete to see who can be the more self-important. That this comic takedown came out right when Hitler seemed to be unstoppable says something about Chaplin's bravery and his outrage. He wanted the world to know who Hitler really was, even if he needed to use a fictional country, title, and name to do so. It might be worth noting that while Chaplin is best known for his silent films, this is a "talkie." Cautions The only caution would be the topic matter: war and the murderous megalomaniac who started it. But this is also black and white, and satire rather than drama, so some of the most shocking material has been muted by the format. Still, this could be a bit much for the very young. However, if kids know anything at all about the Holocaust, they'll likely be old enough to see The Great Dictator. Conclusion My daughters aren't the target demographic for a 1940s black and white World War II film that stars a talking 1930s silent film star. I was so sure they wouldn't be up for this one that, instead of trying to foist it on them for a family movie night, I decided to watch it on my own while they were busy with friends. But a few minutes in our youngest, 9, wandered by, sat down, and never left. The other two and my wife showed up midway, and after a bit of recap to clue them in, they all enjoyed the second half. So, a good film for the whole family? Maybe... if they're an adventurous bunch. My youngest told me that it helped a lot that I was there to explain some the World War II references being made. She already knew about the Holocaust, so she wasn't surprised that the Jews were mistreated, but to see it, even in this muted manner, did get her indignant. It's one thing to hear about people being picked on and singled out for persecution, and quite another to see even a bit of it. Overall, I would give this two very enthusiastic thumbs up! The film is available in both clear high resolution, and also in a variety of cheap knock-offs, so be sure to get the good one. There's even a colorized version that looks intriguing. Most libraries will have a version on DVD, and you should be able to rent it from places like Amazon. Check out the trailer below. ...

Red heart icon with + sign.
Drama, Movie Reviews

Twelve O’Clock High

Drama / War 1949 / 132 minutes RATING: 8/10 When the Americans first entered WWII they did so with a small air force – it would take them time to really amp up the production of fighters and bombers – but no shortage of vital missions that required doing. That meant they needed a “maximal effort” from the men they did have to cover the gap until more men and more materials could be had. But what exactly is a “maximal effort”? How far and how hard can a man be pushed before he crumbles under the strain? When the commander of the 918 Bomber Squadron is pushed past the breaking point, General Frank Savage takes over. His job is to transform the struggling squadron back into an effective fighting force. But how long can he endure the strain of command himself, losing men almost every mission, before he too crumbles under the pressure? Cautions None to note. This is a war film, but most of the action is off screen, and talked about rather than shown. Conclusion The film's title is a reference to how the German fighter pilots would often attack the bombers head-on, coming, then, from "twelve o'clock high." The film has all sorts of kudos – it has been called "probably the best picture  about the pressures which war imposes on those at the top." It was nominated for 4 Oscars (including Best Picture) and won two, including a nod for Best Supporting Actor. And it remained popular enough to spawn a highly rated 3-season 1960s TV version also called 12 O'Clock High. This is one of my own favorite World War II era films, completed just 5 years after war's end. There is an authenticity here that just can't be found in modern-day renditions – actors today didn't experience what everyone, soldiers and their loved ones, lived through at the time. So, two thumbs way up! ...

1 2 3