Should Christians use someone’s “personal pronouns”? (12 min)
J.D Greear, former president of the conservative-learning Southern Baptist Conference, said he would, if asked, refer to a man as “she” and he would do so out of a “generosity of spirit.” This is a pitting of truth vs. love, with Greear choosing to side with love.
But it is a false contrast. In the same way that it would not be loving to affirm an anorexic in their delusion, it’s not loving to affirm a transgender in their lie. As James White notes, some of the Christian confusion here comes from believing there is some sort of moral neutral ground. And some of it comes from not being prepared to pay the cost for standing up for God’s Truth. (For more see When Steve wants to be called Sue.)
Tim Challies on love covering a multitude of sins
“There are as many ways to react badly to sin as there are ways to sin against one another. There are not nearly as many ways to react well to being sinned against. The Bible gives us two: lovingly overlook that sin or lovingly address that sin. The question is, when are we to overlook and when are we to address?”
The “knockout punch” syndrome
Gary Bates explains “why creationists are sometimes too quick to embrace the latest apparent ‘evidence’ for biblical creation.”
The problem with declaring a “pandemic amnesty”
The problem isn’t simply that mistakes were made when we didn’t have enough information. The problem was, “when we did not have adequate information to know what was best, interventionist policymakers nevertheless acted as if they did know.”
Though this isn’t a specifically Christian article (it cites a rabbi), it has thoughts on the nature of forgiveness and repentance which aren’t far off.
The case for kids (10-minute read)
Kevin DeYoung: “I do not urge Christian couples to have as many children as possible. But I do urge them to have more children.”
On the significance of beards
The beardless John Piper recommended this article, and I, equally beardless, add my kudos. In an emasculated world, beards can be a bit of a counter-protest and even a signpost.
Voddie Baucham on how they’re normalizing sin to our children… and us too (10 min)
I’ve been asked why I wear pro-life shirts; do they prompt conversations? And the answer is, no, most often they don’t. I either get a thumbs up, or a lady might make a throat clearing, scoffing sound. So, why wear them then? And why put a pro-life sign on your lawn, or an “Adoption, not Abortion” bumpersticker on your car?
To, as one friend put it, normalize dissent. In our godless age, God’s Truth is so infrequently presented that when it is, it might well be immediately ruled out as the crazy thoughts of some fringe minority. But the unborn’s defenders number in the millions; we’re no fringe element. We only seem like it because we’re being quiet. So, to further the case for the unborn – to get it moved out of the crazy camp to a place where conversations can happen – we need to normalize being pro-life.
The video below is on how impactful normalization can be, though the other way around. Consider just how many Christians feel uncomfortable when God’s thoughts on homosexuality are shared publicly. That’s the culture impacting us. And now, through children’s shows, the world is trying to impact our kids: from Peppa Pig and Muppet Babies to Sesame Street and Blue’s Clues. They seek to normalize what God condemns.
Countering this involves more than just shutting off these shows (though it certainly involves that too). There’s really no escaping the pervasiveness of this normalization effort. So we must acquaint our children with both God’s truth and how to most winsomely communicate that truth on issues like transgenderism, and homosexuality, the unborn, marriage and more. And we need to hear preaching that isn’t embarrassed by God’s stand, but highlights how our good God, who loves us, knows what is best for us.